Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?
This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were ide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1094 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1085 |
container_title | Psychological assessment |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Rice, Amanda K. Boccaccini, Marcus T. Harris, Paige B. Hawes, Samuel W. |
description | This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pas0000009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4332525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1639982714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtrFTEUhYNYbD364g-QARFEOprrJHlRpLUXKAhWwbewJ7NHU-ZMxmRGOP_e1HN60QfzkrDzsfbaexHyjNE3jAr9doJM_xz7gBwwK2zNhPz2sLyppLVQlu6TxzlfUcqkMOoR2efSCt5IfUDOjiPm6iTg0FWfcQjQhiHMm6qPqbqcYQ6-tra69DEV7Bh9QshYQb4pnY_b0vsnZK-HIePT3b0iX08-fjk6qy8-nZ4ffbioQVE210q13uiWSikBjFXGN7SHVnVSGw5WGtQ96sYY3rDOamykYkJwbdF0wKgXK_Juqzst7Ro7j-OcYHBTCmtIGxchuL9_xvDDfY-_nCwyiqsi8GonkOLPBfPs1iF7HAYYMS7ZsUZYa7guu1qRF_-gV3FJYxmvUFJrxpTS_6WUUI1QittCvd5SPsWcE_a3lhl11zG6uxgL_Pz-kLfoTW4FeLkDIHsY-gSjD_mOs4wXc6xwh1sOJnBT3nhIJdIBs19SKgu6bup442SxYJT4DXMOseQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535635529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W.</creator><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W. ; Reynolds, Cecil R</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24932647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Commitments ; Criminal Offenders ; Criminals - psychology ; Criminals - statistics & numerical data ; Forensic Psychiatry - methods ; Forensic Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Measurement errors ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Sex offenders ; Sex Offenses ; Sex Offenses - psychology ; Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data ; Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions ; Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency ; Techniques and methods ; Test Reliability ; Test Scores</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094</ispartof><rights>2014 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2014</rights><rights>2014 American Psychological Association 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29121151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paige B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Criminals - psychology</subject><subject>Criminals - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sex Offenses</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions</subject><subject>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Scores</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtrFTEUhYNYbD364g-QARFEOprrJHlRpLUXKAhWwbewJ7NHU-ZMxmRGOP_e1HN60QfzkrDzsfbaexHyjNE3jAr9doJM_xz7gBwwK2zNhPz2sLyppLVQlu6TxzlfUcqkMOoR2efSCt5IfUDOjiPm6iTg0FWfcQjQhiHMm6qPqbqcYQ6-tra69DEV7Bh9QshYQb4pnY_b0vsnZK-HIePT3b0iX08-fjk6qy8-nZ4ffbioQVE210q13uiWSikBjFXGN7SHVnVSGw5WGtQ96sYY3rDOamykYkJwbdF0wKgXK_Juqzst7Ro7j-OcYHBTCmtIGxchuL9_xvDDfY-_nCwyiqsi8GonkOLPBfPs1iF7HAYYMS7ZsUZYa7guu1qRF_-gV3FJYxmvUFJrxpTS_6WUUI1QittCvd5SPsWcE_a3lhl11zG6uxgL_Pz-kLfoTW4FeLkDIHsY-gSjD_mOs4wXc6xwh1sOJnBT3nhIJdIBs19SKgu6bup442SxYJT4DXMOseQ</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Rice, Amanda K.</creator><creator>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creator><creator>Harris, Paige B.</creator><creator>Hawes, Samuel W.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</title><author>Rice, Amanda K. ; Boccaccini, Marcus T. ; Harris, Paige B. ; Hawes, Samuel W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a501t-55bc87b0444aa8958c60fab5d4782a948e7fe7688261d97e645133279e8da10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Criminals - psychology</topic><topic>Criminals - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sex Offenses</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions</topic><topic>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paige B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice, Amanda K.</au><au>Boccaccini, Marcus T.</au><au>Harris, Paige B.</au><au>Hawes, Samuel W.</au><au>Reynolds, Cecil R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1094</epage><pages>1085-1094</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>24932647</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
ispartof | Psychological assessment, 2014-12, Vol.26 (4), p.1085-1094 |
issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4332525 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Commitments Criminal Offenders Criminals - psychology Criminals - statistics & numerical data Forensic Psychiatry - methods Forensic Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data Human Humans Male Measurement errors Medical sciences Observer Variation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reliability Reproducibility of Results Risk Assessment Risk Assessment - methods Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data Sex offenders Sex Offenses Sex Offenses - psychology Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data Sexual behavior disorders. Psychogenic sexual dysfunctions Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency Techniques and methods Test Reliability Test Scores |
title | Does Field Reliability for Static-99 Scores Decrease as Scores Increase? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Field%20Reliability%20for%20Static-99%20Scores%20Decrease%20as%20Scores%20Increase?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Rice,%20Amanda%20K.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1094&rft.pages=1085-1094&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1639982714%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535635529&rft_id=info:pmid/24932647&rfr_iscdi=true |