Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach

Planktivorous fish can exert strong top‐down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2021-2035
Hauptverfasser: Helenius, Laura K., Aymà Padrós, Anna, Leskinen, Elina, Lehtonen, Hannu, Nurminen, Leena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2035
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2021
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 5
creator Helenius, Laura K.
Aymà Padrós, Anna
Leskinen, Elina
Lehtonen, Hannu
Nurminen, Leena
description Planktivorous fish can exert strong top‐down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low‐diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16‐day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small‐bodied spring zooplankton community in high‐nutrient conditions, as well as a large‐bodied summer community in low‐nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small‐bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate‐feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter‐feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large‐bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. We used mesocosm experiments to examine the contrasting effects of two fish predators with different feeding strategies on two seasonally distinct zooplankton communities. The selective particulate feeding stickleback was found to deplete the spring community and decrease its diversity to a greater extent than the cruising roach, while both predators had an effect on competition between zooplankton species. Predation effects on the summer community were less dependent on predator type.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.1488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4449756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290266638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5138-2fef031806ab1ad6230979654eda218c08506850c87bfb890bd1fc5f08de17d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVoacI0i_6BIuimWUyihy3LWQTCMH1AoIu2ayFL1xmltuVK8gT311fuJCEtVCAkuN89nMNB6A0l55QQdgEG-DktpDxCJ4wU5bqqSvni2f8YncZ4R_IRhBWkeoWOmcjDuuQnKH5NQSe4dRCxb_Ev78dODz-S2_sw47jTI-C0A2znQffORKwHi63bQ4guzctK51LyQXf4sOgHbHzfT4NLWfMSa9xD9MbHHutxDF6b3Wv0stVdhNOHd4W-f9h-23xa33z5-HlzfbM2JeVyzVpoCaeSCN1QbQXjpK5qURZgNaPSEFkSka-RVdM2siaNpa0pWyIt0MpKvkJXB91xanqwBoactVNjcL0Os_Laqb8ng9upW79XRVHUVSmywPsHgeB_ThCT6l000OWg4KeoqJCioJXkLKPv_kHv_BSGHE8xVhMmhOCLo7MDZYKPMUD7ZIYStbSpljbV0mZm3z53_0Q-dpeBiwNw7zqY_6-ktpst_yP5G2Jwq38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290266638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Helenius, Laura K. ; Aymà Padrós, Anna ; Leskinen, Elina ; Lehtonen, Hannu ; Nurminen, Leena</creator><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Laura K. ; Aymà Padrós, Anna ; Leskinen, Elina ; Lehtonen, Hannu ; Nurminen, Leena</creatorcontrib><description>Planktivorous fish can exert strong top‐down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low‐diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16‐day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small‐bodied spring zooplankton community in high‐nutrient conditions, as well as a large‐bodied summer community in low‐nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small‐bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate‐feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter‐feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large‐bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. We used mesocosm experiments to examine the contrasting effects of two fish predators with different feeding strategies on two seasonally distinct zooplankton communities. The selective particulate feeding stickleback was found to deplete the spring community and decrease its diversity to a greater extent than the cruising roach, while both predators had an effect on competition between zooplankton species. Predation effects on the summer community were less dependent on predator type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1488</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26045953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Baltic Sea ; Biodiversity ; Brackish water ; Communities ; Community structure ; Copepoda ; Crustaceans ; Dispersal ; Ecosystems ; Environmental impact ; Feeding ; feeding strategy ; Fish ; Food chains ; Foraging behavior ; Gasterosteus aculeatus ; Hypotheses ; Littoral environments ; mesocosm ; Nutrients ; Original Research ; Particulates ; Predation ; Pressure ; Prey ; Resource availability ; Rutilus rutilus ; Seasonal variations ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Summer ; Taxonomy ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2021-2035</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5138-2fef031806ab1ad6230979654eda218c08506850c87bfb890bd1fc5f08de17d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5138-2fef031806ab1ad6230979654eda218c08506850c87bfb890bd1fc5f08de17d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26045953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Laura K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aymà Padrós, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskinen, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Hannu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurminen, Leena</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Planktivorous fish can exert strong top‐down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low‐diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16‐day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small‐bodied spring zooplankton community in high‐nutrient conditions, as well as a large‐bodied summer community in low‐nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small‐bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate‐feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter‐feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large‐bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. We used mesocosm experiments to examine the contrasting effects of two fish predators with different feeding strategies on two seasonally distinct zooplankton communities. The selective particulate feeding stickleback was found to deplete the spring community and decrease its diversity to a greater extent than the cruising roach, while both predators had an effect on competition between zooplankton species. Predation effects on the summer community were less dependent on predator type.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Baltic Sea</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Brackish water</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>feeding strategy</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Gasterosteus aculeatus</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Littoral environments</subject><subject>mesocosm</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Particulates</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Rutilus rutilus</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVoacI0i_6BIuimWUyihy3LWQTCMH1AoIu2ayFL1xmltuVK8gT311fuJCEtVCAkuN89nMNB6A0l55QQdgEG-DktpDxCJ4wU5bqqSvni2f8YncZ4R_IRhBWkeoWOmcjDuuQnKH5NQSe4dRCxb_Ev78dODz-S2_sw47jTI-C0A2znQffORKwHi63bQ4guzctK51LyQXf4sOgHbHzfT4NLWfMSa9xD9MbHHutxDF6b3Wv0stVdhNOHd4W-f9h-23xa33z5-HlzfbM2JeVyzVpoCaeSCN1QbQXjpK5qURZgNaPSEFkSka-RVdM2siaNpa0pWyIt0MpKvkJXB91xanqwBoactVNjcL0Os_Laqb8ng9upW79XRVHUVSmywPsHgeB_ThCT6l000OWg4KeoqJCioJXkLKPv_kHv_BSGHE8xVhMmhOCLo7MDZYKPMUD7ZIYStbSpljbV0mZm3z53_0Q-dpeBiwNw7zqY_6-ktpst_yP5G2Jwq38</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Helenius, Laura K.</creator><creator>Aymà Padrós, Anna</creator><creator>Leskinen, Elina</creator><creator>Lehtonen, Hannu</creator><creator>Nurminen, Leena</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach</title><author>Helenius, Laura K. ; Aymà Padrós, Anna ; Leskinen, Elina ; Lehtonen, Hannu ; Nurminen, Leena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5138-2fef031806ab1ad6230979654eda218c08506850c87bfb890bd1fc5f08de17d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Baltic Sea</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Brackish water</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>feeding strategy</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Gasterosteus aculeatus</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Littoral environments</topic><topic>mesocosm</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Particulates</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Rutilus rutilus</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Laura K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aymà Padrós, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskinen, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Hannu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurminen, Leena</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Helenius, Laura K.</au><au>Aymà Padrós, Anna</au><au>Leskinen, Elina</au><au>Lehtonen, Hannu</au><au>Nurminen, Leena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2021</spage><epage>2035</epage><pages>2021-2035</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Planktivorous fish can exert strong top‐down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low‐diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16‐day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small‐bodied spring zooplankton community in high‐nutrient conditions, as well as a large‐bodied summer community in low‐nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small‐bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate‐feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter‐feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large‐bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. We used mesocosm experiments to examine the contrasting effects of two fish predators with different feeding strategies on two seasonally distinct zooplankton communities. The selective particulate feeding stickleback was found to deplete the spring community and decrease its diversity to a greater extent than the cruising roach, while both predators had an effect on competition between zooplankton species. Predation effects on the summer community were less dependent on predator type.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>26045953</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.1488</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2021-2035
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4449756
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animal behavior
Baltic Sea
Biodiversity
Brackish water
Communities
Community structure
Copepoda
Crustaceans
Dispersal
Ecosystems
Environmental impact
Feeding
feeding strategy
Fish
Food chains
Foraging behavior
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Hypotheses
Littoral environments
mesocosm
Nutrients
Original Research
Particulates
Predation
Pressure
Prey
Resource availability
Rutilus rutilus
Seasonal variations
Species composition
Species diversity
Summer
Taxonomy
Zooplankton
title Strategies of zooplanktivory shape the dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20of%20zooplanktivory%20shape%20the%20dynamics%20and%20diversity%20of%20littoral%20plankton%20communities:%20a%20mesocosm%20approach&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Helenius,%20Laura%20K.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2021&rft.epage=2035&rft.pages=2021-2035&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.1488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290266638%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290266638&rft_id=info:pmid/26045953&rfr_iscdi=true