Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy
Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration,but also during interventional EUS.EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists.EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) is relatively w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2015-01, Vol.21 (3), p.820-828 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 828 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 820 |
| container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Ogura, Takeshi Higuchi, Kazuhide |
| description | Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration,but also during interventional EUS.EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists.EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstruction.The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%,and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%.Further,the over-all technicalsuccess rate was 93%,and clinical success rate was 98%.Based on the currently available literature,the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%.The data on the cumulative technical and clinical success rate for EUS-CDS is promising.However,EUS-CDS can still lead to several problems,so techniques or devices that are more feasible and safe need to be established.EUS-CDS has the potential to become a first-line biliary drainage procedure,although standardizing the technique in multicenter clinical trials and comparisons with endoscopic biliary drainage by randomized clinical trials are still needed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.820 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4299334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849534851484857</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1663896965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-21e931b70cbe764992c9ac1223bd64ae866d96a3d6e4fe1c9a11cebfdf665a513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1r3DAQhkVoaLZJrzkWH3uxq29Ll0JZ0rQQyCU5C1kae7V4pY1lb8m_r8JullaXEcwz7wwPQrcEN6zl6tuf7dAcKGkCaxTFF2hFKdE1VRx_QCuCcVtrRtsr9CnnLcaUMUE_oisqJOUtESt09wRuE4OzYzWHfa5SX0H0Kbu0D65axnmyOS3R18MSPPjKbdIIPpXil-Qhpjyn3esNuuztmOHzqV6j5593T-tf9cPj_e_1j4faCYznmhLQjHQtdh20kmtNnbaOUMo6L7kFJaXX0jIvgfdASpMQB13veymFFYRdo-_H3P3S7cA7iOW-0eynsLPTq0k2mP87MWzMkA6GU60Z4yXg6ylgSi8L5NnsQnYwjjZCWrIhUjKlpZaioM0RdVPKeYL-vIZg8-beFPemuDeBmeK-DHz597gz_i67AOyUuElxeAlxODMaq7enBeaKa8G4EqT8lGjZX_X_ks0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663896965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration,but also during interventional EUS.EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists.EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstruction.The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%,and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%.Further,the over-all technicalsuccess rate was 93%,and clinical success rate was 98%.Based on the currently available literature,the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%.The data on the cumulative technical and clinical success rate for EUS-CDS is promising.However,EUS-CDS can still lead to several problems,so techniques or devices that are more feasible and safe need to be established.EUS-CDS has the potential to become a first-line biliary drainage procedure,although standardizing the technique in multicenter clinical trials and comparisons with endoscopic biliary drainage by randomized clinical trials are still needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.820</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25624715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Choledochostomy - adverse effects ; Choledochostomy - instrumentation ; Choledochostomy - methods ; Cholestasis - diagnosis ; Cholestasis - therapy ; Decompression - adverse effects ; Decompression - instrumentation ; Decompression - methods ; Drainage - adverse effects ; Drainage - instrumentation ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal ; Endoscopic ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Endosonography - instrumentation ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Minireviews ; Patient Selection ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation ; ultrasound;Endoscopic ; ultrasoundguided</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-01, Vol.21 (3), p.820-828</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-21e931b70cbe764992c9ac1223bd64ae866d96a3d6e4fe1c9a11cebfdf665a513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-21e931b70cbe764992c9ac1223bd64ae866d96a3d6e4fe1c9a11cebfdf665a513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299334/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299334/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><title>Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration,but also during interventional EUS.EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists.EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstruction.The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%,and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%.Further,the over-all technicalsuccess rate was 93%,and clinical success rate was 98%.Based on the currently available literature,the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%.The data on the cumulative technical and clinical success rate for EUS-CDS is promising.However,EUS-CDS can still lead to several problems,so techniques or devices that are more feasible and safe need to be established.EUS-CDS has the potential to become a first-line biliary drainage procedure,although standardizing the technique in multicenter clinical trials and comparisons with endoscopic biliary drainage by randomized clinical trials are still needed.</description><subject>Choledochostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Choledochostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Choledochostomy - methods</subject><subject>Cholestasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cholestasis - therapy</subject><subject>Decompression - adverse effects</subject><subject>Decompression - instrumentation</subject><subject>Decompression - methods</subject><subject>Drainage - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Endoscopic</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System</subject><subject>Endosonography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minireviews</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation</subject><subject>ultrasound;Endoscopic</subject><subject>ultrasoundguided</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1r3DAQhkVoaLZJrzkWH3uxq29Ll0JZ0rQQyCU5C1kae7V4pY1lb8m_r8JullaXEcwz7wwPQrcEN6zl6tuf7dAcKGkCaxTFF2hFKdE1VRx_QCuCcVtrRtsr9CnnLcaUMUE_oisqJOUtESt09wRuE4OzYzWHfa5SX0H0Kbu0D65axnmyOS3R18MSPPjKbdIIPpXil-Qhpjyn3esNuuztmOHzqV6j5593T-tf9cPj_e_1j4faCYznmhLQjHQtdh20kmtNnbaOUMo6L7kFJaXX0jIvgfdASpMQB13veymFFYRdo-_H3P3S7cA7iOW-0eynsLPTq0k2mP87MWzMkA6GU60Z4yXg6ylgSi8L5NnsQnYwjjZCWrIhUjKlpZaioM0RdVPKeYL-vIZg8-beFPemuDeBmeK-DHz597gz_i67AOyUuElxeAlxODMaq7enBeaKa8G4EqT8lGjZX_X_ks0</recordid><startdate>20150121</startdate><enddate>20150121</enddate><creator>Ogura, Takeshi</creator><creator>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150121</creationdate><title>Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy</title><author>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-21e931b70cbe764992c9ac1223bd64ae866d96a3d6e4fe1c9a11cebfdf665a513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Choledochostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Choledochostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Choledochostomy - methods</topic><topic>Cholestasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cholestasis - therapy</topic><topic>Decompression - adverse effects</topic><topic>Decompression - instrumentation</topic><topic>Decompression - methods</topic><topic>Drainage - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Endoscopic</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System</topic><topic>Endosonography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minireviews</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation</topic><topic>ultrasound;Endoscopic</topic><topic>ultrasoundguided</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogura, Takeshi</au><au>Higuchi, Kazuhide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2015-01-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>820</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>820-828</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration,but also during interventional EUS.EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists.EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstruction.The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%,and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%.Further,the over-all technicalsuccess rate was 93%,and clinical success rate was 98%.Based on the currently available literature,the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%.The data on the cumulative technical and clinical success rate for EUS-CDS is promising.However,EUS-CDS can still lead to several problems,so techniques or devices that are more feasible and safe need to be established.EUS-CDS has the potential to become a first-line biliary drainage procedure,although standardizing the technique in multicenter clinical trials and comparisons with endoscopic biliary drainage by randomized clinical trials are still needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25624715</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.820</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
| ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-01, Vol.21 (3), p.820-828 |
| issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4299334 |
| source | MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Choledochostomy - adverse effects Choledochostomy - instrumentation Choledochostomy - methods Cholestasis - diagnosis Cholestasis - therapy Decompression - adverse effects Decompression - instrumentation Decompression - methods Drainage - adverse effects Drainage - instrumentation Drainage - methods Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Endoscopy, Digestive System Endosonography - instrumentation Equipment Design Humans Minireviews Patient Selection Predictive Value of Tests Risk Factors Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation ultrasound Endoscopic ultrasoundguided |
| title | Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A58%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20tips%20of%20endoscopic%20ultrasound-guided%20choledochoduodenostomy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Ogura,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2015-01-21&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=820&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=820-828&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1663896965%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663896965&rft_id=info:pmid/25624715&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849534851484857&rfr_iscdi=true |