Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice

Summary Autoantibodies, including anti‐ribosomal P proteins (anti‐P), are thought to be produced by an antigen‐driven immune response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To test this hypothesis, we reconstituted the ribosomal antigenic complex in vitro using human P0, phosphorylated P1 and P2 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental immunology 2015-02, Vol.179 (2), p.236-244
Hauptverfasser: Sato, H., Onozuka, M., Hagiya, A., Hoshino, S., Narita, I., Uchiumi, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 2
container_start_page 236
container_title Clinical and experimental immunology
container_volume 179
creator Sato, H.
Onozuka, M.
Hagiya, A.
Hoshino, S.
Narita, I.
Uchiumi, T.
description Summary Autoantibodies, including anti‐ribosomal P proteins (anti‐P), are thought to be produced by an antigen‐driven immune response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To test this hypothesis, we reconstituted the ribosomal antigenic complex in vitro using human P0, phosphorylated P1 and P2 and a 28S rRNA fragment covering the P0 binding site, and immunized Murphy Roths large (MRL)/lrp lupus mice with this complex without any added adjuvant to generate anti‐P antibodies. Using hybridoma technology, we subsequently obtained 34 clones, each producing an anti‐P monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognized the conserved C‐terminal tail sequence common to all three P proteins. We also obtained two P0‐specific monoclonal antibodies, but no antibody specific to P1, P2 or rRNA fragment. Two types of mAbs were found among these anti‐P antibodies: one type (e.g. 9D5) reacted more strongly with the phosphorylated P1 and P2 than that with their non‐phosphorylated forms, whereas the other type (e.g. 4H11) reacted equally with both phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of P1/P2. Both 9D5 and 4H11 inhibited the ribosome/eukaryotic elongation factor‐2 (eEF‐2)‐coupled guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase activity. However, preincubation with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C‐terminal sequence common to all three P proteins, but not the peptide that lacked the last three C‐terminal amino acids, mostly prevented the mAb‐induced inhibition of GTPase activity. Thus, at least two types of anti‐P were produced preferentially following the immunization of MRL mice with the reconstituted antigenic complex. Presence of multiple copies of the C‐termini, particularly that of the last three C‐terminal amino acid residues, in the antigenic complex appears to contribute to the immunogenic stimulus.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cei.12460
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4298401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642608966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5420-3571e472bd92eec7b8632840289dae4acf114dd2f869c0ce722dc28832a18473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAsgS1zgsK3tOI5zQapWBSqVP6p6t7z2JHGV2MF2Csupj4DEc_BSfRLc3VIBEhK-jOz5zecZzVcUTwk-IPkcarAHhDKO7xULUvJqSSlr7hcLjHGzbAhme8WjGC_ylXNOHxZ7tKJVJZpqUfxY9SoonSDYrypZ75BvkXLJXl99-4hG77wevFPD9m3tjYWIjA2QKwxSnbIuJpR6QCFnox8zOQWfwLrrq-9n74-Q9uM0wJdtfQcuR3NDmFlngTla16F3c5j6DTrzqY9oUKEDpObk7TjODnIfGXeARqvhcfGgVUOEJ7dxvzh_fXy-ers8_fDmZHV0utQVo3hZVjUBVtO1aSiArteCl1QwTEVjFDClW0KYMbQVvNFYQ02p0VSIkioiWF3uF692stO8HsFocCmoQU7BjipspFdW_plxtpedv5SMNvkbkgVe3AoE_2mGmORoo4ZhUA78HCXhrMaEk5r9D0o5Fg3nGX3-F3rh55CXs6VIWbO6Epl6uaN08DEGaO_6Jlje2EVmu8itXTL77PdB78hf_sjA4Q74bAfY_FtJro5PdpI_AU6o0Fc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641374758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sato, H. ; Onozuka, M. ; Hagiya, A. ; Hoshino, S. ; Narita, I. ; Uchiumi, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, H. ; Onozuka, M. ; Hagiya, A. ; Hoshino, S. ; Narita, I. ; Uchiumi, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Autoantibodies, including anti‐ribosomal P proteins (anti‐P), are thought to be produced by an antigen‐driven immune response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To test this hypothesis, we reconstituted the ribosomal antigenic complex in vitro using human P0, phosphorylated P1 and P2 and a 28S rRNA fragment covering the P0 binding site, and immunized Murphy Roths large (MRL)/lrp lupus mice with this complex without any added adjuvant to generate anti‐P antibodies. Using hybridoma technology, we subsequently obtained 34 clones, each producing an anti‐P monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognized the conserved C‐terminal tail sequence common to all three P proteins. We also obtained two P0‐specific monoclonal antibodies, but no antibody specific to P1, P2 or rRNA fragment. Two types of mAbs were found among these anti‐P antibodies: one type (e.g. 9D5) reacted more strongly with the phosphorylated P1 and P2 than that with their non‐phosphorylated forms, whereas the other type (e.g. 4H11) reacted equally with both phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of P1/P2. Both 9D5 and 4H11 inhibited the ribosome/eukaryotic elongation factor‐2 (eEF‐2)‐coupled guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase activity. However, preincubation with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C‐terminal sequence common to all three P proteins, but not the peptide that lacked the last three C‐terminal amino acids, mostly prevented the mAb‐induced inhibition of GTPase activity. Thus, at least two types of anti‐P were produced preferentially following the immunization of MRL mice with the reconstituted antigenic complex. Presence of multiple copies of the C‐termini, particularly that of the last three C‐terminal amino acid residues, in the antigenic complex appears to contribute to the immunogenic stimulus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cei.12460</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25255895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived - immunology ; Antibody Specificity ; Autoantibodies - immunology ; autoantibody ; Binding sites ; Humans ; Lupus ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology ; Medical research ; Mice ; monoclonal anti‐P ; Original ; Proteins ; ribosomal antigenic complex ; Ribosomal Proteins - immunology ; RNA, Ribosomal, 28S - immunology ; SLE</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental immunology, 2015-02, Vol.179 (2), p.236-244</ispartof><rights>2014 British Society for Immunology</rights><rights>2014 British Society for Immunology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 British Society for Immunology</rights><rights>2014 British Society for Immunology 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5420-3571e472bd92eec7b8632840289dae4acf114dd2f869c0ce722dc28832a18473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5420-3571e472bd92eec7b8632840289dae4acf114dd2f869c0ce722dc28832a18473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298401/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298401/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255895$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onozuka, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiya, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narita, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchiumi, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice</title><title>Clinical and experimental immunology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><description>Summary Autoantibodies, including anti‐ribosomal P proteins (anti‐P), are thought to be produced by an antigen‐driven immune response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To test this hypothesis, we reconstituted the ribosomal antigenic complex in vitro using human P0, phosphorylated P1 and P2 and a 28S rRNA fragment covering the P0 binding site, and immunized Murphy Roths large (MRL)/lrp lupus mice with this complex without any added adjuvant to generate anti‐P antibodies. Using hybridoma technology, we subsequently obtained 34 clones, each producing an anti‐P monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognized the conserved C‐terminal tail sequence common to all three P proteins. We also obtained two P0‐specific monoclonal antibodies, but no antibody specific to P1, P2 or rRNA fragment. Two types of mAbs were found among these anti‐P antibodies: one type (e.g. 9D5) reacted more strongly with the phosphorylated P1 and P2 than that with their non‐phosphorylated forms, whereas the other type (e.g. 4H11) reacted equally with both phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of P1/P2. Both 9D5 and 4H11 inhibited the ribosome/eukaryotic elongation factor‐2 (eEF‐2)‐coupled guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase activity. However, preincubation with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C‐terminal sequence common to all three P proteins, but not the peptide that lacked the last three C‐terminal amino acids, mostly prevented the mAb‐induced inhibition of GTPase activity. Thus, at least two types of anti‐P were produced preferentially following the immunization of MRL mice with the reconstituted antigenic complex. Presence of multiple copies of the C‐termini, particularly that of the last three C‐terminal amino acid residues, in the antigenic complex appears to contribute to the immunogenic stimulus.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived - immunology</subject><subject>Antibody Specificity</subject><subject>Autoantibodies - immunology</subject><subject>autoantibody</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>monoclonal anti‐P</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>ribosomal antigenic complex</subject><subject>Ribosomal Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 28S - immunology</subject><subject>SLE</subject><issn>0009-9104</issn><issn>1365-2249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAsgS1zgsK3tOI5zQapWBSqVP6p6t7z2JHGV2MF2Csupj4DEc_BSfRLc3VIBEhK-jOz5zecZzVcUTwk-IPkcarAHhDKO7xULUvJqSSlr7hcLjHGzbAhme8WjGC_ylXNOHxZ7tKJVJZpqUfxY9SoonSDYrypZ75BvkXLJXl99-4hG77wevFPD9m3tjYWIjA2QKwxSnbIuJpR6QCFnox8zOQWfwLrrq-9n74-Q9uM0wJdtfQcuR3NDmFlngTla16F3c5j6DTrzqY9oUKEDpObk7TjODnIfGXeARqvhcfGgVUOEJ7dxvzh_fXy-ers8_fDmZHV0utQVo3hZVjUBVtO1aSiArteCl1QwTEVjFDClW0KYMbQVvNFYQ02p0VSIkioiWF3uF692stO8HsFocCmoQU7BjipspFdW_plxtpedv5SMNvkbkgVe3AoE_2mGmORoo4ZhUA78HCXhrMaEk5r9D0o5Fg3nGX3-F3rh55CXs6VIWbO6Epl6uaN08DEGaO_6Jlje2EVmu8itXTL77PdB78hf_sjA4Q74bAfY_FtJro5PdpI_AU6o0Fc</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Sato, H.</creator><creator>Onozuka, M.</creator><creator>Hagiya, A.</creator><creator>Hoshino, S.</creator><creator>Narita, I.</creator><creator>Uchiumi, T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice</title><author>Sato, H. ; Onozuka, M. ; Hagiya, A. ; Hoshino, S. ; Narita, I. ; Uchiumi, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5420-3571e472bd92eec7b8632840289dae4acf114dd2f869c0ce722dc28832a18473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived - immunology</topic><topic>Antibody Specificity</topic><topic>Autoantibodies - immunology</topic><topic>autoantibody</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>monoclonal anti‐P</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>ribosomal antigenic complex</topic><topic>Ribosomal Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 28S - immunology</topic><topic>SLE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onozuka, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiya, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narita, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchiumi, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, H.</au><au>Onozuka, M.</au><au>Hagiya, A.</au><au>Hoshino, S.</au><au>Narita, I.</au><au>Uchiumi, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>236-244</pages><issn>0009-9104</issn><eissn>1365-2249</eissn><abstract>Summary Autoantibodies, including anti‐ribosomal P proteins (anti‐P), are thought to be produced by an antigen‐driven immune response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To test this hypothesis, we reconstituted the ribosomal antigenic complex in vitro using human P0, phosphorylated P1 and P2 and a 28S rRNA fragment covering the P0 binding site, and immunized Murphy Roths large (MRL)/lrp lupus mice with this complex without any added adjuvant to generate anti‐P antibodies. Using hybridoma technology, we subsequently obtained 34 clones, each producing an anti‐P monoclonal antibody (mAb) that recognized the conserved C‐terminal tail sequence common to all three P proteins. We also obtained two P0‐specific monoclonal antibodies, but no antibody specific to P1, P2 or rRNA fragment. Two types of mAbs were found among these anti‐P antibodies: one type (e.g. 9D5) reacted more strongly with the phosphorylated P1 and P2 than that with their non‐phosphorylated forms, whereas the other type (e.g. 4H11) reacted equally with both phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of P1/P2. Both 9D5 and 4H11 inhibited the ribosome/eukaryotic elongation factor‐2 (eEF‐2)‐coupled guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase activity. However, preincubation with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C‐terminal sequence common to all three P proteins, but not the peptide that lacked the last three C‐terminal amino acids, mostly prevented the mAb‐induced inhibition of GTPase activity. Thus, at least two types of anti‐P were produced preferentially following the immunization of MRL mice with the reconstituted antigenic complex. Presence of multiple copies of the C‐termini, particularly that of the last three C‐terminal amino acid residues, in the antigenic complex appears to contribute to the immunogenic stimulus.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25255895</pmid><doi>10.1111/cei.12460</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9104
ispartof Clinical and experimental immunology, 2015-02, Vol.179 (2), p.236-244
issn 0009-9104
1365-2249
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4298401
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived - immunology
Antibody Specificity
Autoantibodies - immunology
autoantibody
Binding sites
Humans
Lupus
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology
Medical research
Mice
monoclonal anti‐P
Original
Proteins
ribosomal antigenic complex
Ribosomal Proteins - immunology
RNA, Ribosomal, 28S - immunology
SLE
title Characterization of anti‐P monoclonal antibodies directed against the ribosomal protein–RNA complex antigen and produced using Murphy Roths large autoimmune‐prone mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A00%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20anti%E2%80%90P%20monoclonal%20antibodies%20directed%20against%20the%20ribosomal%20protein%E2%80%93RNA%20complex%20antigen%20and%20produced%20using%20Murphy%20Roths%20large%20autoimmune%E2%80%90prone%20mice&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20immunology&rft.au=Sato,%20H.&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=236-244&rft.issn=0009-9104&rft.eissn=1365-2249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cei.12460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1642608966%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641374758&rft_id=info:pmid/25255895&rfr_iscdi=true