Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis
Patient safety incident (PSI) discovery is an essential component of quality improvement. When submitted, incident reports may provide valuable opportunities for PSI discovery. However, little objective information is available to date to quantify or demonstrate this value. The objective of this inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC emergency medicine 2015-04, Vol.15 (1), p.6-6, Article 6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | BMC emergency medicine |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Reznek, Martin A Kotkowski, Kevin A Arce, Michael W Jepson, Zachary K Bird, Steven B Darling, Chad E |
description | Patient safety incident (PSI) discovery is an essential component of quality improvement. When submitted, incident reports may provide valuable opportunities for PSI discovery. However, little objective information is available to date to quantify or demonstrate this value. The objective of this investigation was to assess how often Emergency Department (ED) incident reports submitted by different sources led to the discovery of PSIs.
A standardized peer review process was implemented to evaluate all incident reports submitted to the ED. Findings of the peer review analysis were recorded prospectively in a quality improvement database. A retrospective analysis of the quality improvement database was performed to calculate the PSI capture rates for incident reports submitted by different source groups.
363 incident reports were analyzed over a period of 18 months; 211 were submitted by healthcare providers (HCPs) and 126 by non-HCPs. PSIs were identified in 108 resulting in an overall capture rate of 31%. HCP-generated reports resulted in a 44% capture rate compared to 10% for non-HCPs (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12873-015-0032-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4404244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541379099</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541379099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-ca9278b4f8876da0274581617697ad97bf2df3d91648293827431ca8cc3dd79f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUUtr3DAQFqUl7x_QSzH0kotTvaxHD4UQ2jQQaA8N5Ca00mirYluuZC_sv6-WTdIEgmA0o-_BiA-h9wRfEKLEp0KokqzFpGsxZrSVb9AR4ZK0lMr7t8_6Q3Rcyh-MiVREH6BD2imFORdHCH7aOcI4N8UGmLdNHF30u9nZaV4yNBnK0s9xXDchp-E_nmFKeS6fG9u4NEw2V58NNGlVIG9qn0bbN7aWbYnlFL0Lti9w9nCfoLtvX39dfW9vf1zfXF3eto4LMbfOairVigelpPAWU8k7RQSRQkvrtVwF6gPzmgiuqGaq4ow4q5xj3ksd2An6svedltUA3tVFs-3NlONg89YkG81LZIy_zTptDOeYU86rwfmDQU5_FyizGWJx0Pd2hLQUQ4TkulNS0kr9uKeubQ8mjiFVR7ejm8uOEyY11rqyLl5h1eNhiC6NEGJ9fyEge4HLqZQM4Wl7gs0udbNP3dTUzS51I6vmw_NvPykeY2b_AD6IqbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674958772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Reznek, Martin A ; Kotkowski, Kevin A ; Arce, Michael W ; Jepson, Zachary K ; Bird, Steven B ; Darling, Chad E</creator><creatorcontrib>Reznek, Martin A ; Kotkowski, Kevin A ; Arce, Michael W ; Jepson, Zachary K ; Bird, Steven B ; Darling, Chad E</creatorcontrib><description>Patient safety incident (PSI) discovery is an essential component of quality improvement. When submitted, incident reports may provide valuable opportunities for PSI discovery. However, little objective information is available to date to quantify or demonstrate this value. The objective of this investigation was to assess how often Emergency Department (ED) incident reports submitted by different sources led to the discovery of PSIs.
A standardized peer review process was implemented to evaluate all incident reports submitted to the ED. Findings of the peer review analysis were recorded prospectively in a quality improvement database. A retrospective analysis of the quality improvement database was performed to calculate the PSI capture rates for incident reports submitted by different source groups.
363 incident reports were analyzed over a period of 18 months; 211 were submitted by healthcare providers (HCPs) and 126 by non-HCPs. PSIs were identified in 108 resulting in an overall capture rate of 31%. HCP-generated reports resulted in a 44% capture rate compared to 10% for non-HCPs (p < 0.001). There was no difference in PSI capture between sub-groups of HCPs and non-HCPs.
HCP-generated ED incident reports were much more likely to capture PSIs than reports submitted by non-HCPs. However, HCP reports still led to PSI discovery less than half the time. Further research is warranted to develop effective strategies to improve the utility of incident reports from both HCPs and non-HCPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-227X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-227X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12873-015-0032-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25880446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Databases, Factual ; Emergency medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Evaluation ; Health care industry ; Humans ; Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Quality control ; Quality Improvement ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>BMC emergency medicine, 2015-04, Vol.15 (1), p.6-6, Article 6</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Reznek et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-ca9278b4f8876da0274581617697ad97bf2df3d91648293827431ca8cc3dd79f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-ca9278b4f8876da0274581617697ad97bf2df3d91648293827431ca8cc3dd79f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404244/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404244/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reznek, Martin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotkowski, Kevin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jepson, Zachary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Chad E</creatorcontrib><title>Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis</title><title>BMC emergency medicine</title><addtitle>BMC Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Patient safety incident (PSI) discovery is an essential component of quality improvement. When submitted, incident reports may provide valuable opportunities for PSI discovery. However, little objective information is available to date to quantify or demonstrate this value. The objective of this investigation was to assess how often Emergency Department (ED) incident reports submitted by different sources led to the discovery of PSIs.
A standardized peer review process was implemented to evaluate all incident reports submitted to the ED. Findings of the peer review analysis were recorded prospectively in a quality improvement database. A retrospective analysis of the quality improvement database was performed to calculate the PSI capture rates for incident reports submitted by different source groups.
363 incident reports were analyzed over a period of 18 months; 211 were submitted by healthcare providers (HCPs) and 126 by non-HCPs. PSIs were identified in 108 resulting in an overall capture rate of 31%. HCP-generated reports resulted in a 44% capture rate compared to 10% for non-HCPs (p < 0.001). There was no difference in PSI capture between sub-groups of HCPs and non-HCPs.
HCP-generated ED incident reports were much more likely to capture PSIs than reports submitted by non-HCPs. However, HCP reports still led to PSI discovery less than half the time. Further research is warranted to develop effective strategies to improve the utility of incident reports from both HCPs and non-HCPs.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Emergency medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1471-227X</issn><issn>1471-227X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptUUtr3DAQFqUl7x_QSzH0kotTvaxHD4UQ2jQQaA8N5Ca00mirYluuZC_sv6-WTdIEgmA0o-_BiA-h9wRfEKLEp0KokqzFpGsxZrSVb9AR4ZK0lMr7t8_6Q3Rcyh-MiVREH6BD2imFORdHCH7aOcI4N8UGmLdNHF30u9nZaV4yNBnK0s9xXDchp-E_nmFKeS6fG9u4NEw2V58NNGlVIG9qn0bbN7aWbYnlFL0Lti9w9nCfoLtvX39dfW9vf1zfXF3eto4LMbfOairVigelpPAWU8k7RQSRQkvrtVwF6gPzmgiuqGaq4ow4q5xj3ksd2An6svedltUA3tVFs-3NlONg89YkG81LZIy_zTptDOeYU86rwfmDQU5_FyizGWJx0Pd2hLQUQ4TkulNS0kr9uKeubQ8mjiFVR7ejm8uOEyY11rqyLl5h1eNhiC6NEGJ9fyEge4HLqZQM4Wl7gs0udbNP3dTUzS51I6vmw_NvPykeY2b_AD6IqbQ</recordid><startdate>20150411</startdate><enddate>20150411</enddate><creator>Reznek, Martin A</creator><creator>Kotkowski, Kevin A</creator><creator>Arce, Michael W</creator><creator>Jepson, Zachary K</creator><creator>Bird, Steven B</creator><creator>Darling, Chad E</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150411</creationdate><title>Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis</title><author>Reznek, Martin A ; Kotkowski, Kevin A ; Arce, Michael W ; Jepson, Zachary K ; Bird, Steven B ; Darling, Chad E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-ca9278b4f8876da0274581617697ad97bf2df3d91648293827431ca8cc3dd79f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Emergency medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reznek, Martin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotkowski, Kevin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jepson, Zachary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Chad E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reznek, Martin A</au><au>Kotkowski, Kevin A</au><au>Arce, Michael W</au><au>Jepson, Zachary K</au><au>Bird, Steven B</au><au>Darling, Chad E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMC emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2015-04-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>6-6</pages><artnum>6</artnum><issn>1471-227X</issn><eissn>1471-227X</eissn><abstract>Patient safety incident (PSI) discovery is an essential component of quality improvement. When submitted, incident reports may provide valuable opportunities for PSI discovery. However, little objective information is available to date to quantify or demonstrate this value. The objective of this investigation was to assess how often Emergency Department (ED) incident reports submitted by different sources led to the discovery of PSIs.
A standardized peer review process was implemented to evaluate all incident reports submitted to the ED. Findings of the peer review analysis were recorded prospectively in a quality improvement database. A retrospective analysis of the quality improvement database was performed to calculate the PSI capture rates for incident reports submitted by different source groups.
363 incident reports were analyzed over a period of 18 months; 211 were submitted by healthcare providers (HCPs) and 126 by non-HCPs. PSIs were identified in 108 resulting in an overall capture rate of 31%. HCP-generated reports resulted in a 44% capture rate compared to 10% for non-HCPs (p < 0.001). There was no difference in PSI capture between sub-groups of HCPs and non-HCPs.
HCP-generated ED incident reports were much more likely to capture PSIs than reports submitted by non-HCPs. However, HCP reports still led to PSI discovery less than half the time. Further research is warranted to develop effective strategies to improve the utility of incident reports from both HCPs and non-HCPs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25880446</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12873-015-0032-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-227X |
ispartof | BMC emergency medicine, 2015-04, Vol.15 (1), p.6-6, Article 6 |
issn | 1471-227X 1471-227X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4404244 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Comparative analysis Databases, Factual Emergency medicine Emergency Service, Hospital - standards Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Evaluation Health care industry Humans Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Quality control Quality Improvement Retrospective Studies |
title | Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20safety%20incident%20capture%20resulting%20from%20incident%20reports:%20a%20comparative%20observational%20analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Reznek,%20Martin%20A&rft.date=2015-04-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=6-6&rft.artnum=6&rft.issn=1471-227X&rft.eissn=1471-227X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12873-015-0032-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541379099%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674958772&rft_id=info:pmid/25880446&rft_galeid=A541379099&rfr_iscdi=true |