How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?

The use of systemic antifungal agents has increased in most tertiary care centers. However, antifungal stewardship has deserved very little attention. Our objective was to assess the knowledge of European prescribing physicians as a first step of an international program of antifungal stewardship. S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC infectious diseases 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80
Hauptverfasser: Valerio, Maricela, Vena, Antonio, Bouza, Emilio, Reiter, Nanna, Viale, Pierluigi, Hochreiter, Marcel, Giannella, Maddalena, Muñoz, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title BMC infectious diseases
container_volume 15
creator Valerio, Maricela
Vena, Antonio
Bouza, Emilio
Reiter, Nanna
Viale, Pierluigi
Hochreiter, Marcel
Giannella, Maddalena
Muñoz, Patricia
description The use of systemic antifungal agents has increased in most tertiary care centers. However, antifungal stewardship has deserved very little attention. Our objective was to assess the knowledge of European prescribing physicians as a first step of an international program of antifungal stewardship. Staff physicians and residents of 4 European countries were invited to complete a 20-point questionnaire that was based on current guidelines of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. 121 physicians (44.6% staff, 55.4% residents) from Spain 53.7%, Italy 17.4%, Denmark 16.5% and Germany 12.4% completed the survey. Hospital departments involved were: medical 51.2%, ICUs 43%, surgical 3.3% and pharmaceutical 2.5%. The mean score of adequate responses (± SD) was 5.8 ± 1.7 points, with statistically significant differences between study site and type of physicians. Regarding candidiasis, 69% of the physicians clearly distinguished colonization from infection and the local rate of fluconazole resistance was known by 24%. The accepted indications of antifungal prophylaxis were known by 38%. Regarding aspergillosis, 52% of responders could differentiate colonization from infection and 42% knew the diagnostic value of galactomannan. Radiological features of invasive aspergillosis were well recognized by 58% of physicians and 57% of them were aware of the antifungal considered as first line treatment. However, only 37% knew the recommended length of therapy. This simple, easily completed questionnaire enabled us to identify some weakness in the knowledge of invasive fungal infection management among European physicians. This survey could serve as a guide to design a future tailored European training program.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12879-015-0809-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4344747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541390342</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541390342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b595t-6ce66eeed71fdf13863d478caad3ba606500c7fbfae9b407a126a4e60c05b7f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r1jAYhosobk5_gCdS8EQPOpMmTdITx5jTDQYDvw48CWn6pG-0TWrSvrr9evPSOVaYIDnIx3Pdd8KdJ8ueY3SIsWBvIi4FrwuEqwIJVBfXD7J9TDkuSkLowzvrvexJjN8RwlyU9eNsr6yEEKgU-9m3M_8rH2a9yU_n4EdQLh8DRB1sY12Xj5uraLVVLuY_XCJV4-cpt26rot1CbmbXqT7tDejJ-kQNyqkOBnDT0dPskVF9hGc380H25f3p55Oz4uLyw_nJ8UXRVHU1FUwDYwDQcmxag4lgpKVcaKVa0iiGWIWQ5qYxCuqGIq5wyRQFhjSqGm4IOcjeLr7j3AzQ6nR3UL0cgx1UuJJeWbmuOLuRnd9KSijllCeDd4tBY_0_DNYV7Qe5ZC9T9nKXvbxONq9u3hH8zxniJAcbNfS9cuDnKDHjlNWYlmVCXy5oSg9kis8nX73D5XFFMakRoTvq8B4qjRYGq70DY9P5SvB6JUjMBL-nTs0xyvNPH_-fvfy6ZvHC6uBjDGBus8FI7jrx3jRe3P2VW8Xf1iN_ACWl2tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674691422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Valerio, Maricela ; Vena, Antonio ; Bouza, Emilio ; Reiter, Nanna ; Viale, Pierluigi ; Hochreiter, Marcel ; Giannella, Maddalena ; Muñoz, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Valerio, Maricela ; Vena, Antonio ; Bouza, Emilio ; Reiter, Nanna ; Viale, Pierluigi ; Hochreiter, Marcel ; Giannella, Maddalena ; Muñoz, Patricia ; COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis) ; on behalf the COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</creatorcontrib><description>The use of systemic antifungal agents has increased in most tertiary care centers. However, antifungal stewardship has deserved very little attention. Our objective was to assess the knowledge of European prescribing physicians as a first step of an international program of antifungal stewardship. Staff physicians and residents of 4 European countries were invited to complete a 20-point questionnaire that was based on current guidelines of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. 121 physicians (44.6% staff, 55.4% residents) from Spain 53.7%, Italy 17.4%, Denmark 16.5% and Germany 12.4% completed the survey. Hospital departments involved were: medical 51.2%, ICUs 43%, surgical 3.3% and pharmaceutical 2.5%. The mean score of adequate responses (± SD) was 5.8 ± 1.7 points, with statistically significant differences between study site and type of physicians. Regarding candidiasis, 69% of the physicians clearly distinguished colonization from infection and the local rate of fluconazole resistance was known by 24%. The accepted indications of antifungal prophylaxis were known by 38%. Regarding aspergillosis, 52% of responders could differentiate colonization from infection and 42% knew the diagnostic value of galactomannan. Radiological features of invasive aspergillosis were well recognized by 58% of physicians and 57% of them were aware of the antifungal considered as first line treatment. However, only 37% knew the recommended length of therapy. This simple, easily completed questionnaire enabled us to identify some weakness in the knowledge of invasive fungal infection management among European physicians. This survey could serve as a guide to design a future tailored European training program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-0809-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25888028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antifungal Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; Aspergillosis - drug therapy ; Candidiasis, Invasive - drug therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Europe ; Female ; Fluconazole - administration &amp; dosage ; Fluconazole - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>BMC infectious diseases, 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Valerio et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b595t-6ce66eeed71fdf13863d478caad3ba606500c7fbfae9b407a126a4e60c05b7f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b595t-6ce66eeed71fdf13863d478caad3ba606500c7fbfae9b407a126a4e60c05b7f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344747/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344747/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valerio, Maricela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vena, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouza, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Nanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viale, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannella, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf the COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</creatorcontrib><title>How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?</title><title>BMC infectious diseases</title><addtitle>BMC Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The use of systemic antifungal agents has increased in most tertiary care centers. However, antifungal stewardship has deserved very little attention. Our objective was to assess the knowledge of European prescribing physicians as a first step of an international program of antifungal stewardship. Staff physicians and residents of 4 European countries were invited to complete a 20-point questionnaire that was based on current guidelines of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. 121 physicians (44.6% staff, 55.4% residents) from Spain 53.7%, Italy 17.4%, Denmark 16.5% and Germany 12.4% completed the survey. Hospital departments involved were: medical 51.2%, ICUs 43%, surgical 3.3% and pharmaceutical 2.5%. The mean score of adequate responses (± SD) was 5.8 ± 1.7 points, with statistically significant differences between study site and type of physicians. Regarding candidiasis, 69% of the physicians clearly distinguished colonization from infection and the local rate of fluconazole resistance was known by 24%. The accepted indications of antifungal prophylaxis were known by 38%. Regarding aspergillosis, 52% of responders could differentiate colonization from infection and 42% knew the diagnostic value of galactomannan. Radiological features of invasive aspergillosis were well recognized by 58% of physicians and 57% of them were aware of the antifungal considered as first line treatment. However, only 37% knew the recommended length of therapy. This simple, easily completed questionnaire enabled us to identify some weakness in the knowledge of invasive fungal infection management among European physicians. This survey could serve as a guide to design a future tailored European training program.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aspergillosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Candidiasis, Invasive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluconazole - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fluconazole - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1471-2334</issn><issn>1471-2334</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r1jAYhosobk5_gCdS8EQPOpMmTdITx5jTDQYDvw48CWn6pG-0TWrSvrr9evPSOVaYIDnIx3Pdd8KdJ8ueY3SIsWBvIi4FrwuEqwIJVBfXD7J9TDkuSkLowzvrvexJjN8RwlyU9eNsr6yEEKgU-9m3M_8rH2a9yU_n4EdQLh8DRB1sY12Xj5uraLVVLuY_XCJV4-cpt26rot1CbmbXqT7tDejJ-kQNyqkOBnDT0dPskVF9hGc380H25f3p55Oz4uLyw_nJ8UXRVHU1FUwDYwDQcmxag4lgpKVcaKVa0iiGWIWQ5qYxCuqGIq5wyRQFhjSqGm4IOcjeLr7j3AzQ6nR3UL0cgx1UuJJeWbmuOLuRnd9KSijllCeDd4tBY_0_DNYV7Qe5ZC9T9nKXvbxONq9u3hH8zxniJAcbNfS9cuDnKDHjlNWYlmVCXy5oSg9kis8nX73D5XFFMakRoTvq8B4qjRYGq70DY9P5SvB6JUjMBL-nTs0xyvNPH_-fvfy6ZvHC6uBjDGBus8FI7jrx3jRe3P2VW8Xf1iN_ACWl2tg</recordid><startdate>20150221</startdate><enddate>20150221</enddate><creator>Valerio, Maricela</creator><creator>Vena, Antonio</creator><creator>Bouza, Emilio</creator><creator>Reiter, Nanna</creator><creator>Viale, Pierluigi</creator><creator>Hochreiter, Marcel</creator><creator>Giannella, Maddalena</creator><creator>Muñoz, Patricia</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150221</creationdate><title>How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?</title><author>Valerio, Maricela ; Vena, Antonio ; Bouza, Emilio ; Reiter, Nanna ; Viale, Pierluigi ; Hochreiter, Marcel ; Giannella, Maddalena ; Muñoz, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b595t-6ce66eeed71fdf13863d478caad3ba606500c7fbfae9b407a126a4e60c05b7f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aspergillosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Candidiasis, Invasive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluconazole - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fluconazole - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valerio, Maricela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vena, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouza, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Nanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viale, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannella, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf the COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valerio, Maricela</au><au>Vena, Antonio</au><au>Bouza, Emilio</au><au>Reiter, Nanna</au><au>Viale, Pierluigi</au><au>Hochreiter, Marcel</au><au>Giannella, Maddalena</au><au>Muñoz, Patricia</au><aucorp>COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf the COMIC study group (Collaborative group on Mycosis)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?</atitle><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2015-02-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>80-80</pages><artnum>80</artnum><issn>1471-2334</issn><eissn>1471-2334</eissn><abstract>The use of systemic antifungal agents has increased in most tertiary care centers. However, antifungal stewardship has deserved very little attention. Our objective was to assess the knowledge of European prescribing physicians as a first step of an international program of antifungal stewardship. Staff physicians and residents of 4 European countries were invited to complete a 20-point questionnaire that was based on current guidelines of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. 121 physicians (44.6% staff, 55.4% residents) from Spain 53.7%, Italy 17.4%, Denmark 16.5% and Germany 12.4% completed the survey. Hospital departments involved were: medical 51.2%, ICUs 43%, surgical 3.3% and pharmaceutical 2.5%. The mean score of adequate responses (± SD) was 5.8 ± 1.7 points, with statistically significant differences between study site and type of physicians. Regarding candidiasis, 69% of the physicians clearly distinguished colonization from infection and the local rate of fluconazole resistance was known by 24%. The accepted indications of antifungal prophylaxis were known by 38%. Regarding aspergillosis, 52% of responders could differentiate colonization from infection and 42% knew the diagnostic value of galactomannan. Radiological features of invasive aspergillosis were well recognized by 58% of physicians and 57% of them were aware of the antifungal considered as first line treatment. However, only 37% knew the recommended length of therapy. This simple, easily completed questionnaire enabled us to identify some weakness in the knowledge of invasive fungal infection management among European physicians. This survey could serve as a guide to design a future tailored European training program.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25888028</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12879-015-0809-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2334
ispartof BMC infectious diseases, 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80
issn 1471-2334
1471-2334
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4344747
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Antifungal Agents - administration & dosage
Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use
Aspergillosis - drug therapy
Candidiasis, Invasive - drug therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Europe
Female
Fluconazole - administration & dosage
Fluconazole - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
title How much European prescribing physicians know about invasive fungal infections management?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20much%20European%20prescribing%20physicians%20know%20about%20invasive%20fungal%20infections%20management?&rft.jtitle=BMC%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Valerio,%20Maricela&rft.aucorp=COMIC%20study%20group%20(Collaborative%20group%20on%20Mycosis)&rft.date=2015-02-21&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=80-80&rft.artnum=80&rft.issn=1471-2334&rft.eissn=1471-2334&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12879-015-0809-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541390342%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674691422&rft_id=info:pmid/25888028&rft_galeid=A541390342&rfr_iscdi=true