Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases

The sensitivity of Papanicolaou smears for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is very low. A comprehensive cytological analysis of endocervical AIS is necessary to increase diagnostic accuracy. The subjects were 74 patients with pathologically-diagnosed AIS. A total of 140 Papanicol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CytoJournal 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.8-8, Article 8
Hauptverfasser: Umezawa, Takashi, Umemori, Miyaka, Horiguchi, Ayana, Nomura, Kouichi, Takahashi, Hiroyuki, Yamada, Kyosuke, Ochiai, Kazunori, Okamoto, Aikou, Ikegami, Masahiro, Sawabe, Motoji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title CytoJournal
container_volume 12
creator Umezawa, Takashi
Umemori, Miyaka
Horiguchi, Ayana
Nomura, Kouichi
Takahashi, Hiroyuki
Yamada, Kyosuke
Ochiai, Kazunori
Okamoto, Aikou
Ikegami, Masahiro
Sawabe, Motoji
description The sensitivity of Papanicolaou smears for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is very low. A comprehensive cytological analysis of endocervical AIS is necessary to increase diagnostic accuracy. The subjects were 74 patients with pathologically-diagnosed AIS. A total of 140 Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to calculate the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smears for detecting AIS and the incidence of sampling/screening/diagnostic errors. The cytological review was performed by 6 cytotechnologists, and the final cytological diagnosis was obtained at the consensus meeting. We classified the cases into three differentiation types; typical type (well-differentiated AIS), polymorphic type (poorly differentiated AIS), and mixed typical and polymorphic type. Three cytological subtypes (endocervical, endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) of AIS were also analyzed. The sensitivity of the original Papanicolaou smears for the detection of AIS was 44.6%, while that for the detection of AIS and adenocarcinoma was 63.5%. The diagnostic accuracy of AIS increased to 78.5% in the final diagnosis. The common characteristic features were microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCG) (82.0%) and mitotic figures (72.2%). The appearance of single cells (2.8%) was rare, and all the cervical cytology smears showed no evidence of necrotic tumor diathesis. The most common AIS was the typical type (41 cases, 67.2%) among all cytologically-diagnosed AIS or adenocarcinoma cases (61 cases). Although mixed typical and polymorphic AIS existed in 17 cases (27.9%), pure polymorphic AIS was very rare (3 cases, 4.9%). The endocervical subtype was the most predominant subtype (67.2%), followed by a few mixed subtypes. The important diagnostic keys for AIS cytology are as follows: (1) The appearance of microbiopsies/HCG (single-cell pattern is rare), (2) mitotic figures in the microbiopsies/HCG, (3) a lack of necrotic tumor diathesis in cases with polymorphic AIS, and (4) recognition of typical cytological subtypes. The relatively low diagnostic accuracy AIS was caused by the underestimation of microbiopsies/HCG and the overestimation of polymorphic components. The typical cytological features of AIS are the presence of microbiopsies/HCG with mitotic figures in the absence of necrotic tumor diathesis in specimens containing endocervical samples. The recognition of infrequent AIS subtypes (endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) is also important.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/1742-6413.156081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4421916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472107293</galeid><sourcerecordid>A472107293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bf1b5c9a1e827408cf4bc12bcdbc4d76e6b50083524197716a1a008ef7eacf743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19W7Jwl48dJjkk53Oh6EYfALFrzoOVSnK2OkOxmT9MDc_Omb3lmXXZAcKlV571WleFX1mtGNYLR5z6TgdSdYs2FtR3v2pLqkSoq6VV3z9MH9onqR0m9Km0Yo9ry64K2SXFF1Wf3dnXKYwt4ZmMgRooPsgk8E_Ejy6XBbHh3sfUjZGWIR8hIxkWAJ-jEYjMdbDIzog4FonA8zEOdJcnn5QLYkYo4hHdBkd0SS8jKeVrYUxEDC9LJ6ZmFK-OouXlU_P3_6sftaX3__8m23va6N4CzXg2VDaxQw7LkUtDdWDIbxwYyDEaPssBtaSvum5YIpKVkHDEqOViIYK0VzVX086x6WYcbRoM8RJn2IboZ40gGcfvzi3S-9D0ctSn_FuiLw7k4ghj8LpqxnlwxOE3gMS9Ks6xnvBFdrr7dn6B4m1M7bUBTNCtdbITmjZflNQW3-gypnxNmZ4NG6Un9EoGeCKQtNEe399Izq1Q969YNe_aDPfiiUNw9_fU_4Z4DmBhSQsmE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681264294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Umezawa, Takashi ; Umemori, Miyaka ; Horiguchi, Ayana ; Nomura, Kouichi ; Takahashi, Hiroyuki ; Yamada, Kyosuke ; Ochiai, Kazunori ; Okamoto, Aikou ; Ikegami, Masahiro ; Sawabe, Motoji</creator><creatorcontrib>Umezawa, Takashi ; Umemori, Miyaka ; Horiguchi, Ayana ; Nomura, Kouichi ; Takahashi, Hiroyuki ; Yamada, Kyosuke ; Ochiai, Kazunori ; Okamoto, Aikou ; Ikegami, Masahiro ; Sawabe, Motoji</creatorcontrib><description>The sensitivity of Papanicolaou smears for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is very low. A comprehensive cytological analysis of endocervical AIS is necessary to increase diagnostic accuracy. The subjects were 74 patients with pathologically-diagnosed AIS. A total of 140 Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to calculate the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smears for detecting AIS and the incidence of sampling/screening/diagnostic errors. The cytological review was performed by 6 cytotechnologists, and the final cytological diagnosis was obtained at the consensus meeting. We classified the cases into three differentiation types; typical type (well-differentiated AIS), polymorphic type (poorly differentiated AIS), and mixed typical and polymorphic type. Three cytological subtypes (endocervical, endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) of AIS were also analyzed. The sensitivity of the original Papanicolaou smears for the detection of AIS was 44.6%, while that for the detection of AIS and adenocarcinoma was 63.5%. The diagnostic accuracy of AIS increased to 78.5% in the final diagnosis. The common characteristic features were microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCG) (82.0%) and mitotic figures (72.2%). The appearance of single cells (2.8%) was rare, and all the cervical cytology smears showed no evidence of necrotic tumor diathesis. The most common AIS was the typical type (41 cases, 67.2%) among all cytologically-diagnosed AIS or adenocarcinoma cases (61 cases). Although mixed typical and polymorphic AIS existed in 17 cases (27.9%), pure polymorphic AIS was very rare (3 cases, 4.9%). The endocervical subtype was the most predominant subtype (67.2%), followed by a few mixed subtypes. The important diagnostic keys for AIS cytology are as follows: (1) The appearance of microbiopsies/HCG (single-cell pattern is rare), (2) mitotic figures in the microbiopsies/HCG, (3) a lack of necrotic tumor diathesis in cases with polymorphic AIS, and (4) recognition of typical cytological subtypes. The relatively low diagnostic accuracy AIS was caused by the underestimation of microbiopsies/HCG and the overestimation of polymorphic components. The typical cytological features of AIS are the presence of microbiopsies/HCG with mitotic figures in the absence of necrotic tumor diathesis in specimens containing endocervical samples. The recognition of infrequent AIS subtypes (endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) is also important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-5963</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.156081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25972909</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Analysis ; Diagnosis</subject><ispartof>CytoJournal, 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.8-8, Article 8</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 Umezawa T, .; licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc. 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bf1b5c9a1e827408cf4bc12bcdbc4d76e6b50083524197716a1a008ef7eacf743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bf1b5c9a1e827408cf4bc12bcdbc4d76e6b50083524197716a1a008ef7eacf743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421916/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421916/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umezawa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umemori, Miyaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiguchi, Ayana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochiai, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Aikou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegami, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawabe, Motoji</creatorcontrib><title>Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases</title><title>CytoJournal</title><addtitle>Cytojournal</addtitle><description>The sensitivity of Papanicolaou smears for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is very low. A comprehensive cytological analysis of endocervical AIS is necessary to increase diagnostic accuracy. The subjects were 74 patients with pathologically-diagnosed AIS. A total of 140 Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to calculate the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smears for detecting AIS and the incidence of sampling/screening/diagnostic errors. The cytological review was performed by 6 cytotechnologists, and the final cytological diagnosis was obtained at the consensus meeting. We classified the cases into three differentiation types; typical type (well-differentiated AIS), polymorphic type (poorly differentiated AIS), and mixed typical and polymorphic type. Three cytological subtypes (endocervical, endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) of AIS were also analyzed. The sensitivity of the original Papanicolaou smears for the detection of AIS was 44.6%, while that for the detection of AIS and adenocarcinoma was 63.5%. The diagnostic accuracy of AIS increased to 78.5% in the final diagnosis. The common characteristic features were microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCG) (82.0%) and mitotic figures (72.2%). The appearance of single cells (2.8%) was rare, and all the cervical cytology smears showed no evidence of necrotic tumor diathesis. The most common AIS was the typical type (41 cases, 67.2%) among all cytologically-diagnosed AIS or adenocarcinoma cases (61 cases). Although mixed typical and polymorphic AIS existed in 17 cases (27.9%), pure polymorphic AIS was very rare (3 cases, 4.9%). The endocervical subtype was the most predominant subtype (67.2%), followed by a few mixed subtypes. The important diagnostic keys for AIS cytology are as follows: (1) The appearance of microbiopsies/HCG (single-cell pattern is rare), (2) mitotic figures in the microbiopsies/HCG, (3) a lack of necrotic tumor diathesis in cases with polymorphic AIS, and (4) recognition of typical cytological subtypes. The relatively low diagnostic accuracy AIS was caused by the underestimation of microbiopsies/HCG and the overestimation of polymorphic components. The typical cytological features of AIS are the presence of microbiopsies/HCG with mitotic figures in the absence of necrotic tumor diathesis in specimens containing endocervical samples. The recognition of infrequent AIS subtypes (endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) is also important.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><issn>0974-5963</issn><issn>1742-6413</issn><issn>0974-5963</issn><issn>1742-6413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19W7Jwl48dJjkk53Oh6EYfALFrzoOVSnK2OkOxmT9MDc_Omb3lmXXZAcKlV571WleFX1mtGNYLR5z6TgdSdYs2FtR3v2pLqkSoq6VV3z9MH9onqR0m9Km0Yo9ry64K2SXFF1Wf3dnXKYwt4ZmMgRooPsgk8E_Ejy6XBbHh3sfUjZGWIR8hIxkWAJ-jEYjMdbDIzog4FonA8zEOdJcnn5QLYkYo4hHdBkd0SS8jKeVrYUxEDC9LJ6ZmFK-OouXlU_P3_6sftaX3__8m23va6N4CzXg2VDaxQw7LkUtDdWDIbxwYyDEaPssBtaSvum5YIpKVkHDEqOViIYK0VzVX086x6WYcbRoM8RJn2IboZ40gGcfvzi3S-9D0ctSn_FuiLw7k4ghj8LpqxnlwxOE3gMS9Ks6xnvBFdrr7dn6B4m1M7bUBTNCtdbITmjZflNQW3-gypnxNmZ4NG6Un9EoGeCKQtNEe399Izq1Q969YNe_aDPfiiUNw9_fU_4Z4DmBhSQsmE</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Umezawa, Takashi</creator><creator>Umemori, Miyaka</creator><creator>Horiguchi, Ayana</creator><creator>Nomura, Kouichi</creator><creator>Takahashi, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Yamada, Kyosuke</creator><creator>Ochiai, Kazunori</creator><creator>Okamoto, Aikou</creator><creator>Ikegami, Masahiro</creator><creator>Sawabe, Motoji</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases</title><author>Umezawa, Takashi ; Umemori, Miyaka ; Horiguchi, Ayana ; Nomura, Kouichi ; Takahashi, Hiroyuki ; Yamada, Kyosuke ; Ochiai, Kazunori ; Okamoto, Aikou ; Ikegami, Masahiro ; Sawabe, Motoji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bf1b5c9a1e827408cf4bc12bcdbc4d76e6b50083524197716a1a008ef7eacf743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umezawa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umemori, Miyaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiguchi, Ayana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochiai, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Aikou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegami, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawabe, Motoji</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CytoJournal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umezawa, Takashi</au><au>Umemori, Miyaka</au><au>Horiguchi, Ayana</au><au>Nomura, Kouichi</au><au>Takahashi, Hiroyuki</au><au>Yamada, Kyosuke</au><au>Ochiai, Kazunori</au><au>Okamoto, Aikou</au><au>Ikegami, Masahiro</au><au>Sawabe, Motoji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases</atitle><jtitle>CytoJournal</jtitle><addtitle>Cytojournal</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>8-8</pages><artnum>8</artnum><issn>0974-5963</issn><issn>1742-6413</issn><eissn>0974-5963</eissn><eissn>1742-6413</eissn><abstract>The sensitivity of Papanicolaou smears for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is very low. A comprehensive cytological analysis of endocervical AIS is necessary to increase diagnostic accuracy. The subjects were 74 patients with pathologically-diagnosed AIS. A total of 140 Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to calculate the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smears for detecting AIS and the incidence of sampling/screening/diagnostic errors. The cytological review was performed by 6 cytotechnologists, and the final cytological diagnosis was obtained at the consensus meeting. We classified the cases into three differentiation types; typical type (well-differentiated AIS), polymorphic type (poorly differentiated AIS), and mixed typical and polymorphic type. Three cytological subtypes (endocervical, endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) of AIS were also analyzed. The sensitivity of the original Papanicolaou smears for the detection of AIS was 44.6%, while that for the detection of AIS and adenocarcinoma was 63.5%. The diagnostic accuracy of AIS increased to 78.5% in the final diagnosis. The common characteristic features were microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCG) (82.0%) and mitotic figures (72.2%). The appearance of single cells (2.8%) was rare, and all the cervical cytology smears showed no evidence of necrotic tumor diathesis. The most common AIS was the typical type (41 cases, 67.2%) among all cytologically-diagnosed AIS or adenocarcinoma cases (61 cases). Although mixed typical and polymorphic AIS existed in 17 cases (27.9%), pure polymorphic AIS was very rare (3 cases, 4.9%). The endocervical subtype was the most predominant subtype (67.2%), followed by a few mixed subtypes. The important diagnostic keys for AIS cytology are as follows: (1) The appearance of microbiopsies/HCG (single-cell pattern is rare), (2) mitotic figures in the microbiopsies/HCG, (3) a lack of necrotic tumor diathesis in cases with polymorphic AIS, and (4) recognition of typical cytological subtypes. The relatively low diagnostic accuracy AIS was caused by the underestimation of microbiopsies/HCG and the overestimation of polymorphic components. The typical cytological features of AIS are the presence of microbiopsies/HCG with mitotic figures in the absence of necrotic tumor diathesis in specimens containing endocervical samples. The recognition of infrequent AIS subtypes (endometrioid and intestinal subtypes) is also important.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>25972909</pmid><doi>10.4103/1742-6413.156081</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-5963
ispartof CytoJournal, 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.8-8, Article 8
issn 0974-5963
1742-6413
0974-5963
1742-6413
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4421916
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Analysis
Diagnosis
title Cytological variations and typical diagnostic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: A retrospective study of 74 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A46%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytological%20variations%20and%20typical%20diagnostic%20features%20of%20endocervical%20adenocarcinoma%20in%20situ:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20of%2074%20cases&rft.jtitle=CytoJournal&rft.au=Umezawa,%20Takashi&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=8-8&rft.artnum=8&rft.issn=0974-5963&rft.eissn=0974-5963&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1742-6413.156081&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA472107293%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681264294&rft_id=info:pmid/25972909&rft_galeid=A472107293&rfr_iscdi=true