Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis
Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast canc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2862 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6Part1 |
container_start_page | 2853 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Sun, Wenqing Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) Qian, Wei Zhang, Jianying Saltzstein, Edward C. Zheng, Bin Lure, Fleming Yu, Hui Zhou, Shi |
description | Purpose:
To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk.
Methods:
The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index.
Results:
From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200).
Conclusions:
The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4919772 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4441716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1693187117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBCIhEfBDyCXNAd-xT43SCjiJQVBAQWVtbnbA8M9gn0HpOMT-Ea-hIsIETS70s7sjHaWkD3ODjnn6RE_VJZbY8QaGQplZKIEs-tkyJhViVBsNCBbMT4xxrQcsU0yEJoLw2Q6JPd30dcPtOrK1scMSqQtvrddQAp1TnOso2_ntEBYzCItmkBrhPD18dliqOg0IMSWZlBnGGjw8bnfg3IefdwhGwWUEXeXfZvcnZ3eji-SyfX55fhkkmTSWJFAbnM7FQioRIGZzKzWfcGRZnlugElrrcw0Aza1urAojJaiSNP-kBQwR7lNjn90Z920wjzDug1QulnwFYS5a8C7_0jtH91D8-qUUtxw3QscLAVC89JhbF3VR4FlCTU2XXRcW8lTw7npqft_vVYmv3n2hOSH8OZLnK9wztziUY675aPc1c2iyW9ZpIdD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1693187117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk.
Methods:
The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index.
Results:
From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200).
Conclusions:
The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4919772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26127038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Analysis of texture ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; Biomedical modeling ; Breast - cytology ; Breast - pathology ; breast cancer risk ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; cancer ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Digital mammography ; Entropy ; feature selection ; Female ; Humans ; Image analysis ; image classification ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image texture ; In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines ; Inference methods or devices ; Mammography ; medical image processing ; multiscale features ; Multiscale methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Radiologists ; Risk Assessment ; ROC Curve ; sensitivity analysis ; Support Vector Machine ; support vector machines ; texture features ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4919772$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4919772$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26127038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lure, Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk.
Methods:
The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index.
Results:
From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200).
Conclusions:
The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</description><subject>Analysis of texture</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Breast - cytology</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>breast cancer risk</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Digital mammography</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>feature selection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>image classification</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image texture</subject><subject>In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines</subject><subject>Inference methods or devices</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>multiscale features</subject><subject>Multiscale methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>support vector machines</subject><subject>texture features</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBCIhEfBDyCXNAd-xT43SCjiJQVBAQWVtbnbA8M9gn0HpOMT-Ea-hIsIETS70s7sjHaWkD3ODjnn6RE_VJZbY8QaGQplZKIEs-tkyJhViVBsNCBbMT4xxrQcsU0yEJoLw2Q6JPd30dcPtOrK1scMSqQtvrddQAp1TnOso2_ntEBYzCItmkBrhPD18dliqOg0IMSWZlBnGGjw8bnfg3IefdwhGwWUEXeXfZvcnZ3eji-SyfX55fhkkmTSWJFAbnM7FQioRIGZzKzWfcGRZnlugElrrcw0Aza1urAojJaiSNP-kBQwR7lNjn90Z920wjzDug1QulnwFYS5a8C7_0jtH91D8-qUUtxw3QscLAVC89JhbF3VR4FlCTU2XXRcW8lTw7npqft_vVYmv3n2hOSH8OZLnK9wztziUY675aPc1c2iyW9ZpIdD</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Sun, Wenqing</creator><creator>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creator><creator>Qian, Wei</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianying</creator><creator>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creator><creator>Zheng, Bin</creator><creator>Lure, Fleming</creator><creator>Yu, Hui</creator><creator>Zhou, Shi</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><author>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis of texture</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Breast - cytology</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>breast cancer risk</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Digital mammography</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>feature selection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>image classification</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image texture</topic><topic>In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines</topic><topic>Inference methods or devices</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>multiscale features</topic><topic>Multiscale methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>support vector machines</topic><topic>texture features</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lure, Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Wenqing</au><au>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</au><au>Qian, Wei</au><au>Zhang, Jianying</au><au>Saltzstein, Edward C.</au><au>Zheng, Bin</au><au>Lure, Fleming</au><au>Yu, Hui</au><au>Zhou, Shi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6Part1</issue><spage>2853</spage><epage>2862</epage><pages>2853-2862</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk.
Methods:
The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index.
Results:
From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200).
Conclusions:
The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>26127038</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4919772</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4441716 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis of texture Biological material, e.g. blood, urine Haemocytometers Biomedical modeling Breast - cytology Breast - pathology breast cancer risk Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging cancer Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications Digital mammography Entropy feature selection Female Humans Image analysis image classification Image data processing or generation, in general Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods image texture In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run Learning machines Inference methods or devices Mammography medical image processing multiscale features Multiscale methods Predictive Value of Tests Radiation Imaging Physics Radiographic Image Enhancement Radiologists Risk Assessment ROC Curve sensitivity analysis Support Vector Machine support vector machines texture features Tissues |
title | Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20multiscale%20texture%20and%20density%20features%20for%20near%E2%80%90term%20breast%20cancer%20risk%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sun,%20Wenqing&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6Part1&rft.spage=2853&rft.epage=2862&rft.pages=2853-2862&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4919772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1693187117%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1693187117&rft_id=info:pmid/26127038&rfr_iscdi=true |