Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system

Purpose: X‐ray fluoroscopy remains an important imaging modality in a number of image‐guided procedures due to its real‐time nature and excellent spatial detail. However, the radiation dose delivered raises concerns about its use particularly in lengthy treatment procedures (>0.5 h). The authors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2014-12, Vol.41 (12), p.121911-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Siddique, S., Fiume, E., Jaffray, D. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 12
container_start_page 121911
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 41
creator Siddique, S.
Fiume, E.
Jaffray, D. A.
description Purpose: X‐ray fluoroscopy remains an important imaging modality in a number of image‐guided procedures due to its real‐time nature and excellent spatial detail. However, the radiation dose delivered raises concerns about its use particularly in lengthy treatment procedures (>0.5 h). The authors have previously presented an algorithm that employs feedback of geometric uncertainty to control dose while maintaining a desired targeting uncertainty during fluoroscopic tracking of fiducials. The method was tested using simulations of motion against controlled noise fields. In this paper, the authors embody the previously reported method in a physical prototype and present changes to the controller required to function in a practical setting. Methods: The metric for feedback used in this study is based on the trace of the covariance of the state of the system, tr(C). The state is defined here as the 2D location of a fiducial on a plane parallel to the detector. A relationship between this metric and the tube current is first developed empirically. This relationship is extended to create a manifold that incorporates a latent variable representing the estimated background attenuation. The manifold is then used within the controller to dynamically adjust the tube current and maintain a specified targeting uncertainty. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, an acrylic sphere (1.6 mm in diameter) was tracked at tube currents ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 mA (0.033 s) at a fixed energy of 80 kVp. The images were acquired on a Varian Paxscan 4030A (2048 × 1536 pixels, ∼100 cm source‐to‐axis distance, ∼160 cm source‐to‐detector distance). The sphere was tracked using a particle filter under two background conditions: (1) uniform sheets of acrylic and (2) an acrylic wedge. The measured tr(C) was used in conjunction with a learned manifold to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a specified uncertainty as the sphere traversed regions of varying thickness corresponding to the acrylic sheets in the background. Results: With feedback engaged, the tracking error was found to correlate well with the specified targeting uncertainty. Tracking of the fiducial was found to be robust to changes in the attenuation presented by the varying background conditions. For a desired uncertainty of 5.0 mm, comparison of the feedback framework with a comparable system employing fixed exposure demonstrated dose savings of 29%. Conclusions: This work presents a relation between
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4900601
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4247368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1634283487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-77167c0f11e152087f9ee337de5d4dd478ae3a31dadd28137a7e1efb0c151bbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFOGzEURS1URAJlwQ-gkbppFwN-tiee2YCqqBSkILpo15bjeUOMJnYYe2hn10_gG_kSDAkRXXTlhY-Or-8l5AjoCQCUp3AiKkonFHbImAnJc8Fo9YGMKa1EzgQtRmQ_hDuaGF7QPTJihZBQSRiT86vgn_4-9s5gF7V1cciMd7HzbWZdpl2Gf1bY2SW6qNusaXvf-WD8asjCECIuP5LdRrcBDzfnAfl18e3n9DKf3Xy_mn6d5UZQgFxKmEhDGwCEgtFSNhUi57LGohZ1LWSpkWsOta5rVgKXWiJgM6cGCpjPDT8gZ2vvqp8vsTYpT6dbtUrRdDcor63698bZhbr1D0q8FDIpk-DTWuBDtCoYG9Es0lcdmqhYKolDyRL1efNM5-97DFEtbTDYttqh74OCCRes5KKUCf2yRk1qJHTYbMMAVS-zKFCbWRJ7_D79lnzbIQH5GvhtWxz-b1LXP16Fzyu2lrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634283487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Siddique, S. ; Fiume, E. ; Jaffray, D. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siddique, S. ; Fiume, E. ; Jaffray, D. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: X‐ray fluoroscopy remains an important imaging modality in a number of image‐guided procedures due to its real‐time nature and excellent spatial detail. However, the radiation dose delivered raises concerns about its use particularly in lengthy treatment procedures (&gt;0.5 h). The authors have previously presented an algorithm that employs feedback of geometric uncertainty to control dose while maintaining a desired targeting uncertainty during fluoroscopic tracking of fiducials. The method was tested using simulations of motion against controlled noise fields. In this paper, the authors embody the previously reported method in a physical prototype and present changes to the controller required to function in a practical setting. Methods: The metric for feedback used in this study is based on the trace of the covariance of the state of the system, tr(C). The state is defined here as the 2D location of a fiducial on a plane parallel to the detector. A relationship between this metric and the tube current is first developed empirically. This relationship is extended to create a manifold that incorporates a latent variable representing the estimated background attenuation. The manifold is then used within the controller to dynamically adjust the tube current and maintain a specified targeting uncertainty. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, an acrylic sphere (1.6 mm in diameter) was tracked at tube currents ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 mA (0.033 s) at a fixed energy of 80 kVp. The images were acquired on a Varian Paxscan 4030A (2048 × 1536 pixels, ∼100 cm source‐to‐axis distance, ∼160 cm source‐to‐detector distance). The sphere was tracked using a particle filter under two background conditions: (1) uniform sheets of acrylic and (2) an acrylic wedge. The measured tr(C) was used in conjunction with a learned manifold to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a specified uncertainty as the sphere traversed regions of varying thickness corresponding to the acrylic sheets in the background. Results: With feedback engaged, the tracking error was found to correlate well with the specified targeting uncertainty. Tracking of the fiducial was found to be robust to changes in the attenuation presented by the varying background conditions. For a desired uncertainty of 5.0 mm, comparison of the feedback framework with a comparable system employing fixed exposure demonstrated dose savings of 29%. Conclusions: This work presents a relation between a state descriptor, tr(C), the x‐ray tube current used, and an estimate of the background attenuation. This relation is leveraged to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a desired geometric uncertainty during fluoroscopy. The authors’ work demonstrates the use of the method in a real x‐ray fluoroscopy system with physical motion against varying backgrounds. The method offers potential savings in imaging dose to patients and staff while maintaining tracking uncertainty during fluoroscopy‐guided treatment procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4900601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25471971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ALGORITHMS ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; biomedical optical imaging ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; Computer Simulation ; Determinants ; diagnostic radiography ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Electric measurements ; feedback ; Fiducial Markers ; FLUOROSCOPY ; Fluoroscopy - instrumentation ; Fluoroscopy - methods ; geometric performance ; image‐guided intervention ; intrafraction motion ; Manifolds ; Medical image noise ; Motion ; Numerical approximation and analysis ; Optical microscopy ; particle filtering (numerical methods) ; Quantum noise ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; radiation therapy ; Radiography ; Scintigraphy ; Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy ; tracking ; Uncertainty ; X-RAY TUBES ; X‐ray imaging</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2014-12, Vol.41 (12), p.121911-n/a</ispartof><rights>2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-77167c0f11e152087f9ee337de5d4dd478ae3a31dadd28137a7e1efb0c151bbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4900601$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4900601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22403182$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siddique, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiume, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffray, D. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: X‐ray fluoroscopy remains an important imaging modality in a number of image‐guided procedures due to its real‐time nature and excellent spatial detail. However, the radiation dose delivered raises concerns about its use particularly in lengthy treatment procedures (&gt;0.5 h). The authors have previously presented an algorithm that employs feedback of geometric uncertainty to control dose while maintaining a desired targeting uncertainty during fluoroscopic tracking of fiducials. The method was tested using simulations of motion against controlled noise fields. In this paper, the authors embody the previously reported method in a physical prototype and present changes to the controller required to function in a practical setting. Methods: The metric for feedback used in this study is based on the trace of the covariance of the state of the system, tr(C). The state is defined here as the 2D location of a fiducial on a plane parallel to the detector. A relationship between this metric and the tube current is first developed empirically. This relationship is extended to create a manifold that incorporates a latent variable representing the estimated background attenuation. The manifold is then used within the controller to dynamically adjust the tube current and maintain a specified targeting uncertainty. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, an acrylic sphere (1.6 mm in diameter) was tracked at tube currents ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 mA (0.033 s) at a fixed energy of 80 kVp. The images were acquired on a Varian Paxscan 4030A (2048 × 1536 pixels, ∼100 cm source‐to‐axis distance, ∼160 cm source‐to‐detector distance). The sphere was tracked using a particle filter under two background conditions: (1) uniform sheets of acrylic and (2) an acrylic wedge. The measured tr(C) was used in conjunction with a learned manifold to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a specified uncertainty as the sphere traversed regions of varying thickness corresponding to the acrylic sheets in the background. Results: With feedback engaged, the tracking error was found to correlate well with the specified targeting uncertainty. Tracking of the fiducial was found to be robust to changes in the attenuation presented by the varying background conditions. For a desired uncertainty of 5.0 mm, comparison of the feedback framework with a comparable system employing fixed exposure demonstrated dose savings of 29%. Conclusions: This work presents a relation between a state descriptor, tr(C), the x‐ray tube current used, and an estimate of the background attenuation. This relation is leveraged to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a desired geometric uncertainty during fluoroscopy. The authors’ work demonstrates the use of the method in a real x‐ray fluoroscopy system with physical motion against varying backgrounds. The method offers potential savings in imaging dose to patients and staff while maintaining tracking uncertainty during fluoroscopy‐guided treatment procedures.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>biomedical optical imaging</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Electric measurements</subject><subject>feedback</subject><subject>Fiducial Markers</subject><subject>FLUOROSCOPY</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - methods</subject><subject>geometric performance</subject><subject>image‐guided intervention</subject><subject>intrafraction motion</subject><subject>Manifolds</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Numerical approximation and analysis</subject><subject>Optical microscopy</subject><subject>particle filtering (numerical methods)</subject><subject>Quantum noise</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy</subject><subject>tracking</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>X-RAY TUBES</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFOGzEURS1URAJlwQ-gkbppFwN-tiee2YCqqBSkILpo15bjeUOMJnYYe2hn10_gG_kSDAkRXXTlhY-Or-8l5AjoCQCUp3AiKkonFHbImAnJc8Fo9YGMKa1EzgQtRmQ_hDuaGF7QPTJihZBQSRiT86vgn_4-9s5gF7V1cciMd7HzbWZdpl2Gf1bY2SW6qNusaXvf-WD8asjCECIuP5LdRrcBDzfnAfl18e3n9DKf3Xy_mn6d5UZQgFxKmEhDGwCEgtFSNhUi57LGohZ1LWSpkWsOta5rVgKXWiJgM6cGCpjPDT8gZ2vvqp8vsTYpT6dbtUrRdDcor63698bZhbr1D0q8FDIpk-DTWuBDtCoYG9Es0lcdmqhYKolDyRL1efNM5-97DFEtbTDYttqh74OCCRes5KKUCf2yRk1qJHTYbMMAVS-zKFCbWRJ7_D79lnzbIQH5GvhtWxz-b1LXP16Fzyu2lrA</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Siddique, S.</creator><creator>Fiume, E.</creator><creator>Jaffray, D. A.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system</title><author>Siddique, S. ; Fiume, E. ; Jaffray, D. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-77167c0f11e152087f9ee337de5d4dd478ae3a31dadd28137a7e1efb0c151bbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>biomedical optical imaging</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Electric measurements</topic><topic>feedback</topic><topic>Fiducial Markers</topic><topic>FLUOROSCOPY</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - methods</topic><topic>geometric performance</topic><topic>image‐guided intervention</topic><topic>intrafraction motion</topic><topic>Manifolds</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Numerical approximation and analysis</topic><topic>Optical microscopy</topic><topic>particle filtering (numerical methods)</topic><topic>Quantum noise</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy</topic><topic>tracking</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>X-RAY TUBES</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siddique, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiume, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffray, D. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siddique, S.</au><au>Fiume, E.</au><au>Jaffray, D. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>121911</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>121911-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: X‐ray fluoroscopy remains an important imaging modality in a number of image‐guided procedures due to its real‐time nature and excellent spatial detail. However, the radiation dose delivered raises concerns about its use particularly in lengthy treatment procedures (&gt;0.5 h). The authors have previously presented an algorithm that employs feedback of geometric uncertainty to control dose while maintaining a desired targeting uncertainty during fluoroscopic tracking of fiducials. The method was tested using simulations of motion against controlled noise fields. In this paper, the authors embody the previously reported method in a physical prototype and present changes to the controller required to function in a practical setting. Methods: The metric for feedback used in this study is based on the trace of the covariance of the state of the system, tr(C). The state is defined here as the 2D location of a fiducial on a plane parallel to the detector. A relationship between this metric and the tube current is first developed empirically. This relationship is extended to create a manifold that incorporates a latent variable representing the estimated background attenuation. The manifold is then used within the controller to dynamically adjust the tube current and maintain a specified targeting uncertainty. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, an acrylic sphere (1.6 mm in diameter) was tracked at tube currents ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 mA (0.033 s) at a fixed energy of 80 kVp. The images were acquired on a Varian Paxscan 4030A (2048 × 1536 pixels, ∼100 cm source‐to‐axis distance, ∼160 cm source‐to‐detector distance). The sphere was tracked using a particle filter under two background conditions: (1) uniform sheets of acrylic and (2) an acrylic wedge. The measured tr(C) was used in conjunction with a learned manifold to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a specified uncertainty as the sphere traversed regions of varying thickness corresponding to the acrylic sheets in the background. Results: With feedback engaged, the tracking error was found to correlate well with the specified targeting uncertainty. Tracking of the fiducial was found to be robust to changes in the attenuation presented by the varying background conditions. For a desired uncertainty of 5.0 mm, comparison of the feedback framework with a comparable system employing fixed exposure demonstrated dose savings of 29%. Conclusions: This work presents a relation between a state descriptor, tr(C), the x‐ray tube current used, and an estimate of the background attenuation. This relation is leveraged to modulate the tube current in order to maintain a desired geometric uncertainty during fluoroscopy. The authors’ work demonstrates the use of the method in a real x‐ray fluoroscopy system with physical motion against varying backgrounds. The method offers potential savings in imaging dose to patients and staff while maintaining tracking uncertainty during fluoroscopy‐guided treatment procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>25471971</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4900601</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2014-12, Vol.41 (12), p.121911-n/a
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4247368
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ALGORITHMS
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
biomedical optical imaging
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
Computer Simulation
Determinants
diagnostic radiography
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Electric measurements
feedback
Fiducial Markers
FLUOROSCOPY
Fluoroscopy - instrumentation
Fluoroscopy - methods
geometric performance
image‐guided intervention
intrafraction motion
Manifolds
Medical image noise
Motion
Numerical approximation and analysis
Optical microscopy
particle filtering (numerical methods)
Quantum noise
RADIATION DOSES
Radiation Imaging Physics
radiation therapy
Radiography
Scintigraphy
Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy
tracking
Uncertainty
X-RAY TUBES
X‐ray imaging
title Iso‐uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iso%E2%80%90uncertainty%20control%20in%20an%20experimental%20fluoroscopy%20system&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Siddique,%20S.&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=121911&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=121911-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4900601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1634283487%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634283487&rft_id=info:pmid/25471971&rfr_iscdi=true