Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review

Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic change...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.9-9
Hauptverfasser: Mateo, Sébastien, Roby-Brami, Agnès, Reilly, Karen T, Rossetti, Yves, Collet, Christian, Rode, Gilles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
container_volume 12
creator Mateo, Sébastien
Roby-Brami, Agnès
Reilly, Karen T
Rossetti, Yves
Collet, Christian
Rode, Gilles
description Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic changes during open-chain upper limb reaching, reach-to-grasp, overhead movements, and fast elbow flexion movements after tetraplegia. Using data from MEDLINE between 1966 and December 2014, we examined temporal and spatial kinematic measures and when available electromyographic recordings. We included fifteen control case and three series case studies with a total of 164 SCI participants and 131 healthy control participants. SCI participants efficiently performed a broad range of tasks with their upper limb and movements were planned and executed with strong kinematic invariants like movement endpoint accuracy and minimal cost. Our review revealed that elbow extension without triceps brachii relies on increased scapulothoracic and glenohumeral movements providing a dynamic coupling between shoulder and elbow. Furthermore, contrary to normal grasping patterns where grasping is prepared during the transport phase, reaching and grasping are performed successively after SCI. The prolonged transport phase ensures correct hand placement while the grasping relies on wrist extension eliciting either whole hand or lateral grip. One of the main kinematic characteristics observed after tetraplegia is motor slowing attested by increased movement time. This could be caused by (i) decreased strength, (ii) triceps brachii paralysis which disrupts normal agonist-antagonist co-contractions, (iii) accuracy preservation at movement endpoint, and/or (iv) grasping relying on tenodesis. Another feature is a reduction of maximal superior reaching during overhead movements which could be caused by i) strength deficit in agonist muscles like pectoralis major, ii) strength deficit in proximal synergic muscles responsible for scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint stability, iii) strength deficit in distal synergic muscles preventing the maintenance of elbow extension by shoulder elbow dynamic coupling, iv) shoulder joint ankyloses, and/or v) shoulder pain. Further studies on open chain movements are needed to identify the contribution of each of these factors in order to tailor upper limb rehabilitation programs for SCI individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1743-0003-12-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4417243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541528180</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541528180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe4325102e1bf8fc1b480c127029dbc0c3f4385df4c9dd1cbfa1150fe87087f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctLxDAQxoMorq-rRyl40UM1k6Tb1oOwiC9Y8KLnkKaT3ax9mXRX_O9NWV1UJIcZvvzmwXyEHAO9AMjGl5AKHlNKeQwszrfI3kbY_pGPyL73i5AImohdMmLJmKeMiT0yeek6dFFl6yJ6tQ3WqrfaR8r0QdXoVlarKvKdbULQrSsj2yyW7uMqUpHDlcX3Q7JjVOXx6CsekJe72-ebh3j6dP94M5nGWuTQxwYFZwlQhlCYzGgoREY1sJSyvCw01dwIniWlETovS9CFUQAJNZilNEtNzg_I9bpvtyxqLDU2vVOV7JytlfuQrbLy909j53LWrqQQkDLBQ4PzdYP5n7KHyVQOGgUQPCyxgsCefQ1z7dsSfS9r6zVWlWqwXXoJ4zxlEDYbB_R0jc5UhdI2pg3T9YDLSSIgYRlkNFAX_1DhlVhb3TZobND_K9Cu9d6h2awMVA7Wy8FdObgrgcnhPic_77PBv73mn60WpwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697217086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mateo, Sébastien ; Roby-Brami, Agnès ; Reilly, Karen T ; Rossetti, Yves ; Collet, Christian ; Rode, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Mateo, Sébastien ; Roby-Brami, Agnès ; Reilly, Karen T ; Rossetti, Yves ; Collet, Christian ; Rode, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic changes during open-chain upper limb reaching, reach-to-grasp, overhead movements, and fast elbow flexion movements after tetraplegia. Using data from MEDLINE between 1966 and December 2014, we examined temporal and spatial kinematic measures and when available electromyographic recordings. We included fifteen control case and three series case studies with a total of 164 SCI participants and 131 healthy control participants. SCI participants efficiently performed a broad range of tasks with their upper limb and movements were planned and executed with strong kinematic invariants like movement endpoint accuracy and minimal cost. Our review revealed that elbow extension without triceps brachii relies on increased scapulothoracic and glenohumeral movements providing a dynamic coupling between shoulder and elbow. Furthermore, contrary to normal grasping patterns where grasping is prepared during the transport phase, reaching and grasping are performed successively after SCI. The prolonged transport phase ensures correct hand placement while the grasping relies on wrist extension eliciting either whole hand or lateral grip. One of the main kinematic characteristics observed after tetraplegia is motor slowing attested by increased movement time. This could be caused by (i) decreased strength, (ii) triceps brachii paralysis which disrupts normal agonist-antagonist co-contractions, (iii) accuracy preservation at movement endpoint, and/or (iv) grasping relying on tenodesis. Another feature is a reduction of maximal superior reaching during overhead movements which could be caused by i) strength deficit in agonist muscles like pectoralis major, ii) strength deficit in proximal synergic muscles responsible for scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint stability, iii) strength deficit in distal synergic muscles preventing the maintenance of elbow extension by shoulder elbow dynamic coupling, iv) shoulder joint ankyloses, and/or v) shoulder pain. Further studies on open chain movements are needed to identify the contribution of each of these factors in order to tailor upper limb rehabilitation programs for SCI individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-12-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25637224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Care and treatment ; Case studies ; Cervical Vertebrae - injuries ; Cognitive science ; Complications and side effects ; Hand Strength ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Neuroscience ; Paralysis ; Quadriplegia - physiopathology ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Review ; Risk factors ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.9-9</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Mateo et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe4325102e1bf8fc1b480c127029dbc0c3f4385df4c9dd1cbfa1150fe87087f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe4325102e1bf8fc1b480c127029dbc0c3f4385df4c9dd1cbfa1150fe87087f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6196-7229 ; 0000-0002-6145-6808 ; 0000-0002-2840-1610 ; 0000-0001-8867-4496 ; 0000-0003-4867-4146</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417243/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417243/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25637224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01143438$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mateo, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roby-Brami, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, Karen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collet, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rode, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review</title><title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><description>Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic changes during open-chain upper limb reaching, reach-to-grasp, overhead movements, and fast elbow flexion movements after tetraplegia. Using data from MEDLINE between 1966 and December 2014, we examined temporal and spatial kinematic measures and when available electromyographic recordings. We included fifteen control case and three series case studies with a total of 164 SCI participants and 131 healthy control participants. SCI participants efficiently performed a broad range of tasks with their upper limb and movements were planned and executed with strong kinematic invariants like movement endpoint accuracy and minimal cost. Our review revealed that elbow extension without triceps brachii relies on increased scapulothoracic and glenohumeral movements providing a dynamic coupling between shoulder and elbow. Furthermore, contrary to normal grasping patterns where grasping is prepared during the transport phase, reaching and grasping are performed successively after SCI. The prolonged transport phase ensures correct hand placement while the grasping relies on wrist extension eliciting either whole hand or lateral grip. One of the main kinematic characteristics observed after tetraplegia is motor slowing attested by increased movement time. This could be caused by (i) decreased strength, (ii) triceps brachii paralysis which disrupts normal agonist-antagonist co-contractions, (iii) accuracy preservation at movement endpoint, and/or (iv) grasping relying on tenodesis. Another feature is a reduction of maximal superior reaching during overhead movements which could be caused by i) strength deficit in agonist muscles like pectoralis major, ii) strength deficit in proximal synergic muscles responsible for scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint stability, iii) strength deficit in distal synergic muscles preventing the maintenance of elbow extension by shoulder elbow dynamic coupling, iv) shoulder joint ankyloses, and/or v) shoulder pain. Further studies on open chain movements are needed to identify the contribution of each of these factors in order to tailor upper limb rehabilitation programs for SCI individuals.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><issn>1743-0003</issn><issn>1743-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctLxDAQxoMorq-rRyl40UM1k6Tb1oOwiC9Y8KLnkKaT3ax9mXRX_O9NWV1UJIcZvvzmwXyEHAO9AMjGl5AKHlNKeQwszrfI3kbY_pGPyL73i5AImohdMmLJmKeMiT0yeek6dFFl6yJ6tQ3WqrfaR8r0QdXoVlarKvKdbULQrSsj2yyW7uMqUpHDlcX3Q7JjVOXx6CsekJe72-ebh3j6dP94M5nGWuTQxwYFZwlQhlCYzGgoREY1sJSyvCw01dwIniWlETovS9CFUQAJNZilNEtNzg_I9bpvtyxqLDU2vVOV7JytlfuQrbLy909j53LWrqQQkDLBQ4PzdYP5n7KHyVQOGgUQPCyxgsCefQ1z7dsSfS9r6zVWlWqwXXoJ4zxlEDYbB_R0jc5UhdI2pg3T9YDLSSIgYRlkNFAX_1DhlVhb3TZobND_K9Cu9d6h2awMVA7Wy8FdObgrgcnhPic_77PBv73mn60WpwY</recordid><startdate>20150130</startdate><enddate>20150130</enddate><creator>Mateo, Sébastien</creator><creator>Roby-Brami, Agnès</creator><creator>Reilly, Karen T</creator><creator>Rossetti, Yves</creator><creator>Collet, Christian</creator><creator>Rode, Gilles</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-7229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-6808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-1610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8867-4496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-4146</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150130</creationdate><title>Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review</title><author>Mateo, Sébastien ; Roby-Brami, Agnès ; Reilly, Karen T ; Rossetti, Yves ; Collet, Christian ; Rode, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe4325102e1bf8fc1b480c127029dbc0c3f4385df4c9dd1cbfa1150fe87087f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mateo, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roby-Brami, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, Karen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collet, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rode, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mateo, Sébastien</au><au>Roby-Brami, Agnès</au><au>Reilly, Karen T</au><au>Rossetti, Yves</au><au>Collet, Christian</au><au>Rode, Gilles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-01-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>9-9</pages><issn>1743-0003</issn><eissn>1743-0003</eissn><abstract>Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic changes during open-chain upper limb reaching, reach-to-grasp, overhead movements, and fast elbow flexion movements after tetraplegia. Using data from MEDLINE between 1966 and December 2014, we examined temporal and spatial kinematic measures and when available electromyographic recordings. We included fifteen control case and three series case studies with a total of 164 SCI participants and 131 healthy control participants. SCI participants efficiently performed a broad range of tasks with their upper limb and movements were planned and executed with strong kinematic invariants like movement endpoint accuracy and minimal cost. Our review revealed that elbow extension without triceps brachii relies on increased scapulothoracic and glenohumeral movements providing a dynamic coupling between shoulder and elbow. Furthermore, contrary to normal grasping patterns where grasping is prepared during the transport phase, reaching and grasping are performed successively after SCI. The prolonged transport phase ensures correct hand placement while the grasping relies on wrist extension eliciting either whole hand or lateral grip. One of the main kinematic characteristics observed after tetraplegia is motor slowing attested by increased movement time. This could be caused by (i) decreased strength, (ii) triceps brachii paralysis which disrupts normal agonist-antagonist co-contractions, (iii) accuracy preservation at movement endpoint, and/or (iv) grasping relying on tenodesis. Another feature is a reduction of maximal superior reaching during overhead movements which could be caused by i) strength deficit in agonist muscles like pectoralis major, ii) strength deficit in proximal synergic muscles responsible for scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint stability, iii) strength deficit in distal synergic muscles preventing the maintenance of elbow extension by shoulder elbow dynamic coupling, iv) shoulder joint ankyloses, and/or v) shoulder pain. Further studies on open chain movements are needed to identify the contribution of each of these factors in order to tailor upper limb rehabilitation programs for SCI individuals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25637224</pmid><doi>10.1186/1743-0003-12-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-7229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-6808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-1610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8867-4496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-4146</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-0003
ispartof Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.9-9
issn 1743-0003
1743-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4417243
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Biomechanical Phenomena
Care and treatment
Case studies
Cervical Vertebrae - injuries
Cognitive science
Complications and side effects
Hand Strength
Humans
Kinematics
Neuroscience
Paralysis
Quadriplegia - physiopathology
Range of Motion, Articular
Review
Risk factors
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Upper Extremity - physiopathology
title Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A30%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20limb%20kinematics%20after%20cervical%20spinal%20cord%20injury:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroengineering%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Mateo,%20S%C3%A9bastien&rft.date=2015-01-30&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=9-9&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1743-0003-12-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541528180%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697217086&rft_id=info:pmid/25637224&rft_galeid=A541528180&rfr_iscdi=true