Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases

Many sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section, which may impact the need for further axillary dissection (AD). However, the need for AD in patients with small metastases has been recently called into question, meaning that frozen SLNB may be unnecessary....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2014-11, Vol.148 (2), p.355-361
Hauptverfasser: Poling, Justin S., Tsangaris, Theodore N., Argani, Pedram, Cimino-Mathews, Ashley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 355
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 148
creator Poling, Justin S.
Tsangaris, Theodore N.
Argani, Pedram
Cimino-Mathews, Ashley
description Many sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section, which may impact the need for further axillary dissection (AD). However, the need for AD in patients with small metastases has been recently called into question, meaning that frozen SLNB may be unnecessary. Furthermore, frozen section can compromise tissue for further study. At our institution, we grossly evaluate all SLNB and freeze half of the node. Here, we evaluate the frozen SLNB discrepancy rate using this method, focusing on cause of discrepancy and need for further surgery. We reviewed surgical pathology records for all breast cancer resections with frozen section of SLNB examined from 2003 to 2012. For cases with a frozen section discrepancy, we compiled clinicopathologic data. In total, 1,940 cases involved frozen section evaluation of SLNB. In 95 cases (4.9 % of total cases, 23.8 % of positive node cases), the SLNB was called negative on frozen but positive on final examination (false negatives). The majority of missed metastases are isolated tumor cells or micrometastases. A trend was observed toward fewer patients receiving completion AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB in the later years of the study. The protocol of freezing half of a SLNB is a reasonable method, with results similar to or better than other studies. The main adverse outcome is the need for separate AD; however, additional positive nodes are uncommon. The trend of fewer patients getting additional AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB suggests that clinicians may be using this information differently recently.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4352298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A390727564</galeid><sourcerecordid>A390727564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c704t-dda147bc60eae30df4ca7191f330eb958beb2f0654c5de88be939123abf2e15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1u1DAUhS0EosPAA7BBkZAQC1Ku7Tged4FUVRSQKrGBteU4NzOuEnuwk6Hl6XGYUmYQyAv72t85_juEPKdwSgHk20RBVKoEWpWc1rS8eUAWVEheSkblQ7IAWsuyXkF9Qp6kdA0ASoJ6TE6Y4HSlmFgQdxnDD_RFQju64AvcmX4yv4ahK5qIJo2FNdE6HwaTMT86j33R3w7bTeFDi-msMEXEMYa0nU12mKudw--zAX2jKsj6hOkpedSZPuGzu35Jvl6-_3Lxsbz6_OHTxflVaSVUY9m2hlaysTWgQQ5tV1kjqaId54CNEqsGG9ZBLSorWlzlUnFFGTdNx5AKy5fk3d53OzUDtjafOJpeb6MbTLzVwTh9vOLdRq_DTldcMKZW2eD1nUEM3yZMox5cstj3xmOYkqY1Y1BXHGhGX_6FXocp-ny9maIgJXDxh1qbHrXzXcj72tlUn3MFkkmR7Zbk9B9Ubi0OzgaPncvzR4JXB4INmn7cpNBP8-elY5DuQZv_KEXs7h-Dgp6DpPdB0jlIeg6SvsmaF4eveK_4nZwMsD2Q8pJfYzy4-n9dfwIxjNNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1621077035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Poling, Justin S. ; Tsangaris, Theodore N. ; Argani, Pedram ; Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</creator><creatorcontrib>Poling, Justin S. ; Tsangaris, Theodore N. ; Argani, Pedram ; Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</creatorcontrib><description>Many sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section, which may impact the need for further axillary dissection (AD). However, the need for AD in patients with small metastases has been recently called into question, meaning that frozen SLNB may be unnecessary. Furthermore, frozen section can compromise tissue for further study. At our institution, we grossly evaluate all SLNB and freeze half of the node. Here, we evaluate the frozen SLNB discrepancy rate using this method, focusing on cause of discrepancy and need for further surgery. We reviewed surgical pathology records for all breast cancer resections with frozen section of SLNB examined from 2003 to 2012. For cases with a frozen section discrepancy, we compiled clinicopathologic data. In total, 1,940 cases involved frozen section evaluation of SLNB. In 95 cases (4.9 % of total cases, 23.8 % of positive node cases), the SLNB was called negative on frozen but positive on final examination (false negatives). The majority of missed metastases are isolated tumor cells or micrometastases. A trend was observed toward fewer patients receiving completion AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB in the later years of the study. The protocol of freezing half of a SLNB is a reasonable method, with results similar to or better than other studies. The main adverse outcome is the need for separate AD; however, additional positive nodes are uncommon. The trend of fewer patients getting additional AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB suggests that clinicians may be using this information differently recently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25318925</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Axilla ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery ; Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary ; Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery ; Clinical Trial ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Frozen Sections ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphatic system ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Micrometastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2014-11, Vol.148 (2), p.355-361</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c704t-dda147bc60eae30df4ca7191f330eb958beb2f0654c5de88be939123abf2e15c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c704t-dda147bc60eae30df4ca7191f330eb958beb2f0654c5de88be939123abf2e15c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25318925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poling, Justin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsangaris, Theodore N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argani, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</creatorcontrib><title>Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Many sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section, which may impact the need for further axillary dissection (AD). However, the need for AD in patients with small metastases has been recently called into question, meaning that frozen SLNB may be unnecessary. Furthermore, frozen section can compromise tissue for further study. At our institution, we grossly evaluate all SLNB and freeze half of the node. Here, we evaluate the frozen SLNB discrepancy rate using this method, focusing on cause of discrepancy and need for further surgery. We reviewed surgical pathology records for all breast cancer resections with frozen section of SLNB examined from 2003 to 2012. For cases with a frozen section discrepancy, we compiled clinicopathologic data. In total, 1,940 cases involved frozen section evaluation of SLNB. In 95 cases (4.9 % of total cases, 23.8 % of positive node cases), the SLNB was called negative on frozen but positive on final examination (false negatives). The majority of missed metastases are isolated tumor cells or micrometastases. A trend was observed toward fewer patients receiving completion AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB in the later years of the study. The protocol of freezing half of a SLNB is a reasonable method, with results similar to or better than other studies. The main adverse outcome is the need for separate AD; however, additional positive nodes are uncommon. The trend of fewer patients getting additional AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB suggests that clinicians may be using this information differently recently.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Frozen Sections</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Micrometastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1u1DAUhS0EosPAA7BBkZAQC1Ku7Tged4FUVRSQKrGBteU4NzOuEnuwk6Hl6XGYUmYQyAv72t85_juEPKdwSgHk20RBVKoEWpWc1rS8eUAWVEheSkblQ7IAWsuyXkF9Qp6kdA0ASoJ6TE6Y4HSlmFgQdxnDD_RFQju64AvcmX4yv4ahK5qIJo2FNdE6HwaTMT86j33R3w7bTeFDi-msMEXEMYa0nU12mKudw--zAX2jKsj6hOkpedSZPuGzu35Jvl6-_3Lxsbz6_OHTxflVaSVUY9m2hlaysTWgQQ5tV1kjqaId54CNEqsGG9ZBLSorWlzlUnFFGTdNx5AKy5fk3d53OzUDtjafOJpeb6MbTLzVwTh9vOLdRq_DTldcMKZW2eD1nUEM3yZMox5cstj3xmOYkqY1Y1BXHGhGX_6FXocp-ny9maIgJXDxh1qbHrXzXcj72tlUn3MFkkmR7Zbk9B9Ubi0OzgaPncvzR4JXB4INmn7cpNBP8-elY5DuQZv_KEXs7h-Dgp6DpPdB0jlIeg6SvsmaF4eveK_4nZwMsD2Q8pJfYzy4-n9dfwIxjNNM</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Poling, Justin S.</creator><creator>Tsangaris, Theodore N.</creator><creator>Argani, Pedram</creator><creator>Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases</title><author>Poling, Justin S. ; Tsangaris, Theodore N. ; Argani, Pedram ; Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c704t-dda147bc60eae30df4ca7191f330eb958beb2f0654c5de88be939123abf2e15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Frozen Sections</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Micrometastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poling, Justin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsangaris, Theodore N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argani, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medicine (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poling, Justin S.</au><au>Tsangaris, Theodore N.</au><au>Argani, Pedram</au><au>Cimino-Mathews, Ashley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>355-361</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>Many sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section, which may impact the need for further axillary dissection (AD). However, the need for AD in patients with small metastases has been recently called into question, meaning that frozen SLNB may be unnecessary. Furthermore, frozen section can compromise tissue for further study. At our institution, we grossly evaluate all SLNB and freeze half of the node. Here, we evaluate the frozen SLNB discrepancy rate using this method, focusing on cause of discrepancy and need for further surgery. We reviewed surgical pathology records for all breast cancer resections with frozen section of SLNB examined from 2003 to 2012. For cases with a frozen section discrepancy, we compiled clinicopathologic data. In total, 1,940 cases involved frozen section evaluation of SLNB. In 95 cases (4.9 % of total cases, 23.8 % of positive node cases), the SLNB was called negative on frozen but positive on final examination (false negatives). The majority of missed metastases are isolated tumor cells or micrometastases. A trend was observed toward fewer patients receiving completion AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB in the later years of the study. The protocol of freezing half of a SLNB is a reasonable method, with results similar to or better than other studies. The main adverse outcome is the need for separate AD; however, additional positive nodes are uncommon. The trend of fewer patients getting additional AD after a discrepant frozen SLNB suggests that clinicians may be using this information differently recently.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25318925</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2014-11, Vol.148 (2), p.355-361
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4352298
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis
Axilla
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer research
Cancer therapies
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery
Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery
Clinical Trial
Diagnosis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Frozen Sections
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic system
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Young Adult
title Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frozen%20section%20evaluation%20of%20breast%20carcinoma%20sentinel%20lymph%20nodes:%20a%20retrospective%20review%20of%201,940%20cases&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Poling,%20Justin%20S.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=355-361&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA390727564%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1621077035&rft_id=info:pmid/25318925&rft_galeid=A390727564&rfr_iscdi=true