Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies

Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐wor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858
Hauptverfasser: OZA, SAUMIL R., HUNTER, TINA D., BIVIANO, ANGELO B., DANDAMUDI, GOPI, HERWEG, BENGT, PATEL, ANSHUL M., POLLAK, SCOTT J., WANG, HUIJIAN, FISHEL, ROBERT S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 858
container_issue 8
container_start_page 852
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 25
creator OZA, SAUMIL R.
HUNTER, TINA D.
BIVIANO, ANGELO B.
DANDAMUDI, GOPI
HERWEG, BENGT
PATEL, ANSHUL M.
POLLAK, SCOTT J.
WANG, HUIJIAN
FISHEL, ROBERT S.
description Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter. Methods This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee. Results A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths. Conclusion Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.12403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4282391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1552804607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEoqWw4AWQJTawSOtLnLgsKo1GvaGWKW0RS8txjmc8ZOLBdtrm0Xg7TNMOFwlvjqXznV_n8mfZa4J3SXp7Sw27hBaYPcm2CS9wLkhZPU1_XPCciYptZS9CWGJMWIn582yLFiWmmInt7MdE9xHQlTIQB-QMUh2araHLT723cxWhQZO6VdG6Dk1VXEAEj25tXCBe5ieuBXThvOsDurZrZJxHl6qxznj43kOnh9_FSfpCeXc3hJVq0SR6m8KRrb1tR-IDmnSqHYINyHi3QhTN6gD-5j6Z2EuY2xD9gK5i31gIL7NnRrUBXj3EnezL0eH19CQ_mx2fTidnueacsJwCawTTqhZgoCSk5qQqVYW5qo3BmHMMAlNBgXLGudC6qeuCFIbUqtSCA9vJDkbddV-voNHQRa9aufZ2pfwgnbLy70xnF3LubmSRVNk-SQLvHgS8S1sJUa5s0JDG7iBtThLOqcDpIlVC3_6DLl3v0_QjxURJcZGo9yOlvQvBg9k0Q7D8ZQiZDCHvDZHYN392vyEfHZCAvRG4tS0M_1eSH6eHj5L5WJHOAXebCuW_ybJiFZdfPx1Lev55v2TnlZyyn-x40Yo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552386204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creator><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><description>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter. Methods This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee. Results A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths. Conclusion Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.12403</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24602038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acute safety ; Aged ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac Catheters ; catheter ablation ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation - instrumentation ; Catheters ; complications ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects ; Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation ; thermocool SF catheter ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 The Authors Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjce.12403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjce.12403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TINA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERWEG, BENGT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, HUIJIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter. Methods This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee. Results A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths. Conclusion Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</description><subject>acute safety</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheters</subject><subject>catheter ablation</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation</subject><subject>thermocool SF catheter</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEoqWw4AWQJTawSOtLnLgsKo1GvaGWKW0RS8txjmc8ZOLBdtrm0Xg7TNMOFwlvjqXznV_n8mfZa4J3SXp7Sw27hBaYPcm2CS9wLkhZPU1_XPCciYptZS9CWGJMWIn582yLFiWmmInt7MdE9xHQlTIQB-QMUh2araHLT723cxWhQZO6VdG6Dk1VXEAEj25tXCBe5ieuBXThvOsDurZrZJxHl6qxznj43kOnh9_FSfpCeXc3hJVq0SR6m8KRrb1tR-IDmnSqHYINyHi3QhTN6gD-5j6Z2EuY2xD9gK5i31gIL7NnRrUBXj3EnezL0eH19CQ_mx2fTidnueacsJwCawTTqhZgoCSk5qQqVYW5qo3BmHMMAlNBgXLGudC6qeuCFIbUqtSCA9vJDkbddV-voNHQRa9aufZ2pfwgnbLy70xnF3LubmSRVNk-SQLvHgS8S1sJUa5s0JDG7iBtThLOqcDpIlVC3_6DLl3v0_QjxURJcZGo9yOlvQvBg9k0Q7D8ZQiZDCHvDZHYN392vyEfHZCAvRG4tS0M_1eSH6eHj5L5WJHOAXebCuW_ybJiFZdfPx1Lev55v2TnlZyyn-x40Yo</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creator><creator>HUNTER, TINA D.</creator><creator>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creator><creator>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creator><creator>HERWEG, BENGT</creator><creator>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creator><creator>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creator><creator>WANG, HUIJIAN</creator><creator>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</title><author>OZA, SAUMIL R. ; HUNTER, TINA D. ; BIVIANO, ANGELO B. ; DANDAMUDI, GOPI ; HERWEG, BENGT ; PATEL, ANSHUL M. ; POLLAK, SCOTT J. ; WANG, HUIJIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5513-2e3d83cab8efe611b5176a705abff00550e80282e253558ccdbb414f1ba6c85e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>acute safety</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheters</topic><topic>catheter ablation</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation</topic><topic>thermocool SF catheter</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OZA, SAUMIL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TINA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERWEG, BENGT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, HUIJIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OZA, SAUMIL R.</au><au>HUNTER, TINA D.</au><au>BIVIANO, ANGELO B.</au><au>DANDAMUDI, GOPI</au><au>HERWEG, BENGT</au><au>PATEL, ANSHUL M.</au><au>POLLAK, SCOTT J.</au><au>WANG, HUIJIAN</au><au>FISHEL, ROBERT S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>852</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>852-858</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Acute Safety from 2 AF Ablation Registries Introduction This report presents safety data on the use of a new open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter with a 56‐hole porous tip in 742 patients enrolled in 2 US prospective, multicenter observational registry studies representing real‐world use of the catheter. Methods This analysis is comprised of patients who underwent RFA of drug‐refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute adverse events (AEs) were collected and categorized by seriousness, timing, and relatedness, with 7 days of follow‐up data in one study and at least 120 days of data from a 1‐year follow‐up in the other. Acute serious adverse events (SAEs) that were identified as potentially related to the device and/or procedure were adjudicated by an independent safety committee. Results A total of 30 patients (4.0%) in the combined studies experienced an acute SAE related to the device and/or procedure, which was similar in the subset of patients age 65 and over (4.2%). These SAEs included 1.2% cardiac tamponade/perforation, 0.7% pericarditis, 0.5% pulmonary events, and 0.8% vascular access complications. No myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrioesophageal fistulas within 7 days postprocedure were reported. In the study with extended follow‐up, 1 pulmonary vein stenosis and 1 esophageal injury were seen beyond 7 days postprocedure (0.2% each). There were no device or procedure related deaths. Conclusion Results from 2 large observational studies demonstrated that a new porous tip RFA catheter was safe for the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal AF, including treatment of older patients (≥65 years).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24602038</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.12403</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3873
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2014-08, Vol.25 (8), p.852-858
issn 1045-3873
1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4282391
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects acute safety
Aged
atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - complications
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiac Catheters
catheter ablation
Catheter Ablation - adverse effects
Catheter Ablation - instrumentation
Catheters
complications
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Registries
Risk Factors
Studies
Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects
Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation
thermocool SF catheter
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
title Acute Safety of an Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter with 56-Hole Porous Tip for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from 2 Observational Registry Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A53%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20Safety%20of%20an%20Open-Irrigated%20Ablation%20Catheter%20with%2056-Hole%20Porous%20Tip%20for%20Radiofrequency%20Ablation%20of%20Paroxysmal%20Atrial%20Fibrillation:%20Analysis%20from%202%20Observational%20Registry%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=OZA,%20SAUMIL%20R.&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=852&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=852-858&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.12403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1552804607%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552386204&rft_id=info:pmid/24602038&rfr_iscdi=true