Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
Objective To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. Design Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2015-01, Vol.5 (5), p.e007111-e007111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e007111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e007111 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Becerra, Virginia Gracia, Alfredo Desai, Kamal Abogunrin, Seye Brand, Sarah Chapman, Ruth García Alonso, Fernando Fuster, Valentín Sanz, Ginés |
description | Objective To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. Design Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. Setting General practice in the UK. Participants Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. Intervention Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. Conclusions Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4452741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1682427632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c92afd691a11b07da3c45f7a0bc28c2fc20db66c1da1e24dc5c9a0940731a5043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1q3DAUhU1paEKSJygUQTfdOJVkyR5vCmXoHw1kk6zFtXQVa5AlV7IH8hJ55irMNKRdVZsruN853MOpqreMXjHWtB-HaRdnDDWnTNSUdoyxV9UZp0LULZXy9Yv_aXWZ846WJ2QvJX9TnXLZ90yI_qx63Ma81Ggt6sXtMWDOBIIh8zp4p8mI4JeRDGVh3UKiJRl1DAbSA9GQjIt7yHr1kIhxGSEjmRMWn8XFQGyKE3HTnOIeDQEzYsKgkazZhXsCZI7-YXbeExfIMiK5-3lRnVjwGS-P87y6-_rldvu9vr759mP7-boeRMeXWvccrGl7BowNtDPQaCFtB3TQfKO51ZyaoW01M8CQC6Ol7oH2gnYNA0lFc159OviWnBMaXQ5O4NWc3FSiqQhO_b0JblT3ca-EkLwTrBh8OBqk-GvFvKjJZY3eQ8C4ZsXaDRe8axte0Pf_oLu4plDiKdZtZNM0lMpCNQdKp5hzQvt8DKPqqXJ1rFw9Va4OlRfVu5c5njV_Ci7A1QEo6v9y_A0anruH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785333005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Becerra, Virginia ; Gracia, Alfredo ; Desai, Kamal ; Abogunrin, Seye ; Brand, Sarah ; Chapman, Ruth ; García Alonso, Fernando ; Fuster, Valentín ; Sanz, Ginés</creator><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Virginia ; Gracia, Alfredo ; Desai, Kamal ; Abogunrin, Seye ; Brand, Sarah ; Chapman, Ruth ; García Alonso, Fernando ; Fuster, Valentín ; Sanz, Ginés</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. Design Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. Setting General practice in the UK. Participants Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. Intervention Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. Conclusions Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25991449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Aged ; Aspirin ; Cardiovascular Agents - economics ; Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Cardiovascular Diseases - drug therapy ; Cardiovascular Diseases - economics ; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control ; Clinical outcomes ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Disease prevention ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Health Economics ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Humans ; Markov Chains ; Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Models, Economic ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Polypharmacy ; Population ; Prevention ; Public health ; Public Health - economics ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statins ; Stroke ; Transient ischemic attack</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2015-01, Vol.5 (5), p.e007111-e007111</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c92afd691a11b07da3c45f7a0bc28c2fc20db66c1da1e24dc5c9a0940731a5043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c92afd691a11b07da3c45f7a0bc28c2fc20db66c1da1e24dc5c9a0940731a5043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/5/e007111.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/5/e007111.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27526,27527,27901,27902,53766,53768,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abogunrin, Seye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Alonso, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuster, Valentín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Ginés</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. Design Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. Setting General practice in the UK. Participants Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. Intervention Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. Conclusions Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aspirin</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Agents - economics</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - economics</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Markov Chains</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - economics</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statins</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Transient ischemic attack</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1q3DAUhU1paEKSJygUQTfdOJVkyR5vCmXoHw1kk6zFtXQVa5AlV7IH8hJ55irMNKRdVZsruN853MOpqreMXjHWtB-HaRdnDDWnTNSUdoyxV9UZp0LULZXy9Yv_aXWZ846WJ2QvJX9TnXLZ90yI_qx63Ma81Ggt6sXtMWDOBIIh8zp4p8mI4JeRDGVh3UKiJRl1DAbSA9GQjIt7yHr1kIhxGSEjmRMWn8XFQGyKE3HTnOIeDQEzYsKgkazZhXsCZI7-YXbeExfIMiK5-3lRnVjwGS-P87y6-_rldvu9vr759mP7-boeRMeXWvccrGl7BowNtDPQaCFtB3TQfKO51ZyaoW01M8CQC6Ol7oH2gnYNA0lFc159OviWnBMaXQ5O4NWc3FSiqQhO_b0JblT3ca-EkLwTrBh8OBqk-GvFvKjJZY3eQ8C4ZsXaDRe8axte0Pf_oLu4plDiKdZtZNM0lMpCNQdKp5hzQvt8DKPqqXJ1rFw9Va4OlRfVu5c5njV_Ci7A1QEo6v9y_A0anruH</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Becerra, Virginia</creator><creator>Gracia, Alfredo</creator><creator>Desai, Kamal</creator><creator>Abogunrin, Seye</creator><creator>Brand, Sarah</creator><creator>Chapman, Ruth</creator><creator>García Alonso, Fernando</creator><creator>Fuster, Valentín</creator><creator>Sanz, Ginés</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK</title><author>Becerra, Virginia ; Gracia, Alfredo ; Desai, Kamal ; Abogunrin, Seye ; Brand, Sarah ; Chapman, Ruth ; García Alonso, Fernando ; Fuster, Valentín ; Sanz, Ginés</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c92afd691a11b07da3c45f7a0bc28c2fc20db66c1da1e24dc5c9a0940731a5043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aspirin</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Agents - economics</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - economics</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Markov Chains</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - economics</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statins</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Transient ischemic attack</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abogunrin, Seye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Alonso, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuster, Valentín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Ginés</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becerra, Virginia</au><au>Gracia, Alfredo</au><au>Desai, Kamal</au><au>Abogunrin, Seye</au><au>Brand, Sarah</au><au>Chapman, Ruth</au><au>García Alonso, Fernando</au><au>Fuster, Valentín</au><au>Sanz, Ginés</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e007111</spage><epage>e007111</epage><pages>e007111-e007111</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. Design Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. Setting General practice in the UK. Participants Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. Intervention Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. Conclusions Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>25991449</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2015-01, Vol.5 (5), p.e007111-e007111 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4452741 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Acute coronary syndromes Aged Aspirin Cardiovascular Agents - economics Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Cardiovascular Diseases - drug therapy Cardiovascular Diseases - economics Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control Clinical outcomes Cost analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Disease prevention Drug Therapy, Combination Health Economics Heart attacks Heart failure Humans Markov Chains Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data Models, Economic Mortality Myocardial infarction Polypharmacy Population Prevention Public health Public Health - economics Sensitivity analysis Statins Stroke Transient ischemic attack |
title | Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20and%20public%20health%20benefit%20of%20secondary%20cardiovascular%20disease%20prevention%20from%20improved%20adherence%20using%20a%20polypill%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Becerra,%20Virginia&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e007111&rft.epage=e007111&rft.pages=e007111-e007111&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1682427632%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785333005&rft_id=info:pmid/25991449&rfr_iscdi=true |