Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis

Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549
Hauptverfasser: Şurlin, Valeriu, Săftoiu, Adrian, Dumitrescu, Daniela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16549
container_issue 44
container_start_page 16544
container_title World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
container_volume 20
creator Şurlin, Valeriu
Săftoiu, Adrian
Dumitrescu, Daniela
description Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4248197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849525252484955</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1652386092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1vGyEQhlHUqHGS_oBcqj32si4MHwuXSq2VpJEi9ZKcEcvChmi92LDrqP--OHatFg6MZt55mXkQuiF4SRsmv7699ssd4GVgbEkEZ-wMLQCIqkEy_AEtCMZNrSg0F-gy51eMgVIOH9EFcCYUBligHw9r04exryaXp1z5mCpj7ZzM5KoumH6MOeQq-pKdS6oNQzDpd7Uxo03OTGEK-RqdezNk9-n4XqHnu9un1c_68df9w-r7Y20Zo1NtvGwtV50xwrCW444RSTqllHcedxaD54KKtgVDhLSi8Z7wtmm8aJn1DVh6hb4dfDdzu3addeOUzKA3KazLSDqaoP-vjOFF93GnGTBJVFMMvhwNUtzOZV-9Dtm6YTCji3PWBSFQKbCCIiUHqU0x5-T86RuC9Z69Lux1Ya8Le_3OvvR8_ne-U8df2EVAj6Yvcey3hfpJo7DcH8Uxk0xx2N_3iNM_C-iSYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652386092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</creator><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><description>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25469022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Animals ; Biliary ; Diagnostic Imaging - methods ; Endoscopic ; Gallstones - complications ; Gallstones - diagnosis ; Gallstones - therapy ; Humans ; Lithiasis ; Pancreatitis ; Pancreatitis - diagnosis ; Pancreatitis - etiology ; Pancreatitis - therapy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Topic Highlight ; ultrason</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549</ispartof><rights>2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248197/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248197/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Săftoiu, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biliary</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopic</subject><subject>Gallstones - complications</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallstones - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithiasis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - therapy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Topic Highlight</subject><subject>ultrason</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1vGyEQhlHUqHGS_oBcqj32si4MHwuXSq2VpJEi9ZKcEcvChmi92LDrqP--OHatFg6MZt55mXkQuiF4SRsmv7699ssd4GVgbEkEZ-wMLQCIqkEy_AEtCMZNrSg0F-gy51eMgVIOH9EFcCYUBligHw9r04exryaXp1z5mCpj7ZzM5KoumH6MOeQq-pKdS6oNQzDpd7Uxo03OTGEK-RqdezNk9-n4XqHnu9un1c_68df9w-r7Y20Zo1NtvGwtV50xwrCW444RSTqllHcedxaD54KKtgVDhLSi8Z7wtmm8aJn1DVh6hb4dfDdzu3addeOUzKA3KazLSDqaoP-vjOFF93GnGTBJVFMMvhwNUtzOZV-9Dtm6YTCji3PWBSFQKbCCIiUHqU0x5-T86RuC9Z69Lux1Ya8Le_3OvvR8_ne-U8df2EVAj6Yvcey3hfpJo7DcH8Uxk0xx2N_3iNM_C-iSYA</recordid><startdate>20141128</startdate><enddate>20141128</enddate><creator>Şurlin, Valeriu</creator><creator>Săftoiu, Adrian</creator><creator>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141128</creationdate><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><author>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biliary</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopic</topic><topic>Gallstones - complications</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallstones - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithiasis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - therapy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Topic Highlight</topic><topic>ultrason</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Săftoiu, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şurlin, Valeriu</au><au>Săftoiu, Adrian</au><au>Dumitrescu, Daniela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2014-11-28</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>44</issue><spage>16544</spage><epage>16549</epage><pages>16544-16549</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25469022</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1007-9327
ispartof World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549
issn 1007-9327
2219-2840
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4248197
source MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Animals
Biliary
Diagnostic Imaging - methods
Endoscopic
Gallstones - complications
Gallstones - diagnosis
Gallstones - therapy
Humans
Lithiasis
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis - diagnosis
Pancreatitis - etiology
Pancreatitis - therapy
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Topic Highlight
ultrason
title Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20tests%20for%20accurate%20diagnosis%20of%20acute%20biliary%20pancreatitis&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=%C5%9Eurlin,%20Valeriu&rft.date=2014-11-28&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=44&rft.spage=16544&rft.epage=16549&rft.pages=16544-16549&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1652386092%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652386092&rft_id=info:pmid/25469022&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849525252484955&rfr_iscdi=true