Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA

We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)—national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment exam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.508-522
Hauptverfasser: Mahan, Carolyn G, Young, John A, Miller, Bruce J, Saunders, Michael C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 2
container_start_page 508
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 55
creator Mahan, Carolyn G
Young, John A
Miller, Bruce J
Saunders, Michael C
description We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)—national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment examined a variety of aquatic and terrestrial indicators of ecosystem components that reflect the parks’ conservation purpose and reference condition. Our assessment compared these indicators to ecological thresholds to determine the condition of park watersheds. Selected indicators included chemical and physical measures of water quality, biologic indicators of water quality, and landscape condition measures. For the chemical and physical measures of water quality, we used a water quality index and each of its nine components to assess the condition of water quality in each watershed. For biologic measures of water quality, we used the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera aquatic macroinvertebrate index and, secondarily, the Hilsenhoff aquatic macroinvertebrate index. Finally, for the landscape condition measures of our model, we used percent forest and percent impervious surface. Based on our overall assessment, UPDE and DEWA watersheds had an ecological assessment score of 0.433 on a −1 to 1 fuzzy logic scale. This score indicates that, in general, the natural resource condition within watersheds at these parks is healthy or ecologically unimpaired; however, we had only partial data for many of our indicators. Our model is iterative and new data may be incorporated as they become available. These natural parks are located within a rapidly urbanizing landscape—we recommend that natural resource managers remain vigilant to surrounding land uses that may adversely affect natural resources within the parks.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4318981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1669880378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-38c5ed3bd7f8efac7110597911cccf2d77bd5f7329573dc92a70a92514e8f97e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdiAJTYsCPgnju1NpVEpUKn8iGkkdpbHcVKXjD3YDmgehbfFo5RqYIFY3cX57vG91weAxxi9xAjxVwkh0vAK4bpCVOJqdwcscE1JVVR5FywQbeoKM_LlCDxI6RohRIVg98ERYZRjLMkC_GyT8wM8M2EMgzN6hOe-KzWHmKD2HdTwtTUuueDhatpuQ8xwtUvZbmAfYoGzHaLOtju0WKZkU9pYn6HO8PJHgB90Lg5F-qTjV9h6lxN0HuYrC9-7rlrmUfvsDPxsh8K9gO1q-RDc6_WY7KObegzaN2eXp--qi49vz0-XF5VpKMoVFYbZjq473gvba1P2QkxyibExpicd5-uO9ZwSyTjtjCSaIy0Jw7UVveSWHoOT2Xc7rTe2M2XqqEe1jW6j404F7dSfindXagjfVU2xkAIXg-c3BjF8m2zKauOSsWNZyYYpKdw0UghEufgftHwRn12f_YVehymWE-4phjllgrFC4ZkyMaQUbX87N0ZqnxE1Z0SVjKh9RtSu9Dw5XPi243coCkBmIBXJDzYePP0P16dzU6-D0kN0SbUrgjArJKqbGtNfj7rSXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651735855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mahan, Carolyn G ; Young, John A ; Miller, Bruce J ; Saunders, Michael C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahan, Carolyn G ; Young, John A ; Miller, Bruce J ; Saunders, Michael C</creatorcontrib><description>We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)—national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment examined a variety of aquatic and terrestrial indicators of ecosystem components that reflect the parks’ conservation purpose and reference condition. Our assessment compared these indicators to ecological thresholds to determine the condition of park watersheds. Selected indicators included chemical and physical measures of water quality, biologic indicators of water quality, and landscape condition measures. For the chemical and physical measures of water quality, we used a water quality index and each of its nine components to assess the condition of water quality in each watershed. For biologic measures of water quality, we used the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera aquatic macroinvertebrate index and, secondarily, the Hilsenhoff aquatic macroinvertebrate index. Finally, for the landscape condition measures of our model, we used percent forest and percent impervious surface. Based on our overall assessment, UPDE and DEWA watersheds had an ecological assessment score of 0.433 on a −1 to 1 fuzzy logic scale. This score indicates that, in general, the natural resource condition within watersheds at these parks is healthy or ecologically unimpaired; however, we had only partial data for many of our indicators. Our model is iterative and new data may be incorporated as they become available. These natural parks are located within a rapidly urbanizing landscape—we recommend that natural resource managers remain vigilant to surrounding land uses that may adversely affect natural resources within the parks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25371192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic Pollution ; Assessments ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Decision Making ; Decision support systems ; Delaware ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring - standards ; Ephemeroptera ; Forestry Management ; forests ; Fuzzy logic ; geographic information systems ; Indicator organisms ; Indicators ; Land use ; Landscape ; Landscapes ; Macroinvertebrates ; managers ; National parks ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Nature Conservation ; Parks ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Plecoptera ; Recreation ; Riparian buffers ; rivers ; Rivers - chemistry ; Trichoptera ; Waste Water Technology ; Water gaps ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water Quality ; Water quality measurements ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.508-522</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-38c5ed3bd7f8efac7110597911cccf2d77bd5f7329573dc92a70a92514e8f97e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-38c5ed3bd7f8efac7110597911cccf2d77bd5f7329573dc92a70a92514e8f97e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25371192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahan, Carolyn G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Bruce J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Michael C</creatorcontrib><title>Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)—national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment examined a variety of aquatic and terrestrial indicators of ecosystem components that reflect the parks’ conservation purpose and reference condition. Our assessment compared these indicators to ecological thresholds to determine the condition of park watersheds. Selected indicators included chemical and physical measures of water quality, biologic indicators of water quality, and landscape condition measures. For the chemical and physical measures of water quality, we used a water quality index and each of its nine components to assess the condition of water quality in each watershed. For biologic measures of water quality, we used the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera aquatic macroinvertebrate index and, secondarily, the Hilsenhoff aquatic macroinvertebrate index. Finally, for the landscape condition measures of our model, we used percent forest and percent impervious surface. Based on our overall assessment, UPDE and DEWA watersheds had an ecological assessment score of 0.433 on a −1 to 1 fuzzy logic scale. This score indicates that, in general, the natural resource condition within watersheds at these parks is healthy or ecologically unimpaired; however, we had only partial data for many of our indicators. Our model is iterative and new data may be incorporated as they become available. These natural parks are located within a rapidly urbanizing landscape—we recommend that natural resource managers remain vigilant to surrounding land uses that may adversely affect natural resources within the parks.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Delaware</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - standards</subject><subject>Ephemeroptera</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>geographic information systems</subject><subject>Indicator organisms</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>managers</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Plecoptera</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Trichoptera</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water gaps</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water quality measurements</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdiAJTYsCPgnju1NpVEpUKn8iGkkdpbHcVKXjD3YDmgehbfFo5RqYIFY3cX57vG91weAxxi9xAjxVwkh0vAK4bpCVOJqdwcscE1JVVR5FywQbeoKM_LlCDxI6RohRIVg98ERYZRjLMkC_GyT8wM8M2EMgzN6hOe-KzWHmKD2HdTwtTUuueDhatpuQ8xwtUvZbmAfYoGzHaLOtju0WKZkU9pYn6HO8PJHgB90Lg5F-qTjV9h6lxN0HuYrC9-7rlrmUfvsDPxsh8K9gO1q-RDc6_WY7KObegzaN2eXp--qi49vz0-XF5VpKMoVFYbZjq473gvba1P2QkxyibExpicd5-uO9ZwSyTjtjCSaIy0Jw7UVveSWHoOT2Xc7rTe2M2XqqEe1jW6j404F7dSfindXagjfVU2xkAIXg-c3BjF8m2zKauOSsWNZyYYpKdw0UghEufgftHwRn12f_YVehymWE-4phjllgrFC4ZkyMaQUbX87N0ZqnxE1Z0SVjKh9RtSu9Dw5XPi243coCkBmIBXJDzYePP0P16dzU6-D0kN0SbUrgjArJKqbGtNfj7rSXA</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Mahan, Carolyn G</creator><creator>Young, John A</creator><creator>Miller, Bruce J</creator><creator>Saunders, Michael C</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA</title><author>Mahan, Carolyn G ; Young, John A ; Miller, Bruce J ; Saunders, Michael C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-38c5ed3bd7f8efac7110597911cccf2d77bd5f7329573dc92a70a92514e8f97e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Delaware</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - standards</topic><topic>Ephemeroptera</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>geographic information systems</topic><topic>Indicator organisms</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>managers</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Plecoptera</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Trichoptera</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water gaps</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water quality measurements</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahan, Carolyn G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Bruce J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Michael C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahan, Carolyn G</au><au>Young, John A</au><au>Miller, Bruce J</au><au>Saunders, Michael C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>508</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>508-522</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>We implemented an integrated ecological assessment using a GIS-based decision support system model for Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River (UPDE) and Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)—national park units with the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Our assessment examined a variety of aquatic and terrestrial indicators of ecosystem components that reflect the parks’ conservation purpose and reference condition. Our assessment compared these indicators to ecological thresholds to determine the condition of park watersheds. Selected indicators included chemical and physical measures of water quality, biologic indicators of water quality, and landscape condition measures. For the chemical and physical measures of water quality, we used a water quality index and each of its nine components to assess the condition of water quality in each watershed. For biologic measures of water quality, we used the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera aquatic macroinvertebrate index and, secondarily, the Hilsenhoff aquatic macroinvertebrate index. Finally, for the landscape condition measures of our model, we used percent forest and percent impervious surface. Based on our overall assessment, UPDE and DEWA watersheds had an ecological assessment score of 0.433 on a −1 to 1 fuzzy logic scale. This score indicates that, in general, the natural resource condition within watersheds at these parks is healthy or ecologically unimpaired; however, we had only partial data for many of our indicators. Our model is iterative and new data may be incorporated as they become available. These natural parks are located within a rapidly urbanizing landscape—we recommend that natural resource managers remain vigilant to surrounding land uses that may adversely affect natural resources within the parks.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>25371192</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.508-522
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4318981
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic Pollution
Assessments
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Decision Making
Decision support systems
Delaware
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecological monitoring
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring - standards
Ephemeroptera
Forestry Management
forests
Fuzzy logic
geographic information systems
Indicator organisms
Indicators
Land use
Landscape
Landscapes
Macroinvertebrates
managers
National parks
Natural resource management
Natural resources
Nature Conservation
Parks
Parks & recreation areas
Plecoptera
Recreation
Riparian buffers
rivers
Rivers - chemistry
Trichoptera
Waste Water Technology
Water gaps
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Water Quality
Water quality measurements
Watershed management
Watersheds
title Using Ecological Indicators and a Decision Support System for Integrated Ecological Assessment at Two National Park Units in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A56%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Ecological%20Indicators%20and%20a%20Decision%20Support%20System%20for%20Integrated%20Ecological%20Assessment%20at%20Two%20National%20Park%20Units%20in%20the%20Mid-Atlantic%20Region,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Mahan,%20Carolyn%20G&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=508-522&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-014-0391-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1669880378%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651735855&rft_id=info:pmid/25371192&rfr_iscdi=true