Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis
Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out rec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16549 |
---|---|
container_issue | 44 |
container_start_page | 16544 |
container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Şurlin, Valeriu Săftoiu, Adrian Dumitrescu, Daniela |
description | Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4248197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849525252484955</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1652386092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1vGyEQhlHUqHGS_oBcqj32si4MHwuXSq2VpJEi9ZKcEcvChmi92LDrqP--OHatFg6MZt55mXkQuiF4SRsmv7699ssd4GVgbEkEZ-wMLQCIqkEy_AEtCMZNrSg0F-gy51eMgVIOH9EFcCYUBligHw9r04exryaXp1z5mCpj7ZzM5KoumH6MOeQq-pKdS6oNQzDpd7Uxo03OTGEK-RqdezNk9-n4XqHnu9un1c_68df9w-r7Y20Zo1NtvGwtV50xwrCW444RSTqllHcedxaD54KKtgVDhLSi8Z7wtmm8aJn1DVh6hb4dfDdzu3addeOUzKA3KazLSDqaoP-vjOFF93GnGTBJVFMMvhwNUtzOZV-9Dtm6YTCji3PWBSFQKbCCIiUHqU0x5-T86RuC9Z69Lux1Ya8Le_3OvvR8_ne-U8df2EVAj6Yvcey3hfpJo7DcH8Uxk0xx2N_3iNM_C-iSYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652386092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</creator><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><description>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25469022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Animals ; Biliary ; Diagnostic Imaging - methods ; Endoscopic ; Gallstones - complications ; Gallstones - diagnosis ; Gallstones - therapy ; Humans ; Lithiasis ; Pancreatitis ; Pancreatitis - diagnosis ; Pancreatitis - etiology ; Pancreatitis - therapy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Topic Highlight ; ultrason</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549</ispartof><rights>2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248197/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248197/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Săftoiu, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biliary</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopic</subject><subject>Gallstones - complications</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallstones - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithiasis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - therapy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Topic Highlight</subject><subject>ultrason</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1vGyEQhlHUqHGS_oBcqj32si4MHwuXSq2VpJEi9ZKcEcvChmi92LDrqP--OHatFg6MZt55mXkQuiF4SRsmv7699ssd4GVgbEkEZ-wMLQCIqkEy_AEtCMZNrSg0F-gy51eMgVIOH9EFcCYUBligHw9r04exryaXp1z5mCpj7ZzM5KoumH6MOeQq-pKdS6oNQzDpd7Uxo03OTGEK-RqdezNk9-n4XqHnu9un1c_68df9w-r7Y20Zo1NtvGwtV50xwrCW444RSTqllHcedxaD54KKtgVDhLSi8Z7wtmm8aJn1DVh6hb4dfDdzu3addeOUzKA3KazLSDqaoP-vjOFF93GnGTBJVFMMvhwNUtzOZV-9Dtm6YTCji3PWBSFQKbCCIiUHqU0x5-T86RuC9Z69Lux1Ya8Le_3OvvR8_ne-U8df2EVAj6Yvcey3hfpJo7DcH8Uxk0xx2N_3iNM_C-iSYA</recordid><startdate>20141128</startdate><enddate>20141128</enddate><creator>Şurlin, Valeriu</creator><creator>Săftoiu, Adrian</creator><creator>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141128</creationdate><title>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</title><author>Şurlin, Valeriu ; Săftoiu, Adrian ; Dumitrescu, Daniela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-af8bc59daa6a4b50d4181d999fef0dc02f5636bb2a168c67ff15b77f6b4cf72c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biliary</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopic</topic><topic>Gallstones - complications</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallstones - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithiasis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - therapy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Topic Highlight</topic><topic>ultrason</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şurlin, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Săftoiu, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şurlin, Valeriu</au><au>Săftoiu, Adrian</au><au>Dumitrescu, Daniela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2014-11-28</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>44</issue><spage>16544</spage><epage>16549</epage><pages>16544-16549</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25469022</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-11, Vol.20 (44), p.16544-16549 |
issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4248197 |
source | MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute Disease Animals Biliary Diagnostic Imaging - methods Endoscopic Gallstones - complications Gallstones - diagnosis Gallstones - therapy Humans Lithiasis Pancreatitis Pancreatitis - diagnosis Pancreatitis - etiology Pancreatitis - therapy Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Risk Factors Topic Highlight ultrason |
title | Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20tests%20for%20accurate%20diagnosis%20of%20acute%20biliary%20pancreatitis&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=%C5%9Eurlin,%20Valeriu&rft.date=2014-11-28&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=44&rft.spage=16544&rft.epage=16549&rft.pages=16544-16549&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1652386092%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652386092&rft_id=info:pmid/25469022&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849525252484955&rfr_iscdi=true |