Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial
Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses. This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2014-10, Vol.30 (4), p.496-501 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 501 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 496 |
container_title | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Sng, Ban Leong Woo, David Leong, Wan Ling Wang, Hao Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert Sia, Alex Th |
description | Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses.
This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption.
The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes.
Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0970-9185.142842 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4234785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A392470523</galeid><sourcerecordid>A392470523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4342-6181eac2dba268b2b3e9c9d0efd326bff5b0f248f2ec7a513ea65833d6f1c74f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2rEzEUHUTx1ad7VxIQxM3UfM5MXQil-AUP3Og6ZCY3bSQzqUnmyfOv-ee8pc_SigRuyL3nnCSHU1XPGV1KRsUbumppvWKdWjLJO8kfVAvOBat5K-jDanEaX1VPcv5OqaItV4-rK64kV20rF9XvTRz3JvkcJxIdGfA0F0i1nwpskylgyd4UD1OphziVFEPAFuy9nZMJxEwmbCF7Q376siNTJH7yxeOkNxmrn9ycPWrfQspzJmO0cFD9d-xiIsH0WM1kiYXgkXD3lqxJwkYc_S-89ewBJeEdT6tHzoQMz-736-rbh_dfN5_qmy8fP2_WN_UgheR1wzoGZuC2N7zpet4LWA0rS8FZwZveOdVTx2XnOAytUUyAaVQnhG0cG1rpxHX17qi7n_sR7IBm4N_1PvnRpDsdjdeXk8nv9DbeasmFbDuFAq_vBVL8MUMuevR5gBDMBHHOmjWiVS1WhtCXR-jWBNDoT0TF4QDXa7HisqWKC0Qt_4PCZWH0aBM4j_0Lwqszwg5MKLscw1zQ_HwJpEfgkGLOCdzpm4zqQ-b0IVT6ECp9zBxSXpzbcyL8DZn4A-dY1q0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637571631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sng, Ban Leong ; Woo, David ; Leong, Wan Ling ; Wang, Hao ; Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert ; Sia, Alex Th</creator><creatorcontrib>Sng, Ban Leong ; Woo, David ; Leong, Wan Ling ; Wang, Hao ; Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert ; Sia, Alex Th</creatorcontrib><description>Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses.
This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption.
The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes.
Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.142842</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25425774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analysis ; Childbirth ; Drug delivery systems ; Drugs ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Original ; Vehicles</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2014-10, Vol.30 (4), p.496-501</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4342-6181eac2dba268b2b3e9c9d0efd326bff5b0f248f2ec7a513ea65833d6f1c74f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4342-6181eac2dba268b2b3e9c9d0efd326bff5b0f248f2ec7a513ea65833d6f1c74f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234785/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sng, Ban Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Wan Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sia, Alex Th</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses.
This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption.
The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes.
Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUk2rEzEUHUTx1ad7VxIQxM3UfM5MXQil-AUP3Og6ZCY3bSQzqUnmyfOv-ee8pc_SigRuyL3nnCSHU1XPGV1KRsUbumppvWKdWjLJO8kfVAvOBat5K-jDanEaX1VPcv5OqaItV4-rK64kV20rF9XvTRz3JvkcJxIdGfA0F0i1nwpskylgyd4UD1OphziVFEPAFuy9nZMJxEwmbCF7Q376siNTJH7yxeOkNxmrn9ycPWrfQspzJmO0cFD9d-xiIsH0WM1kiYXgkXD3lqxJwkYc_S-89ewBJeEdT6tHzoQMz-736-rbh_dfN5_qmy8fP2_WN_UgheR1wzoGZuC2N7zpet4LWA0rS8FZwZveOdVTx2XnOAytUUyAaVQnhG0cG1rpxHX17qi7n_sR7IBm4N_1PvnRpDsdjdeXk8nv9DbeasmFbDuFAq_vBVL8MUMuevR5gBDMBHHOmjWiVS1WhtCXR-jWBNDoT0TF4QDXa7HisqWKC0Qt_4PCZWH0aBM4j_0Lwqszwg5MKLscw1zQ_HwJpEfgkGLOCdzpm4zqQ-b0IVT6ECp9zBxSXpzbcyL8DZn4A-dY1q0</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Sng, Ban Leong</creator><creator>Woo, David</creator><creator>Leong, Wan Ling</creator><creator>Wang, Hao</creator><creator>Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert</creator><creator>Sia, Alex Th</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Sng, Ban Leong ; Woo, David ; Leong, Wan Ling ; Wang, Hao ; Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert ; Sia, Alex Th</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4342-6181eac2dba268b2b3e9c9d0efd326bff5b0f248f2ec7a513ea65833d6f1c74f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sng, Ban Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Wan Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sia, Alex Th</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sng, Ban Leong</au><au>Woo, David</au><au>Leong, Wan Ling</au><au>Wang, Hao</au><au>Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert</au><au>Sia, Alex Th</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>496-501</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><abstract>Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA) is a novel epidural drug delivery system. It automatically adjusts the basal infusion based on the individual's need for analgesia as labor progresses.
This study compared the time-weighted local anesthetic (LA) consumption by comparing parturients using CIPCEA with no initial basal infusion (CIPCEA0) with CIPCEA with initial moderate basal infusion of 5 ml/H (CIPCEA5). We recruited 76 subjects after ethics approval. The computer integration of CIPCEA titrate the basal infusion to 5, 10, 15, or 20 ml/H if the parturient required respectively, one, two, three, or four patient demands in the previous hour. The basal infusion reduced by 5 ml/H if there was no demand in the previous hour. The sample size was calculated to show equivalence in LA consumption.
The time-weighted LA consumption between both groups were similar with CIPCEA0 group (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 8.9 [3.5] mg/H) compared to the CIPCEA5 group (mean [SD] 9.9 [3.5] mg/H), P = 0.080. Both groups had a similar incidence of breakthrough pain, duration of the second stage, mode of delivery, and patient satisfaction. However, more subjects in the CIPCEA0 group required patient self-bolus. There were no differences in fetal outcomes.
Both CIPCEA regimens had similar time-weighted LA consumption and initial moderate basal infusion with CIPCEA may not be required.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>25425774</pmid><doi>10.4103/0970-9185.142842</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9185 |
ispartof | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2014-10, Vol.30 (4), p.496-501 |
issn | 0970-9185 2231-2730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4234785 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Analgesia Analysis Childbirth Drug delivery systems Drugs Medical research Medicine, Experimental Original Vehicles |
title | Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20computer-integrated%20patient-controlled%20epidural%20analgesia%20with%20no%20initial%20basal%20infusion%20versus%20moderate%20basal%20infusion%20for%20labor%20and%20delivery:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Sng,%20Ban%20Leong&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=496-501&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0970-9185.142842&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA392470523%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637571631&rft_id=info:pmid/25425774&rft_galeid=A392470523&rfr_iscdi=true |