A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Visualized Experiments 2014-12 (94) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 94 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of Visualized Experiments |
container_volume | |
creator | Rothrock, Michael J. Hiett, Kelli L. Gamble, John Caudill, Andrew C. Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. Caporaso, J. Gregory |
description | The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3791/52161 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_223</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4396950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253292295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu2zAQRYkiRZMm-YEsAm4KZOOET0ncFHCdJ-DmgbZAdwQlDWsakuiSlFF_QX47SuwE7iqr4QwP71zwInRIySnPFT2TjGb0A9qjSpARKfLfO1vnXfQ5xjkhGSOy-IR2mZSiUFztoccxvl6VwdX4_HaML_6lYKrkfIe_Q5r5GlsfcJoBfuhN45JJbgnYdPVz36XXwThGiLGFLmFv8bdBAYIzDZ74tu07lxxEbINv8b3vmxRW-D74ul_v-WHaRQPxAH20polwuKn76Nflxc_J9Wh6d3UzGU9HlaAyjShIUuUgMptRaiyhRBFecl7KghdElAA1lzxnGQNKFREqt2BKRWwpKKiy4vvo61p30Zct1NXgOZhGL4JrTVhpb5z-_6ZzM_3HL7XgKlOSDAInG4Hg__YQk25drKBpTAe-j5oxyZliTMl3UZoJKljGVT6gX9ZoFXyMAeybI0r0c776Jd-BO962_0a9BjoAR2tg7peg574P3fCdm9dPFoeqkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641426397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><source>Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE</source><creator>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</creator><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-087X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-087X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3791/52161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25548939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MyJove Corporation</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria - genetics ; bacterial communities ; Chickens - microbiology ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; environmental science ; feces ; Feces - chemistry ; Feces - microbiology ; Gram-positive bacteria ; homogenization ; hybrids ; metagenomics ; Metagenomics - methods ; Molecular Biology ; poultry ; Poultry - microbiology ; poultry production ; purification methods ; quantitative polymerase chain reaction ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; ribosomal RNA ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; robots</subject><ispartof>Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2014-12 (94)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014, Journal of Visualized Experiments</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014, Journal of Visualized Experiments 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.jove.com/files/email_thumbs/52161.png</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3830,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3791/52161$$EView_record_in_Journal_of_Visualized_Experiments$$FView_record_in_$$GJournal_of_Visualized_Experiments</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiett, Kelli L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudill, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><title>Journal of Visualized Experiments</title><addtitle>J Vis Exp</addtitle><description>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>environmental science</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>homogenization</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>metagenomics</subject><subject>Metagenomics - methods</subject><subject>Molecular Biology</subject><subject>poultry</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>poultry production</subject><subject>purification methods</subject><subject>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>ribosomal RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>robots</subject><issn>1940-087X</issn><issn>1940-087X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu2zAQRYkiRZMm-YEsAm4KZOOET0ncFHCdJ-DmgbZAdwQlDWsakuiSlFF_QX47SuwE7iqr4QwP71zwInRIySnPFT2TjGb0A9qjSpARKfLfO1vnXfQ5xjkhGSOy-IR2mZSiUFztoccxvl6VwdX4_HaML_6lYKrkfIe_Q5r5GlsfcJoBfuhN45JJbgnYdPVz36XXwThGiLGFLmFv8bdBAYIzDZ74tu07lxxEbINv8b3vmxRW-D74ul_v-WHaRQPxAH20polwuKn76Nflxc_J9Wh6d3UzGU9HlaAyjShIUuUgMptRaiyhRBFecl7KghdElAA1lzxnGQNKFREqt2BKRWwpKKiy4vvo61p30Zct1NXgOZhGL4JrTVhpb5z-_6ZzM_3HL7XgKlOSDAInG4Hg__YQk25drKBpTAe-j5oxyZliTMl3UZoJKljGVT6gX9ZoFXyMAeybI0r0c776Jd-BO962_0a9BjoAR2tg7peg574P3fCdm9dPFoeqkg</recordid><startdate>20141210</startdate><enddate>20141210</enddate><creator>Rothrock, Michael J.</creator><creator>Hiett, Kelli L.</creator><creator>Gamble, John</creator><creator>Caudill, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creator><creator>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creator><general>MyJove Corporation</general><scope>ALOKQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141210</creationdate><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><author>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>environmental science</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>homogenization</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>metagenomics</topic><topic>Metagenomics - methods</topic><topic>Molecular Biology</topic><topic>poultry</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>poultry production</topic><topic>purification methods</topic><topic>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>ribosomal RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiett, Kelli L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudill, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><collection>JoVE Journal: Biology</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Visualized Experiments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rothrock, Michael J.</au><au>Hiett, Kelli L.</au><au>Gamble, John</au><au>Caudill, Andrew C.</au><au>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</au><au>Caporaso, J. Gregory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Visualized Experiments</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis Exp</addtitle><date>2014-12-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><issue>94</issue><issn>1940-087X</issn><eissn>1940-087X</eissn><abstract>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MyJove Corporation</pub><pmid>25548939</pmid><doi>10.3791/52161</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-087X |
ispartof | Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2014-12 (94) |
issn | 1940-087X 1940-087X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4396950 |
source | Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE |
subjects | Animals Bacteria - genetics bacterial communities Chickens - microbiology DNA DNA, Bacterial - genetics DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification environmental science feces Feces - chemistry Feces - microbiology Gram-positive bacteria homogenization hybrids metagenomics Metagenomics - methods Molecular Biology poultry Poultry - microbiology poultry production purification methods quantitative polymerase chain reaction Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ribosomal RNA RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics robots |
title | A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_223&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Hybrid%20DNA%20Extraction%20Method%20for%20the%20Qualitative%20and%20Quantitative%20Assessment%20of%20Bacterial%20Communities%20from%20Poultry%20Production%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Visualized%20Experiments&rft.au=Rothrock,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2014-12-10&rft.issue=94&rft.issn=1940-087X&rft.eissn=1940-087X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3791/52161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_223%3E2253292295%3C/proquest_223%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641426397&rft_id=info:pmid/25548939&rfr_iscdi=true |