Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?

This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were ide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological assessment 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094
Hauptverfasser: Rice, Amanda K., Boccaccini, Marcus T., Harris, Paige B., Hawes, Samuel W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1094
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1085
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 26
creator Rice, Amanda K.
Boccaccini, Marcus T.
Harris, Paige B.
Hawes, Samuel W.
description This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pas0000009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4332525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1639982714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtrFTEUhYNYbD364g-QARFEOprrJHlRpLUXKAhWwbewJ7NHU-ZMxmRGOP_e1HN60QfzkrDzsfbaexHyjNE3jAr9doJM_xz7gBwwK2zNhPz2sLyppLVQlu6TxzlfUcqkMOoR2efSCt5IfUDOjiPm6iTg0FWfcQjQhiHMm6qPqbqcYQ6-tra69DEV7Bh9QshYQb4pnY_b0vsnZK-HIePT3b0iX08-fjk6qy8-nZ4ffbioQVE210q13uiWSikBjFXGN7SHVnVSGw5WGtQ96sYY3rDOamykYkJwbdF0wKgXK_Juqzst7Ro7j-OcYHBTCmtIGxchuL9_xvDDfY-_nCwyiqsi8GonkOLPBfPs1iF7HAYYMS7ZsUZYa7guu1qRF_-gV3FJYxmvUFJrxpTS_6WUUI1QittCvd5SPsWcE_a3lhl11zG6uxgL_Pz-kLfoTW4FeLkDIHsY-gSjD_mOs4wXc6xwh1sOJnBT3nhIJdIBs19SKgu6bup442SxYJT4DXMOseQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535635529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W.</creator><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W. ; Reynolds, Cecil R</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson &amp; Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24932647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Commitments ; Criminal Offenders ; Criminals - psychology ; Criminals - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Forensic Psychiatry - methods ; Forensic Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Measurement errors ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sex offenders ; Sex Offenses ; Sex Offenses - psychology ; Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions ; Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency ; Techniques and methods ; Test Reliability ; Test Scores</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094</ispartof><rights>2014 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2014</rights><rights>2014 American Psychological Association 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29121151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paige B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson &amp; Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Criminals - psychology</subject><subject>Criminals - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sex Offenses</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions</subject><subject>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Scores</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtrFTEUhYNYbD364g-QARFEOprrJHlRpLUXKAhWwbewJ7NHU-ZMxmRGOP_e1HN60QfzkrDzsfbaexHyjNE3jAr9doJM_xz7gBwwK2zNhPz2sLyppLVQlu6TxzlfUcqkMOoR2efSCt5IfUDOjiPm6iTg0FWfcQjQhiHMm6qPqbqcYQ6-tra69DEV7Bh9QshYQb4pnY_b0vsnZK-HIePT3b0iX08-fjk6qy8-nZ4ffbioQVE210q13uiWSikBjFXGN7SHVnVSGw5WGtQ96sYY3rDOamykYkJwbdF0wKgXK_Juqzst7Ro7j-OcYHBTCmtIGxchuL9_xvDDfY-_nCwyiqsi8GonkOLPBfPs1iF7HAYYMS7ZsUZYa7guu1qRF_-gV3FJYxmvUFJrxpTS_6WUUI1QittCvd5SPsWcE_a3lhl11zG6uxgL_Pz-kLfoTW4FeLkDIHsY-gSjD_mOs4wXc6xwh1sOJnBT3nhIJdIBs19SKgu6bup442SxYJT4DXMOseQ</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Rice, Amanda K.</creator><creator>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creator><creator>Harris, Paige B.</creator><creator>Hawes, Samuel W.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><author>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Criminals - psychology</topic><topic>Criminals - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sex Offenses</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions</topic><topic>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paige B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice, Amanda K.</au><au>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</au><au>Harris, Paige B.</au><au>Hawes, Samuel W.</au><au>Reynolds, Cecil R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1094</epage><pages>1085-1094</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson &amp; Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>24932647</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4332525
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Commitments
Criminal Offenders
Criminals - psychology
Criminals - statistics & numerical data
Forensic Psychiatry - methods
Forensic Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data
Human
Humans
Male
Measurement errors
Medical sciences
Observer Variation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Sex offenders
Sex Offenses
Sex Offenses - psychology
Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data
Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions
Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency
Techniques and methods
Test Reliability
Test Scores
title Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Field%20Reliability%20for%20Static-99%20Scores%20Decrease%20as%20Scores%20Increase?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Rice,%20Amanda%20K.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1094&rft.pages=1085-1094&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1639982714%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535635529&rft_id=info:pmid/24932647&rfr_iscdi=true