Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis

Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast canc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Wenqing, Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill), Qian, Wei, Zhang, Jianying, Saltzstein, Edward C., Zheng, Bin, Lure, Fleming, Yu, Hui, Zhou, Shi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2862
container_issue 6Part1
container_start_page 2853
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Sun, Wenqing
Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)
Qian, Wei
Zhang, Jianying
Saltzstein, Edward C.
Zheng, Bin
Lure, Fleming
Yu, Hui
Zhou, Shi
description Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk. Methods: The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index. Results: From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200). Conclusions: The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4919772
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4441716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1693187117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBCIhEfBDyCXNAd-xT43SCjiJQVBAQWVtbnbA8M9gn0HpOMT-Ea-hIsIETS70s7sjHaWkD3ODjnn6RE_VJZbY8QaGQplZKIEs-tkyJhViVBsNCBbMT4xxrQcsU0yEJoLw2Q6JPd30dcPtOrK1scMSqQtvrddQAp1TnOso2_ntEBYzCItmkBrhPD18dliqOg0IMSWZlBnGGjw8bnfg3IefdwhGwWUEXeXfZvcnZ3eji-SyfX55fhkkmTSWJFAbnM7FQioRIGZzKzWfcGRZnlugElrrcw0Aza1urAojJaiSNP-kBQwR7lNjn90Z920wjzDug1QulnwFYS5a8C7_0jtH91D8-qUUtxw3QscLAVC89JhbF3VR4FlCTU2XXRcW8lTw7npqft_vVYmv3n2hOSH8OZLnK9wztziUY675aPc1c2iyW9ZpIdD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1693187117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk. Methods: The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index. Results: From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200). Conclusions: The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4919772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26127038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Analysis of texture ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; Biomedical modeling ; Breast - cytology ; Breast - pathology ; breast cancer risk ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; cancer ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Digital mammography ; Entropy ; feature selection ; Female ; Humans ; Image analysis ; image classification ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image texture ; In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines ; Inference methods or devices ; Mammography ; medical image processing ; multiscale features ; Multiscale methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Radiologists ; Risk Assessment ; ROC Curve ; sensitivity analysis ; Support Vector Machine ; support vector machines ; texture features ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4919772$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4919772$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26127038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lure, Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk. Methods: The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index. Results: From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200). Conclusions: The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</description><subject>Analysis of texture</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Breast - cytology</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>breast cancer risk</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Digital mammography</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>feature selection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>image classification</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image texture</subject><subject>In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines</subject><subject>Inference methods or devices</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>multiscale features</subject><subject>Multiscale methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>support vector machines</subject><subject>texture features</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBCIhEfBDyCXNAd-xT43SCjiJQVBAQWVtbnbA8M9gn0HpOMT-Ea-hIsIETS70s7sjHaWkD3ODjnn6RE_VJZbY8QaGQplZKIEs-tkyJhViVBsNCBbMT4xxrQcsU0yEJoLw2Q6JPd30dcPtOrK1scMSqQtvrddQAp1TnOso2_ntEBYzCItmkBrhPD18dliqOg0IMSWZlBnGGjw8bnfg3IefdwhGwWUEXeXfZvcnZ3eji-SyfX55fhkkmTSWJFAbnM7FQioRIGZzKzWfcGRZnlugElrrcw0Aza1urAojJaiSNP-kBQwR7lNjn90Z920wjzDug1QulnwFYS5a8C7_0jtH91D8-qUUtxw3QscLAVC89JhbF3VR4FlCTU2XXRcW8lTw7npqft_vVYmv3n2hOSH8OZLnK9wztziUY675aPc1c2iyW9ZpIdD</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Sun, Wenqing</creator><creator>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creator><creator>Qian, Wei</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianying</creator><creator>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creator><creator>Zheng, Bin</creator><creator>Lure, Fleming</creator><creator>Yu, Hui</creator><creator>Zhou, Shi</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</title><author>Sun, Wenqing ; Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill) ; Qian, Wei ; Zhang, Jianying ; Saltzstein, Edward C. ; Zheng, Bin ; Lure, Fleming ; Yu, Hui ; Zhou, Shi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3792-ad9d9b2eae42fec3c9663c9e560dd7a039993c60a0b96f9e27632f883508aede3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis of texture</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Breast - cytology</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>breast cancer risk</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Digital mammography</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>feature selection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>image classification</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image texture</topic><topic>In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run; Learning machines</topic><topic>Inference methods or devices</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>multiscale features</topic><topic>Multiscale methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>support vector machines</topic><topic>texture features</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltzstein, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lure, Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Wenqing</au><au>Tseng, Tzu‐Liang (Bill)</au><au>Qian, Wei</au><au>Zhang, Jianying</au><au>Saltzstein, Edward C.</au><au>Zheng, Bin</au><au>Lure, Fleming</au><au>Yu, Hui</au><au>Zhou, Shi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6Part1</issue><spage>2853</spage><epage>2862</epage><pages>2853-2862</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To help improve efficacy of screening mammography by eventually establishing a new optimal personalized screening paradigm, the authors investigated the potential of using the quantitative multiscale texture and density feature analysis of digital mammograms to predict near‐term breast cancer risk. Methods: The authors’ dataset includes digital mammograms acquired from 340 women. Among them, 141 were positive and 199 were negative/benign cases. The negative digital mammograms acquired from the “prior” screening examinations were used in the study. Based on the intensity value distributions, five subregions at different scales were extracted from each mammogram. Five groups of features, including density and texture features, were developed and calculated on every one of the subregions. Sequential forward floating selection was used to search for the effective combinations. Using the selected features, a support vector machine (SVM) was optimized using a tenfold validation method to predict the risk of each woman having image‐detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the performance assessment index. Results: From a total number of 765 features computed from multiscale subregions, an optimal feature set of 12 features was selected. Applying this feature set, a SVM classifier yielded performance of AUC = 0.729 ± 0.021. The positive predictive value was 0.657 (92 of 140) and the negative predictive value was 0.755 (151 of 200). Conclusions: The study results demonstrated a moderately high positive association between risk prediction scores generated by the quantitative multiscale mammographic image feature analysis and the actual risk of a woman having an image‐detectable breast cancer in the next subsequent examinations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>26127038</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4919772</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part1), p.2853-2862
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4441716
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis of texture
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
Biomedical modeling
Breast - cytology
Breast - pathology
breast cancer risk
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
cancer
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Digital mammography
Entropy
feature selection
Female
Humans
Image analysis
image classification
Image data processing or generation, in general
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
image texture
In which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the computer itself during a complete run
Learning machines
Inference methods or devices
Mammography
medical image processing
multiscale features
Multiscale methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiation Imaging Physics
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Radiologists
Risk Assessment
ROC Curve
sensitivity analysis
Support Vector Machine
support vector machines
texture features
Tissues
title Using multiscale texture and density features for near‐term breast cancer risk analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20multiscale%20texture%20and%20density%20features%20for%20near%E2%80%90term%20breast%20cancer%20risk%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sun,%20Wenqing&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6Part1&rft.spage=2853&rft.epage=2862&rft.pages=2853-2862&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4919772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1693187117%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1693187117&rft_id=info:pmid/26127038&rfr_iscdi=true