A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression
Genetic introgression of domesticated to wild conspecifics is of great concern to the genetic integrity and viability of the wild populations. Therefore, we need tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. A challenge to quantitation of unidi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2014-08, Vol.4 (16), p.3256-3263 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3263 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 3256 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Karlsson, Sten Diserud, Ola H. Moen, Thomas Hindar, Kjetil |
description | Genetic introgression of domesticated to wild conspecifics is of great concern to the genetic integrity and viability of the wild populations. Therefore, we need tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. A challenge to quantitation of unidirectional gene flow is that both the donor and the recipient population may be genetically substructured and that the subpopulations are subjected to genetic drift and may exchange migrants between one another. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow and demonstrate its usefulness to farm and wild Atlantic salmon as a model species. The challenge of having several wild and farm populations was circumvented by in silico generating one analytical center point for farm and wild salmon, respectively. Distributions for the probability that an individual is wild were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and farm genotypes using STRUCTURE. We show that estimates of proportions of the genome being of domesticated origin in a particular wild population can be obtained without having a historical reference sample for the same population. The main advantages of the method presented are the standardized way in which genetic processes within and between populations are taken into account, and the individual‐based analyses giving estimates for each individual independent of other individuals. The method makes use of established software, and as long as genetic markers showing generic genetic differences between domesticated and wild populations are available, it can be applied to all species with unidirectional gene flow. Results from our method are easy to interpret and understand, and will serve as a powerful tool for management, especially because there is no need for a specific historical wild reference sample.
Tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations are needed for a large number of species. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow. Expected probability distributions for belonging to wild and domesticated populations were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and domesticated genotypes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.1169 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4222212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1637569097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-365191007bb8cdfd5c2927c1693cb288a744f2633790afc3312d972727124c323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMoWtSFf0AG3OiiNa-ZJBtBSn0huNF1SJNMTZkmbTKj1F9valWqIN4sEpKPc8_NAeAIwQGCEJ9bbckAoUpsgR6GtOwzVvLtjfMeOExpCnNVEFPIdsEeLikjlPEeuLssUqu8UdG4N2uKmW2fgynqEItFp3zr6qXzk6LzzrhodeuCV00xsd62ThfOtzFMok0p3x-AnVo1yR5-7vvg6Wr0OLzp3z9c3w4v7_u6pFj0SVUikZ2z8ZhrU5tSY4GZzgMQPcacK0ZpjStCmICq1oQgbATDeSFMNcFkH1ysdefdeGaNttmEauQ8upmKSxmUkz9fvHuWk_AiKc6FVgKnnwIxLDqbWjlzSdumUd6GLkmUO5UV4RT9j1aElZWAgmX05Bc6DV3Mv5UkxgJyxBnimTpbUzqGlKKtv30jKFd5ylWecpVnZo83B_0mv9LLwPkaeHWNXf6tJEfDEfmQfAfxqqiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290818718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Karlsson, Sten ; Diserud, Ola H. ; Moen, Thomas ; Hindar, Kjetil</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Sten ; Diserud, Ola H. ; Moen, Thomas ; Hindar, Kjetil</creatorcontrib><description>Genetic introgression of domesticated to wild conspecifics is of great concern to the genetic integrity and viability of the wild populations. Therefore, we need tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. A challenge to quantitation of unidirectional gene flow is that both the donor and the recipient population may be genetically substructured and that the subpopulations are subjected to genetic drift and may exchange migrants between one another. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow and demonstrate its usefulness to farm and wild Atlantic salmon as a model species. The challenge of having several wild and farm populations was circumvented by in silico generating one analytical center point for farm and wild salmon, respectively. Distributions for the probability that an individual is wild were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and farm genotypes using STRUCTURE. We show that estimates of proportions of the genome being of domesticated origin in a particular wild population can be obtained without having a historical reference sample for the same population. The main advantages of the method presented are the standardized way in which genetic processes within and between populations are taken into account, and the individual‐based analyses giving estimates for each individual independent of other individuals. The method makes use of established software, and as long as genetic markers showing generic genetic differences between domesticated and wild populations are available, it can be applied to all species with unidirectional gene flow. Results from our method are easy to interpret and understand, and will serve as a powerful tool for management, especially because there is no need for a specific historical wild reference sample.
Tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations are needed for a large number of species. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow. Expected probability distributions for belonging to wild and domesticated populations were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and domesticated genotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25473478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Aquaculture ; Atlantic salmon ; Conspecifics ; Domestication ; Farms ; Gene flow ; Genetic drift ; Genetic markers ; Genomes ; Genotypes ; Methods ; Monitoring ; Original Research ; Population ; Population genetics ; Populations ; Quantitation ; Salmo salar ; Salmon ; Sample size ; single nucleotide polymorphisms ; Subpopulations ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2014-08, Vol.4 (16), p.3256-3263</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-365191007bb8cdfd5c2927c1693cb288a744f2633790afc3312d972727124c323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-365191007bb8cdfd5c2927c1693cb288a744f2633790afc3312d972727124c323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222212/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222212/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Sten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diserud, Ola H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindar, Kjetil</creatorcontrib><title>A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Genetic introgression of domesticated to wild conspecifics is of great concern to the genetic integrity and viability of the wild populations. Therefore, we need tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. A challenge to quantitation of unidirectional gene flow is that both the donor and the recipient population may be genetically substructured and that the subpopulations are subjected to genetic drift and may exchange migrants between one another. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow and demonstrate its usefulness to farm and wild Atlantic salmon as a model species. The challenge of having several wild and farm populations was circumvented by in silico generating one analytical center point for farm and wild salmon, respectively. Distributions for the probability that an individual is wild were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and farm genotypes using STRUCTURE. We show that estimates of proportions of the genome being of domesticated origin in a particular wild population can be obtained without having a historical reference sample for the same population. The main advantages of the method presented are the standardized way in which genetic processes within and between populations are taken into account, and the individual‐based analyses giving estimates for each individual independent of other individuals. The method makes use of established software, and as long as genetic markers showing generic genetic differences between domesticated and wild populations are available, it can be applied to all species with unidirectional gene flow. Results from our method are easy to interpret and understand, and will serve as a powerful tool for management, especially because there is no need for a specific historical wild reference sample.
Tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations are needed for a large number of species. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow. Expected probability distributions for belonging to wild and domesticated populations were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and domesticated genotypes.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Atlantic salmon</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Domestication</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Genetic drift</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Quantitation</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>single nucleotide polymorphisms</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMoWtSFf0AG3OiiNa-ZJBtBSn0huNF1SJNMTZkmbTKj1F9valWqIN4sEpKPc8_NAeAIwQGCEJ9bbckAoUpsgR6GtOwzVvLtjfMeOExpCnNVEFPIdsEeLikjlPEeuLssUqu8UdG4N2uKmW2fgynqEItFp3zr6qXzk6LzzrhodeuCV00xsd62ThfOtzFMok0p3x-AnVo1yR5-7vvg6Wr0OLzp3z9c3w4v7_u6pFj0SVUikZ2z8ZhrU5tSY4GZzgMQPcacK0ZpjStCmICq1oQgbATDeSFMNcFkH1ysdefdeGaNttmEauQ8upmKSxmUkz9fvHuWk_AiKc6FVgKnnwIxLDqbWjlzSdumUd6GLkmUO5UV4RT9j1aElZWAgmX05Bc6DV3Mv5UkxgJyxBnimTpbUzqGlKKtv30jKFd5ylWecpVnZo83B_0mv9LLwPkaeHWNXf6tJEfDEfmQfAfxqqiQ</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Karlsson, Sten</creator><creator>Diserud, Ola H.</creator><creator>Moen, Thomas</creator><creator>Hindar, Kjetil</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression</title><author>Karlsson, Sten ; Diserud, Ola H. ; Moen, Thomas ; Hindar, Kjetil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-365191007bb8cdfd5c2927c1693cb288a744f2633790afc3312d972727124c323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Atlantic salmon</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Domestication</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Genetic drift</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Quantitation</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>single nucleotide polymorphisms</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Sten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diserud, Ola H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindar, Kjetil</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlsson, Sten</au><au>Diserud, Ola H.</au><au>Moen, Thomas</au><au>Hindar, Kjetil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>3256</spage><epage>3263</epage><pages>3256-3263</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Genetic introgression of domesticated to wild conspecifics is of great concern to the genetic integrity and viability of the wild populations. Therefore, we need tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. A challenge to quantitation of unidirectional gene flow is that both the donor and the recipient population may be genetically substructured and that the subpopulations are subjected to genetic drift and may exchange migrants between one another. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow and demonstrate its usefulness to farm and wild Atlantic salmon as a model species. The challenge of having several wild and farm populations was circumvented by in silico generating one analytical center point for farm and wild salmon, respectively. Distributions for the probability that an individual is wild were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and farm genotypes using STRUCTURE. We show that estimates of proportions of the genome being of domesticated origin in a particular wild population can be obtained without having a historical reference sample for the same population. The main advantages of the method presented are the standardized way in which genetic processes within and between populations are taken into account, and the individual‐based analyses giving estimates for each individual independent of other individuals. The method makes use of established software, and as long as genetic markers showing generic genetic differences between domesticated and wild populations are available, it can be applied to all species with unidirectional gene flow. Results from our method are easy to interpret and understand, and will serve as a powerful tool for management, especially because there is no need for a specific historical wild reference sample.
Tools that can be used for monitoring unidirectional gene flow from domesticated to wild populations are needed for a large number of species. We develop a standardized method for quantifying and monitoring domesticated to wild gene flow. Expected probability distributions for belonging to wild and domesticated populations were generated from individual‐based analyses of observed wild and domesticated genotypes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>25473478</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.1169</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2014-08, Vol.4 (16), p.3256-3263 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4222212 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal behavior Aquaculture Atlantic salmon Conspecifics Domestication Farms Gene flow Genetic drift Genetic markers Genomes Genotypes Methods Monitoring Original Research Population Population genetics Populations Quantitation Salmo salar Salmon Sample size single nucleotide polymorphisms Subpopulations Viability |
title | A standardized method for quantifying unidirectional genetic introgression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T08%3A53%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20standardized%20method%20for%20quantifying%20unidirectional%20genetic%20introgression&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Karlsson,%20Sten&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=3256&rft.epage=3263&rft.pages=3256-3263&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.1169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1637569097%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290818718&rft_id=info:pmid/25473478&rfr_iscdi=true |