Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine
Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personalized medicine 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 216 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Journal of personalized medicine |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Hresko, Andrew Haga, Susanne B |
description | Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jpm2040201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4251376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1643405416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottRe_AGy4EWE1XynvQhS_CgUvOg5ZLOTumW7WZNuQX-9Ka21OpcZmId33plB6JzgG8bG-HbRLinmmGJyhPoUK5FzTuXxQd1DwxgXOMVIUCrxKepRISRlEveRmDaxC6axkFm_hmDmkLW-rmwFMXM-ZC2E6BtTV19QZksoU6eBM3TiTB1huMsD9Pb48Dp5zmcvT9PJ_Sy3XNFVLl3BsbNE8REhXCklJBhBlWWupCVR1josHWNcSoyZLABUwRQbGc6oM7xkA3S31W27Is220KyCqXUbqqUJn9qbSv_tNNW7nvu15lQQpmQSuNoJBP_RQVzpZRUt1LVpwHdRE8kZx4KTDXr5D134LqTNEyWoGCdPhCbqekvZ4GMM4PZmCNabh-jfhyT44tD-Hv05P_sGeAGFMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525943212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</creator><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><description>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm2040201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25562360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Precision medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2012</rights><rights>2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251376/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251376/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><description>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</description><subject>Precision medicine</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottRe_AGy4EWE1XynvQhS_CgUvOg5ZLOTumW7WZNuQX-9Ka21OpcZmId33plB6JzgG8bG-HbRLinmmGJyhPoUK5FzTuXxQd1DwxgXOMVIUCrxKepRISRlEveRmDaxC6axkFm_hmDmkLW-rmwFMXM-ZC2E6BtTV19QZksoU6eBM3TiTB1huMsD9Pb48Dp5zmcvT9PJ_Sy3XNFVLl3BsbNE8REhXCklJBhBlWWupCVR1josHWNcSoyZLABUwRQbGc6oM7xkA3S31W27Is220KyCqXUbqqUJn9qbSv_tNNW7nvu15lQQpmQSuNoJBP_RQVzpZRUt1LVpwHdRE8kZx4KTDXr5D134LqTNEyWoGCdPhCbqekvZ4GMM4PZmCNabh-jfhyT44tD-Hv05P_sGeAGFMQ</recordid><startdate>20121030</startdate><enddate>20121030</enddate><creator>Hresko, Andrew</creator><creator>Haga, Susanne B</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121030</creationdate><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><author>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Precision medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hresko, Andrew</au><au>Haga, Susanne B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><date>2012-10-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>201-216</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>25562360</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm2040201</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4426 |
ispartof | Journal of personalized medicine, 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216 |
issn | 2075-4426 2075-4426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4251376 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Precision medicine |
title | Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insurance%20coverage%20policies%20for%20personalized%20medicine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Hresko,%20Andrew&rft.date=2012-10-30&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=201-216&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm2040201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1643405416%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525943212&rft_id=info:pmid/25562360&rfr_iscdi=true |