Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine

Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personalized medicine 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216
Hauptverfasser: Hresko, Andrew, Haga, Susanne B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 4
container_start_page 201
container_title Journal of personalized medicine
container_volume 2
creator Hresko, Andrew
Haga, Susanne B
description Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jpm2040201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4251376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1643405416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottRe_AGy4EWE1XynvQhS_CgUvOg5ZLOTumW7WZNuQX-9Ka21OpcZmId33plB6JzgG8bG-HbRLinmmGJyhPoUK5FzTuXxQd1DwxgXOMVIUCrxKepRISRlEveRmDaxC6axkFm_hmDmkLW-rmwFMXM-ZC2E6BtTV19QZksoU6eBM3TiTB1huMsD9Pb48Dp5zmcvT9PJ_Sy3XNFVLl3BsbNE8REhXCklJBhBlWWupCVR1josHWNcSoyZLABUwRQbGc6oM7xkA3S31W27Is220KyCqXUbqqUJn9qbSv_tNNW7nvu15lQQpmQSuNoJBP_RQVzpZRUt1LVpwHdRE8kZx4KTDXr5D134LqTNEyWoGCdPhCbqekvZ4GMM4PZmCNabh-jfhyT44tD-Hv05P_sGeAGFMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525943212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</creator><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><description>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm2040201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25562360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Precision medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2012</rights><rights>2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251376/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251376/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><description>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</description><subject>Precision medicine</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottRe_AGy4EWE1XynvQhS_CgUvOg5ZLOTumW7WZNuQX-9Ka21OpcZmId33plB6JzgG8bG-HbRLinmmGJyhPoUK5FzTuXxQd1DwxgXOMVIUCrxKepRISRlEveRmDaxC6axkFm_hmDmkLW-rmwFMXM-ZC2E6BtTV19QZksoU6eBM3TiTB1huMsD9Pb48Dp5zmcvT9PJ_Sy3XNFVLl3BsbNE8REhXCklJBhBlWWupCVR1josHWNcSoyZLABUwRQbGc6oM7xkA3S31W27Is220KyCqXUbqqUJn9qbSv_tNNW7nvu15lQQpmQSuNoJBP_RQVzpZRUt1LVpwHdRE8kZx4KTDXr5D134LqTNEyWoGCdPhCbqekvZ4GMM4PZmCNabh-jfhyT44tD-Hv05P_sGeAGFMQ</recordid><startdate>20121030</startdate><enddate>20121030</enddate><creator>Hresko, Andrew</creator><creator>Haga, Susanne B</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121030</creationdate><title>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</title><author>Hresko, Andrew ; Haga, Susanne B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6fb40fc174811477756ea527c3fd2d17ccf06f334660036bee7b3738a432fa4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Precision medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hresko, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hresko, Andrew</au><au>Haga, Susanne B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><date>2012-10-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>201-216</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>25562360</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm2040201</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4426
ispartof Journal of personalized medicine, 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.201-216
issn 2075-4426
2075-4426
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4251376
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Precision medicine
title Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insurance%20coverage%20policies%20for%20personalized%20medicine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Hresko,%20Andrew&rft.date=2012-10-30&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=201-216&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm2040201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1643405416%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525943212&rft_id=info:pmid/25562360&rfr_iscdi=true