The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 1...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation medicine & rehabilitation, 2015-01, Vol.7 (1), p.3-3, Article 3 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Cheema, Birinder S Davies, Timothy B Stewart, Matthew Papalia, Shona Atlantis, Evan |
| description | High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults.
Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.
Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2052-1847-7-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4429464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541620496</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541620496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ceecd8f4e54d937d9fbe5b41fcaf692c4edbc7ec786af675d634465109f9d0c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVROlOfZaIVWqenFqMDamh0pRlH5IkXJJzgjDsCbBsDV40_0t-bPFSrrdrQoHhuGZd8ToLYq3uDrDuGs_kaohJe4oK1lZvyiOd_eXe_FRcRrjXZVXxxgn_HVxRBrOalKx4-LxZgBkQEbbW2fTFkmvERgDKtkNeIgRBYMGuxpK6xP4uDB9-GX9CqVJWr8EG5jiHNEYNEwywT452XiPHqS7XzjrkdSzSxE92DQg2eswWi8dCj0s-Gck0dq6kFBMs96-KV4Z6SKcPp8nxe3Xy5uL7-XV9bcfF-dXpWpwnUoFoHRnKDRU85ppbnpoeoqNkqblRFHQvWKgWNfmBGt0W1PaNrjihutKsfqk-PKku577EbQCn3_mxHqyo5y2IkgrDl-8HcQqbASlhNOWZoGPzwJT-DlDTGK0UYFz0kOYo8Bth0lLMecZff8PehfmKc8gCpLlCG-qivylVtKBsN6E3FctouK8obglFeVtps7-Q-WtYbQqeDA25w8KPuwVDCBdGmJwc7LBx0OwfALVFGKcwOyGgSuxOE8s7hKLuwQTdebf7U9wR__xWf0bUqDWWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442295002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Cheema, Birinder S ; Davies, Timothy B ; Stewart, Matthew ; Papalia, Shona ; Atlantis, Evan</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Birinder S ; Davies, Timothy B ; Stewart, Matthew ; Papalia, Shona ; Atlantis, Evan</creatorcontrib><description>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults.
Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.
Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p < 0.05). Two participants in the boxing group experienced an adverse event; both continued to exercise with modifications to the exercise program. No other adverse events were noted. The boxing group attended more sessions (79% vs. 55%) and had a lower attrition rate (n = 0 vs. n = 2) than the walking group. Analysis of covariance revealed that the boxing group significantly improved body fat percentage (p = 0.047), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026), augmentation index (AIx; p < 0.001), absolute VO2max (p = 0.015), and Physical Functioning (p = 0.042) and Vitality (p = 0.024) domains of HRQoL over time. The walking group did not improve any clinical outcomes, and experienced a worsening of Vitality (p = 0.043).
Boxing training (HIIT) in adults with abdominal obesity is feasible and may elicit a better therapeutic effect on obesity, cardiovascular, and HRQoL outcomes than an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT). Robustly designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and inform clinical guidelines and practice for obesity treatment.
ACTRN12615000007538.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-1847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-1847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2052-1847-7-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25973207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adults ; Age ; Body fat ; Body mass index ; Boxing ; Comparative analysis ; Diabetes ; Exercise ; Exercise equipment ; Fitness equipment ; Health aspects ; Heart rate ; Intervention ; Kidney diseases ; Metabolism ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Physical fitness ; Physiological aspects ; Rest ; Social networks ; Training ; Walking</subject><ispartof>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2015-01, Vol.7 (1), p.3-3, Article 3</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Cheema et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ceecd8f4e54d937d9fbe5b41fcaf692c4edbc7ec786af675d634465109f9d0c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ceecd8f4e54d937d9fbe5b41fcaf692c4edbc7ec786af675d634465109f9d0c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429464/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429464/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25973207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Birinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalia, Shona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atlantis, Evan</creatorcontrib><title>The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study</title><title>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation</title><addtitle>BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults.
Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.
Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p < 0.05). Two participants in the boxing group experienced an adverse event; both continued to exercise with modifications to the exercise program. No other adverse events were noted. The boxing group attended more sessions (79% vs. 55%) and had a lower attrition rate (n = 0 vs. n = 2) than the walking group. Analysis of covariance revealed that the boxing group significantly improved body fat percentage (p = 0.047), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026), augmentation index (AIx; p < 0.001), absolute VO2max (p = 0.015), and Physical Functioning (p = 0.042) and Vitality (p = 0.024) domains of HRQoL over time. The walking group did not improve any clinical outcomes, and experienced a worsening of Vitality (p = 0.043).
Boxing training (HIIT) in adults with abdominal obesity is feasible and may elicit a better therapeutic effect on obesity, cardiovascular, and HRQoL outcomes than an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT). Robustly designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and inform clinical guidelines and practice for obesity treatment.
ACTRN12615000007538.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Boxing</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise equipment</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Rest</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>2052-1847</issn><issn>2052-1847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVROlOfZaIVWqenFqMDamh0pRlH5IkXJJzgjDsCbBsDV40_0t-bPFSrrdrQoHhuGZd8ToLYq3uDrDuGs_kaohJe4oK1lZvyiOd_eXe_FRcRrjXZVXxxgn_HVxRBrOalKx4-LxZgBkQEbbW2fTFkmvERgDKtkNeIgRBYMGuxpK6xP4uDB9-GX9CqVJWr8EG5jiHNEYNEwywT452XiPHqS7XzjrkdSzSxE92DQg2eswWi8dCj0s-Gck0dq6kFBMs96-KV4Z6SKcPp8nxe3Xy5uL7-XV9bcfF-dXpWpwnUoFoHRnKDRU85ppbnpoeoqNkqblRFHQvWKgWNfmBGt0W1PaNrjihutKsfqk-PKku577EbQCn3_mxHqyo5y2IkgrDl-8HcQqbASlhNOWZoGPzwJT-DlDTGK0UYFz0kOYo8Bth0lLMecZff8PehfmKc8gCpLlCG-qivylVtKBsN6E3FctouK8obglFeVtps7-Q-WtYbQqeDA25w8KPuwVDCBdGmJwc7LBx0OwfALVFGKcwOyGgSuxOE8s7hKLuwQTdebf7U9wR__xWf0bUqDWWw</recordid><startdate>20150116</startdate><enddate>20150116</enddate><creator>Cheema, Birinder S</creator><creator>Davies, Timothy B</creator><creator>Stewart, Matthew</creator><creator>Papalia, Shona</creator><creator>Atlantis, Evan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150116</creationdate><title>The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study</title><author>Cheema, Birinder S ; Davies, Timothy B ; Stewart, Matthew ; Papalia, Shona ; Atlantis, Evan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ceecd8f4e54d937d9fbe5b41fcaf692c4edbc7ec786af675d634465109f9d0c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Boxing</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise equipment</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Rest</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Birinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalia, Shona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atlantis, Evan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheema, Birinder S</au><au>Davies, Timothy B</au><au>Stewart, Matthew</au><au>Papalia, Shona</au><au>Atlantis, Evan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-01-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>3-3</pages><artnum>3</artnum><issn>2052-1847</issn><eissn>2052-1847</eissn><abstract>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults.
Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.
Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p < 0.05). Two participants in the boxing group experienced an adverse event; both continued to exercise with modifications to the exercise program. No other adverse events were noted. The boxing group attended more sessions (79% vs. 55%) and had a lower attrition rate (n = 0 vs. n = 2) than the walking group. Analysis of covariance revealed that the boxing group significantly improved body fat percentage (p = 0.047), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026), augmentation index (AIx; p < 0.001), absolute VO2max (p = 0.015), and Physical Functioning (p = 0.042) and Vitality (p = 0.024) domains of HRQoL over time. The walking group did not improve any clinical outcomes, and experienced a worsening of Vitality (p = 0.043).
Boxing training (HIIT) in adults with abdominal obesity is feasible and may elicit a better therapeutic effect on obesity, cardiovascular, and HRQoL outcomes than an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT). Robustly designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and inform clinical guidelines and practice for obesity treatment.
ACTRN12615000007538.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25973207</pmid><doi>10.1186/2052-1847-7-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2052-1847 |
| ispartof | BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2015-01, Vol.7 (1), p.3-3, Article 3 |
| issn | 2052-1847 2052-1847 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4429464 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Abdomen Adults Age Body fat Body mass index Boxing Comparative analysis Diabetes Exercise Exercise equipment Fitness equipment Health aspects Heart rate Intervention Kidney diseases Metabolism Obesity Overweight Physical fitness Physiological aspects Rest Social networks Training Walking |
| title | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A14%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20feasibility%20and%20effectiveness%20of%20high-intensity%20boxing%20training%20versus%20moderate-intensity%20brisk%20walking%20in%20adults%20with%20abdominal%20obesity:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20sports%20science,%20medicine%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Cheema,%20Birinder%20S&rft.date=2015-01-16&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=3-3&rft.artnum=3&rft.issn=2052-1847&rft.eissn=2052-1847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2052-1847-7-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541620496%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442295002&rft_id=info:pmid/25973207&rft_galeid=A541620496&rfr_iscdi=true |