Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma

Background Addition of anti‐GD2 antibody ch14.18 to the treatment of neuroblastoma has improved outcomes. The most common side effect of ch14.18 is neuropathic pain, which may in part be complement‐mediated. Hu14.18K322A is a humanized anti‐GD2 antibody designed to diminish complement activation and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric blood & cancer 2015-02, Vol.62 (2), p.224-228
Hauptverfasser: Anghelescu, Doralina L., Goldberg, Jacob L., Faughnan, Lane G., Wu, Jianrong, Mao, Shenghua, Furman, Wayne L., Santana, Victor M., Navid, Fariba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 2
container_start_page 224
container_title Pediatric blood & cancer
container_volume 62
creator Anghelescu, Doralina L.
Goldberg, Jacob L.
Faughnan, Lane G.
Wu, Jianrong
Mao, Shenghua
Furman, Wayne L.
Santana, Victor M.
Navid, Fariba
description Background Addition of anti‐GD2 antibody ch14.18 to the treatment of neuroblastoma has improved outcomes. The most common side effect of ch14.18 is neuropathic pain, which may in part be complement‐mediated. Hu14.18K322A is a humanized anti‐GD2 antibody designed to diminish complement activation and induce less pain. We compare the pain outcomes in patients treated with ch14.18 and those treated with hu14.18K322A, and explore dose‐dependent relationships between pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels in patients treated with hu14.18K322A. Procedure Opioid (morphine equivalent mg/kg) and anxiolytic requirements during course 1 (4 days) in patients treated with hu14.18K322A and ch14.18 were reviewed. Correlations between antibody dose and pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels were examined for patients receiving hu14.18K322A. Results Patients treated with hu14.18K322A (n = 19) had lower opioid requirements than those who received ch14.18 (n = 9). The differences in median opioid requirements (mg/kg) were statistically significant for the overall course (1.57 vs. 2.41, P = 0.019) as well as for Days 3 (0.34 vs. 0.65, P = 0.005), and 4 (0.32 vs. 0.64, P = 0.010). No difference in anxiolytic use was observed between the two groups. In the group treated with hu14.18K322A, we found a positive correlation between antibody dose administered and pain scores, but no correlation between antibody dose and opioid requirements or changes in complement levels. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, hu14.18K322A induced less pain than ch14.18 based on opioid requirements. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:224–228. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pbc.25280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4425626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891867504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-754416f83029122eca74492bc624610faeb6281bbf32eb208cd793c13f3062a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w4A-gSFzoIa09_swFqSywgErhAKrUi2V7HeqSxMF2WPrvcbvtCpCQOM1I88yrd-atqicYHWKE4Ggy9hAYSHSv2sWMsoYhLO5ve9TuVHspXRaUIyYfVjvAiARBYbc6X4Rh0tGnMNahqyftS52zDYNLtXF57dxY53Wo9Zh9s3wFN40JK1_mhZ109m7MqV77fFGPbo7B9DrlMOhH1YNO98k9vq371Zc3rz8v3jYnH5fvFscnjWWYokYwSjHvJEHQYgBntaC0BWM5UI5Rp53hILExHQFnAEm7Ei2xmHQEcdCS7FcvNrrTbAa3ssVO1L2aoh90vFJBe_XnZPQX6mv4oSgFxoEXgee3AjF8n13KavDJur7XowtzUli2WHLBEP0PFDjHwFtU0Gd_oZdhjmP5RKEkEi0wem3-YEPZGFKKrtv6xkhdh6tKuOom3MI-_f3QLXmXZgGONsDa9-7q30rq08vFnWSz2fApu5_bDR2_KS6IYOrsdKnaMwbvTz-cK0J-AfgsvIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880792548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Anghelescu, Doralina L. ; Goldberg, Jacob L. ; Faughnan, Lane G. ; Wu, Jianrong ; Mao, Shenghua ; Furman, Wayne L. ; Santana, Victor M. ; Navid, Fariba</creator><creatorcontrib>Anghelescu, Doralina L. ; Goldberg, Jacob L. ; Faughnan, Lane G. ; Wu, Jianrong ; Mao, Shenghua ; Furman, Wayne L. ; Santana, Victor M. ; Navid, Fariba</creatorcontrib><description>Background Addition of anti‐GD2 antibody ch14.18 to the treatment of neuroblastoma has improved outcomes. The most common side effect of ch14.18 is neuropathic pain, which may in part be complement‐mediated. Hu14.18K322A is a humanized anti‐GD2 antibody designed to diminish complement activation and induce less pain. We compare the pain outcomes in patients treated with ch14.18 and those treated with hu14.18K322A, and explore dose‐dependent relationships between pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels in patients treated with hu14.18K322A. Procedure Opioid (morphine equivalent mg/kg) and anxiolytic requirements during course 1 (4 days) in patients treated with hu14.18K322A and ch14.18 were reviewed. Correlations between antibody dose and pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels were examined for patients receiving hu14.18K322A. Results Patients treated with hu14.18K322A (n = 19) had lower opioid requirements than those who received ch14.18 (n = 9). The differences in median opioid requirements (mg/kg) were statistically significant for the overall course (1.57 vs. 2.41, P = 0.019) as well as for Days 3 (0.34 vs. 0.65, P = 0.005), and 4 (0.32 vs. 0.64, P = 0.010). No difference in anxiolytic use was observed between the two groups. In the group treated with hu14.18K322A, we found a positive correlation between antibody dose administered and pain scores, but no correlation between antibody dose and opioid requirements or changes in complement levels. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, hu14.18K322A induced less pain than ch14.18 based on opioid requirements. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:224–228. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-5009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-5017</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25382742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; anti-GD2 antibodies ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Complement Activation - immunology ; Complement Inactivator Proteins - therapeutic use ; Complement System Proteins - drug effects ; Female ; Gangliosides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Gangliosides - immunology ; Hematology ; Humans ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Infant ; Male ; Neuralgia - drug therapy ; neuroblastoma ; Neuroblastoma - therapy ; Oncology ; opioids ; pain ; pediatric oncology ; Pediatrics ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Pediatric blood &amp; cancer, 2015-02, Vol.62 (2), p.224-228</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-754416f83029122eca74492bc624610faeb6281bbf32eb208cd793c13f3062a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-754416f83029122eca74492bc624610faeb6281bbf32eb208cd793c13f3062a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpbc.25280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpbc.25280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25382742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anghelescu, Doralina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Jacob L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faughnan, Lane G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Shenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furman, Wayne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navid, Fariba</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma</title><title>Pediatric blood &amp; cancer</title><addtitle>Pediatr Blood Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Addition of anti‐GD2 antibody ch14.18 to the treatment of neuroblastoma has improved outcomes. The most common side effect of ch14.18 is neuropathic pain, which may in part be complement‐mediated. Hu14.18K322A is a humanized anti‐GD2 antibody designed to diminish complement activation and induce less pain. We compare the pain outcomes in patients treated with ch14.18 and those treated with hu14.18K322A, and explore dose‐dependent relationships between pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels in patients treated with hu14.18K322A. Procedure Opioid (morphine equivalent mg/kg) and anxiolytic requirements during course 1 (4 days) in patients treated with hu14.18K322A and ch14.18 were reviewed. Correlations between antibody dose and pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels were examined for patients receiving hu14.18K322A. Results Patients treated with hu14.18K322A (n = 19) had lower opioid requirements than those who received ch14.18 (n = 9). The differences in median opioid requirements (mg/kg) were statistically significant for the overall course (1.57 vs. 2.41, P = 0.019) as well as for Days 3 (0.34 vs. 0.65, P = 0.005), and 4 (0.32 vs. 0.64, P = 0.010). No difference in anxiolytic use was observed between the two groups. In the group treated with hu14.18K322A, we found a positive correlation between antibody dose administered and pain scores, but no correlation between antibody dose and opioid requirements or changes in complement levels. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, hu14.18K322A induced less pain than ch14.18 based on opioid requirements. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:224–228. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>anti-GD2 antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Complement Activation - immunology</subject><subject>Complement Inactivator Proteins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Complement System Proteins - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gangliosides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Gangliosides - immunology</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuralgia - drug therapy</subject><subject>neuroblastoma</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>opioids</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>pediatric oncology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1545-5009</issn><issn>1545-5017</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w4A-gSFzoIa09_swFqSywgErhAKrUi2V7HeqSxMF2WPrvcbvtCpCQOM1I88yrd-atqicYHWKE4Ggy9hAYSHSv2sWMsoYhLO5ve9TuVHspXRaUIyYfVjvAiARBYbc6X4Rh0tGnMNahqyftS52zDYNLtXF57dxY53Wo9Zh9s3wFN40JK1_mhZ109m7MqV77fFGPbo7B9DrlMOhH1YNO98k9vq371Zc3rz8v3jYnH5fvFscnjWWYokYwSjHvJEHQYgBntaC0BWM5UI5Rp53hILExHQFnAEm7Ei2xmHQEcdCS7FcvNrrTbAa3ssVO1L2aoh90vFJBe_XnZPQX6mv4oSgFxoEXgee3AjF8n13KavDJur7XowtzUli2WHLBEP0PFDjHwFtU0Gd_oZdhjmP5RKEkEi0wem3-YEPZGFKKrtv6xkhdh6tKuOom3MI-_f3QLXmXZgGONsDa9-7q30rq08vFnWSz2fApu5_bDR2_KS6IYOrsdKnaMwbvTz-cK0J-AfgsvIw</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Anghelescu, Doralina L.</creator><creator>Goldberg, Jacob L.</creator><creator>Faughnan, Lane G.</creator><creator>Wu, Jianrong</creator><creator>Mao, Shenghua</creator><creator>Furman, Wayne L.</creator><creator>Santana, Victor M.</creator><creator>Navid, Fariba</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma</title><author>Anghelescu, Doralina L. ; Goldberg, Jacob L. ; Faughnan, Lane G. ; Wu, Jianrong ; Mao, Shenghua ; Furman, Wayne L. ; Santana, Victor M. ; Navid, Fariba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5140-754416f83029122eca74492bc624610faeb6281bbf32eb208cd793c13f3062a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>anti-GD2 antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Complement Activation - immunology</topic><topic>Complement Inactivator Proteins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Complement System Proteins - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gangliosides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Gangliosides - immunology</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuralgia - drug therapy</topic><topic>neuroblastoma</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>opioids</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>pediatric oncology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anghelescu, Doralina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Jacob L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faughnan, Lane G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Shenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furman, Wayne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navid, Fariba</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pediatric blood &amp; cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anghelescu, Doralina L.</au><au>Goldberg, Jacob L.</au><au>Faughnan, Lane G.</au><au>Wu, Jianrong</au><au>Mao, Shenghua</au><au>Furman, Wayne L.</au><au>Santana, Victor M.</au><au>Navid, Fariba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric blood &amp; cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Blood Cancer</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>224-228</pages><issn>1545-5009</issn><eissn>1545-5017</eissn><abstract>Background Addition of anti‐GD2 antibody ch14.18 to the treatment of neuroblastoma has improved outcomes. The most common side effect of ch14.18 is neuropathic pain, which may in part be complement‐mediated. Hu14.18K322A is a humanized anti‐GD2 antibody designed to diminish complement activation and induce less pain. We compare the pain outcomes in patients treated with ch14.18 and those treated with hu14.18K322A, and explore dose‐dependent relationships between pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels in patients treated with hu14.18K322A. Procedure Opioid (morphine equivalent mg/kg) and anxiolytic requirements during course 1 (4 days) in patients treated with hu14.18K322A and ch14.18 were reviewed. Correlations between antibody dose and pain scores, opioid requirements, and complement levels were examined for patients receiving hu14.18K322A. Results Patients treated with hu14.18K322A (n = 19) had lower opioid requirements than those who received ch14.18 (n = 9). The differences in median opioid requirements (mg/kg) were statistically significant for the overall course (1.57 vs. 2.41, P = 0.019) as well as for Days 3 (0.34 vs. 0.65, P = 0.005), and 4 (0.32 vs. 0.64, P = 0.010). No difference in anxiolytic use was observed between the two groups. In the group treated with hu14.18K322A, we found a positive correlation between antibody dose administered and pain scores, but no correlation between antibody dose and opioid requirements or changes in complement levels. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, hu14.18K322A induced less pain than ch14.18 based on opioid requirements. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:224–228. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25382742</pmid><doi>10.1002/pbc.25280</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-5009
ispartof Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015-02, Vol.62 (2), p.224-228
issn 1545-5009
1545-5017
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4425626
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
anti-GD2 antibodies
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
Child
Child, Preschool
Complement Activation - immunology
Complement Inactivator Proteins - therapeutic use
Complement System Proteins - drug effects
Female
Gangliosides - antagonists & inhibitors
Gangliosides - immunology
Hematology
Humans
Immunotherapy - methods
Infant
Male
Neuralgia - drug therapy
neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma - therapy
Oncology
opioids
pain
pediatric oncology
Pediatrics
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of pain outcomes between two anti-GD2 antibodies in patients with neuroblastoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pain%20outcomes%20between%20two%20anti-GD2%20antibodies%20in%20patients%20with%20neuroblastoma&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20blood%20&%20cancer&rft.au=Anghelescu,%20Doralina%20L.&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=224-228&rft.issn=1545-5009&rft.eissn=1545-5017&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pbc.25280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1891867504%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880792548&rft_id=info:pmid/25382742&rfr_iscdi=true