Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model

Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2004-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1285-1290
Hauptverfasser: Sopher, Aviva B, Thornton, John C, Wang, Jack, Pierson, Richard N., Jr, Heymsfield, Steven B, Horlick, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1290
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1285
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 113
creator Sopher, Aviva B
Thornton, John C
Wang, Jack
Pierson, Richard N., Jr
Heymsfield, Steven B
Horlick, Mary
description Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.113.5.1285
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4418431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A116859276</galeid><sourcerecordid>A116859276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-771497aa080131dc4c21d4d26fa6e7e9f62e47f2a89179afe9223a2f639946ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsJJA4ZGs7dj44IC1LtyC1KkIguFnTZJJ15diLnQD7Q_i_OOyK7qLKB38974zn9STJU0ZnTAp-usYmzBjLZnLGeCnvJceMVmUqeCHvJ8eUZiwVlMqj5FEIN5RSIQv-MDliknFWiew4-X2JEEaPPdqBuJZ8RF_HJXQ47d66ZkOWMBBtiWCMLFbaNB4tAduQeeMMhokOr8mcLFy_Bq-Ds5Py3QgmPbPouw35ln6CDZlfB-fXg3Y9Dn5DvuphRYAs3ejTrXT4-4ZL16B5nDxowQR8sptPki_Ls8-L9-nF1fmHxfwirfNMDmlRMFEVALSkLGNNLWrOGtHwvIUcC6zanKMoWg5lxYoKWqw4z4C3eVZVIgfMTpI327jr8brHZqrFg1Frr3vwG-VAq8Mbq1eqcz-UEKwUGYsBXu4CePd9xDCoXkdLjAGLbgyqYBWVkhYRfP4feBMrt7E4xXmZySraG6F0C3VgUGnbupi07jDaCMZZbHU8njOWl7LiRR752R18HA32ur5T8OpAEJkBfw0djCGo8vzikE3vYmtnDHao4j8srg750y1fexeCx_afjYyqqVnV1Kwqlqmkmpo1Kp7tu3_L77ozAi92AIQaTOvB1jrscQUXjNPb1CvdrX5qj1MqDYPXddhb7qX-AyedAUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228359411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sopher, Aviva B ; Thornton, John C ; Wang, Jack ; Pierson, Richard N., Jr ; Heymsfield, Steven B ; Horlick, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Sopher, Aviva B ; Thornton, John C ; Wang, Jack ; Pierson, Richard N., Jr ; Heymsfield, Steven B ; Horlick, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15121943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elk Grove Village, IL: Am Acad Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adipose tissue ; Adipose tissues ; Adolescent ; Analysis ; Anthropometry - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Bone densitometry ; Child ; Childhood obesity ; Children &amp; youth ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Humans ; Male ; Medical procedures ; Medical sciences ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Obesity ; Obesity - diagnosis ; Obesity in children ; Pediatrics ; Risk factors ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2004-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1285-1290</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics May 2004</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-771497aa080131dc4c21d4d26fa6e7e9f62e47f2a89179afe9223a2f639946ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-771497aa080131dc4c21d4d26fa6e7e9f62e47f2a89179afe9223a2f639946ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15724120$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15121943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sopher, Aviva B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Richard N., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horlick, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>Adipose tissues</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Bone densitometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childhood obesity</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Obesity in children</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsJJA4ZGs7dj44IC1LtyC1KkIguFnTZJJ15diLnQD7Q_i_OOyK7qLKB38974zn9STJU0ZnTAp-usYmzBjLZnLGeCnvJceMVmUqeCHvJ8eUZiwVlMqj5FEIN5RSIQv-MDliknFWiew4-X2JEEaPPdqBuJZ8RF_HJXQ47d66ZkOWMBBtiWCMLFbaNB4tAduQeeMMhokOr8mcLFy_Bq-Ds5Py3QgmPbPouw35ln6CDZlfB-fXg3Y9Dn5DvuphRYAs3ejTrXT4-4ZL16B5nDxowQR8sptPki_Ls8-L9-nF1fmHxfwirfNMDmlRMFEVALSkLGNNLWrOGtHwvIUcC6zanKMoWg5lxYoKWqw4z4C3eVZVIgfMTpI327jr8brHZqrFg1Frr3vwG-VAq8Mbq1eqcz-UEKwUGYsBXu4CePd9xDCoXkdLjAGLbgyqYBWVkhYRfP4feBMrt7E4xXmZySraG6F0C3VgUGnbupi07jDaCMZZbHU8njOWl7LiRR752R18HA32ur5T8OpAEJkBfw0djCGo8vzikE3vYmtnDHao4j8srg750y1fexeCx_afjYyqqVnV1Kwqlqmkmpo1Kp7tu3_L77ozAi92AIQaTOvB1jrscQUXjNPb1CvdrX5qj1MqDYPXddhb7qX-AyedAUE</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Sopher, Aviva B</creator><creator>Thornton, John C</creator><creator>Wang, Jack</creator><creator>Pierson, Richard N., Jr</creator><creator>Heymsfield, Steven B</creator><creator>Horlick, Mary</creator><general>Am Acad Pediatrics</general><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model</title><author>Sopher, Aviva B ; Thornton, John C ; Wang, Jack ; Pierson, Richard N., Jr ; Heymsfield, Steven B ; Horlick, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-771497aa080131dc4c21d4d26fa6e7e9f62e47f2a89179afe9223a2f639946ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>Adipose tissues</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Bone densitometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childhood obesity</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Obesity in children</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sopher, Aviva B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Richard N., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horlick, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sopher, Aviva B</au><au>Thornton, John C</au><au>Wang, Jack</au><au>Pierson, Richard N., Jr</au><au>Heymsfield, Steven B</au><au>Horlick, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1285</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1285-1290</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.</abstract><cop>Elk Grove Village, IL</cop><pub>Am Acad Pediatrics</pub><pmid>15121943</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.113.5.1285</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2004-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1285-1290
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4418431
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adipose tissue
Adipose tissues
Adolescent
Analysis
Anthropometry - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Body Composition
Body fat
Bone densitometry
Child
Childhood obesity
Children & youth
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
Humans
Male
Medical procedures
Medical sciences
Molecular and cellular biology
Obesity
Obesity - diagnosis
Obesity in children
Pediatrics
Risk factors
X-rays
title Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A06%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20Percentage%20of%20Body%20Fat%20in%20411%20Children%20and%20Adolescents:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Dual-Energy%20X-Ray%20Absorptiometry%20With%20a%20Four-Compartment%20Model&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Sopher,%20Aviva%20B&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1285&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1285-1290&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.113.5.1285&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA116859276%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228359411&rft_id=info:pmid/15121943&rft_galeid=A116859276&rfr_iscdi=true