Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men. This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of sexual medicine 2015-04, Vol.12 (4), p.975-984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 984 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 975 |
container_title | Journal of sexual medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Pastuszak, Alexander W. Hyman, Daniel A. Yadav, Naveen Godoy, Guilherme Lipshultz, Larry I. Araujo, Andre B. Khera, Mohit |
description | Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.
The known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.
Acute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.
The relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.
Screening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost‐effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED. Pastuszak AW, Hyman DA, Yadav N, Godoy G, Lipshultz LI, Araujo AB, and Khera M. Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: A cost analysis. J Sex Med 2015;12:975–984. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jsm.12848 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4390459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743609515309851</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671220633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4598-5a7fd1f251d136379d161f7a6ca962aae741613cadf1bb33d01138633d744eb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EoqVw4A8gH-GQ1l7vJwekKC1tUSsOLWdrYs8Gl43derJB-fdMSFOBBHPxaPzMO6N5hXir1bHmOLmj5bEu2rJ9Jg51U5pJrVX3fJ-rrjoQr4julDIcxUtxUFRN0XaqPBSLs4xuFQaUpxvqx8h5ihJIgryG_AOz7FOWM8g-pDWQGwfI8jQQAnFLgEVMFJiOXl7GFeY1xq3CRzmVs0QrOY0wbJh4LV70MBC-eXyPxLfPZ7ezi8nV1_PL2fRq4sqqaycVNL3XfVFpr01tms7rWvcN1A66ugDApuSCceB7PZ8b45XWpq05acoSuXAkPu1078f5Er3jdTIM9j6HJeSNTRDs3z8xfLeLtLal4XtUHQu8fxTI6WFEWtllIIfDABHTSFbXjS4KxSMZ_bBDXU5EGfunMVrZrTGWjbG_jWH23Z97PZF7Jxg42QE_2YzN_5Xsl5vrvaTZdSDfcx0wW3IBo0Mftp5an8I_FvkFdhqqzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671220633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Pastuszak, Alexander W. ; Hyman, Daniel A. ; Yadav, Naveen ; Godoy, Guilherme ; Lipshultz, Larry I. ; Araujo, Andre B. ; Khera, Mohit</creator><creatorcontrib>Pastuszak, Alexander W. ; Hyman, Daniel A. ; Yadav, Naveen ; Godoy, Guilherme ; Lipshultz, Larry I. ; Araujo, Andre B. ; Khera, Mohit</creatorcontrib><description>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.
The known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.
Acute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.
The relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.
Screening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost‐effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED. Pastuszak AW, Hyman DA, Yadav N, Godoy G, Lipshultz LI, Araujo AB, and Khera M. Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: A cost analysis. J Sex Med 2015;12:975–984.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-6109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25728904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Blood Pressure ; Cardiovascular Disease ; Cardiovascular Disease Treatment ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular Risk Factors ; Cost Analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Erectile Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Erectile Dysfunction Treatment ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lipids - blood ; Male ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of sexual medicine, 2015-04, Vol.12 (4), p.975-984</ispartof><rights>2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4598-5a7fd1f251d136379d161f7a6ca962aae741613cadf1bb33d01138633d744eb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4598-5a7fd1f251d136379d161f7a6ca962aae741613cadf1bb33d01138633d744eb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjsm.12848$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjsm.12848$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pastuszak, Alexander W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyman, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipshultz, Larry I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Andre B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khera, Mohit</creatorcontrib><title>Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis</title><title>Journal of sexual medicine</title><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><description>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.
The known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.
Acute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.
The relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.
Screening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost‐effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED. Pastuszak AW, Hyman DA, Yadav N, Godoy G, Lipshultz LI, Araujo AB, and Khera M. Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: A cost analysis. J Sex Med 2015;12:975–984.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Disease Treatment</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Risk Factors</subject><subject>Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction Treatment</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lipids - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1743-6095</issn><issn>1743-6109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EoqVw4A8gH-GQ1l7vJwekKC1tUSsOLWdrYs8Gl43derJB-fdMSFOBBHPxaPzMO6N5hXir1bHmOLmj5bEu2rJ9Jg51U5pJrVX3fJ-rrjoQr4julDIcxUtxUFRN0XaqPBSLs4xuFQaUpxvqx8h5ihJIgryG_AOz7FOWM8g-pDWQGwfI8jQQAnFLgEVMFJiOXl7GFeY1xq3CRzmVs0QrOY0wbJh4LV70MBC-eXyPxLfPZ7ezi8nV1_PL2fRq4sqqaycVNL3XfVFpr01tms7rWvcN1A66ugDApuSCceB7PZ8b45XWpq05acoSuXAkPu1078f5Er3jdTIM9j6HJeSNTRDs3z8xfLeLtLal4XtUHQu8fxTI6WFEWtllIIfDABHTSFbXjS4KxSMZ_bBDXU5EGfunMVrZrTGWjbG_jWH23Z97PZF7Jxg42QE_2YzN_5Xsl5vrvaTZdSDfcx0wW3IBo0Mftp5an8I_FvkFdhqqzw</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Pastuszak, Alexander W.</creator><creator>Hyman, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Yadav, Naveen</creator><creator>Godoy, Guilherme</creator><creator>Lipshultz, Larry I.</creator><creator>Araujo, Andre B.</creator><creator>Khera, Mohit</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis</title><author>Pastuszak, Alexander W. ; Hyman, Daniel A. ; Yadav, Naveen ; Godoy, Guilherme ; Lipshultz, Larry I. ; Araujo, Andre B. ; Khera, Mohit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4598-5a7fd1f251d136379d161f7a6ca962aae741613cadf1bb33d01138633d744eb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Disease Treatment</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Risk Factors</topic><topic>Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction Treatment</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lipids - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pastuszak, Alexander W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyman, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipshultz, Larry I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Andre B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khera, Mohit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pastuszak, Alexander W.</au><au>Hyman, Daniel A.</au><au>Yadav, Naveen</au><au>Godoy, Guilherme</au><au>Lipshultz, Larry I.</au><au>Araujo, Andre B.</au><au>Khera, Mohit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>975-984</pages><issn>1743-6095</issn><eissn>1743-6109</eissn><abstract>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.
The known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.
Acute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.
The relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.
Screening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost‐effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED. Pastuszak AW, Hyman DA, Yadav N, Godoy G, Lipshultz LI, Araujo AB, and Khera M. Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: A cost analysis. J Sex Med 2015;12:975–984.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25728904</pmid><doi>10.1111/jsm.12848</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1743-6095 |
ispartof | Journal of sexual medicine, 2015-04, Vol.12 (4), p.975-984 |
issn | 1743-6095 1743-6109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4390459 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Biomarkers Blood Pressure Cardiovascular Disease Cardiovascular Disease Treatment Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology Cardiovascular Risk Factors Cost Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Erectile Dysfunction Erectile Dysfunction - epidemiology Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Glycated Hemoglobin A Humans Incidence Lipids - blood Male Mass Screening - economics Mass Screening - methods Middle Aged Prevalence Risk Factors |
title | Erectile Dysfunction as a Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Intervention: A Cost Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Erectile%20Dysfunction%20as%20a%20Marker%20for%20Cardiovascular%20Disease%20Diagnosis%20and%20Intervention:%20A%20Cost%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sexual%20medicine&rft.au=Pastuszak,%20Alexander%20W.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=975-984&rft.issn=1743-6095&rft.eissn=1743-6109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jsm.12848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1671220633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671220633&rft_id=info:pmid/25728904&rft_els_id=S1743609515309851&rfr_iscdi=true |