Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2015-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e117-e122
Hauptverfasser: Rubio-Palau, Josep, Garcia-Linares, Jordi, Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio, González-Lagunas, Javier, Raspall-Martin, Guillermo, Mareque-Bueno, Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e122
container_issue 1
container_start_page e117
container_title Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal
container_volume 20
creator Rubio-Palau, Josep
Garcia-Linares, Jordi
Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio
González-Lagunas, Javier
Raspall-Martin, Guillermo
Mareque-Bueno, Javier
description Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d'Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance.
doi_str_mv 10.4317/medoral.20009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4320414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1641426166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-9997a6c7154d9e192e9a782b4b5506956204f291e4b23ce51560a5b97acb494e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkkuPFCEUhStG4zx06dawMXFTLVAUNBuTyWQcTSZxo2vC41YXhipaoHtGf6M_Sqqn7YwrCPc7595cTtO8IXjFOiI-TOBi0mFFMcbyWXNOuFy3XDL-_Mn9rLnI-QfGnSCCv2zOaM9ELwQ9b_7cDAPYguKA_FySbnXYQww6oW3QFiaYDzW8ou-QHUNMIzx452dAxkftRsh-D2gDAcUZlRGqi_UOZguL7GQWcwFffEZDDCHe-3lzgOGhtrTFV22lJz07b3YLX0afHJoWbV6hK-TizgRoTfCzQ6lycfK_wSFbH7zVAZXkdXjVvBh0yPD6eF423z_dfLv-3N59vf1yfXXX2m4tSiulFJpbQXrmJBBJQWqxpoaZvsdc9pxiNlBJgBnaWehJz7HuTRVZwySD7rL5-Oi73Zm6fwvL5oLaJj_p9EtF7dX_ldmPahP3inXVmrBq8P5okOLPHeSiJp8thKBniLusCK8U5YTziraPqE0x5wTDqQ3BakmAOiZAHRJQ-bdPZzvR_768-wtkDbM-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641426166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rubio-Palau, Josep ; Garcia-Linares, Jordi ; Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio ; González-Lagunas, Javier ; Raspall-Martin, Guillermo ; Mareque-Bueno, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubio-Palau, Josep ; Garcia-Linares, Jordi ; Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio ; González-Lagunas, Javier ; Raspall-Martin, Guillermo ; Mareque-Bueno, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d'Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1698-4447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/medoral.20009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25475772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><subject>Adhesives - administration &amp; dosage ; Adult ; Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Dry Socket - epidemiology ; Dry Socket - etiology ; Dry Socket - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Gels ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Mandible ; Molar - surgery ; Mouthwashes - administration &amp; dosage ; Tooth Extraction - adverse effects ; Tooth Socket ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2015-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e117-e122</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2015 Medicina Oral S.L. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-9997a6c7154d9e192e9a782b4b5506956204f291e4b23ce51560a5b97acb494e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320414/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320414/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubio-Palau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Linares, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Lagunas, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raspall-Martin, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareque-Bueno, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial</title><title>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</title><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><description>Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d'Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance.</description><subject>Adhesives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Dry Socket - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dry Socket - etiology</subject><subject>Dry Socket - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Molar - surgery</subject><subject>Mouthwashes - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tooth Socket</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><issn>1698-6946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkkuPFCEUhStG4zx06dawMXFTLVAUNBuTyWQcTSZxo2vC41YXhipaoHtGf6M_Sqqn7YwrCPc7595cTtO8IXjFOiI-TOBi0mFFMcbyWXNOuFy3XDL-_Mn9rLnI-QfGnSCCv2zOaM9ELwQ9b_7cDAPYguKA_FySbnXYQww6oW3QFiaYDzW8ou-QHUNMIzx452dAxkftRsh-D2gDAcUZlRGqi_UOZguL7GQWcwFffEZDDCHe-3lzgOGhtrTFV22lJz07b3YLX0afHJoWbV6hK-TizgRoTfCzQ6lycfK_wSFbH7zVAZXkdXjVvBh0yPD6eF423z_dfLv-3N59vf1yfXXX2m4tSiulFJpbQXrmJBBJQWqxpoaZvsdc9pxiNlBJgBnaWehJz7HuTRVZwySD7rL5-Oi73Zm6fwvL5oLaJj_p9EtF7dX_ldmPahP3inXVmrBq8P5okOLPHeSiJp8thKBniLusCK8U5YTziraPqE0x5wTDqQ3BakmAOiZAHRJQ-bdPZzvR_768-wtkDbM-</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Rubio-Palau, Josep</creator><creator>Garcia-Linares, Jordi</creator><creator>Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio</creator><creator>González-Lagunas, Javier</creator><creator>Raspall-Martin, Guillermo</creator><creator>Mareque-Bueno, Javier</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial</title><author>Rubio-Palau, Josep ; Garcia-Linares, Jordi ; Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio ; González-Lagunas, Javier ; Raspall-Martin, Guillermo ; Mareque-Bueno, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-9997a6c7154d9e192e9a782b4b5506956204f291e4b23ce51560a5b97acb494e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adhesives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Dry Socket - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dry Socket - etiology</topic><topic>Dry Socket - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Molar - surgery</topic><topic>Mouthwashes - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tooth Socket</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubio-Palau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Linares, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Lagunas, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raspall-Martin, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareque-Bueno, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubio-Palau, Josep</au><au>Garcia-Linares, Jordi</au><au>Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio</au><au>González-Lagunas, Javier</au><au>Raspall-Martin, Guillermo</au><au>Mareque-Bueno, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e117</spage><epage>e122</epage><pages>e117-e122</pages><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><eissn>1698-6946</eissn><abstract>Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d'Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>25475772</pmid><doi>10.4317/medoral.20009</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1698-6946
ispartof Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2015-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e117-e122
issn 1698-6946
1698-4447
1698-6946
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4320414
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adhesives - administration & dosage
Adult
Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage
Dentistry
Double-Blind Method
Dry Socket - epidemiology
Dry Socket - etiology
Dry Socket - prevention & control
Female
Gels
Humans
Incidence
Male
Mandible
Molar - surgery
Mouthwashes - administration & dosage
Tooth Extraction - adverse effects
Tooth Socket
Young Adult
title Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20intra-alveolar%20placement%20of%200.2%25%20chlorhexidine%20bioadhesive%20gel%20on%20the%20incidence%20of%20alveolar%20osteitis%20following%20the%20extraction%20of%20mandibular%20third%20molars.%20A%20double-blind%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20oral,%20patolog%C3%ADa%20oral%20y%20cirug%C3%ADa%20bucal&rft.au=Rubio-Palau,%20Josep&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e117&rft.epage=e122&rft.pages=e117-e122&rft.issn=1698-6946&rft.eissn=1698-6946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/medoral.20009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1641426166%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641426166&rft_id=info:pmid/25475772&rfr_iscdi=true