Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. A ret...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC urology 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | BMC urology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter Anheuser, Petra Schmidt, Stefan Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin Pichlmeier, Uwe Schriefer, Philipp Matthies, Cord Hartmann, Michael Ruf, Christian G |
description | The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited.
A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant.
26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction.
More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4363351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541430611</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541430611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rFTEUhoNYbG39AW4k4MbNtCefM9kIpfgFBTftOuQmZ3ojczNjkqv4781w29qCZHFykud9OYeXkLcMzhkb9EVhfDCyA6Y6AAYdvCAnTPas49LAyyf3Y_K6lB-N6QelX5FjroahV4qfEH-DpUa_n1ymS55L3WLBQmOii6sRUy30d6xbWv9h3iWPmXbUeY9LXTuaXUXqUnhQ0dJqGZ2vcU5n5Gh0U8E39_WU3H7-dHP1tbv-_uXb1eV154XRteO99CjByNBrDVrzIAI3g-8ZcwrEJkjt5YYbBwNnQatgwKlB9CGMmxG5Eafk48F32W92GHybI7vJLjnuXP5jZxft858Ut_Zu_mWl0EIo1gw-3Bvk-ee-bWx3sXicJpdw3hfLdC-1AQPQ0PcH9M5NaGMa5-boV9xeKsmkAM1Ww_P_UO0E3EU_Jxxje38mYAeBb1mUjOPj9Azsmrk9ZG5b5nbN3K6jvHu69qPiIWTxFw2-p9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674690900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</creator><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><description>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited.
A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant.
26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction.
More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25887552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Distribution ; Analysis ; Body Image - psychology ; Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Germany - epidemiology ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery ; Orchiectomy - psychology ; Orchiectomy - rehabilitation ; Orchiectomy - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Prevalence ; Prostheses and Implants - psychology ; Prostheses and Implants - statistics & numerical data ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sexual Partners - psychology ; Testicular cancer ; Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Testicular Neoplasms - psychology ; Testicular Neoplasms - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC urology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Dieckmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anheuser, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriefer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Cord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><title>BMC urology</title><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><description>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited.
A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant.
26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction.
More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - psychology</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - psychology</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sexual Partners - psychology</subject><subject>Testicular cancer</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2490</issn><issn>1471-2490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rFTEUhoNYbG39AW4k4MbNtCefM9kIpfgFBTftOuQmZ3ojczNjkqv4781w29qCZHFykud9OYeXkLcMzhkb9EVhfDCyA6Y6AAYdvCAnTPas49LAyyf3Y_K6lB-N6QelX5FjroahV4qfEH-DpUa_n1ymS55L3WLBQmOii6sRUy30d6xbWv9h3iWPmXbUeY9LXTuaXUXqUnhQ0dJqGZ2vcU5n5Gh0U8E39_WU3H7-dHP1tbv-_uXb1eV154XRteO99CjByNBrDVrzIAI3g-8ZcwrEJkjt5YYbBwNnQatgwKlB9CGMmxG5Eafk48F32W92GHybI7vJLjnuXP5jZxft858Ut_Zu_mWl0EIo1gw-3Bvk-ee-bWx3sXicJpdw3hfLdC-1AQPQ0PcH9M5NaGMa5-boV9xeKsmkAM1Ww_P_UO0E3EU_Jxxje38mYAeBb1mUjOPj9Azsmrk9ZG5b5nbN3K6jvHu69qPiIWTxFw2-p9o</recordid><startdate>20150313</startdate><enddate>20150313</enddate><creator>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creator><creator>Anheuser, Petra</creator><creator>Schmidt, Stefan</creator><creator>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creator><creator>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creator><creator>Schriefer, Philipp</creator><creator>Matthies, Cord</creator><creator>Hartmann, Michael</creator><creator>Ruf, Christian G</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150313</creationdate><title>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</title><author>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter ; Anheuser, Petra ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin ; Pichlmeier, Uwe ; Schriefer, Philipp ; Matthies, Cord ; Hartmann, Michael ; Ruf, Christian G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-274ce4094d7660662d3d298c711a503bd46c4b29a0821d65d90a5837ddfbfe293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - psychology</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - psychology</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sexual Partners - psychology</topic><topic>Testicular cancer</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anheuser, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriefer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Cord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Christian G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter</au><au>Anheuser, Petra</au><au>Schmidt, Stefan</au><au>Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin</au><au>Pichlmeier, Uwe</au><au>Schriefer, Philipp</au><au>Matthies, Cord</au><au>Hartmann, Michael</au><au>Ruf, Christian G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><date>2015-03-13</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><artnum>16</artnum><issn>1471-2490</issn><eissn>1471-2490</eissn><abstract>The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited.
A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant.
26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was "very high" and "high" in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction.
More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25887552</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2490 |
ispartof | BMC urology, 2015-03, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16 |
issn | 1471-2490 1471-2490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4363351 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Age Distribution Analysis Body Image - psychology Care and treatment Diagnosis Germany - epidemiology Health aspects Humans Male Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - epidemiology Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - psychology Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - surgery Orchiectomy - psychology Orchiectomy - rehabilitation Orchiectomy - statistics & numerical data Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Patient satisfaction Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Prevalence Prostheses and Implants - psychology Prostheses and Implants - statistics & numerical data Quality of Life - psychology Retrospective Studies Sexual Partners - psychology Testicular cancer Testicular Neoplasms - epidemiology Testicular Neoplasms - psychology Testicular Neoplasms - surgery Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A58%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testicular%20prostheses%20in%20patients%20with%20testicular%20cancer%20-%20acceptance%20rate%20and%20patient%20satisfaction&rft.jtitle=BMC%20urology&rft.au=Dieckmann,%20Klaus-Peter&rft.date=2015-03-13&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.artnum=16&rft.issn=1471-2490&rft.eissn=1471-2490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541430611%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674690900&rft_id=info:pmid/25887552&rft_galeid=A541430611&rfr_iscdi=true |