Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction

Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgical oncology 2014-11, Vol.12 (1), p.330-330, Article 330
Hauptverfasser: Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp, Krebs, Juliane, Gosheger, Georg, Streitbuerger, Arne, Nottrott, Markus, Sauer, Tim, Hoell, Steffen, Singh, Gurpal, Hardes, Jendrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 330
container_issue 1
container_start_page 330
container_title World journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 12
creator Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp
Krebs, Juliane
Gosheger, Georg
Streitbuerger, Arne
Nottrott, Markus
Sauer, Tim
Hoell, Steffen
Singh, Gurpal
Hardes, Jendrik
description Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care. This study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case. Mean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%. Our data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1477-7819-12-330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4289050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539696680</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539696680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b652t-4b807b3a9e77a01cf2f787fb684d29c3f5f41adb62f97588382e74d2534076783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl2L1DAUhoso7rp675UEBPGmaz7aJvVCWAa_YMUbvQ5pejKTJU3GpBH8Af5vU7uOM7KSQELOc94k5z1V9ZTgS0JE94o0nNdckL4mtGYM36vOD0f3j_Zn1aOUbjCmjLXsYXVGW8Y7ypvz6uenMGanIprzFCICP4Z9DGneQYKErEcpx63VyqG9cs6q2QaPgkEu-G09BA9oglmlMiG9RgpFGLP-DZXcVXPIcQSPlB9LfMxRDQ4Kp4NPc1zhx9UDo1yCJ7frRfX13dsvmw_19ef3HzdX1_XQtXSum0FgPjDVA-cKE22o4YKboRPNSHvNTGsaosaho6bnrRBMUOAl1LIG844LdlG9WXX3eZhg1ODnqJzcRzup-EMGZeVpxNud3IbvsqGixy0uAptVYLDhPwKnER0mudggFxskobK4VFRe3j4jhm8Z0iwnmzQ4pzyEnCTpWMMpa3tS0Of_oDchR1-KtFBt-WHP2F9qqxxI600ol-tFVF61rO_6rhPLtZd3UGWMMNliBxhbzk8SXhwl7EC5eZeCy4tl6RTEK6hL76QI5lARguXSqXfV4NmxFYeEP63JfgHbAuSy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635382933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp ; Krebs, Juliane ; Gosheger, Georg ; Streitbuerger, Arne ; Nottrott, Markus ; Sauer, Tim ; Hoell, Steffen ; Singh, Gurpal ; Hardes, Jendrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp ; Krebs, Juliane ; Gosheger, Georg ; Streitbuerger, Arne ; Nottrott, Markus ; Sauer, Tim ; Hoell, Steffen ; Singh, Gurpal ; Hardes, Jendrik</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care. This study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case. Mean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%. Our data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-330</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25376274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Neoplasms - rehabilitation ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Implants, Artificial ; Limb Salvage ; Male ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology, Experimental ; Palliative Care ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgery, Plastic ; Survival Rate ; Tumor Burden</subject><ispartof>World journal of surgical oncology, 2014-11, Vol.12 (1), p.330-330, Article 330</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Henrichs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Henrichs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b652t-4b807b3a9e77a01cf2f787fb684d29c3f5f41adb62f97588382e74d2534076783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b652t-4b807b3a9e77a01cf2f787fb684d29c3f5f41adb62f97588382e74d2534076783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289050/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289050/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosheger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streitbuerger, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nottrott, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoell, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gurpal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardes, Jendrik</creatorcontrib><title>Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction</title><title>World journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>World J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care. This study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case. Mean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%. Our data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants, Artificial</subject><subject>Limb Salvage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>1477-7819</issn><issn>1477-7819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl2L1DAUhoso7rp675UEBPGmaz7aJvVCWAa_YMUbvQ5pejKTJU3GpBH8Af5vU7uOM7KSQELOc94k5z1V9ZTgS0JE94o0nNdckL4mtGYM36vOD0f3j_Zn1aOUbjCmjLXsYXVGW8Y7ypvz6uenMGanIprzFCICP4Z9DGneQYKErEcpx63VyqG9cs6q2QaPgkEu-G09BA9oglmlMiG9RgpFGLP-DZXcVXPIcQSPlB9LfMxRDQ4Kp4NPc1zhx9UDo1yCJ7frRfX13dsvmw_19ef3HzdX1_XQtXSum0FgPjDVA-cKE22o4YKboRPNSHvNTGsaosaho6bnrRBMUOAl1LIG844LdlG9WXX3eZhg1ODnqJzcRzup-EMGZeVpxNud3IbvsqGixy0uAptVYLDhPwKnER0mudggFxskobK4VFRe3j4jhm8Z0iwnmzQ4pzyEnCTpWMMpa3tS0Of_oDchR1-KtFBt-WHP2F9qqxxI600ol-tFVF61rO_6rhPLtZd3UGWMMNliBxhbzk8SXhwl7EC5eZeCy4tl6RTEK6hL76QI5lARguXSqXfV4NmxFYeEP63JfgHbAuSy</recordid><startdate>20141107</startdate><enddate>20141107</enddate><creator>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp</creator><creator>Krebs, Juliane</creator><creator>Gosheger, Georg</creator><creator>Streitbuerger, Arne</creator><creator>Nottrott, Markus</creator><creator>Sauer, Tim</creator><creator>Hoell, Steffen</creator><creator>Singh, Gurpal</creator><creator>Hardes, Jendrik</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141107</creationdate><title>Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction</title><author>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp ; Krebs, Juliane ; Gosheger, Georg ; Streitbuerger, Arne ; Nottrott, Markus ; Sauer, Tim ; Hoell, Steffen ; Singh, Gurpal ; Hardes, Jendrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b652t-4b807b3a9e77a01cf2f787fb684d29c3f5f41adb62f97588382e74d2534076783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants, Artificial</topic><topic>Limb Salvage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosheger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streitbuerger, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nottrott, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoell, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gurpal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardes, Jendrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp</au><au>Krebs, Juliane</au><au>Gosheger, Georg</au><au>Streitbuerger, Arne</au><au>Nottrott, Markus</au><au>Sauer, Tim</au><au>Hoell, Steffen</au><au>Singh, Gurpal</au><au>Hardes, Jendrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>World journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>World J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-11-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>330-330</pages><artnum>330</artnum><issn>1477-7819</issn><eissn>1477-7819</eissn><abstract>Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care. This study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case. Mean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%. Our data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25376274</pmid><doi>10.1186/1477-7819-12-330</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7819
ispartof World journal of surgical oncology, 2014-11, Vol.12 (1), p.330-330, Article 330
issn 1477-7819
1477-7819
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4289050
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Neoplasms - rehabilitation
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Bone Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer
Care and treatment
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Implants, Artificial
Limb Salvage
Male
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology, Experimental
Palliative Care
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis
Prosthesis Implantation
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Surgery, Plastic
Survival Rate
Tumor Burden
title Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A15%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modular%20tumor%20endoprostheses%20in%20surgical%20palliation%20of%20long-bone%20metastases:%20a%20reduction%20in%20tumor%20burden%20and%20a%20durable%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Henrichs,%20Marcel-Philipp&rft.date=2014-11-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=330-330&rft.artnum=330&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1477-7819-12-330&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539696680%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635382933&rft_id=info:pmid/25376274&rft_galeid=A539696680&rfr_iscdi=true