The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC urology 2014-10, Vol.14 (1), p.82-82, Article 82
Hauptverfasser: Nayak, Jasmir G, Drachenberg, Darrel E, Mau, Elke, Suderman, Derek, Bucher, Oliver, Lambert, Pascal, Quon, Harvey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title BMC urology
container_volume 14
creator Nayak, Jasmir G
Drachenberg, Darrel E
Mau, Elke
Suderman, Derek
Bucher, Oliver
Lambert, Pascal
Quon, Harvey
description Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (>99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2490-14-82
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4216843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539593262</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539593262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-622ffe53cf612a1d8fc3d184c504420ca74108e69abaae548374e40dea16094b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kktv1DAUhSMEog9Ys0OW2LBJ61c8DgukUpWHVIlNWVs3jj3jKskNsUM1_x6nU4YOKvLClu_xd32OXRRvGD1jTKtzJles5LKmJZOl5s-K4_3O80fro-IkxltK2UpX6mVxxCshasnocXF3s3Ek9CPYRNAT77oO7-ImjCRNEIYwrAkOZIS0wQ7XwUJHcE4WexeJx0W8SCZo70vjhDFBcjZhv_1AgIw4zh2kkBkNRNcSGKDbxhBfFS88dNG9fphPix-fr24uv5bX3798u7y4LptKrlKpOPfeVcJ6xTiwVnsrWqalraiUnFpYZRfaqRoaAFdJLVbSSdo6YIrWshGnxccdd5yb3rXWDdlXZ8Yp9DBtDUIwh5UhbMwafxnJmdJSZMCnHaAJ-B_AYSVnY5bgzRJ8XhnNM-T9wy0m_Dm7mEwfos1Zw-BwjoYpVgtOKa2z9N0_0lucp5zavUrXKlPZX9UaOmfC4DH3tgvUXFSirjJNLW3PnlDl0bo-WBycD3n_4MD57oDNDxkn5_c-WbaSP9wTzt4-znev__PDxG9bztJ-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1618964901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Nayak, Jasmir G ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Mau, Elke ; Suderman, Derek ; Bucher, Oliver ; Lambert, Pascal ; Quon, Harvey</creator><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Jasmir G ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Mau, Elke ; Suderman, Derek ; Bucher, Oliver ; Lambert, Pascal ; Quon, Harvey</creatorcontrib><description>Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (&gt;99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p &lt; 0.0001). NFTA and NA urologists were more likely to have PSM compared to FTA urologists (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.44-4.35 and OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.53-2.88, respectively). However, the proportion of PSM between NFTA and NA urologists was not significant (p = 0.492). In addition, pathological stage (p = 0.0004), Gleason sum (p &lt; 0.0001), and surgeon volume (p = 0.017) were associated with PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of clinical and functional outcomes. Uro-oncology fellowship trained surgeons had significantly lower rates of PSM than non-fellowship trained surgeons in this population based cohort. This study demonstrates the importance of surgeon-related variables on pathological outcomes and highlights the value of additional urologic oncology fellowship training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-82</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25339410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Aged ; Antigens ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Clinical Competence ; Fellowships and Scholarships ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology ; Population ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Surgery ; Urology ; Urology - education ; Variables</subject><ispartof>BMC urology, 2014-10, Vol.14 (1), p.82-82, Article 82</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Nayak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Nayak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-622ffe53cf612a1d8fc3d184c504420ca74108e69abaae548374e40dea16094b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-622ffe53cf612a1d8fc3d184c504420ca74108e69abaae548374e40dea16094b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216843/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216843/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25339410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Jasmir G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mau, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suderman, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucher, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quon, Harvey</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis</title><title>BMC urology</title><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><description>Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (&gt;99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p &lt; 0.0001). NFTA and NA urologists were more likely to have PSM compared to FTA urologists (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.44-4.35 and OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.53-2.88, respectively). However, the proportion of PSM between NFTA and NA urologists was not significant (p = 0.492). In addition, pathological stage (p = 0.0004), Gleason sum (p &lt; 0.0001), and surgeon volume (p = 0.017) were associated with PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of clinical and functional outcomes. Uro-oncology fellowship trained surgeons had significantly lower rates of PSM than non-fellowship trained surgeons in this population based cohort. This study demonstrates the importance of surgeon-related variables on pathological outcomes and highlights the value of additional urologic oncology fellowship training.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Fellowships and Scholarships</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urology - education</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1471-2490</issn><issn>1471-2490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kktv1DAUhSMEog9Ys0OW2LBJ61c8DgukUpWHVIlNWVs3jj3jKskNsUM1_x6nU4YOKvLClu_xd32OXRRvGD1jTKtzJles5LKmJZOl5s-K4_3O80fro-IkxltK2UpX6mVxxCshasnocXF3s3Ek9CPYRNAT77oO7-ImjCRNEIYwrAkOZIS0wQ7XwUJHcE4WexeJx0W8SCZo70vjhDFBcjZhv_1AgIw4zh2kkBkNRNcSGKDbxhBfFS88dNG9fphPix-fr24uv5bX3798u7y4LptKrlKpOPfeVcJ6xTiwVnsrWqalraiUnFpYZRfaqRoaAFdJLVbSSdo6YIrWshGnxccdd5yb3rXWDdlXZ8Yp9DBtDUIwh5UhbMwafxnJmdJSZMCnHaAJ-B_AYSVnY5bgzRJ8XhnNM-T9wy0m_Dm7mEwfos1Zw-BwjoYpVgtOKa2z9N0_0lucp5zavUrXKlPZX9UaOmfC4DH3tgvUXFSirjJNLW3PnlDl0bo-WBycD3n_4MD57oDNDxkn5_c-WbaSP9wTzt4-znev__PDxG9bztJ-</recordid><startdate>20141023</startdate><enddate>20141023</enddate><creator>Nayak, Jasmir G</creator><creator>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creator><creator>Mau, Elke</creator><creator>Suderman, Derek</creator><creator>Bucher, Oliver</creator><creator>Lambert, Pascal</creator><creator>Quon, Harvey</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141023</creationdate><title>The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis</title><author>Nayak, Jasmir G ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Mau, Elke ; Suderman, Derek ; Bucher, Oliver ; Lambert, Pascal ; Quon, Harvey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-622ffe53cf612a1d8fc3d184c504420ca74108e69abaae548374e40dea16094b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Fellowships and Scholarships</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urology - education</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Jasmir G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mau, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suderman, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucher, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quon, Harvey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nayak, Jasmir G</au><au>Drachenberg, Darrel E</au><au>Mau, Elke</au><au>Suderman, Derek</au><au>Bucher, Oliver</au><au>Lambert, Pascal</au><au>Quon, Harvey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMC urology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Urol</addtitle><date>2014-10-23</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>82-82</pages><artnum>82</artnum><issn>1471-2490</issn><eissn>1471-2490</eissn><abstract>Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (&gt;99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p &lt; 0.0001). NFTA and NA urologists were more likely to have PSM compared to FTA urologists (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.44-4.35 and OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.53-2.88, respectively). However, the proportion of PSM between NFTA and NA urologists was not significant (p = 0.492). In addition, pathological stage (p = 0.0004), Gleason sum (p &lt; 0.0001), and surgeon volume (p = 0.017) were associated with PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of clinical and functional outcomes. Uro-oncology fellowship trained surgeons had significantly lower rates of PSM than non-fellowship trained surgeons in this population based cohort. This study demonstrates the importance of surgeon-related variables on pathological outcomes and highlights the value of additional urologic oncology fellowship training.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25339410</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2490-14-82</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2490
ispartof BMC urology, 2014-10, Vol.14 (1), p.82-82, Article 82
issn 1471-2490
1471-2490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4216843
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Accreditation
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Aged
Antigens
Cancer
Care and treatment
Clinical Competence
Fellowships and Scholarships
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology
Population
Prostate - pathology
Prostate - surgery
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Studies
Surgery
Urology
Urology - education
Variables
title The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A39%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20fellowship%20training%20on%20pathological%20outcomes%20following%20radical%20prostatectomy:%20a%20population%20based%20analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20urology&rft.au=Nayak,%20Jasmir%20G&rft.date=2014-10-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=82-82&rft.artnum=82&rft.issn=1471-2490&rft.eissn=1471-2490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2490-14-82&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539593262%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1618964901&rft_id=info:pmid/25339410&rft_galeid=A539593262&rfr_iscdi=true