origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents
Background Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of botany 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.255-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Annals of botany |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Greilhuber, J Dolezel, J Lysak, M.A Bennett, M.D |
description | Background Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for the DNA content of the monoploid chromosome set only (with chromosome number x). Reconsideration of the terminology is required. Aim Our purpose is to discuss the currently unstable usage of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value', and to propose a new unified terminology which can describe nuclear DNA contents with ease and without ambiguity. Proposals We argue that there is a need to maintain the term genome size in a broad sense as a covering term, because it is widely understood, short and phonetically pleasing. Proposals are made for a unified and consensual terminology. In this, 'genome size' should mean the DNA content based on chromosome number x and n, and should be used mainly in a general sense. The necessary distinction of the kinds of genome sizes is made by the adjectives 'monoploid' and the neology 'holoploid'. 'Holoploid genome size' is a shortcut for the DNA content of the whole chromosome complement characteristic for the individual (and by generalization for the population, species, etc.) irrespective of the degree of generative polyploidy, aneuploidies, etc. This term was lacking in the terminology and is for reasons of linguistic consistency indispensable. The abbreviated terms for monoploid and holoploid genome size are, respectively, Cx-value and C-value. Quantitative data on genome size should always indicate the C-level by a numerical prefix, such as 1C, 1Cx, 2C, etc. The proposed conventions cover general fundamental aspects relating to genome size in plants and animals, but do not treat in detail cytogenetic particularities (e.g. haploids, hybrids, etc.) which will need minor extensions of the present scheme in a future paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/aob/mci019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4246724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42795844</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42795844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-a3198e42d7769f7c5fe36fb9970250da5560c9ee40b6a21e603aec3ad337db033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxVcIREPhwh2wOBAJsdTfji9IVYAWqSpUUIG4WN7d2dRhdx1sbwT963GaKHxcOFn2-3nezLyieEjwS4I1O7K-Ouprh4m-VUzyiyhnVOPbxQQzLErFJD8o7sW4xBhTqcnd4oAIoSVXbFKsfXALN7xAsPbdmJwfkB0atAp-5SM0KCZbuc5d2xvJtyhdAUoQ-oimCxh8Dyi6a5je_JrOy7XtxnxLHjUQ6-AqQMNYd2ADen1-jGo_JBhSvF_caW0X4cHuPCwu3775ND8tz96fvJsfn5W1mPFUWkb0DDhtlJK6VbVogcm20lphKnBjhZC41gAcV9JSAhIzCzWzDWOqqTBjh8Wrbd3VWPXQ1Nk72M6sgutt-Gm8deZvZXBXZuHXhlMuFeW5wLNdgeC_jxCT6V2soevsAH6MRipGJWf4vyAlhGmiSAaf_gMu_RiGvAVDtMCCKL6xfb6F6uBjDNDuWybYbEI3OXSzDT3Dj_8c8je6SzkDj7bAMiYf9jqnSuc1b9zKre5igh973YZvm_mUMKdfvpoLRecX5x9OzOfMP9nyrfXGLoKL5vIjxYRhnJPRM8p-AXOuy5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195051744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Greilhuber, J ; Dolezel, J ; Lysak, M.A ; Bennett, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Greilhuber, J ; Dolezel, J ; Lysak, M.A ; Bennett, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Background Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for the DNA content of the monoploid chromosome set only (with chromosome number x). Reconsideration of the terminology is required. Aim Our purpose is to discuss the currently unstable usage of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value', and to propose a new unified terminology which can describe nuclear DNA contents with ease and without ambiguity. Proposals We argue that there is a need to maintain the term genome size in a broad sense as a covering term, because it is widely understood, short and phonetically pleasing. Proposals are made for a unified and consensual terminology. In this, 'genome size' should mean the DNA content based on chromosome number x and n, and should be used mainly in a general sense. The necessary distinction of the kinds of genome sizes is made by the adjectives 'monoploid' and the neology 'holoploid'. 'Holoploid genome size' is a shortcut for the DNA content of the whole chromosome complement characteristic for the individual (and by generalization for the population, species, etc.) irrespective of the degree of generative polyploidy, aneuploidies, etc. This term was lacking in the terminology and is for reasons of linguistic consistency indispensable. The abbreviated terms for monoploid and holoploid genome size are, respectively, Cx-value and C-value. Quantitative data on genome size should always indicate the C-level by a numerical prefix, such as 1C, 1Cx, 2C, etc. The proposed conventions cover general fundamental aspects relating to genome size in plants and animals, but do not treat in detail cytogenetic particularities (e.g. haploids, hybrids, etc.) which will need minor extensions of the present scheme in a future paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15596473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>C-value ; cell nucleus ; Cell Nucleus - genetics ; Chromosomes ; Cx-value ; DEFINING 'C-VALUE' AND 'GENOME SIZE' ; DNA ; DNA content ; DNA, Plant - analysis ; DNA, Plant - genetics ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; genome ; Genome size ; Genome, Plant ; Genomes ; Haploidy ; holoploid ; monoploid ; plant genetics ; Plants ; Plants - genetics ; Ploidies ; polyploid ; Polyploidy ; quantitative analysis ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Annals of botany, 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>Annals of Botany Company 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jan 2, 2005</rights><rights>Annals of Botany 95/1 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-a3198e42d7769f7c5fe36fb9970250da5560c9ee40b6a21e603aec3ad337db033</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42795844$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42795844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15596473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greilhuber, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolezel, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysak, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents</title><title>Annals of botany</title><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><description>Background Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for the DNA content of the monoploid chromosome set only (with chromosome number x). Reconsideration of the terminology is required. Aim Our purpose is to discuss the currently unstable usage of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value', and to propose a new unified terminology which can describe nuclear DNA contents with ease and without ambiguity. Proposals We argue that there is a need to maintain the term genome size in a broad sense as a covering term, because it is widely understood, short and phonetically pleasing. Proposals are made for a unified and consensual terminology. In this, 'genome size' should mean the DNA content based on chromosome number x and n, and should be used mainly in a general sense. The necessary distinction of the kinds of genome sizes is made by the adjectives 'monoploid' and the neology 'holoploid'. 'Holoploid genome size' is a shortcut for the DNA content of the whole chromosome complement characteristic for the individual (and by generalization for the population, species, etc.) irrespective of the degree of generative polyploidy, aneuploidies, etc. This term was lacking in the terminology and is for reasons of linguistic consistency indispensable. The abbreviated terms for monoploid and holoploid genome size are, respectively, Cx-value and C-value. Quantitative data on genome size should always indicate the C-level by a numerical prefix, such as 1C, 1Cx, 2C, etc. The proposed conventions cover general fundamental aspects relating to genome size in plants and animals, but do not treat in detail cytogenetic particularities (e.g. haploids, hybrids, etc.) which will need minor extensions of the present scheme in a future paper.</description><subject>C-value</subject><subject>cell nucleus</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Cx-value</subject><subject>DEFINING 'C-VALUE' AND 'GENOME SIZE'</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA content</subject><subject>DNA, Plant - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>genome</subject><subject>Genome size</subject><subject>Genome, Plant</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Haploidy</subject><subject>holoploid</subject><subject>monoploid</subject><subject>plant genetics</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants - genetics</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>polyploid</subject><subject>Polyploidy</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>0305-7364</issn><issn>1095-8290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxVcIREPhwh2wOBAJsdTfji9IVYAWqSpUUIG4WN7d2dRhdx1sbwT963GaKHxcOFn2-3nezLyieEjwS4I1O7K-Ouprh4m-VUzyiyhnVOPbxQQzLErFJD8o7sW4xBhTqcnd4oAIoSVXbFKsfXALN7xAsPbdmJwfkB0atAp-5SM0KCZbuc5d2xvJtyhdAUoQ-oimCxh8Dyi6a5je_JrOy7XtxnxLHjUQ6-AqQMNYd2ADen1-jGo_JBhSvF_caW0X4cHuPCwu3775ND8tz96fvJsfn5W1mPFUWkb0DDhtlJK6VbVogcm20lphKnBjhZC41gAcV9JSAhIzCzWzDWOqqTBjh8Wrbd3VWPXQ1Nk72M6sgutt-Gm8deZvZXBXZuHXhlMuFeW5wLNdgeC_jxCT6V2soevsAH6MRipGJWf4vyAlhGmiSAaf_gMu_RiGvAVDtMCCKL6xfb6F6uBjDNDuWybYbEI3OXSzDT3Dj_8c8je6SzkDj7bAMiYf9jqnSuc1b9zKre5igh973YZvm_mUMKdfvpoLRecX5x9OzOfMP9nyrfXGLoKL5vIjxYRhnJPRM8p-AXOuy5M</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Greilhuber, J</creator><creator>Dolezel, J</creator><creator>Lysak, M.A</creator><creator>Bennett, M.D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents</title><author>Greilhuber, J ; Dolezel, J ; Lysak, M.A ; Bennett, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-a3198e42d7769f7c5fe36fb9970250da5560c9ee40b6a21e603aec3ad337db033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>C-value</topic><topic>cell nucleus</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Cx-value</topic><topic>DEFINING 'C-VALUE' AND 'GENOME SIZE'</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA content</topic><topic>DNA, Plant - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>genome</topic><topic>Genome size</topic><topic>Genome, Plant</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Haploidy</topic><topic>holoploid</topic><topic>monoploid</topic><topic>plant genetics</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants - genetics</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>polyploid</topic><topic>Polyploidy</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greilhuber, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolezel, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysak, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greilhuber, J</au><au>Dolezel, J</au><au>Lysak, M.A</au><au>Bennett, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents</atitle><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0305-7364</issn><eissn>1095-8290</eissn><abstract>Background Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for the DNA content of the monoploid chromosome set only (with chromosome number x). Reconsideration of the terminology is required. Aim Our purpose is to discuss the currently unstable usage of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value', and to propose a new unified terminology which can describe nuclear DNA contents with ease and without ambiguity. Proposals We argue that there is a need to maintain the term genome size in a broad sense as a covering term, because it is widely understood, short and phonetically pleasing. Proposals are made for a unified and consensual terminology. In this, 'genome size' should mean the DNA content based on chromosome number x and n, and should be used mainly in a general sense. The necessary distinction of the kinds of genome sizes is made by the adjectives 'monoploid' and the neology 'holoploid'. 'Holoploid genome size' is a shortcut for the DNA content of the whole chromosome complement characteristic for the individual (and by generalization for the population, species, etc.) irrespective of the degree of generative polyploidy, aneuploidies, etc. This term was lacking in the terminology and is for reasons of linguistic consistency indispensable. The abbreviated terms for monoploid and holoploid genome size are, respectively, Cx-value and C-value. Quantitative data on genome size should always indicate the C-level by a numerical prefix, such as 1C, 1Cx, 2C, etc. The proposed conventions cover general fundamental aspects relating to genome size in plants and animals, but do not treat in detail cytogenetic particularities (e.g. haploids, hybrids, etc.) which will need minor extensions of the present scheme in a future paper.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15596473</pmid><doi>10.1093/aob/mci019</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7364 |
ispartof | Annals of botany, 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.255-260 |
issn | 0305-7364 1095-8290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4246724 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | C-value cell nucleus Cell Nucleus - genetics Chromosomes Cx-value DEFINING 'C-VALUE' AND 'GENOME SIZE' DNA DNA content DNA, Plant - analysis DNA, Plant - genetics Evolution Evolution, Molecular genome Genome size Genome, Plant Genomes Haploidy holoploid monoploid plant genetics Plants Plants - genetics Ploidies polyploid Polyploidy quantitative analysis Terminology |
title | origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T17%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=origin,%20evolution%20and%20proposed%20stabilization%20of%20the%20terms%20'genome%20size'%20and%20'C-value'%20to%20describe%20nuclear%20DNA%20contents&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20botany&rft.au=Greilhuber,%20J&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0305-7364&rft.eissn=1095-8290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aob/mci019&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E42795844%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195051744&rft_id=info:pmid/15596473&rft_jstor_id=42795844&rfr_iscdi=true |