Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of dentistry 2015-01, Vol.9 (1), p.080-086 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 086 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 080 |
| container_title | European journal of dentistry |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Carvalho, Maira de Souza Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Marques, André Augusto Franco |
| description | ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups, according to the instrumentation system used. The negative control group consisted of five specimens that were not instrumented. The mesial canals (buccal and lingual) in Reciproc Group were instrumented with file R25 and the WaveOne group with the Primary file. The samples were submitted to histological processing and analyzed under a digital microscope.
Results:
The WaveOne group presented a larger amount of debris than the Reciproc Group, however, without statistically significant difference (
P
> 0.05). A larger amount of debris in the control group was observed, with statistically significant difference to Reciproc and WaveOne groups (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions:
The two reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems presented similar effectiveness for root canal cleaning. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/1305-7456.149648 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4319305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A399372706</galeid><sourcerecordid>A399372706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-f3b2d72cf352c385ed2dc11026d08736f05f12e1e1aa931f8d3d67b79750af7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1klGL1DAUhYso7jr67pMEBPGls0nTNq0PwrKsrrCwIIqPIZPeTLOkyZiklfkj_t5N7TjsgBJIQu53DuTek2WvCV6XBNMLQnGVs7Kq16Rs67J5kp0fnury6fFe1WfZixDuMa5p3bbPs7OiYoSWTXue_b7RITrjtloKg2ASZhRRO4ucQrEHJA0Iq-0WgVIgo57AQgh_qr8c8iD1zjuZJAkJaTOQK20AhX2IMASkLQowgQezR3L0E3TIOxeRFFaY8AF9PTigxIQxoB9igjsLL7NnKtXh1eFcZd8_XX-7uslv7z5_ubq8zWVZtk2u6KboWCEVrQpJmwq6opOE4KLucMNorXClSAEEiBAtJarpaFezDWtZhYVikq6yj4vvbtwM0Emw0QvDd14Pwu-5E5qfVqzu-dZNvKSkTd1NBu8PBt79HCFEPuggwRhhwY2Bk7pqGC4ryhL6dkG3wgDXVrnkKGecX9K2paxgaUCrbP0PKq0OBi2dhbm9p4J3jwQ9CBP74Mw4TzGcgngBpXcheFDHbxLM5zjxOS98zgtf4pQkbx635yj4m58EXCxA7DUMwO_d6OfB_t_yAVhr1fI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658704537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carvalho, Maira de Souza ; Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos ; Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt ; Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti ; Marques, André Augusto Franco</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Maira de Souza ; Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos ; Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt ; Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti ; Marques, André Augusto Franco</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups, according to the instrumentation system used. The negative control group consisted of five specimens that were not instrumented. The mesial canals (buccal and lingual) in Reciproc Group were instrumented with file R25 and the WaveOne group with the Primary file. The samples were submitted to histological processing and analyzed under a digital microscope.
Results:
The WaveOne group presented a larger amount of debris than the Reciproc Group, however, without statistically significant difference (
P
> 0.05). A larger amount of debris in the control group was observed, with statistically significant difference to Reciproc and WaveOne groups (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions:
The two reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems presented similar effectiveness for root canal cleaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149648</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25713489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Dental care ; Dental hygiene ; Dental research ; Mouth ; Original ; Original Article ; Roots ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2015-01, Vol.9 (1), p.080-086</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-f3b2d72cf352c385ed2dc11026d08736f05f12e1e1aa931f8d3d67b79750af7c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319305/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319305/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,20872,27905,27906,53772,53774,54568,54596</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Maira de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, André Augusto Franco</creatorcontrib><title>Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups, according to the instrumentation system used. The negative control group consisted of five specimens that were not instrumented. The mesial canals (buccal and lingual) in Reciproc Group were instrumented with file R25 and the WaveOne group with the Primary file. The samples were submitted to histological processing and analyzed under a digital microscope.
Results:
The WaveOne group presented a larger amount of debris than the Reciproc Group, however, without statistically significant difference (
P
> 0.05). A larger amount of debris in the control group was observed, with statistically significant difference to Reciproc and WaveOne groups (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions:
The two reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems presented similar effectiveness for root canal cleaning.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Dental care</subject><subject>Dental hygiene</subject><subject>Dental research</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1klGL1DAUhYso7jr67pMEBPGls0nTNq0PwrKsrrCwIIqPIZPeTLOkyZiklfkj_t5N7TjsgBJIQu53DuTek2WvCV6XBNMLQnGVs7Kq16Rs67J5kp0fnury6fFe1WfZixDuMa5p3bbPs7OiYoSWTXue_b7RITrjtloKg2ASZhRRO4ucQrEHJA0Iq-0WgVIgo57AQgh_qr8c8iD1zjuZJAkJaTOQK20AhX2IMASkLQowgQezR3L0E3TIOxeRFFaY8AF9PTigxIQxoB9igjsLL7NnKtXh1eFcZd8_XX-7uslv7z5_ubq8zWVZtk2u6KboWCEVrQpJmwq6opOE4KLucMNorXClSAEEiBAtJarpaFezDWtZhYVikq6yj4vvbtwM0Emw0QvDd14Pwu-5E5qfVqzu-dZNvKSkTd1NBu8PBt79HCFEPuggwRhhwY2Bk7pqGC4ryhL6dkG3wgDXVrnkKGecX9K2paxgaUCrbP0PKq0OBi2dhbm9p4J3jwQ9CBP74Mw4TzGcgngBpXcheFDHbxLM5zjxOS98zgtf4pQkbx635yj4m58EXCxA7DUMwO_d6OfB_t_yAVhr1fI</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Maira de Souza</creator><creator>Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos</creator><creator>Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt</creator><creator>Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti</creator><creator>Marques, André Augusto Franco</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne</title><author>Carvalho, Maira de Souza ; Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos ; Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt ; Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti ; Marques, André Augusto Franco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-f3b2d72cf352c385ed2dc11026d08736f05f12e1e1aa931f8d3d67b79750af7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Dental care</topic><topic>Dental hygiene</topic><topic>Dental research</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Maira de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, André Augusto Franco</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Maira de Souza</au><au>Sponchiado, Emílio Carlos</au><au>Garrido, Angela Delfina Bitencourt</au><au>Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti</au><au>Marques, André Augusto Franco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>080</spage><epage>086</epage><pages>080-086</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups, according to the instrumentation system used. The negative control group consisted of five specimens that were not instrumented. The mesial canals (buccal and lingual) in Reciproc Group were instrumented with file R25 and the WaveOne group with the Primary file. The samples were submitted to histological processing and analyzed under a digital microscope.
Results:
The WaveOne group presented a larger amount of debris than the Reciproc Group, however, without statistically significant difference (
P
> 0.05). A larger amount of debris in the control group was observed, with statistically significant difference to Reciproc and WaveOne groups (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions:
The two reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems presented similar effectiveness for root canal cleaning.</abstract><cop>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</pub><pmid>25713489</pmid><doi>10.4103/1305-7456.149648</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1305-7456 |
| ispartof | European journal of dentistry, 2015-01, Vol.9 (1), p.080-086 |
| issn | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4319305 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Care and treatment Dental care Dental hygiene Dental research Mouth Original Original Article Roots Teeth |
| title | Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A33%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Histological%20evaluation%20of%20the%20cleaning%20effectiveness%20of%20two%20reciprocating%20single-file%20systems%20in%20severely%20curved%20root%20canals:%20Reciproc%20versus%20WaveOne&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Maira%20de%20Souza&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=080&rft.epage=086&rft.pages=080-086&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1305-7456.149648&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA399372706%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658704537&rft_id=info:pmid/25713489&rft_galeid=A399372706&rfr_iscdi=true |