Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies
Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐wor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 858 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 852 |
container_title | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | OZA, SAUMIL R. HUNTER, TINA D. BIVIANO, ANGELO B. DANDAMUDI, GOPI HERWEG, BENGT PATEL, ANSHUL M. POLLAK, SCOTT J. WANG, HUIJIAN FISHEL, ROBERT S. |
description | Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries
Introduction
This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter.
Methods
This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee.
Results
A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths.
Conclusion
Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jce.12403 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4282391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1552804607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEoqWw4AWQJTawSOtLnLgsKo1GvaGWKW0RS8txjmc8ZOLBdtrm0Xg7TNMOFwlvjqXznV_n8mfZa4J3SXp7Sw27hBaYPcm2CS9wLkhZPU1_XPCciYptZS9CWGJMWIn582yLFiWmmInt7MdE9xHQlTIQB-QMUh2araHLT723cxWhQZO6VdG6Dk1VXEAEj25tXCBe5ieuBXThvOsDurZrZJxHl6qxznj43kOnh9_FSfpCeXc3hJVq0SR6m8KRrb1tR-IDmnSqHYINyHi3QhTN6gD-5j6Z2EuY2xD9gK5i31gIL7NnRrUBXj3EnezL0eH19CQ_mx2fTidnueacsJwCawTTqhZgoCSk5qQqVYW5qo3BmHMMAlNBgXLGudC6qeuCFIbUqtSCA9vJDkbddV-voNHQRa9aufZ2pfwgnbLy70xnF3LubmSRVNk-SQLvHgS8S1sJUa5s0JDG7iBtThLOqcDpIlVC3_6DLl3v0_QjxURJcZGo9yOlvQvBg9k0Q7D8ZQiZDCHvDZHYN392vyEfHZCAvRG4tS0M_1eSH6eHj5L5WJHOAXebCuW_ybJiFZdfPx1Lev55v2TnlZyyn-x40Yo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552386204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creator><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><description>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries
Introduction
This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter.
Methods
This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee.
Results
A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths.
Conclusion
Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.12403</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24602038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acute safety ; Aged ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac Catheters ; catheter ablation ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation - instrumentation ; Catheters ; complications ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects ; Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation ; thermocool SF catheter ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 The Authors Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjce.12403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjce.12403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TINA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERWEG, BENGT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, HUIJIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries
Introduction
This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter.
Methods
This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee.
Results
A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths.
Conclusion
Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</description><subject>acute safety</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheters</subject><subject>catheter ablation</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation</subject><subject>thermocool SF catheter</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEoqWw4AWQJTawSOtLnLgsKo1GvaGWKW0RS8txjmc8ZOLBdtrm0Xg7TNMOFwlvjqXznV_n8mfZa4J3SXp7Sw27hBaYPcm2CS9wLkhZPU1_XPCciYptZS9CWGJMWIn582yLFiWmmInt7MdE9xHQlTIQB-QMUh2araHLT723cxWhQZO6VdG6Dk1VXEAEj25tXCBe5ieuBXThvOsDurZrZJxHl6qxznj43kOnh9_FSfpCeXc3hJVq0SR6m8KRrb1tR-IDmnSqHYINyHi3QhTN6gD-5j6Z2EuY2xD9gK5i31gIL7NnRrUBXj3EnezL0eH19CQ_mx2fTidnueacsJwCawTTqhZgoCSk5qQqVYW5qo3BmHMMAlNBgXLGudC6qeuCFIbUqtSCA9vJDkbddV-voNHQRa9aufZ2pfwgnbLy70xnF3LubmSRVNk-SQLvHgS8S1sJUa5s0JDG7iBtThLOqcDpIlVC3_6DLl3v0_QjxURJcZGo9yOlvQvBg9k0Q7D8ZQiZDCHvDZHYN392vyEfHZCAvRG4tS0M_1eSH6eHj5L5WJHOAXebCuW_ybJiFZdfPx1Lev55v2TnlZyyn-x40Yo</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creator><creator>HUNTER, TINA D.</creator><creator>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creator><creator>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creator><creator>HERWEG, BENGT</creator><creator>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creator><creator>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creator><creator>WANG, HUIJIAN</creator><creator>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><author>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>acute safety</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheters</topic><topic>catheter ablation</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation</topic><topic>thermocool SF catheter</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TINA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERWEG, BENGT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, HUIJIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OZA, SAUMIL R.</au><au>HUNTER, TINA D.</au><au>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</au><au>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</au><au>HERWEG, BENGT</au><au>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</au><au>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</au><au>WANG, HUIJIAN</au><au>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>852</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>852-858</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries
Introduction
This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter.
Methods
This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee.
Results
A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths.
Conclusion
Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24602038</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.12403</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-3873 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858 |
issn | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4282391 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | acute safety Aged atrial fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation - complications Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology Atrial Fibrillation - surgery Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiac Catheters catheter ablation Catheter Ablation - adverse effects Catheter Ablation - instrumentation Catheters complications Equipment Design Female Humans Male Middle Aged Original Prospective Studies Recurrence Registries Risk Factors Studies Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation thermocool SF catheter Time Factors Treatment Outcome United States |
title | Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A53%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20Safety%20of%20an%20Open-Irrigated%20Ablation%20Catheter%20with%2056-Hole%20Porous%20Tip%20for%20Radiofrequency%20Ablation%20of%20Paroxysmal%20Atrial%20Fibrillation:%20Analysis%20from%202%20Observational%20Registry%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=OZA,%20SAUMIL%20R.&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=852&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=852-858&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.12403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1552804607%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552386204&rft_id=info:pmid/24602038&rfr_iscdi=true |