A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Visualized Experiments 2014-12 (94)
Hauptverfasser: Rothrock, Michael J., Hiett, Kelli L., Gamble, John, Caudill, Andrew C., Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M., Caporaso, J. Gregory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 94
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Visualized Experiments
container_volume
creator Rothrock, Michael J.
Hiett, Kelli L.
Gamble, John
Caudill, Andrew C.
Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.
Caporaso, J. Gregory
description The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.
doi_str_mv 10.3791/52161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_223</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4396950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253292295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu2zAQRYkiRZMm-YEsAm4KZOOET0ncFHCdJ-DmgbZAdwQlDWsakuiSlFF_QX47SuwE7iqr4QwP71zwInRIySnPFT2TjGb0A9qjSpARKfLfO1vnXfQ5xjkhGSOy-IR2mZSiUFztoccxvl6VwdX4_HaML_6lYKrkfIe_Q5r5GlsfcJoBfuhN45JJbgnYdPVz36XXwThGiLGFLmFv8bdBAYIzDZ74tu07lxxEbINv8b3vmxRW-D74ul_v-WHaRQPxAH20polwuKn76Nflxc_J9Wh6d3UzGU9HlaAyjShIUuUgMptRaiyhRBFecl7KghdElAA1lzxnGQNKFREqt2BKRWwpKKiy4vvo61p30Zct1NXgOZhGL4JrTVhpb5z-_6ZzM_3HL7XgKlOSDAInG4Hg__YQk25drKBpTAe-j5oxyZliTMl3UZoJKljGVT6gX9ZoFXyMAeybI0r0c776Jd-BO962_0a9BjoAR2tg7peg574P3fCdm9dPFoeqkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641426397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><source>Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE</source><creator>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</creator><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-087X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-087X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3791/52161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25548939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MyJove Corporation</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria - genetics ; bacterial communities ; Chickens - microbiology ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification ; environmental science ; feces ; Feces - chemistry ; Feces - microbiology ; Gram-positive bacteria ; homogenization ; hybrids ; metagenomics ; Metagenomics - methods ; Molecular Biology ; poultry ; Poultry - microbiology ; poultry production ; purification methods ; quantitative polymerase chain reaction ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; ribosomal RNA ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; robots</subject><ispartof>Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2014-12 (94)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014, Journal of Visualized Experiments</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014, Journal of Visualized Experiments 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.jove.com/files/email_thumbs/52161.png</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3830,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3791/52161$$EView_record_in_Journal_of_Visualized_Experiments$$FView_record_in_$$GJournal_of_Visualized_Experiments</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiett, Kelli L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudill, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><title>Journal of Visualized Experiments</title><addtitle>J Vis Exp</addtitle><description>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>environmental science</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>homogenization</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>metagenomics</subject><subject>Metagenomics - methods</subject><subject>Molecular Biology</subject><subject>poultry</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>poultry production</subject><subject>purification methods</subject><subject>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>ribosomal RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>robots</subject><issn>1940-087X</issn><issn>1940-087X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu2zAQRYkiRZMm-YEsAm4KZOOET0ncFHCdJ-DmgbZAdwQlDWsakuiSlFF_QX47SuwE7iqr4QwP71zwInRIySnPFT2TjGb0A9qjSpARKfLfO1vnXfQ5xjkhGSOy-IR2mZSiUFztoccxvl6VwdX4_HaML_6lYKrkfIe_Q5r5GlsfcJoBfuhN45JJbgnYdPVz36XXwThGiLGFLmFv8bdBAYIzDZ74tu07lxxEbINv8b3vmxRW-D74ul_v-WHaRQPxAH20polwuKn76Nflxc_J9Wh6d3UzGU9HlaAyjShIUuUgMptRaiyhRBFecl7KghdElAA1lzxnGQNKFREqt2BKRWwpKKiy4vvo61p30Zct1NXgOZhGL4JrTVhpb5z-_6ZzM_3HL7XgKlOSDAInG4Hg__YQk25drKBpTAe-j5oxyZliTMl3UZoJKljGVT6gX9ZoFXyMAeybI0r0c776Jd-BO962_0a9BjoAR2tg7peg574P3fCdm9dPFoeqkg</recordid><startdate>20141210</startdate><enddate>20141210</enddate><creator>Rothrock, Michael J.</creator><creator>Hiett, Kelli L.</creator><creator>Gamble, John</creator><creator>Caudill, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creator><creator>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creator><general>MyJove Corporation</general><scope>ALOKQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141210</creationdate><title>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</title><author>Rothrock, Michael J. ; Hiett, Kelli L. ; Gamble, John ; Caudill, Andrew C. ; Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M. ; Caporaso, J. Gregory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-1e50c7e46f611af010903b33b583804beed3537262e1190497feab90fb41e9bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>environmental science</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>homogenization</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>metagenomics</topic><topic>Metagenomics - methods</topic><topic>Molecular Biology</topic><topic>poultry</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>poultry production</topic><topic>purification methods</topic><topic>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>ribosomal RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rothrock, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiett, Kelli L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudill, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporaso, J. Gregory</creatorcontrib><collection>JoVE Journal: Biology</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Visualized Experiments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rothrock, Michael J.</au><au>Hiett, Kelli L.</au><au>Gamble, John</au><au>Caudill, Andrew C.</au><au>Cicconi-Hogan, Kellie M.</au><au>Caporaso, J. Gregory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Visualized Experiments</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis Exp</addtitle><date>2014-12-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><issue>94</issue><issn>1940-087X</issn><eissn>1940-087X</eissn><abstract>The efficacy of DNA extraction protocols can be highly dependent upon both the type of sample being investigated and the types of downstream analyses performed. Considering that the use of new bacterial community analysis techniques (e.g., microbiomics, metagenomics) is becoming more prevalent in the agricultural and environmental sciences and many environmental samples within these disciplines can be physiochemically and microbiologically unique (e.g., fecal and litter/bedding samples from the poultry production spectrum), appropriate and effective DNA extraction methods need to be carefully chosen. Therefore, a novel semi-automated hybrid DNA extraction method was developed specifically for use with environmental poultry production samples. This method is a combination of the two major types of DNA extraction: mechanical and enzymatic. A two-step intense mechanical homogenization step (using bead-beating specifically formulated for environmental samples) was added to the beginning of the “gold standard” enzymatic DNA extraction method for fecal samples to enhance the removal of bacteria and DNA from the sample matrix and improve the recovery of Gram-positive bacterial community members. Once the enzymatic extraction portion of the hybrid method was initiated, the remaining purification process was automated using a robotic workstation to increase sample throughput and decrease sample processing error. In comparison to the strict mechanical and enzymatic DNA extraction methods, this novel hybrid method provided the best overall combined performance when considering quantitative (using 16S rRNA qPCR) and qualitative (using microbiomics) estimates of the total bacterial communities when processing poultry feces and litter samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MyJove Corporation</pub><pmid>25548939</pmid><doi>10.3791/52161</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1940-087X
ispartof Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2014-12 (94)
issn 1940-087X
1940-087X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4396950
source Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE
subjects Animals
Bacteria - genetics
bacterial communities
Chickens - microbiology
DNA
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification
environmental science
feces
Feces - chemistry
Feces - microbiology
Gram-positive bacteria
homogenization
hybrids
metagenomics
Metagenomics - methods
Molecular Biology
poultry
Poultry - microbiology
poultry production
purification methods
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
ribosomal RNA
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
robots
title A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_223&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Hybrid%20DNA%20Extraction%20Method%20for%20the%20Qualitative%20and%20Quantitative%20Assessment%20of%20Bacterial%20Communities%20from%20Poultry%20Production%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Visualized%20Experiments&rft.au=Rothrock,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2014-12-10&rft.issue=94&rft.issn=1940-087X&rft.eissn=1940-087X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3791/52161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_223%3E2253292295%3C/proquest_223%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641426397&rft_id=info:pmid/25548939&rfr_iscdi=true