Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium
Background/Objectives: In spite of several studies relating dietary patterns to breast cancer risk, evidence so far remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate associations of dietary patterns derived with three different methods with breast cancer risk. Subjects/Methods: The Mediterranean...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical nutrition 2014-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1353-1358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1353 |
container_title | European journal of clinical nutrition |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Pot, G K Stephen, A M Dahm, C C Key, T J Cairns, B J Burley, V J Cade, J E Greenwood, D C Keogh, R H Bhaniani, A McTaggart, A Lentjes, M A H Mishra, G Brunner, E J Khaw, K T |
description | Background/Objectives:
In spite of several studies relating dietary patterns to breast cancer risk, evidence so far remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate associations of dietary patterns derived with three different methods with breast cancer risk.
Subjects/Methods:
The Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), principal components analyses (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) were used to derive dietary patterns in a case–control study of 610 breast cancer cases and 1891 matched controls within four UK cohort studies. Dietary intakes were collected prospectively using 4- to 7-day food diaries and resulting food consumption data were grouped into 42 food groups. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for associations between pattern scores and breast cancer risk adjusting for relevant covariates. A separate model was fitted for post-menopausal women only.
Results:
The MDS was not associated with breast cancer risk (OR comparing first tertile with third 1.20 (95% CI 0.92; 1.56)), nor the first PCA-derived dietary pattern, explaining 2.7% of variation of diet and characterized by cheese, crisps and savoury snacks, legumes, nuts and seeds (OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.91; 1.53)). The first RRR-derived pattern, a ‘high-alcohol’ pattern, was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00; 1.62), which was most pronounced in post-menopausal women (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.08; 1.98)).
Conclusions:
A ‘high-alcohol’ dietary pattern derived with RRR was associated with an increased breast cancer risk; no evidence of associations of other dietary patterns with breast cancer risk was observed in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ejcn.2014.135 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4340564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A403167861</galeid><sourcerecordid>A403167861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c751t-27544c0e06047199c46fb317f5a91486f737093b0f2fed3ff5d36ef3604512233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX16FUConiZMd-ZvgjL-IkLXtxzyKQr0xm7kzFJr4h_3gzO7s7KIJJAQfLkrVTV2zRPCZ4TzBavYWPDnGLC54SJe80p4UrOhOT4fnOKW8FnDGN10jzKeYMrpRR92JxQgQWlDJ82v956KCb9RFtTCqSQUQfJX0GHfvjSo3Eait8OgEYofewycimOyMXYoc6b5CEjEzq0SmByQdYECwkln78hH1DpAV1-RtcZlrGPqdQQco1-Gh83D5wZMjzZx7Pm8v27r8uPs4svHz4tzy9mVglSZlQJzi0GLDFXpG0tl27FiHLCtIQvpFNM4ZatsKMOOuac6JgExyouSK2SnTVv_uhup9UInYVQkhn0Nvmx_ktH4_Xdm-B7vY5XmjOOayurwKu9QIrfJ8hFjz5bGAYTIE5ZEykXVEgmxH-gtG0Vk1JV9Plf6CZOKdROaCp53Uxw_C9qpyUWnMsDam0G0D64WAuxu9T6vIoQqRaSVGp2hFpDgFp1DOB8Pb7Dz4_wdXUwenv0wcuDBz2YofQ5DlPxdehHf2JTzDmBu5kGwXrna73ztd75WldfV_7Z4Qhv6GsjV-DFHjDZmsGlakWfb7kWU6qoui0p16uwhnTQzqOZfwOrGwxN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629584460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pot, G K ; Stephen, A M ; Dahm, C C ; Key, T J ; Cairns, B J ; Burley, V J ; Cade, J E ; Greenwood, D C ; Keogh, R H ; Bhaniani, A ; McTaggart, A ; Lentjes, M A H ; Mishra, G ; Brunner, E J ; Khaw, K T</creator><creatorcontrib>Pot, G K ; Stephen, A M ; Dahm, C C ; Key, T J ; Cairns, B J ; Burley, V J ; Cade, J E ; Greenwood, D C ; Keogh, R H ; Bhaniani, A ; McTaggart, A ; Lentjes, M A H ; Mishra, G ; Brunner, E J ; Khaw, K T</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Objectives:
In spite of several studies relating dietary patterns to breast cancer risk, evidence so far remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate associations of dietary patterns derived with three different methods with breast cancer risk.
Subjects/Methods:
The Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), principal components analyses (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) were used to derive dietary patterns in a case–control study of 610 breast cancer cases and 1891 matched controls within four UK cohort studies. Dietary intakes were collected prospectively using 4- to 7-day food diaries and resulting food consumption data were grouped into 42 food groups. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for associations between pattern scores and breast cancer risk adjusting for relevant covariates. A separate model was fitted for post-menopausal women only.
Results:
The MDS was not associated with breast cancer risk (OR comparing first tertile with third 1.20 (95% CI 0.92; 1.56)), nor the first PCA-derived dietary pattern, explaining 2.7% of variation of diet and characterized by cheese, crisps and savoury snacks, legumes, nuts and seeds (OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.91; 1.53)). The first RRR-derived pattern, a ‘high-alcohol’ pattern, was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00; 1.62), which was most pronounced in post-menopausal women (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.08; 1.98)).
Conclusions:
A ‘high-alcohol’ dietary pattern derived with RRR was associated with an increased breast cancer risk; no evidence of associations of other dietary patterns with breast cancer risk was observed in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25052230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/499 ; 692/699/67/1347 ; 692/700/2814 ; Alcohols ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; Case studies ; Case-Control Studies ; Clinical Nutrition ; Cohort Studies ; Dairy products ; Diaries ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Diet, Mediterranean ; Epidemiology ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food groups ; Food intake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Humans ; Incidence ; Internal Medicine ; Legumes ; Logistic Models ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Menopause ; Metabolic Diseases ; Middle Aged ; Nuts ; original-article ; Post-menopause ; Principal Component Analysis ; Principal components analysis ; Prospective Studies ; Public Health ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Risk ; Risk factors ; Seeds ; Snack foods ; Tumors ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1353-1358</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Dec 2014</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c751t-27544c0e06047199c46fb317f5a91486f737093b0f2fed3ff5d36ef3604512233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c751t-27544c0e06047199c46fb317f5a91486f737093b0f2fed3ff5d36ef3604512233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/ejcn.2014.135$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/ejcn.2014.135$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29022727$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25052230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pot, G K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahm, C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burley, V J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaniani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTaggart, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentjes, M A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, K T</creatorcontrib><title>Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium</title><title>European journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Background/Objectives:
In spite of several studies relating dietary patterns to breast cancer risk, evidence so far remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate associations of dietary patterns derived with three different methods with breast cancer risk.
Subjects/Methods:
The Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), principal components analyses (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) were used to derive dietary patterns in a case–control study of 610 breast cancer cases and 1891 matched controls within four UK cohort studies. Dietary intakes were collected prospectively using 4- to 7-day food diaries and resulting food consumption data were grouped into 42 food groups. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for associations between pattern scores and breast cancer risk adjusting for relevant covariates. A separate model was fitted for post-menopausal women only.
Results:
The MDS was not associated with breast cancer risk (OR comparing first tertile with third 1.20 (95% CI 0.92; 1.56)), nor the first PCA-derived dietary pattern, explaining 2.7% of variation of diet and characterized by cheese, crisps and savoury snacks, legumes, nuts and seeds (OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.91; 1.53)). The first RRR-derived pattern, a ‘high-alcohol’ pattern, was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00; 1.62), which was most pronounced in post-menopausal women (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.08; 1.98)).
Conclusions:
A ‘high-alcohol’ dietary pattern derived with RRR was associated with an increased breast cancer risk; no evidence of associations of other dietary patterns with breast cancer risk was observed in this study.</description><subject>692/499</subject><subject>692/699/67/1347</subject><subject>692/700/2814</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet, Mediterranean</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food groups</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuts</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Post-menopause</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Snack foods</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0954-3007</issn><issn>1476-5640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX16FUConiZMd-ZvgjL-IkLXtxzyKQr0xm7kzFJr4h_3gzO7s7KIJJAQfLkrVTV2zRPCZ4TzBavYWPDnGLC54SJe80p4UrOhOT4fnOKW8FnDGN10jzKeYMrpRR92JxQgQWlDJ82v956KCb9RFtTCqSQUQfJX0GHfvjSo3Eait8OgEYofewycimOyMXYoc6b5CEjEzq0SmByQdYECwkln78hH1DpAV1-RtcZlrGPqdQQco1-Gh83D5wZMjzZx7Pm8v27r8uPs4svHz4tzy9mVglSZlQJzi0GLDFXpG0tl27FiHLCtIQvpFNM4ZatsKMOOuac6JgExyouSK2SnTVv_uhup9UInYVQkhn0Nvmx_ktH4_Xdm-B7vY5XmjOOayurwKu9QIrfJ8hFjz5bGAYTIE5ZEykXVEgmxH-gtG0Vk1JV9Plf6CZOKdROaCp53Uxw_C9qpyUWnMsDam0G0D64WAuxu9T6vIoQqRaSVGp2hFpDgFp1DOB8Pb7Dz4_wdXUwenv0wcuDBz2YofQ5DlPxdehHf2JTzDmBu5kGwXrna73ztd75WldfV_7Z4Qhv6GsjV-DFHjDZmsGlakWfb7kWU6qoui0p16uwhnTQzqOZfwOrGwxN</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Pot, G K</creator><creator>Stephen, A M</creator><creator>Dahm, C C</creator><creator>Key, T J</creator><creator>Cairns, B J</creator><creator>Burley, V J</creator><creator>Cade, J E</creator><creator>Greenwood, D C</creator><creator>Keogh, R H</creator><creator>Bhaniani, A</creator><creator>McTaggart, A</creator><creator>Lentjes, M A H</creator><creator>Mishra, G</creator><creator>Brunner, E J</creator><creator>Khaw, K T</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium</title><author>Pot, G K ; Stephen, A M ; Dahm, C C ; Key, T J ; Cairns, B J ; Burley, V J ; Cade, J E ; Greenwood, D C ; Keogh, R H ; Bhaniani, A ; McTaggart, A ; Lentjes, M A H ; Mishra, G ; Brunner, E J ; Khaw, K T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c751t-27544c0e06047199c46fb317f5a91486f737093b0f2fed3ff5d36ef3604512233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>692/499</topic><topic>692/699/67/1347</topic><topic>692/700/2814</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet, Mediterranean</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food groups</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuts</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Post-menopause</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Snack foods</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pot, G K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahm, C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burley, V J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaniani, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTaggart, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentjes, M A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, K T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pot, G K</au><au>Stephen, A M</au><au>Dahm, C C</au><au>Key, T J</au><au>Cairns, B J</au><au>Burley, V J</au><au>Cade, J E</au><au>Greenwood, D C</au><au>Keogh, R H</au><au>Bhaniani, A</au><au>McTaggart, A</au><au>Lentjes, M A H</au><au>Mishra, G</au><au>Brunner, E J</au><au>Khaw, K T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1353</spage><epage>1358</epage><pages>1353-1358</pages><issn>0954-3007</issn><eissn>1476-5640</eissn><abstract>Background/Objectives:
In spite of several studies relating dietary patterns to breast cancer risk, evidence so far remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate associations of dietary patterns derived with three different methods with breast cancer risk.
Subjects/Methods:
The Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), principal components analyses (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) were used to derive dietary patterns in a case–control study of 610 breast cancer cases and 1891 matched controls within four UK cohort studies. Dietary intakes were collected prospectively using 4- to 7-day food diaries and resulting food consumption data were grouped into 42 food groups. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for associations between pattern scores and breast cancer risk adjusting for relevant covariates. A separate model was fitted for post-menopausal women only.
Results:
The MDS was not associated with breast cancer risk (OR comparing first tertile with third 1.20 (95% CI 0.92; 1.56)), nor the first PCA-derived dietary pattern, explaining 2.7% of variation of diet and characterized by cheese, crisps and savoury snacks, legumes, nuts and seeds (OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.91; 1.53)). The first RRR-derived pattern, a ‘high-alcohol’ pattern, was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00; 1.62), which was most pronounced in post-menopausal women (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.08; 1.98)).
Conclusions:
A ‘high-alcohol’ dietary pattern derived with RRR was associated with an increased breast cancer risk; no evidence of associations of other dietary patterns with breast cancer risk was observed in this study.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>25052230</pmid><doi>10.1038/ejcn.2014.135</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-3007 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1353-1358 |
issn | 0954-3007 1476-5640 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4340564 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 692/499 692/699/67/1347 692/700/2814 Alcohols Biological and medical sciences Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - etiology Case studies Case-Control Studies Clinical Nutrition Cohort Studies Dairy products Diaries Diet Diet Records Diet, Mediterranean Epidemiology Feeding Behavior - physiology Feeding. Feeding behavior Female Food Food consumption Food groups Food intake Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health aspects Health risks Humans Incidence Internal Medicine Legumes Logistic Models Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Menopause Metabolic Diseases Middle Aged Nuts original-article Post-menopause Principal Component Analysis Principal components analysis Prospective Studies Public Health Regression analysis Regression models Risk Risk factors Seeds Snack foods Tumors United Kingdom - epidemiology Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
title | Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T14%3A12%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary%20patterns%20derived%20with%20multiple%20methods%20from%20food%20diaries%20and%20breast%20cancer%20risk%20in%20the%20UK%20Dietary%20Cohort%20Consortium&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Pot,%20G%20K&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1353&rft.epage=1358&rft.pages=1353-1358&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ejcn.2014.135&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA403167861%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629584460&rft_id=info:pmid/25052230&rft_galeid=A403167861&rfr_iscdi=true |