Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy
Background Great Danes (GDs) with osseous‐associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) have osteoarthritis (OA) of the cervical vertebrae. OA is often associated with increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in people and dogs. Hypothesis/Objectives To compare the trabecular BMD of the cervical verte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of veterinary internal medicine 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.1799-1804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1804 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1799 |
container_title | Journal of veterinary internal medicine |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Armstrong, J. da Costa, R.C. Martin-Vaquero, P. |
description | Background
Great Danes (GDs) with osseous‐associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) have osteoarthritis (OA) of the cervical vertebrae. OA is often associated with increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in people and dogs.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To compare the trabecular BMD of the cervical vertebrae between clinically normal (control) GDs and GDs with osseous‐associated CSM by using computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that the vertebral trabecular BMD of CSM‐affected GDs would be higher than that of control GDs.
Animals
Client‐owned GDs: 12 controls, 10 CSM affected.
Methods
Prospective study. CT of the cervical vertebral column was obtained alongside a calibration phantom. By placing a circular region of interest at the articular process joints, vertebral body, pedicles, and within each rod of the calibration phantom, trabecular BMD was measured in Hounsfield units, which were converted to diphosphate equivalent densities. Trabecular BMD measurements were compared between CSM‐affected and control dogs, and between males and females within the control group.
Results
Differences between CSM‐affected and control dogs were not significant for the articular processes (mean = −39; P = .37; 95% CI: −102 to 24), vertebral bodies (mean = −62; P = .08; 95% CI: −129 to 6), or pedicles (mean = −36; P = .51; 95% CI: −105 to 33). Differences between female and male were not significant.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
This study revealed no difference in BMD between control and CSM‐affected GDs. Based on our findings no association was detected between cervical OA and BMD in GDs with CSM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jvim.12444 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4330089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1627078849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4864-5ccf790b09c4959e3b2bd541dc8b1d03053b9c3dd62d624d777629391d5a11773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhlcIREPhwgMgS1wQ0hZ7ba-zF6Q2hVCUUqSE9mh57Qlx2LWDvRvYI2-O07QRcMCy5JH9ze-Z-bPsOcEnJK03661tT0jBGHuQjUhFq5yUonyYjfC4InlZMnyUPYlxjXHBORePs6OC08RzOsp-TSBsrVYNuobQQR1StAiqBt03KqAz7wBdWge7-3Nw0XYDsg5NA6gOnSsHEd3YboWUM7eB7zt0FSP4PuanMXptVQcGHX6Zb7wzQ-PbARq_Ud1qeJo9WqomwrO78zj78v7dYvIhn11NLyans1yzcclyrvVSVLjGlWYVr4DWRW04I0aPa2IwxZzWlabGlEXazAghyiLNghiuCBGCHmdv97qbvm7BaHBdakpugm1VGKRXVv794uxKfvVbySjFaZJJ4NWdQPDfe4idbG3U0DRpCqldScpCYDEesx368h907fvgUnuS4uQNYxXGiXq9p3TwMQZYHoohWO6clTtn5a2zCX7xZ_kH9N7KBJA98MM2MPxHSn68vri8F833OTZ28POQo8I3WQoquLz5NJV0_nkyXxQzWdLfMUe_fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3067644900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Armstrong, J. ; da Costa, R.C. ; Martin-Vaquero, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, J. ; da Costa, R.C. ; Martin-Vaquero, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Great Danes (GDs) with osseous‐associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) have osteoarthritis (OA) of the cervical vertebrae. OA is often associated with increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in people and dogs.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To compare the trabecular BMD of the cervical vertebrae between clinically normal (control) GDs and GDs with osseous‐associated CSM by using computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that the vertebral trabecular BMD of CSM‐affected GDs would be higher than that of control GDs.
Animals
Client‐owned GDs: 12 controls, 10 CSM affected.
Methods
Prospective study. CT of the cervical vertebral column was obtained alongside a calibration phantom. By placing a circular region of interest at the articular process joints, vertebral body, pedicles, and within each rod of the calibration phantom, trabecular BMD was measured in Hounsfield units, which were converted to diphosphate equivalent densities. Trabecular BMD measurements were compared between CSM‐affected and control dogs, and between males and females within the control group.
Results
Differences between CSM‐affected and control dogs were not significant for the articular processes (mean = −39; P = .37; 95% CI: −102 to 24), vertebral bodies (mean = −62; P = .08; 95% CI: −129 to 6), or pedicles (mean = −36; P = .51; 95% CI: −105 to 33). Differences between female and male were not significant.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
This study revealed no difference in BMD between control and CSM‐affected GDs. Based on our findings no association was detected between cervical OA and BMD in GDs with CSM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-6640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12444</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25312453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arthritis ; Bone Density ; Case-Control Studies ; Cervical spine ; Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Computed tomography ; Dog ; Dog Diseases - physiopathology ; Dogs ; Female ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoporosis ; Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Compression - veterinary ; Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology ; Spinal Stenosis - veterinary ; Tomography ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Vertebrae ; Wobbler syndrome ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.1799-1804</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4864-5ccf790b09c4959e3b2bd541dc8b1d03053b9c3dd62d624d777629391d5a11773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4864-5ccf790b09c4959e3b2bd541dc8b1d03053b9c3dd62d624d777629391d5a11773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330089/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330089/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1418,11567,27929,27930,45579,45580,46057,46481,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjvim.12444$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25312453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Vaquero, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy</title><title>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</title><addtitle>J Vet Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background
Great Danes (GDs) with osseous‐associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) have osteoarthritis (OA) of the cervical vertebrae. OA is often associated with increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in people and dogs.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To compare the trabecular BMD of the cervical vertebrae between clinically normal (control) GDs and GDs with osseous‐associated CSM by using computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that the vertebral trabecular BMD of CSM‐affected GDs would be higher than that of control GDs.
Animals
Client‐owned GDs: 12 controls, 10 CSM affected.
Methods
Prospective study. CT of the cervical vertebral column was obtained alongside a calibration phantom. By placing a circular region of interest at the articular process joints, vertebral body, pedicles, and within each rod of the calibration phantom, trabecular BMD was measured in Hounsfield units, which were converted to diphosphate equivalent densities. Trabecular BMD measurements were compared between CSM‐affected and control dogs, and between males and females within the control group.
Results
Differences between CSM‐affected and control dogs were not significant for the articular processes (mean = −39; P = .37; 95% CI: −102 to 24), vertebral bodies (mean = −62; P = .08; 95% CI: −129 to 6), or pedicles (mean = −36; P = .51; 95% CI: −105 to 33). Differences between female and male were not significant.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
This study revealed no difference in BMD between control and CSM‐affected GDs. Based on our findings no association was detected between cervical OA and BMD in GDs with CSM.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cervical spine</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dog</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - veterinary</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Wobbler syndrome</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0891-6640</issn><issn>1939-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhlcIREPhwgMgS1wQ0hZ7ba-zF6Q2hVCUUqSE9mh57Qlx2LWDvRvYI2-O07QRcMCy5JH9ze-Z-bPsOcEnJK03661tT0jBGHuQjUhFq5yUonyYjfC4InlZMnyUPYlxjXHBORePs6OC08RzOsp-TSBsrVYNuobQQR1StAiqBt03KqAz7wBdWge7-3Nw0XYDsg5NA6gOnSsHEd3YboWUM7eB7zt0FSP4PuanMXptVQcGHX6Zb7wzQ-PbARq_Ud1qeJo9WqomwrO78zj78v7dYvIhn11NLyans1yzcclyrvVSVLjGlWYVr4DWRW04I0aPa2IwxZzWlabGlEXazAghyiLNghiuCBGCHmdv97qbvm7BaHBdakpugm1VGKRXVv794uxKfvVbySjFaZJJ4NWdQPDfe4idbG3U0DRpCqldScpCYDEesx368h907fvgUnuS4uQNYxXGiXq9p3TwMQZYHoohWO6clTtn5a2zCX7xZ_kH9N7KBJA98MM2MPxHSn68vri8F833OTZ28POQo8I3WQoquLz5NJV0_nkyXxQzWdLfMUe_fg</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Armstrong, J.</creator><creator>da Costa, R.C.</creator><creator>Martin-Vaquero, P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy</title><author>Armstrong, J. ; da Costa, R.C. ; Martin-Vaquero, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4864-5ccf790b09c4959e3b2bd541dc8b1d03053b9c3dd62d624d777629391d5a11773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cervical spine</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dog</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - veterinary</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Wobbler syndrome</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Vaquero, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, J.</au><au>da Costa, R.C.</au><au>Martin-Vaquero, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Vet Intern Med</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1799</spage><epage>1804</epage><pages>1799-1804</pages><issn>0891-6640</issn><eissn>1939-1676</eissn><abstract>Background
Great Danes (GDs) with osseous‐associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM) have osteoarthritis (OA) of the cervical vertebrae. OA is often associated with increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in people and dogs.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To compare the trabecular BMD of the cervical vertebrae between clinically normal (control) GDs and GDs with osseous‐associated CSM by using computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that the vertebral trabecular BMD of CSM‐affected GDs would be higher than that of control GDs.
Animals
Client‐owned GDs: 12 controls, 10 CSM affected.
Methods
Prospective study. CT of the cervical vertebral column was obtained alongside a calibration phantom. By placing a circular region of interest at the articular process joints, vertebral body, pedicles, and within each rod of the calibration phantom, trabecular BMD was measured in Hounsfield units, which were converted to diphosphate equivalent densities. Trabecular BMD measurements were compared between CSM‐affected and control dogs, and between males and females within the control group.
Results
Differences between CSM‐affected and control dogs were not significant for the articular processes (mean = −39; P = .37; 95% CI: −102 to 24), vertebral bodies (mean = −62; P = .08; 95% CI: −129 to 6), or pedicles (mean = −36; P = .51; 95% CI: −105 to 33). Differences between female and male were not significant.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
This study revealed no difference in BMD between control and CSM‐affected GDs. Based on our findings no association was detected between cervical OA and BMD in GDs with CSM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25312453</pmid><doi>10.1111/jvim.12444</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0891-6640 |
ispartof | Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.1799-1804 |
issn | 0891-6640 1939-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4330089 |
source | Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Animals Arthritis Bone Density Case-Control Studies Cervical spine Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology Computed tomography Dog Dog Diseases - physiopathology Dogs Female Magnetic resonance imaging Male Osteoarthritis Osteoporosis Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology Spinal Cord Compression - veterinary Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology Spinal Stenosis - veterinary Tomography Ultrasonic imaging Vertebrae Wobbler syndrome Womens health |
title | Cervical Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in Great Danes With and Without Osseous-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A37%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20Vertebral%20Trabecular%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20in%20Great%20Danes%20With%20and%20Without%20Osseous-Associated%20Cervical%20Spondylomyelopathy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20veterinary%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Armstrong,%20J.&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1799&rft.epage=1804&rft.pages=1799-1804&rft.issn=0891-6640&rft.eissn=1939-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jvim.12444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1627078849%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3067644900&rft_id=info:pmid/25312453&rfr_iscdi=true |