Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG

Abstract The appropriate surgical technique to treat patients with uterine fibroids is still a matter of debate as is the potential risk of incorrect treatment if histological examination detects a uterine sarcoma instead of uterine fibroids. The published epidemiology for uterine sarcoma is set aga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2015-02, Vol.75 (2), p.148-164
Hauptverfasser: Beckmann, M. W., Juhasz-Böss, I., Denschlag, D., Gaß, P., Dimpfl, T., Harter, P., Mallmann, P., Renner, S. P., Rimbach, S., Runnebaum, I., Untch, M., Brucker, S. Y., Wallwiener, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 148
container_title Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
container_volume 75
creator Beckmann, M. W.
Juhasz-Böss, I.
Denschlag, D.
Gaß, P.
Dimpfl, T.
Harter, P.
Mallmann, P.
Renner, S. P.
Rimbach, S.
Runnebaum, I.
Untch, M.
Brucker, S. Y.
Wallwiener, D.
description Abstract The appropriate surgical technique to treat patients with uterine fibroids is still a matter of debate as is the potential risk of incorrect treatment if histological examination detects a uterine sarcoma instead of uterine fibroids. The published epidemiology for uterine sarcoma is set against the incidence of accidental findings during surgery for uterine fibroids. International comments on this topic are discussed and are incorporated into the assessment by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The ICD-O-3 version of 2003 was used for the anatomical and topographical coding of uterine sarcomas, and the “Operations- und Prozedurenschlüssel” (OPS) 2014, the German standard for process codes and interventions, was used to determine surgical extirpation methods. Categorical qualifiers were defined to analyze the data provided by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS; Hospital and Causes of Death Statistics), the population-based Cancer Register of Bavaria. A systematic search was done of the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane collaboration, covering the period from 1966 until November 2014. The incidence of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids in uterine surgery was compared to the literature and with the different registries. The incidence of uterine sarcoma in 2010, standardized for age, was 1.53 for Bavaria, or 1.30 for every 100 000 women, respectively, averaged for the years 2002–2011, and 1.30 for every 100 000 women in Germany. The mean incidence collated from various surveys was 2.02 for every 100 000 women (0.35–7.02; standard deviation 2.01). The numbers of inpatient surgical procedures such as myoma enucleation, morcellation, hysterectomy or cervical stump removal to treat the indication “uterine myoma” have steadily declined in Germany across all age groups (an absolute decrease of 17 % in 2012 compared to 2007). There has been a shift in the preferred method of surgical access from an abdominal/vaginal approach to endoscopic or endoscopically assisted procedures to treat uterine fibroids, with the use of morcellation increasing by almost 11 000 coded procedures in 2012. Based on international statements (AAGL, ACOG, ESGE, FDA, SGO) on the risk of uterine sarcoma as an coincidental finding during uterine fibroid surgery and the associated risk of a deterioration of prognosis (in the case of morcellation procedures), this overview presents the opinion of the DGGG in the form
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0035-1545684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4361164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826623444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2ca538c979b9bbf174996cc91ece973b547f0eae5b7d958622b2245531b77903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYxonR2LV69Wg4epkKDH9mPJiYaleTNm7seibAvtOlzgwrMCa99e7Rb-gnkXHXph48AXl-PC8PD0LPKTmhRIhXqSKkFhUVXMiGP0ALyuumahrCH6IFIVRWQgl6hJ6kdF2OvKXyMTpiQrWqFc0C_bic4pV3pscXkLdhk3AXIs5bwOsIJg8wZhw6_CVD9CPgM29j8IX6dfsTf_bp633x0kQXBoPNuMGrGGwPQ5r1ixAd9L3JPoyv8SokP-_wyuwgzvo87d1yuXyKHnWmT_DssB6j9dn79emH6vzT8uPp2_PKcdbkijkj6saVALa1tqOKt610rqXgoFW1FVx1BAwIqzYlo2TMMsaFqKlVqiX1MXqzt91NdoCNKxGj6fUu-sHEGx2M1_8qo9_qq_Bd81pSKnkxeHkwiOHbBCnrwac_CUcIU9K0YVKymvMZPdmjLoaUInR3YyjRc4E66blAfSiwXHhx_3F3-N_GClDtgbz1MIC-DlMcy2_9z_A3ZyWmpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826623444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Beckmann, M. W. ; Juhasz-Böss, I. ; Denschlag, D. ; Gaß, P. ; Dimpfl, T. ; Harter, P. ; Mallmann, P. ; Renner, S. P. ; Rimbach, S. ; Runnebaum, I. ; Untch, M. ; Brucker, S. Y. ; Wallwiener, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, M. W. ; Juhasz-Böss, I. ; Denschlag, D. ; Gaß, P. ; Dimpfl, T. ; Harter, P. ; Mallmann, P. ; Renner, S. P. ; Rimbach, S. ; Runnebaum, I. ; Untch, M. ; Brucker, S. Y. ; Wallwiener, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The appropriate surgical technique to treat patients with uterine fibroids is still a matter of debate as is the potential risk of incorrect treatment if histological examination detects a uterine sarcoma instead of uterine fibroids. The published epidemiology for uterine sarcoma is set against the incidence of accidental findings during surgery for uterine fibroids. International comments on this topic are discussed and are incorporated into the assessment by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The ICD-O-3 version of 2003 was used for the anatomical and topographical coding of uterine sarcomas, and the “Operations- und Prozedurenschlüssel” (OPS) 2014, the German standard for process codes and interventions, was used to determine surgical extirpation methods. Categorical qualifiers were defined to analyze the data provided by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS; Hospital and Causes of Death Statistics), the population-based Cancer Register of Bavaria. A systematic search was done of the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane collaboration, covering the period from 1966 until November 2014. The incidence of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids in uterine surgery was compared to the literature and with the different registries. The incidence of uterine sarcoma in 2010, standardized for age, was 1.53 for Bavaria, or 1.30 for every 100 000 women, respectively, averaged for the years 2002–2011, and 1.30 for every 100 000 women in Germany. The mean incidence collated from various surveys was 2.02 for every 100 000 women (0.35–7.02; standard deviation 2.01). The numbers of inpatient surgical procedures such as myoma enucleation, morcellation, hysterectomy or cervical stump removal to treat the indication “uterine myoma” have steadily declined in Germany across all age groups (an absolute decrease of 17 % in 2012 compared to 2007). There has been a shift in the preferred method of surgical access from an abdominal/vaginal approach to endoscopic or endoscopically assisted procedures to treat uterine fibroids, with the use of morcellation increasing by almost 11 000 coded procedures in 2012. Based on international statements (AAGL, ACOG, ESGE, FDA, SGO) on the risk of uterine sarcoma as an coincidental finding during uterine fibroid surgery and the associated risk of a deterioration of prognosis (in the case of morcellation procedures), this overview presents the opinion of the DGGG in the form of four Statements, five Recommendation and four Demands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25797958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart · New York: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>DGGG Review</subject><ispartof>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015-02, Vol.75 (2), p.148-164</ispartof><rights>Thieme Medical Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2ca538c979b9bbf174996cc91ece973b547f0eae5b7d958622b2245531b77903</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361164/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361164/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25797958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, M. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhasz-Böss, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denschlag, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaß, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimpfl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harter, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimbach, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runnebaum, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untch, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, S. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG</title><title>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</title><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><description>Abstract The appropriate surgical technique to treat patients with uterine fibroids is still a matter of debate as is the potential risk of incorrect treatment if histological examination detects a uterine sarcoma instead of uterine fibroids. The published epidemiology for uterine sarcoma is set against the incidence of accidental findings during surgery for uterine fibroids. International comments on this topic are discussed and are incorporated into the assessment by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The ICD-O-3 version of 2003 was used for the anatomical and topographical coding of uterine sarcomas, and the “Operations- und Prozedurenschlüssel” (OPS) 2014, the German standard for process codes and interventions, was used to determine surgical extirpation methods. Categorical qualifiers were defined to analyze the data provided by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS; Hospital and Causes of Death Statistics), the population-based Cancer Register of Bavaria. A systematic search was done of the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane collaboration, covering the period from 1966 until November 2014. The incidence of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids in uterine surgery was compared to the literature and with the different registries. The incidence of uterine sarcoma in 2010, standardized for age, was 1.53 for Bavaria, or 1.30 for every 100 000 women, respectively, averaged for the years 2002–2011, and 1.30 for every 100 000 women in Germany. The mean incidence collated from various surveys was 2.02 for every 100 000 women (0.35–7.02; standard deviation 2.01). The numbers of inpatient surgical procedures such as myoma enucleation, morcellation, hysterectomy or cervical stump removal to treat the indication “uterine myoma” have steadily declined in Germany across all age groups (an absolute decrease of 17 % in 2012 compared to 2007). There has been a shift in the preferred method of surgical access from an abdominal/vaginal approach to endoscopic or endoscopically assisted procedures to treat uterine fibroids, with the use of morcellation increasing by almost 11 000 coded procedures in 2012. Based on international statements (AAGL, ACOG, ESGE, FDA, SGO) on the risk of uterine sarcoma as an coincidental finding during uterine fibroid surgery and the associated risk of a deterioration of prognosis (in the case of morcellation procedures), this overview presents the opinion of the DGGG in the form of four Statements, five Recommendation and four Demands.</description><subject>DGGG Review</subject><issn>0016-5751</issn><issn>1438-8804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYxonR2LV69Wg4epkKDH9mPJiYaleTNm7seibAvtOlzgwrMCa99e7Rb-gnkXHXph48AXl-PC8PD0LPKTmhRIhXqSKkFhUVXMiGP0ALyuumahrCH6IFIVRWQgl6hJ6kdF2OvKXyMTpiQrWqFc0C_bic4pV3pscXkLdhk3AXIs5bwOsIJg8wZhw6_CVD9CPgM29j8IX6dfsTf_bp633x0kQXBoPNuMGrGGwPQ5r1ixAd9L3JPoyv8SokP-_wyuwgzvo87d1yuXyKHnWmT_DssB6j9dn79emH6vzT8uPp2_PKcdbkijkj6saVALa1tqOKt610rqXgoFW1FVx1BAwIqzYlo2TMMsaFqKlVqiX1MXqzt91NdoCNKxGj6fUu-sHEGx2M1_8qo9_qq_Bd81pSKnkxeHkwiOHbBCnrwac_CUcIU9K0YVKymvMZPdmjLoaUInR3YyjRc4E66blAfSiwXHhx_3F3-N_GClDtgbz1MIC-DlMcy2_9z_A3ZyWmpQ</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Beckmann, M. W.</creator><creator>Juhasz-Böss, I.</creator><creator>Denschlag, D.</creator><creator>Gaß, P.</creator><creator>Dimpfl, T.</creator><creator>Harter, P.</creator><creator>Mallmann, P.</creator><creator>Renner, S. P.</creator><creator>Rimbach, S.</creator><creator>Runnebaum, I.</creator><creator>Untch, M.</creator><creator>Brucker, S. Y.</creator><creator>Wallwiener, D.</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG</title><author>Beckmann, M. W. ; Juhasz-Böss, I. ; Denschlag, D. ; Gaß, P. ; Dimpfl, T. ; Harter, P. ; Mallmann, P. ; Renner, S. P. ; Rimbach, S. ; Runnebaum, I. ; Untch, M. ; Brucker, S. Y. ; Wallwiener, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2ca538c979b9bbf174996cc91ece973b547f0eae5b7d958622b2245531b77903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>DGGG Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, M. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhasz-Böss, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denschlag, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaß, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimpfl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harter, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimbach, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runnebaum, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untch, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, S. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beckmann, M. W.</au><au>Juhasz-Böss, I.</au><au>Denschlag, D.</au><au>Gaß, P.</au><au>Dimpfl, T.</au><au>Harter, P.</au><au>Mallmann, P.</au><au>Renner, S. P.</au><au>Rimbach, S.</au><au>Runnebaum, I.</au><au>Untch, M.</au><au>Brucker, S. Y.</au><au>Wallwiener, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG</atitle><jtitle>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</jtitle><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>148-164</pages><issn>0016-5751</issn><eissn>1438-8804</eissn><abstract>Abstract The appropriate surgical technique to treat patients with uterine fibroids is still a matter of debate as is the potential risk of incorrect treatment if histological examination detects a uterine sarcoma instead of uterine fibroids. The published epidemiology for uterine sarcoma is set against the incidence of accidental findings during surgery for uterine fibroids. International comments on this topic are discussed and are incorporated into the assessment by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The ICD-O-3 version of 2003 was used for the anatomical and topographical coding of uterine sarcomas, and the “Operations- und Prozedurenschlüssel” (OPS) 2014, the German standard for process codes and interventions, was used to determine surgical extirpation methods. Categorical qualifiers were defined to analyze the data provided by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS; Hospital and Causes of Death Statistics), the population-based Cancer Register of Bavaria. A systematic search was done of the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane collaboration, covering the period from 1966 until November 2014. The incidence of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids in uterine surgery was compared to the literature and with the different registries. The incidence of uterine sarcoma in 2010, standardized for age, was 1.53 for Bavaria, or 1.30 for every 100 000 women, respectively, averaged for the years 2002–2011, and 1.30 for every 100 000 women in Germany. The mean incidence collated from various surveys was 2.02 for every 100 000 women (0.35–7.02; standard deviation 2.01). The numbers of inpatient surgical procedures such as myoma enucleation, morcellation, hysterectomy or cervical stump removal to treat the indication “uterine myoma” have steadily declined in Germany across all age groups (an absolute decrease of 17 % in 2012 compared to 2007). There has been a shift in the preferred method of surgical access from an abdominal/vaginal approach to endoscopic or endoscopically assisted procedures to treat uterine fibroids, with the use of morcellation increasing by almost 11 000 coded procedures in 2012. Based on international statements (AAGL, ACOG, ESGE, FDA, SGO) on the risk of uterine sarcoma as an coincidental finding during uterine fibroid surgery and the associated risk of a deterioration of prognosis (in the case of morcellation procedures), this overview presents the opinion of the DGGG in the form of four Statements, five Recommendation and four Demands.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart · New York</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>25797958</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0035-1545684</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5751
ispartof Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015-02, Vol.75 (2), p.148-164
issn 0016-5751
1438-8804
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4361164
source PubMed Central Free
subjects DGGG Review
title Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids – Risk of Uterine Sarcoma and Problems of Morcellation: Position Paper of the DGGG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A11%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Methods%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Uterine%20Fibroids%20%E2%80%93%20Risk%20of%20Uterine%20Sarcoma%20and%20Problems%20of%20Morcellation:%20Position%20Paper%20of%20the%20DGGG&rft.jtitle=Geburtshilfe%20und%20Frauenheilkunde&rft.au=Beckmann,%20M.%20W.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=148-164&rft.issn=0016-5751&rft.eissn=1438-8804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0035-1545684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826623444%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826623444&rft_id=info:pmid/25797958&rfr_iscdi=true