Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction

The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A ret...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC urology 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16
Hauptverfasser: Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter, Anheuser, Petra, Schmidt, Stefan, Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin, Pichlmeier, Uwe, Schriefer, Philipp, Matthies, Cord, Hartmann, Michael, Ruf, Christian G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title BMC urology
container_volume 15
creator Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter
Anheuser, Petra
Schmidt, Stefan
Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Schriefer, Philipp
Matthies, Cord
Hartmann, Michael
Ruf, Christian G
description The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4363351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541430611</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541430611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rFTEUhoNYbG39AW4k4MbNtCefM9kIpfgFBTftOuQmZ3ojczNjkqv4781w29qCZHFykud9OYeXkLcMzhkb9EVhfDCyA6Y6AAYdvCAnTPas49LAyyf3Y_K6lB-N6QelX5FjroahV4qfEH-DpUa_n1ymS55L3WLBQmOii6sRUy30d6xbWv9h3iWPmXbUeY9LXTuaXUXqUnhQ0dJqGZ2vcU5n5Gh0U8E39_WU3H7-dHP1tbv-_uXb1eV154XRteO99CjByNBrDVrzIAI3g-8ZcwrEJkjt5YYbBwNnQatgwKlB9CGMmxG5Eafk48F32W92GHybI7vJLjnuXP5jZxft858Ut_Zu_mWl0EIo1gw-3Bvk-ee-bWx3sXicJpdw3hfLdC-1AQPQ0PcH9M5NaGMa5-boV9xeKsmkAM1Ww_P_UO0E3EU_Jxxje38mYAeBb1mUjOPj9Azsmrk9ZG5b5nbN3K6jvHu69qPiIWTxFw2-p9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674690900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</creator><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><description>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25887552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Distribution ; Analysis ; Body Image - psychology ; Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Germany - epidemiology ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery ; Orchiectomy - psychology ; Orchiectomy - rehabilitation ; Orchiectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevalence ; Prostheses and Implants - psychology ; Prostheses and Implants - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sexual Partners - psychology ; Testicular cancer ; Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Testicular Neoplasms - psychology ; Testicular Neoplasms - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC urology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Dieckmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anheuser, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriefer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Cord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><title>BMC urology</title><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><description>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - psychology</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - psychology</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sexual Partners - psychology</subject><subject>Testicular cancer</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2490</issn><issn>1471-2490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rFTEUhoNYbG39AW4k4MbNtCefM9kIpfgFBTftOuQmZ3ojczNjkqv4781w29qCZHFykud9OYeXkLcMzhkb9EVhfDCyA6Y6AAYdvCAnTPas49LAyyf3Y_K6lB-N6QelX5FjroahV4qfEH-DpUa_n1ymS55L3WLBQmOii6sRUy30d6xbWv9h3iWPmXbUeY9LXTuaXUXqUnhQ0dJqGZ2vcU5n5Gh0U8E39_WU3H7-dHP1tbv-_uXb1eV154XRteO99CjByNBrDVrzIAI3g-8ZcwrEJkjt5YYbBwNnQatgwKlB9CGMmxG5Eafk48F32W92GHybI7vJLjnuXP5jZxft858Ut_Zu_mWl0EIo1gw-3Bvk-ee-bWx3sXicJpdw3hfLdC-1AQPQ0PcH9M5NaGMa5-boV9xeKsmkAM1Ww_P_UO0E3EU_Jxxje38mYAeBb1mUjOPj9Azsmrk9ZG5b5nbN3K6jvHu69qPiIWTxFw2-p9o</recordid><startdate>20150313</startdate><enddate>20150313</enddate><creator>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creator><creator>Anheuser, Petra</creator><creator>Schmidt, Stefan</creator><creator>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creator><creator>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creator><creator>Schriefer, Philipp</creator><creator>Matthies, Cord</creator><creator>Hartmann, Michael</creator><creator>Ruf, Christian G</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150313</creationdate><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><author>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - psychology</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - psychology</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sexual Partners - psychology</topic><topic>Testicular cancer</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anheuser, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriefer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Cord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</au><au>Anheuser, Petra</au><au>Schmidt, Stefan</au><au>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</au><au>Pichlmeier, Uwe</au><au>Schriefer, Philipp</au><au>Matthies, Cord</au><au>Hartmann, Michael</au><au>Ruf, Christian G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><date>2015-03-13</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><artnum>16</artnum><issn>1471-2490</issn><eissn>1471-2490</eissn><abstract>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25887552</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2490
ispartof BMC urology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16
issn 1471-2490
1471-2490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4363351
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Age Distribution
Analysis
Body Image - psychology
Care and treatment
Diagnosis
Germany - epidemiology
Health aspects
Humans
Male
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery
Orchiectomy - psychology
Orchiectomy - rehabilitation
Orchiectomy - statistics & numerical data
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Patient satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Prostheses and Implants - psychology
Prostheses and Implants - statistics & numerical data
Quality of Life - psychology
Retrospective Studies
Sexual Partners - psychology
Testicular cancer
Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology
Testicular Neoplasms - psychology
Testicular Neoplasms - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A58%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testicular%20prostheses%20in%20patients%20with%20testicular%20cancer%20-%20acceptance%20rate%20and%20patient%20satisfaction&rft.jtitle=BMC%20urology&rft.au=Dieckmann,%20Klaus-Peter&rft.date=2015-03-13&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.artnum=16&rft.issn=1471-2490&rft.eissn=1471-2490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541430611%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674690900&rft_id=info:pmid/25887552&rft_galeid=A541430611&rfr_iscdi=true