Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis

During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC evolutionary biology 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.38-38, Article 38
Hauptverfasser: Arthur, Nicholas J, Dyer, Kelly A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title BMC evolutionary biology
container_volume 15
creator Arthur, Nicholas J
Dyer, Kelly A
description During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here we focus on Drosophila suboccidentalis and D. occidentalis, which are closely related mushroom-feeding species that inhabit western North America and are not known to overlap in geographic range. We investigate patterns of reproductive isolation between these species, including premating, postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic barriers to gene flow. Using flies that originate from a single population of each species, we find that the strength of premating sexual isolation between these species is asymmetric: while D. occidentalis females mate with D. suboccidentalis males at a reduced but moderate rate, D. suboccidentalis females discriminate strongly against mating with D. occidentalis males. Female hybrids will mate at high rates with males of either species, indicating that this discrimination has a recessive genetic basis. Hybrid males are accepted by females of both species. We do not find evidence for postmating prezygotic or postzygotic isolating barriers, as females use the sperm of heterospecific males and both male and female hybrids are fully fertile. Premating isolation is substantial but incomplete, and appears to be the primary form of reproductive isolation between these species. If these species do hybridize, the lack of postzygotic barriers may allow for gene flow between them. Given that these species are recently diverged and are not known to be sympatric, the level of premating isolation is relatively strong given the lack of intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Further work is necessary to characterize the geographic and genetic variation in reproductive isolating barriers, as well as to determine the factors that drive reproductive isolation and the consequences that isolating barriers as well as geographic isolation have had on patterns of gene flow between these species.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12862-015-0328-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4369358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541361845</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541361845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b631t-f306a9307b01393afbbbad2a8c1b559567e6a27c649f94662fa21f671fd08b563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1TAURSMEoqXwAUyQJSYwSMmxEyeZIF21PCpVQuIxtmzn5F4jJw6xU5r_4IPxVUqVSEUe2Dp7ne3HdpK8hOwcoOLvPNCK0zSDIs0YrdL5UXIKeQkphbx6vFqfJM-8_5llUFYUniYntKgqAF6eJn92fu46DKPR0hKPt1OcjHdWBuN6oqZAekcG50MXK_1-rWH4jdiTcECirfNoZzJiFLEhfkBt0JPL0Xk3HIyVxE_KaW0a7IO0xhPZN2t5rT1PnrTSenxxN58lPz5--H7xOb3-8unqYnedKs4gpC3LuKxZVqoMWM1kq5SSDZWVBlUUdcFL5JKWmud1W-ec01ZSaHkJbZNVquDsLHm_-A6T6rDRcftRWjGMppPjLJw0Yqv05iD27kbkjNesqKLB5WKgjPuPwVbRrhNLaiKmJo6piTnavLk7x-h-TeiD6IzXaK3s0U1exKRyGrPLi4i-XtC9tChM37roq4-42BU5MA4Ldf4AFUeDndGux9bE-qbh7aYhMgFvw15O3ourb1-3LCysjun5Edv7-0Imjv_ywRu-Wr_0fce_j8j-Aryp4sY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674217845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arthur, Nicholas J ; Dyer, Kelly A</creator><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Nicholas J ; Dyer, Kelly A</creatorcontrib><description>During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here we focus on Drosophila suboccidentalis and D. occidentalis, which are closely related mushroom-feeding species that inhabit western North America and are not known to overlap in geographic range. We investigate patterns of reproductive isolation between these species, including premating, postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic barriers to gene flow. Using flies that originate from a single population of each species, we find that the strength of premating sexual isolation between these species is asymmetric: while D. occidentalis females mate with D. suboccidentalis males at a reduced but moderate rate, D. suboccidentalis females discriminate strongly against mating with D. occidentalis males. Female hybrids will mate at high rates with males of either species, indicating that this discrimination has a recessive genetic basis. Hybrid males are accepted by females of both species. We do not find evidence for postmating prezygotic or postzygotic isolating barriers, as females use the sperm of heterospecific males and both male and female hybrids are fully fertile. Premating isolation is substantial but incomplete, and appears to be the primary form of reproductive isolation between these species. If these species do hybridize, the lack of postzygotic barriers may allow for gene flow between them. Given that these species are recently diverged and are not known to be sympatric, the level of premating isolation is relatively strong given the lack of intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Further work is necessary to characterize the geographic and genetic variation in reproductive isolating barriers, as well as to determine the factors that drive reproductive isolation and the consequences that isolating barriers as well as geographic isolation have had on patterns of gene flow between these species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0328-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25881167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Drosophila - classification ; Drosophila - genetics ; Drosophila - physiology ; Female ; Gene Flow ; Genetic Variation ; Hybridization, Genetic ; Male ; North America ; Reproductive Isolation ; Sexual Behavior, Animal ; Species Specificity ; Spermatozoa</subject><ispartof>BMC evolutionary biology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.38-38, Article 38</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Arthur and Dyer; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b631t-f306a9307b01393afbbbad2a8c1b559567e6a27c649f94662fa21f671fd08b563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b631t-f306a9307b01393afbbbad2a8c1b559567e6a27c649f94662fa21f671fd08b563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369358/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369358/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Kelly A</creatorcontrib><title>Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis</title><title>BMC evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>BMC Evol Biol</addtitle><description>During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here we focus on Drosophila suboccidentalis and D. occidentalis, which are closely related mushroom-feeding species that inhabit western North America and are not known to overlap in geographic range. We investigate patterns of reproductive isolation between these species, including premating, postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic barriers to gene flow. Using flies that originate from a single population of each species, we find that the strength of premating sexual isolation between these species is asymmetric: while D. occidentalis females mate with D. suboccidentalis males at a reduced but moderate rate, D. suboccidentalis females discriminate strongly against mating with D. occidentalis males. Female hybrids will mate at high rates with males of either species, indicating that this discrimination has a recessive genetic basis. Hybrid males are accepted by females of both species. We do not find evidence for postmating prezygotic or postzygotic isolating barriers, as females use the sperm of heterospecific males and both male and female hybrids are fully fertile. Premating isolation is substantial but incomplete, and appears to be the primary form of reproductive isolation between these species. If these species do hybridize, the lack of postzygotic barriers may allow for gene flow between them. Given that these species are recently diverged and are not known to be sympatric, the level of premating isolation is relatively strong given the lack of intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Further work is necessary to characterize the geographic and genetic variation in reproductive isolating barriers, as well as to determine the factors that drive reproductive isolation and the consequences that isolating barriers as well as geographic isolation have had on patterns of gene flow between these species.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Drosophila - classification</subject><subject>Drosophila - genetics</subject><subject>Drosophila - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Flow</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Reproductive Isolation</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><issn>1471-2148</issn><issn>1471-2148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1TAURSMEoqXwAUyQJSYwSMmxEyeZIF21PCpVQuIxtmzn5F4jJw6xU5r_4IPxVUqVSEUe2Dp7ne3HdpK8hOwcoOLvPNCK0zSDIs0YrdL5UXIKeQkphbx6vFqfJM-8_5llUFYUniYntKgqAF6eJn92fu46DKPR0hKPt1OcjHdWBuN6oqZAekcG50MXK_1-rWH4jdiTcECirfNoZzJiFLEhfkBt0JPL0Xk3HIyVxE_KaW0a7IO0xhPZN2t5rT1PnrTSenxxN58lPz5--H7xOb3-8unqYnedKs4gpC3LuKxZVqoMWM1kq5SSDZWVBlUUdcFL5JKWmud1W-ec01ZSaHkJbZNVquDsLHm_-A6T6rDRcftRWjGMppPjLJw0Yqv05iD27kbkjNesqKLB5WKgjPuPwVbRrhNLaiKmJo6piTnavLk7x-h-TeiD6IzXaK3s0U1exKRyGrPLi4i-XtC9tChM37roq4-42BU5MA4Ldf4AFUeDndGux9bE-qbh7aYhMgFvw15O3ourb1-3LCysjun5Edv7-0Imjv_ywRu-Wr_0fce_j8j-Aryp4sY</recordid><startdate>20150312</startdate><enddate>20150312</enddate><creator>Arthur, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Dyer, Kelly A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150312</creationdate><title>Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis</title><author>Arthur, Nicholas J ; Dyer, Kelly A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b631t-f306a9307b01393afbbbad2a8c1b559567e6a27c649f94662fa21f671fd08b563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Drosophila - classification</topic><topic>Drosophila - genetics</topic><topic>Drosophila - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Flow</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Reproductive Isolation</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Kelly A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arthur, Nicholas J</au><au>Dyer, Kelly A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis</atitle><jtitle>BMC evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2015-03-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>38-38</pages><artnum>38</artnum><issn>1471-2148</issn><eissn>1471-2148</eissn><abstract>During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here we focus on Drosophila suboccidentalis and D. occidentalis, which are closely related mushroom-feeding species that inhabit western North America and are not known to overlap in geographic range. We investigate patterns of reproductive isolation between these species, including premating, postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic barriers to gene flow. Using flies that originate from a single population of each species, we find that the strength of premating sexual isolation between these species is asymmetric: while D. occidentalis females mate with D. suboccidentalis males at a reduced but moderate rate, D. suboccidentalis females discriminate strongly against mating with D. occidentalis males. Female hybrids will mate at high rates with males of either species, indicating that this discrimination has a recessive genetic basis. Hybrid males are accepted by females of both species. We do not find evidence for postmating prezygotic or postzygotic isolating barriers, as females use the sperm of heterospecific males and both male and female hybrids are fully fertile. Premating isolation is substantial but incomplete, and appears to be the primary form of reproductive isolation between these species. If these species do hybridize, the lack of postzygotic barriers may allow for gene flow between them. Given that these species are recently diverged and are not known to be sympatric, the level of premating isolation is relatively strong given the lack of intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Further work is necessary to characterize the geographic and genetic variation in reproductive isolating barriers, as well as to determine the factors that drive reproductive isolation and the consequences that isolating barriers as well as geographic isolation have had on patterns of gene flow between these species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25881167</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12862-015-0328-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2148
ispartof BMC evolutionary biology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.38-38, Article 38
issn 1471-2148
1471-2148
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4369358
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Drosophila - classification
Drosophila - genetics
Drosophila - physiology
Female
Gene Flow
Genetic Variation
Hybridization, Genetic
Male
North America
Reproductive Isolation
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Species Specificity
Spermatozoa
title Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A43%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymmetrical%20sexual%20isolation%20but%20no%20postmating%20isolation%20between%20the%20closely%20related%20species%20Drosophila%20suboccidentalis%20and%20Drosophila%20occidentalis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Arthur,%20Nicholas%20J&rft.date=2015-03-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=38-38&rft.artnum=38&rft.issn=1471-2148&rft.eissn=1471-2148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12862-015-0328-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541361845%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674217845&rft_id=info:pmid/25881167&rft_galeid=A541361845&rfr_iscdi=true