Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study

•We examined ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision.•Of 484,310 adults seen by EMS, 36% were transported to emergency departments.•Raw transport rates were only 2% higher for older vs. younger adults.•Adjusted transport rates were also only 2% higher for older adults.•Age-specific g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2014-12, Vol.73, p.373-379
Hauptverfasser: Hunold, Katherine M., Sochor, Mark R., McLean, Samuel A., Mosteller, Kaitlyn B., Fernandez, Antonio R., Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue
container_start_page 373
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 73
creator Hunold, Katherine M.
Sochor, Mark R.
McLean, Samuel A.
Mosteller, Kaitlyn B.
Fernandez, Antonio R.
Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
description •We examined ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision.•Of 484,310 adults seen by EMS, 36% were transported to emergency departments.•Raw transport rates were only 2% higher for older vs. younger adults.•Adjusted transport rates were also only 2% higher for older adults.•Age-specific guidelines may improve the triage of older adults after MVC. Older adults are at greater risk than younger adults for life-threatening injury after motor vehicle collision (MVC). Among those with life-threatening injury, older adults are also at greater risk of not being transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to an emergency department. Despite the greater risk of serious injury and non-transportation among older adults, little is known about the relationship between patient age and EMS transportation rates for individuals experiencing MVC. We describe transport rates across the age-span for adults seen by EMS after experiencing MVC using data reported to the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles between 2008 and 2011. Of all adults aged 18 years and older experiencing MVC and seen by EMS (n=484,310), 36.3% (n=175,768) were transported to an emergency department. Rates of transport for individuals seen by EMS after MVC increased only a small amount with increasing patient age. After adjusting for potential confounders of the relationship between patient age and the decision to transport (patient gender, patient race, air bag deployment, patient trapped or ejected, and injury severity), transport rates were: age 18–64=36.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.9–36.2%); age 65–74=36.6% (95% CI, 36.0–37.1%); age 75–84=37.3% (95% CI, 36.5–38.1%), and age 85–94=38.2% (95% CI, 36.7–39.8%). In North Carolina between 2008 and 2011, the transportation rate was only slightly higher for older adults than for younger adults, and most older adults experiencing MVC and seen by EMS were not transported to the emergency department. These findings have implications for efforts to improve the sensitivity of criteria used by EMS to determine the need for transport for older adults experiencing MVC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4253949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457514002930</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660067581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-dba33df2a9ea3898c3378ddb6269feba48ebf1555b4fc8c975cdcffa183e2bb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7jj6A7yR3AjetCZt0zYKwrD4BQve6HVIk5PdDG1Tk3Rg_r1nmHHVG9mrfD3n5T3nDSEvOSs54-3bfan1UlaMNyWTJavaR2TD-04WFRPdY7JhjPGiEZ24Is9S2uOx6zvxlFxVouasruWGzLtpWEc9G6A56jktIWYadYZEtcsQ6RRyiPQAd96MQE0YR598mKnD2zBaJA6ppMewzre413Ydc3pHd3QJC-pmRItBJ7A05dUen5MnTo8JXlzWLfnx6eP36y_FzbfPX693N4VBt7mwg65r6yotQde97E1dd721Q1u10sGgmx4Gx4UQQ-NMb2QnjDXOad7XUA0Dr7fkw1l3WYcJrIEZuxvVEv2k41EF7dW_L7O_U7fhoBocjWwkCry5CMTwc4WU1eSTgRFHBWFNirctY20nev4AtOkYyor-AWglZVcxzGZL-Bk1MaQUwd2b50yd0ld7hemrU_qKSYXpY82rv7u-r_gdNwKvL4BORo8OEzc-_eFw1C1vTz7fnznAjA4eokrGA34S6yOYrGzw_7HxCz9D0AI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629972003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hunold, Katherine M. ; Sochor, Mark R. ; McLean, Samuel A. ; Mosteller, Kaitlyn B. ; Fernandez, Antonio R. ; Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunold, Katherine M. ; Sochor, Mark R. ; McLean, Samuel A. ; Mosteller, Kaitlyn B. ; Fernandez, Antonio R. ; Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><description>•We examined ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision.•Of 484,310 adults seen by EMS, 36% were transported to emergency departments.•Raw transport rates were only 2% higher for older vs. younger adults.•Adjusted transport rates were also only 2% higher for older adults.•Age-specific guidelines may improve the triage of older adults after MVC. Older adults are at greater risk than younger adults for life-threatening injury after motor vehicle collision (MVC). Among those with life-threatening injury, older adults are also at greater risk of not being transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to an emergency department. Despite the greater risk of serious injury and non-transportation among older adults, little is known about the relationship between patient age and EMS transportation rates for individuals experiencing MVC. We describe transport rates across the age-span for adults seen by EMS after experiencing MVC using data reported to the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles between 2008 and 2011. Of all adults aged 18 years and older experiencing MVC and seen by EMS (n=484,310), 36.3% (n=175,768) were transported to an emergency department. Rates of transport for individuals seen by EMS after MVC increased only a small amount with increasing patient age. After adjusting for potential confounders of the relationship between patient age and the decision to transport (patient gender, patient race, air bag deployment, patient trapped or ejected, and injury severity), transport rates were: age 18–64=36.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.9–36.2%); age 65–74=36.6% (95% CI, 36.0–37.1%); age 75–84=37.3% (95% CI, 36.5–38.1%), and age 85–94=38.2% (95% CI, 36.7–39.8%). In North Carolina between 2008 and 2011, the transportation rate was only slightly higher for older adults than for younger adults, and most older adults experiencing MVC and seen by EMS were not transported to the emergency department. These findings have implications for efforts to improve the sensitivity of criteria used by EMS to determine the need for transport for older adults experiencing MVC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25310339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulances - utilization ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Emergency vehicles ; EMS ; Female ; Geriatrics ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Injuries ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Motor vehicle collision ; North Carolina ; Patients ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk ; Transport ; Transportation of Patients - utilization ; Triage ; Wounds and Injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2014-12, Vol.73, p.373-379</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-dba33df2a9ea3898c3378ddb6269feba48ebf1555b4fc8c975cdcffa183e2bb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-dba33df2a9ea3898c3378ddb6269feba48ebf1555b4fc8c975cdcffa183e2bb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28986168$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25310339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunold, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sochor, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosteller, Kaitlyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Antonio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>•We examined ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision.•Of 484,310 adults seen by EMS, 36% were transported to emergency departments.•Raw transport rates were only 2% higher for older vs. younger adults.•Adjusted transport rates were also only 2% higher for older adults.•Age-specific guidelines may improve the triage of older adults after MVC. Older adults are at greater risk than younger adults for life-threatening injury after motor vehicle collision (MVC). Among those with life-threatening injury, older adults are also at greater risk of not being transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to an emergency department. Despite the greater risk of serious injury and non-transportation among older adults, little is known about the relationship between patient age and EMS transportation rates for individuals experiencing MVC. We describe transport rates across the age-span for adults seen by EMS after experiencing MVC using data reported to the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles between 2008 and 2011. Of all adults aged 18 years and older experiencing MVC and seen by EMS (n=484,310), 36.3% (n=175,768) were transported to an emergency department. Rates of transport for individuals seen by EMS after MVC increased only a small amount with increasing patient age. After adjusting for potential confounders of the relationship between patient age and the decision to transport (patient gender, patient race, air bag deployment, patient trapped or ejected, and injury severity), transport rates were: age 18–64=36.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.9–36.2%); age 65–74=36.6% (95% CI, 36.0–37.1%); age 75–84=37.3% (95% CI, 36.5–38.1%), and age 85–94=38.2% (95% CI, 36.7–39.8%). In North Carolina between 2008 and 2011, the transportation rate was only slightly higher for older adults than for younger adults, and most older adults experiencing MVC and seen by EMS were not transported to the emergency department. These findings have implications for efforts to improve the sensitivity of criteria used by EMS to determine the need for transport for older adults experiencing MVC.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulances - utilization</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Emergency vehicles</subject><subject>EMS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Motor vehicle collision</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients - utilization</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7jj6A7yR3AjetCZt0zYKwrD4BQve6HVIk5PdDG1Tk3Rg_r1nmHHVG9mrfD3n5T3nDSEvOSs54-3bfan1UlaMNyWTJavaR2TD-04WFRPdY7JhjPGiEZ24Is9S2uOx6zvxlFxVouasruWGzLtpWEc9G6A56jktIWYadYZEtcsQ6RRyiPQAd96MQE0YR598mKnD2zBaJA6ppMewzre413Ydc3pHd3QJC-pmRItBJ7A05dUen5MnTo8JXlzWLfnx6eP36y_FzbfPX693N4VBt7mwg65r6yotQde97E1dd721Q1u10sGgmx4Gx4UQQ-NMb2QnjDXOad7XUA0Dr7fkw1l3WYcJrIEZuxvVEv2k41EF7dW_L7O_U7fhoBocjWwkCry5CMTwc4WU1eSTgRFHBWFNirctY20nev4AtOkYyor-AWglZVcxzGZL-Bk1MaQUwd2b50yd0ld7hemrU_qKSYXpY82rv7u-r_gdNwKvL4BORo8OEzc-_eFw1C1vTz7fnznAjA4eokrGA34S6yOYrGzw_7HxCz9D0AI</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Hunold, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Sochor, Mark R.</creator><creator>McLean, Samuel A.</creator><creator>Mosteller, Kaitlyn B.</creator><creator>Fernandez, Antonio R.</creator><creator>Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study</title><author>Hunold, Katherine M. ; Sochor, Mark R. ; McLean, Samuel A. ; Mosteller, Kaitlyn B. ; Fernandez, Antonio R. ; Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-dba33df2a9ea3898c3378ddb6269feba48ebf1555b4fc8c975cdcffa183e2bb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulances - utilization</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Emergency vehicles</topic><topic>EMS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Motor vehicle collision</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients - utilization</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunold, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sochor, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosteller, Kaitlyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Antonio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunold, Katherine M.</au><au>Sochor, Mark R.</au><au>McLean, Samuel A.</au><au>Mosteller, Kaitlyn B.</au><au>Fernandez, Antonio R.</au><au>Platts-Mills, Timothy F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>373</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>373-379</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>•We examined ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision.•Of 484,310 adults seen by EMS, 36% were transported to emergency departments.•Raw transport rates were only 2% higher for older vs. younger adults.•Adjusted transport rates were also only 2% higher for older adults.•Age-specific guidelines may improve the triage of older adults after MVC. Older adults are at greater risk than younger adults for life-threatening injury after motor vehicle collision (MVC). Among those with life-threatening injury, older adults are also at greater risk of not being transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to an emergency department. Despite the greater risk of serious injury and non-transportation among older adults, little is known about the relationship between patient age and EMS transportation rates for individuals experiencing MVC. We describe transport rates across the age-span for adults seen by EMS after experiencing MVC using data reported to the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles between 2008 and 2011. Of all adults aged 18 years and older experiencing MVC and seen by EMS (n=484,310), 36.3% (n=175,768) were transported to an emergency department. Rates of transport for individuals seen by EMS after MVC increased only a small amount with increasing patient age. After adjusting for potential confounders of the relationship between patient age and the decision to transport (patient gender, patient race, air bag deployment, patient trapped or ejected, and injury severity), transport rates were: age 18–64=36.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.9–36.2%); age 65–74=36.6% (95% CI, 36.0–37.1%); age 75–84=37.3% (95% CI, 36.5–38.1%), and age 85–94=38.2% (95% CI, 36.7–39.8%). In North Carolina between 2008 and 2011, the transportation rate was only slightly higher for older adults than for younger adults, and most older adults experiencing MVC and seen by EMS were not transported to the emergency department. These findings have implications for efforts to improve the sensitivity of criteria used by EMS to determine the need for transport for older adults experiencing MVC.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25310339</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2014-12, Vol.73, p.373-379
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4253949
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Accidents, Traffic
Adolescent
Adult
Adults
Age
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulances - utilization
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency medical services
Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data
Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization
Emergency vehicles
EMS
Female
Geriatrics
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Injuries
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Motor vehicle collision
North Carolina
Patients
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk
Transport
Transportation of Patients - utilization
Triage
Wounds and Injuries
Young Adult
title Ambulance transport rates after motor vehicle collision for older vs. younger adults: A population-based study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambulance%20transport%20rates%20after%20motor%20vehicle%20collision%20for%20older%20vs.%20younger%20adults:%20A%20population-based%20study&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Hunold,%20Katherine%20M.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=373-379&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1660067581%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629972003&rft_id=info:pmid/25310339&rft_els_id=S0001457514002930&rfr_iscdi=true