Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics

Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop and demonstrate a set of practical metrics for CT systems optimization. These metrics, based on the Hotelling observer (HO) figure of merit, are task‐based. The authors therefore take the specific example of optimizing a dedicated breast CT system, inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2014-10, Vol.41 (10), p.101917-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Sanchez, Adrian A., Sidky, Emil Y., Pan, Xiaochuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page 101917
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 41
creator Sanchez, Adrian A.
Sidky, Emil Y.
Pan, Xiaochuan
description Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop and demonstrate a set of practical metrics for CT systems optimization. These metrics, based on the Hotelling observer (HO) figure of merit, are task‐based. The authors therefore take the specific example of optimizing a dedicated breast CT system, including the reconstruction algorithm, for two relevant tasks, signal detection and Rayleigh discrimination. Methods: A dedicated breast CT system is simulated using specifications in the literature from an existing prototype. The authors optimize configuration and image reconstruction algorithm parameters for two tasks: the detection of simulated microcalcifications and the discrimination of two adjacent, high‐contrast signals, known as the Rayleigh discrimination task. The effects on task performance of breast diameter, signal location, image grid size, projection view number, and reconstruction filter were all investigated. Two HO metrics were evaluated: the percentage of correct decisions in a two‐alternative forced choice experiment (equivalent to area under the ROC curve or AUC), and the HO efficiency, defined as the squared ratio of HO signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed image to HO SNR in the projection data. Results: The ease and efficiency of the HO metric computation allows a rapid high‐resolution survey of many system parameters. Optimization of a range of system parameters using the HO results in images that subjectively appear optimal for the tasks investigated. Further, the results of assessment through the HO reproduce closely many existing results in the literature regarding the impact of parameter selection on image quality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a task‐based approach to system design, evaluation, and optimization. The methodology presented is equally applicable to determining the impact of a wide range of factors, including patient parameters, system and acquisition design, and the reconstruction algorithm. The results demonstrate the versatility of the proposed HO formalism by not only generating a set of parameters that are optimal for a given task but also by qualitatively reproducing many existing results from the breast CT literature. Meanwhile, the implementation of the proposed methodology is straightforward and entirely simulation‐based. This is an attractive feature for many system optimization problems, where the goal is to analyze the individual system components such as the image reconstruct
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4896099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4290542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1609098676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4139-379cc7d26597f7cc355aebd4464d172e39cce14abc4ad374dfedb18aa2126f373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOwzAUhi0EgnIZeAGUEYYU3xLHCxKquElFMJTZcuwTMCRxsdMimHgEnpEnIdCCYGA6w__pOzeEdgkeEkKKQzLkhcyxlCtoQLlgKadYrqIBxpKnlONsA23GeI8xzlmG19EGzWhBZC4H6Gqi48P761upI9jETzvXuBfdOd8mvkosWGd01ydlAB27ZDRJ5k4n576DunbtbeLLCGEOIWmgC87EbbRW6TrCzrJuoZvTk8noPB1fnV2Mjsep4YTJlAlpjLA0z6SohDEsyzSUlvOcWyIosD4GwnVpuLZMcFuBLUmhNSU0r5hgW-ho4Z3OygasgbYLulbT4BodnpXXTv1NWnenbv1ccSpxxmkv2F8Kgn-cQexU46Lpt9It-FlUpL8nlkUu8h49WKAm-BgDVD9tCFafD1BELR_Qs3u_5_ohvy_eA-kCeHI1PP9vUpfXX8IP1y2Qew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609098676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sanchez, Adrian A. ; Sidky, Emil Y. ; Pan, Xiaochuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Adrian A. ; Sidky, Emil Y. ; Pan, Xiaochuan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop and demonstrate a set of practical metrics for CT systems optimization. These metrics, based on the Hotelling observer (HO) figure of merit, are task‐based. The authors therefore take the specific example of optimizing a dedicated breast CT system, including the reconstruction algorithm, for two relevant tasks, signal detection and Rayleigh discrimination. Methods: A dedicated breast CT system is simulated using specifications in the literature from an existing prototype. The authors optimize configuration and image reconstruction algorithm parameters for two tasks: the detection of simulated microcalcifications and the discrimination of two adjacent, high‐contrast signals, known as the Rayleigh discrimination task. The effects on task performance of breast diameter, signal location, image grid size, projection view number, and reconstruction filter were all investigated. Two HO metrics were evaluated: the percentage of correct decisions in a two‐alternative forced choice experiment (equivalent to area under the ROC curve or AUC), and the HO efficiency, defined as the squared ratio of HO signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed image to HO SNR in the projection data. Results: The ease and efficiency of the HO metric computation allows a rapid high‐resolution survey of many system parameters. Optimization of a range of system parameters using the HO results in images that subjectively appear optimal for the tasks investigated. Further, the results of assessment through the HO reproduce closely many existing results in the literature regarding the impact of parameter selection on image quality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a task‐based approach to system design, evaluation, and optimization. The methodology presented is equally applicable to determining the impact of a wide range of factors, including patient parameters, system and acquisition design, and the reconstruction algorithm. The results demonstrate the versatility of the proposed HO formalism by not only generating a set of parameters that are optimal for a given task but also by qualitatively reproducing many existing results from the breast CT literature. Meanwhile, the implementation of the proposed methodology is straightforward and entirely simulation‐based. This is an attractive feature for many system optimization problems, where the goal is to analyze the individual system components such as the image reconstruction algorithm. Final assessment of the system as a whole should be based also on real data studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4896099</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25281969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; biological organs ; Breast - pathology ; breast CT ; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging ; Computed tomography ; Computer Simulation ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Equipment Design ; Hotelling observer ; Humans ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; Image detection systems ; image quality ; Image quality assessment ; image reconstruction ; Image sensors ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image reconstruction ; Numerical optimization ; optimisation ; Organ Size ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; Reconstruction ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; X‐ray detectors</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2014-10, Vol.41 (10), p.101917-n/a</ispartof><rights>2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4139-379cc7d26597f7cc355aebd4464d172e39cce14abc4ad374dfedb18aa2126f373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4139-379cc7d26597f7cc355aebd4464d172e39cce14abc4ad374dfedb18aa2126f373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6895-9547</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4896099$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4896099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25281969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Adrian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidky, Emil Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Xiaochuan</creatorcontrib><title>Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop and demonstrate a set of practical metrics for CT systems optimization. These metrics, based on the Hotelling observer (HO) figure of merit, are task‐based. The authors therefore take the specific example of optimizing a dedicated breast CT system, including the reconstruction algorithm, for two relevant tasks, signal detection and Rayleigh discrimination. Methods: A dedicated breast CT system is simulated using specifications in the literature from an existing prototype. The authors optimize configuration and image reconstruction algorithm parameters for two tasks: the detection of simulated microcalcifications and the discrimination of two adjacent, high‐contrast signals, known as the Rayleigh discrimination task. The effects on task performance of breast diameter, signal location, image grid size, projection view number, and reconstruction filter were all investigated. Two HO metrics were evaluated: the percentage of correct decisions in a two‐alternative forced choice experiment (equivalent to area under the ROC curve or AUC), and the HO efficiency, defined as the squared ratio of HO signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed image to HO SNR in the projection data. Results: The ease and efficiency of the HO metric computation allows a rapid high‐resolution survey of many system parameters. Optimization of a range of system parameters using the HO results in images that subjectively appear optimal for the tasks investigated. Further, the results of assessment through the HO reproduce closely many existing results in the literature regarding the impact of parameter selection on image quality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a task‐based approach to system design, evaluation, and optimization. The methodology presented is equally applicable to determining the impact of a wide range of factors, including patient parameters, system and acquisition design, and the reconstruction algorithm. The results demonstrate the versatility of the proposed HO formalism by not only generating a set of parameters that are optimal for a given task but also by qualitatively reproducing many existing results from the breast CT literature. Meanwhile, the implementation of the proposed methodology is straightforward and entirely simulation‐based. This is an attractive feature for many system optimization problems, where the goal is to analyze the individual system components such as the image reconstruction algorithm. Final assessment of the system as a whole should be based also on real data studies.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>biological organs</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>breast CT</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Hotelling observer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>Image detection systems</subject><subject>image quality</subject><subject>Image quality assessment</subject><subject>image reconstruction</subject><subject>Image sensors</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Numerical optimization</subject><subject>optimisation</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>X‐ray detectors</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOwzAUhi0EgnIZeAGUEYYU3xLHCxKquElFMJTZcuwTMCRxsdMimHgEnpEnIdCCYGA6w__pOzeEdgkeEkKKQzLkhcyxlCtoQLlgKadYrqIBxpKnlONsA23GeI8xzlmG19EGzWhBZC4H6Gqi48P761upI9jETzvXuBfdOd8mvkosWGd01ydlAB27ZDRJ5k4n576DunbtbeLLCGEOIWmgC87EbbRW6TrCzrJuoZvTk8noPB1fnV2Mjsep4YTJlAlpjLA0z6SohDEsyzSUlvOcWyIosD4GwnVpuLZMcFuBLUmhNSU0r5hgW-ho4Z3OygasgbYLulbT4BodnpXXTv1NWnenbv1ccSpxxmkv2F8Kgn-cQexU46Lpt9It-FlUpL8nlkUu8h49WKAm-BgDVD9tCFafD1BELR_Qs3u_5_ohvy_eA-kCeHI1PP9vUpfXX8IP1y2Qew</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Sanchez, Adrian A.</creator><creator>Sidky, Emil Y.</creator><creator>Pan, Xiaochuan</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-9547</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics</title><author>Sanchez, Adrian A. ; Sidky, Emil Y. ; Pan, Xiaochuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4139-379cc7d26597f7cc355aebd4464d172e39cce14abc4ad374dfedb18aa2126f373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>biological organs</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>breast CT</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Hotelling observer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>Image detection systems</topic><topic>image quality</topic><topic>Image quality assessment</topic><topic>image reconstruction</topic><topic>Image sensors</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Numerical optimization</topic><topic>optimisation</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>X‐ray detectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Adrian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidky, Emil Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Xiaochuan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez, Adrian A.</au><au>Sidky, Emil Y.</au><au>Pan, Xiaochuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>101917</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>101917-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop and demonstrate a set of practical metrics for CT systems optimization. These metrics, based on the Hotelling observer (HO) figure of merit, are task‐based. The authors therefore take the specific example of optimizing a dedicated breast CT system, including the reconstruction algorithm, for two relevant tasks, signal detection and Rayleigh discrimination. Methods: A dedicated breast CT system is simulated using specifications in the literature from an existing prototype. The authors optimize configuration and image reconstruction algorithm parameters for two tasks: the detection of simulated microcalcifications and the discrimination of two adjacent, high‐contrast signals, known as the Rayleigh discrimination task. The effects on task performance of breast diameter, signal location, image grid size, projection view number, and reconstruction filter were all investigated. Two HO metrics were evaluated: the percentage of correct decisions in a two‐alternative forced choice experiment (equivalent to area under the ROC curve or AUC), and the HO efficiency, defined as the squared ratio of HO signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed image to HO SNR in the projection data. Results: The ease and efficiency of the HO metric computation allows a rapid high‐resolution survey of many system parameters. Optimization of a range of system parameters using the HO results in images that subjectively appear optimal for the tasks investigated. Further, the results of assessment through the HO reproduce closely many existing results in the literature regarding the impact of parameter selection on image quality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a task‐based approach to system design, evaluation, and optimization. The methodology presented is equally applicable to determining the impact of a wide range of factors, including patient parameters, system and acquisition design, and the reconstruction algorithm. The results demonstrate the versatility of the proposed HO formalism by not only generating a set of parameters that are optimal for a given task but also by qualitatively reproducing many existing results from the breast CT literature. Meanwhile, the implementation of the proposed methodology is straightforward and entirely simulation‐based. This is an attractive feature for many system optimization problems, where the goal is to analyze the individual system components such as the image reconstruction algorithm. Final assessment of the system as a whole should be based also on real data studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>25281969</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4896099</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-9547</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2014-10, Vol.41 (10), p.101917-n/a
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4290542
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
biological organs
Breast - pathology
breast CT
Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging
Computed tomography
Computer Simulation
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Equipment Design
Hotelling observer
Humans
Image data processing or generation, in general
Image detection systems
image quality
Image quality assessment
image reconstruction
Image sensors
Medical image noise
medical image processing
Medical image reconstruction
Numerical optimization
optimisation
Organ Size
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Imaging Physics
Reconstruction
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
X‐ray detectors
title Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A01%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task%E2%80%90based%20optimization%20of%20dedicated%20breast%20CT%20via%20Hotelling%20observer%20metrics&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sanchez,%20Adrian%20A.&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=101917&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=101917-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4896099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1609098676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609098676&rft_id=info:pmid/25281969&rfr_iscdi=true