Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial
Many children do not engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), highlighting the need to find ways to increase children's PA. Process evaluations play an important role in improving the science of randomised controlled trials. We recently reported the results of the Action 3:30 clu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC public health 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.156-156, Article 156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Jago, Russell Sebire, Simon J Davies, Ben Wood, Lesley Banfield, Kathryn Edwards, Mark J Powell, Jane E Montgomery, Alan A Thompson, Janice L Fox, Kenneth R |
description | Many children do not engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), highlighting the need to find ways to increase children's PA. Process evaluations play an important role in improving the science of randomised controlled trials. We recently reported the results of the Action 3:30 cluster randomised feasibility trial illustrating higher levels of moderate to vigorous intensity PA among boys but not girls. The aim of this paper is to report the process evaluation results including intervention fidelity, implementation, context and how intervention components and trial design could be improved before proceeding to a definitive RCT.
Children's session enjoyment was assessed every two weeks. Reasons for non-attendance were provided by questionnaire at the end of the intervention. Post intervention interviews were held with participating teaching assistants (TAs) and school key contacts (KCs), and focus groups were conducted with children in all 10 intervention schools. Interviews and focus groups examined how recruitment and session attendance might be improved and established which elements of the programme that were and were not well received.
Data indicated good intervention fidelity with TA's adopting enjoyment-focussed teaching styles and the sessions improving children's skills and self-esteem. Several positive aspects of implementation were identified, including high session variety, the opportunity to work in teams, the child-led sessions and the engaging leader style. In terms of context there was evidence that TA's faced difficulties managing challenging behaviour and that further training in this area was needed. TAs and KCs felt that recruitment could be improved by providing taster sessions during PE lessons and clarifying the days that the clubs would run at the point of recruitment. The programme could be improved to enhance interest for girls, by including training for managing disruptive behaviour and making some activities more age-group appropriate.
Action 3.30 showed promise but could be improved by ensuring age appropriate activities, providing more appeal to girls and improving recruitment through taster sessions and early establishment of days of the week it is to be offered on.
ISRCTN58502739. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-015-1501-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4340639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541413331</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541413331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-d2a24b9a4d9607fdd008e5268c1eb9e1540e97e1d95616b61918191a9486ffa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ustu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGWWMAmxRPbeXSBVJVXpUpsYG1NnMm9rnzti51c0U_iL3F6S2lRkWXZHp858zhTFC-BHwO09bsEVdt2JQdVguJQikfFIcgGykqq9vGd-0HxLKVLzqFpVfW0OKhU23Qt8MPi17k3kTBZv2Jmbd0Qyb9JbLu-StagY2gmu7PTFZvWMcyrNUM2EWakX5WYkk0T-ok5Ghj9nCKaOUZrZoeRWT9R3JGfbPAnbBuDoZQY7dDNuNhYGDMpXUfIL3EiOIvoh7CxKdONS1K9ddexo0X3vHgyokv04uY8Kr5_-vjt7Et58fXz-dnpRdkrpaZyqLCSfYdy6GrejMPAeUuqqlsD1HcESnLqGoKhUzXUfQ0dtHljJ9t6HLERR8X7Pe927jc0mFxBRKe30W4wXumAVt__8XatV2GnpZC8Fl0m-LAn6G34D8H9HxM2ei-lzlLqRUotMs3bmzxi-DFTmnRujCHn0FOYk4a6kRUIEHWGvv4Hehnm6HOXdFVlnRsha_iLWqEjbf0YFsEWUn2qJEgQQiyo4wdQeQ20sSZ4Gm2233OAvYOJIaVI422lwPUypg_W9upuj289_syl-A1ua-af</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2298173461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jago, Russell ; Sebire, Simon J ; Davies, Ben ; Wood, Lesley ; Banfield, Kathryn ; Edwards, Mark J ; Powell, Jane E ; Montgomery, Alan A ; Thompson, Janice L ; Fox, Kenneth R</creator><creatorcontrib>Jago, Russell ; Sebire, Simon J ; Davies, Ben ; Wood, Lesley ; Banfield, Kathryn ; Edwards, Mark J ; Powell, Jane E ; Montgomery, Alan A ; Thompson, Janice L ; Fox, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><description>Many children do not engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), highlighting the need to find ways to increase children's PA. Process evaluations play an important role in improving the science of randomised controlled trials. We recently reported the results of the Action 3:30 cluster randomised feasibility trial illustrating higher levels of moderate to vigorous intensity PA among boys but not girls. The aim of this paper is to report the process evaluation results including intervention fidelity, implementation, context and how intervention components and trial design could be improved before proceeding to a definitive RCT.
Children's session enjoyment was assessed every two weeks. Reasons for non-attendance were provided by questionnaire at the end of the intervention. Post intervention interviews were held with participating teaching assistants (TAs) and school key contacts (KCs), and focus groups were conducted with children in all 10 intervention schools. Interviews and focus groups examined how recruitment and session attendance might be improved and established which elements of the programme that were and were not well received.
Data indicated good intervention fidelity with TA's adopting enjoyment-focussed teaching styles and the sessions improving children's skills and self-esteem. Several positive aspects of implementation were identified, including high session variety, the opportunity to work in teams, the child-led sessions and the engaging leader style. In terms of context there was evidence that TA's faced difficulties managing challenging behaviour and that further training in this area was needed. TAs and KCs felt that recruitment could be improved by providing taster sessions during PE lessons and clarifying the days that the clubs would run at the point of recruitment. The programme could be improved to enhance interest for girls, by including training for managing disruptive behaviour and making some activities more age-group appropriate.
Action 3.30 showed promise but could be improved by ensuring age appropriate activities, providing more appeal to girls and improving recruitment through taster sessions and early establishment of days of the week it is to be offered on.
ISRCTN58502739.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1501-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25879810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Age ; Age Factors ; Child ; Children ; Curricula ; Exercise ; Feasibility ; Female ; Girls ; Health Promotion - organization & administration ; Humans ; Intervention ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Methods ; Physical activity ; Physical education ; Physical fitness ; Play and Playthings ; Public health ; Randomization ; Recruitment ; Schools ; Schools - organization & administration ; Sex Factors ; Systematic review ; Teachers ; Teaching assistants ; Teenagers ; Training</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.156-156, Article 156</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Jago et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-d2a24b9a4d9607fdd008e5268c1eb9e1540e97e1d95616b61918191a9486ffa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-d2a24b9a4d9607fdd008e5268c1eb9e1540e97e1d95616b61918191a9486ffa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340639/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340639/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jago, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebire, Simon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfield, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jane E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Alan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Janice L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>Many children do not engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), highlighting the need to find ways to increase children's PA. Process evaluations play an important role in improving the science of randomised controlled trials. We recently reported the results of the Action 3:30 cluster randomised feasibility trial illustrating higher levels of moderate to vigorous intensity PA among boys but not girls. The aim of this paper is to report the process evaluation results including intervention fidelity, implementation, context and how intervention components and trial design could be improved before proceeding to a definitive RCT.
Children's session enjoyment was assessed every two weeks. Reasons for non-attendance were provided by questionnaire at the end of the intervention. Post intervention interviews were held with participating teaching assistants (TAs) and school key contacts (KCs), and focus groups were conducted with children in all 10 intervention schools. Interviews and focus groups examined how recruitment and session attendance might be improved and established which elements of the programme that were and were not well received.
Data indicated good intervention fidelity with TA's adopting enjoyment-focussed teaching styles and the sessions improving children's skills and self-esteem. Several positive aspects of implementation were identified, including high session variety, the opportunity to work in teams, the child-led sessions and the engaging leader style. In terms of context there was evidence that TA's faced difficulties managing challenging behaviour and that further training in this area was needed. TAs and KCs felt that recruitment could be improved by providing taster sessions during PE lessons and clarifying the days that the clubs would run at the point of recruitment. The programme could be improved to enhance interest for girls, by including training for managing disruptive behaviour and making some activities more age-group appropriate.
Action 3.30 showed promise but could be improved by ensuring age appropriate activities, providing more appeal to girls and improving recruitment through taster sessions and early establishment of days of the week it is to be offered on.
ISRCTN58502739.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical education</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Play and Playthings</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Schools - organization & administration</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching assistants</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ustu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGWWMAmxRPbeXSBVJVXpUpsYG1NnMm9rnzti51c0U_iL3F6S2lRkWXZHp858zhTFC-BHwO09bsEVdt2JQdVguJQikfFIcgGykqq9vGd-0HxLKVLzqFpVfW0OKhU23Qt8MPi17k3kTBZv2Jmbd0Qyb9JbLu-StagY2gmu7PTFZvWMcyrNUM2EWakX5WYkk0T-ok5Ghj9nCKaOUZrZoeRWT9R3JGfbPAnbBuDoZQY7dDNuNhYGDMpXUfIL3EiOIvoh7CxKdONS1K9ddexo0X3vHgyokv04uY8Kr5_-vjt7Et58fXz-dnpRdkrpaZyqLCSfYdy6GrejMPAeUuqqlsD1HcESnLqGoKhUzXUfQ0dtHljJ9t6HLERR8X7Pe927jc0mFxBRKe30W4wXumAVt__8XatV2GnpZC8Fl0m-LAn6G34D8H9HxM2ei-lzlLqRUotMs3bmzxi-DFTmnRujCHn0FOYk4a6kRUIEHWGvv4Hehnm6HOXdFVlnRsha_iLWqEjbf0YFsEWUn2qJEgQQiyo4wdQeQ20sSZ4Gm2233OAvYOJIaVI422lwPUypg_W9upuj289_syl-A1ua-af</recordid><startdate>20150218</startdate><enddate>20150218</enddate><creator>Jago, Russell</creator><creator>Sebire, Simon J</creator><creator>Davies, Ben</creator><creator>Wood, Lesley</creator><creator>Banfield, Kathryn</creator><creator>Edwards, Mark J</creator><creator>Powell, Jane E</creator><creator>Montgomery, Alan A</creator><creator>Thompson, Janice L</creator><creator>Fox, Kenneth R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150218</creationdate><title>Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial</title><author>Jago, Russell ; Sebire, Simon J ; Davies, Ben ; Wood, Lesley ; Banfield, Kathryn ; Edwards, Mark J ; Powell, Jane E ; Montgomery, Alan A ; Thompson, Janice L ; Fox, Kenneth R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-d2a24b9a4d9607fdd008e5268c1eb9e1540e97e1d95616b61918191a9486ffa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical education</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Play and Playthings</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Schools - organization & administration</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching assistants</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jago, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebire, Simon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfield, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jane E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Alan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Janice L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jago, Russell</au><au>Sebire, Simon J</au><au>Davies, Ben</au><au>Wood, Lesley</au><au>Banfield, Kathryn</au><au>Edwards, Mark J</au><au>Powell, Jane E</au><au>Montgomery, Alan A</au><au>Thompson, Janice L</au><au>Fox, Kenneth R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2015-02-18</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>156-156</pages><artnum>156</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Many children do not engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), highlighting the need to find ways to increase children's PA. Process evaluations play an important role in improving the science of randomised controlled trials. We recently reported the results of the Action 3:30 cluster randomised feasibility trial illustrating higher levels of moderate to vigorous intensity PA among boys but not girls. The aim of this paper is to report the process evaluation results including intervention fidelity, implementation, context and how intervention components and trial design could be improved before proceeding to a definitive RCT.
Children's session enjoyment was assessed every two weeks. Reasons for non-attendance were provided by questionnaire at the end of the intervention. Post intervention interviews were held with participating teaching assistants (TAs) and school key contacts (KCs), and focus groups were conducted with children in all 10 intervention schools. Interviews and focus groups examined how recruitment and session attendance might be improved and established which elements of the programme that were and were not well received.
Data indicated good intervention fidelity with TA's adopting enjoyment-focussed teaching styles and the sessions improving children's skills and self-esteem. Several positive aspects of implementation were identified, including high session variety, the opportunity to work in teams, the child-led sessions and the engaging leader style. In terms of context there was evidence that TA's faced difficulties managing challenging behaviour and that further training in this area was needed. TAs and KCs felt that recruitment could be improved by providing taster sessions during PE lessons and clarifying the days that the clubs would run at the point of recruitment. The programme could be improved to enhance interest for girls, by including training for managing disruptive behaviour and making some activities more age-group appropriate.
Action 3.30 showed promise but could be improved by ensuring age appropriate activities, providing more appeal to girls and improving recruitment through taster sessions and early establishment of days of the week it is to be offered on.
ISRCTN58502739.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25879810</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-015-1501-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2015-02, Vol.15 (1), p.156-156, Article 156 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4340639 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Age Age Factors Child Children Curricula Exercise Feasibility Female Girls Health Promotion - organization & administration Humans Intervention Interviews as Topic Male Methods Physical activity Physical education Physical fitness Play and Playthings Public health Randomization Recruitment Schools Schools - organization & administration Sex Factors Systematic review Teachers Teaching assistants Teenagers Training |
title | Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20children's%20physical%20activity%20through%20a%20teaching-assistant%20led%20extracurricular%20intervention:%20process%20evaluation%20of%20the%20action%203:30%20randomised%20feasibility%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Jago,%20Russell&rft.date=2015-02-18&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=156-156&rft.artnum=156&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-015-1501-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541413331%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2298173461&rft_id=info:pmid/25879810&rft_galeid=A541413331&rfr_iscdi=true |