Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module

The WHOQOL-SRPB has been a useful module to measure aspects of QOL related to spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs, but recent research has pointed to potential problems with its proposed factor structure. Three of the eight facets of the WHOQOL-SRPB have been identified as potentially...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health and quality of life outcomes 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-26, Article 26
Hauptverfasser: Krägeloh, Christian U, Billington, D Rex, Henning, Marcus A, Chai, Penny Pei Minn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Health and quality of life outcomes
container_volume 13
creator Krägeloh, Christian U
Billington, D Rex
Henning, Marcus A
Chai, Penny Pei Minn
description The WHOQOL-SRPB has been a useful module to measure aspects of QOL related to spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs, but recent research has pointed to potential problems with its proposed factor structure. Three of the eight facets of the WHOQOL-SRPB have been identified as potentially different from the others, and to date only a limited number of factor analyses of the instrument have been published. Analyses were conducted using data from a sample of 679 university students who had completed the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, the WHOQOL-SRPB module, the Perceived Stress scale, and the Brief COPE coping strategies questionnaire. Informed by these analyses, confirmatory factor analyses suitable for ordinal-level data explored the potential for a two-factor solution as opposed to the originally proposed one-factor solution. The facets WHOQOL-SRPB facets connected, strength, and faith were highly correlated with each other as well as with the religious coping sub-scale of the Brief COPE. Combining these three facets to one factor in a two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB yielded superior goodness-of-fit indices compared to the original one-factor solution. A two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB is more tenable, in which three of the eight WHOQOL-SRPB facets group together as a spiritual coping factor and the remaining facets form a factor of spiritual quality of life. While discarding the facets connectedness, strength, and faith without additional research would be premature, users of the scale need to be aware of this alternative two-factor structure, and may wish to analyze scores using this structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12955-015-0212-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4344777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541503803</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541503803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-d0bfe743f634e80877198c84de97724ed624cfe7128d348bf061edecbb2dafac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1klFr1TAUgIs43Jz-AF8k4IvCOpM0bXN9EMbUbXDholN8DGlychdpmy5J591f8deaa-d1hUlp0_Z850tyTrLsBcHHhPDqbSB0UZY5JummhOabR9kBYXWd1yUtH99738-ehvADY1pQWj7J9mnJF5hSdpD9uhyst3GULbpODxtvkTOotQaQ7DUKu6hyg-3X7xDcWA29AmScRxLFny43UsX0EaIfVRw9bA3xCtD389Xn1fKfI8mPkIfWrq0bQw8hHP2ZZAAfXJ_maFIMTECd02MLz7I9I9sAz-_Gw-zbp49fT8_z5ers4vRkmTdlRWKucWOgZoWpCgYc87omC64407Coa8pAV5SpRBDKdcF4Y3BFQINqGqplWnpxmL2fvMPYdKAV9NHLVgzedtLfCietmEd6eyXW7kawgqUC10nwYRI01v1HMI8o14mpdyL1Tmx7JzZJ8_puHd5djxCi6GxQ0Layh1QvQaqaVbzknCT01YSuZQvC9sYlr9ri4qRkpMQFx0Wijh-g0qWhs8r1YGz6P0t4M0tITIRNXMsxBHFx-WXOkolV3oXgwez2S7DYns4Hd_jyfqV3GX-PY_EbHIjkCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674685881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Krägeloh, Christian U ; Billington, D Rex ; Henning, Marcus A ; Chai, Penny Pei Minn</creator><creatorcontrib>Krägeloh, Christian U ; Billington, D Rex ; Henning, Marcus A ; Chai, Penny Pei Minn</creatorcontrib><description>The WHOQOL-SRPB has been a useful module to measure aspects of QOL related to spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs, but recent research has pointed to potential problems with its proposed factor structure. Three of the eight facets of the WHOQOL-SRPB have been identified as potentially different from the others, and to date only a limited number of factor analyses of the instrument have been published. Analyses were conducted using data from a sample of 679 university students who had completed the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, the WHOQOL-SRPB module, the Perceived Stress scale, and the Brief COPE coping strategies questionnaire. Informed by these analyses, confirmatory factor analyses suitable for ordinal-level data explored the potential for a two-factor solution as opposed to the originally proposed one-factor solution. The facets WHOQOL-SRPB facets connected, strength, and faith were highly correlated with each other as well as with the religious coping sub-scale of the Brief COPE. Combining these three facets to one factor in a two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB yielded superior goodness-of-fit indices compared to the original one-factor solution. A two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB is more tenable, in which three of the eight WHOQOL-SRPB facets group together as a spiritual coping factor and the remaining facets form a factor of spiritual quality of life. While discarding the facets connectedness, strength, and faith without additional research would be premature, users of the scale need to be aware of this alternative two-factor structure, and may wish to analyze scores using this structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0212-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25890224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Analysis ; Attitude to Health ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hope ; Humans ; Male ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Religious aspects ; Sense of Coherence ; Social aspects ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-26, Article 26</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Krageloh et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-d0bfe743f634e80877198c84de97724ed624cfe7128d348bf061edecbb2dafac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-d0bfe743f634e80877198c84de97724ed624cfe7128d348bf061edecbb2dafac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344777/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344777/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krägeloh, Christian U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billington, D Rex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Penny Pei Minn</creatorcontrib><title>Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module</title><title>Health and quality of life outcomes</title><addtitle>Health Qual Life Outcomes</addtitle><description>The WHOQOL-SRPB has been a useful module to measure aspects of QOL related to spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs, but recent research has pointed to potential problems with its proposed factor structure. Three of the eight facets of the WHOQOL-SRPB have been identified as potentially different from the others, and to date only a limited number of factor analyses of the instrument have been published. Analyses were conducted using data from a sample of 679 university students who had completed the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, the WHOQOL-SRPB module, the Perceived Stress scale, and the Brief COPE coping strategies questionnaire. Informed by these analyses, confirmatory factor analyses suitable for ordinal-level data explored the potential for a two-factor solution as opposed to the originally proposed one-factor solution. The facets WHOQOL-SRPB facets connected, strength, and faith were highly correlated with each other as well as with the religious coping sub-scale of the Brief COPE. Combining these three facets to one factor in a two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB yielded superior goodness-of-fit indices compared to the original one-factor solution. A two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB is more tenable, in which three of the eight WHOQOL-SRPB facets group together as a spiritual coping factor and the remaining facets form a factor of spiritual quality of life. While discarding the facets connectedness, strength, and faith without additional research would be premature, users of the scale need to be aware of this alternative two-factor structure, and may wish to analyze scores using this structure.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hope</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Sense of Coherence</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1477-7525</issn><issn>1477-7525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1klFr1TAUgIs43Jz-AF8k4IvCOpM0bXN9EMbUbXDholN8DGlychdpmy5J591f8deaa-d1hUlp0_Z850tyTrLsBcHHhPDqbSB0UZY5JummhOabR9kBYXWd1yUtH99738-ehvADY1pQWj7J9mnJF5hSdpD9uhyst3GULbpODxtvkTOotQaQ7DUKu6hyg-3X7xDcWA29AmScRxLFny43UsX0EaIfVRw9bA3xCtD389Xn1fKfI8mPkIfWrq0bQw8hHP2ZZAAfXJ_maFIMTECd02MLz7I9I9sAz-_Gw-zbp49fT8_z5ers4vRkmTdlRWKucWOgZoWpCgYc87omC64407Coa8pAV5SpRBDKdcF4Y3BFQINqGqplWnpxmL2fvMPYdKAV9NHLVgzedtLfCietmEd6eyXW7kawgqUC10nwYRI01v1HMI8o14mpdyL1Tmx7JzZJ8_puHd5djxCi6GxQ0Layh1QvQaqaVbzknCT01YSuZQvC9sYlr9ri4qRkpMQFx0Wijh-g0qWhs8r1YGz6P0t4M0tITIRNXMsxBHFx-WXOkolV3oXgwez2S7DYns4Hd_jyfqV3GX-PY_EbHIjkCQ</recordid><startdate>20150225</startdate><enddate>20150225</enddate><creator>Krägeloh, Christian U</creator><creator>Billington, D Rex</creator><creator>Henning, Marcus A</creator><creator>Chai, Penny Pei Minn</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150225</creationdate><title>Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module</title><author>Krägeloh, Christian U ; Billington, D Rex ; Henning, Marcus A ; Chai, Penny Pei Minn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-d0bfe743f634e80877198c84de97724ed624cfe7128d348bf061edecbb2dafac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hope</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Sense of Coherence</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krägeloh, Christian U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billington, D Rex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Penny Pei Minn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krägeloh, Christian U</au><au>Billington, D Rex</au><au>Henning, Marcus A</au><au>Chai, Penny Pei Minn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module</atitle><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle><addtitle>Health Qual Life Outcomes</addtitle><date>2015-02-25</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>26-26</pages><artnum>26</artnum><issn>1477-7525</issn><eissn>1477-7525</eissn><abstract>The WHOQOL-SRPB has been a useful module to measure aspects of QOL related to spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs, but recent research has pointed to potential problems with its proposed factor structure. Three of the eight facets of the WHOQOL-SRPB have been identified as potentially different from the others, and to date only a limited number of factor analyses of the instrument have been published. Analyses were conducted using data from a sample of 679 university students who had completed the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, the WHOQOL-SRPB module, the Perceived Stress scale, and the Brief COPE coping strategies questionnaire. Informed by these analyses, confirmatory factor analyses suitable for ordinal-level data explored the potential for a two-factor solution as opposed to the originally proposed one-factor solution. The facets WHOQOL-SRPB facets connected, strength, and faith were highly correlated with each other as well as with the religious coping sub-scale of the Brief COPE. Combining these three facets to one factor in a two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB yielded superior goodness-of-fit indices compared to the original one-factor solution. A two-factor solution for the WHOQOL-SRPB is more tenable, in which three of the eight WHOQOL-SRPB facets group together as a spiritual coping factor and the remaining facets form a factor of spiritual quality of life. While discarding the facets connectedness, strength, and faith without additional research would be premature, users of the scale need to be aware of this alternative two-factor structure, and may wish to analyze scores using this structure.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25890224</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12955-015-0212-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7525
ispartof Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-26, Article 26
issn 1477-7525
1477-7525
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4344777
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Analysis
Attitude to Health
Female
Health aspects
Hope
Humans
Male
Quality of Life - psychology
Religious aspects
Sense of Coherence
Social aspects
Spirituality
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Young Adult
title Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spiritual%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20spiritual%20coping:%20evidence%20for%20a%20two-factor%20structure%20of%20the%20WHOQOL%20spirituality,%20religiousness,%20and%20personal%20beliefs%20module&rft.jtitle=Health%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes&rft.au=Kr%C3%A4geloh,%20Christian%20U&rft.date=2015-02-25&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=26-26&rft.artnum=26&rft.issn=1477-7525&rft.eissn=1477-7525&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12955-015-0212-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541503803%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674685881&rft_id=info:pmid/25890224&rft_galeid=A541503803&rfr_iscdi=true