How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use

Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features. To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2014-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1001-1008
Hauptverfasser: Ancker, Jessica S, Kern, Lisa M, Edwards, Alison, Nosal, Sarah, Stein, Daniel M, Hauser, Diane, Kaushal, Rainu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1001
container_title Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
container_volume 21
creator Ancker, Jessica S
Kern, Lisa M
Edwards, Alison
Nosal, Sarah
Stein, Daniel M
Hauser, Diane
Kaushal, Rainu
description Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features. To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time. Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use. Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency. Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4215048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1610763354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-91c88f33bd2e5acbe95e67adc6f4c756969e4039aac2bc2497601b460f00336a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9rGzEQxZfSkqRpPkGh6NjLtvov76WlhKQuBAKlgd7ErHbWqyBLriQ7-Nt3jd3QnGZg3nszw69p3jP6iTGhP8Paw2MMLadMtJRyzc2r5oIpbtrOyN-v555q0yrKzXnztpRHSpnmQp0151x2TM62i-ZpmZ6IL6ROSDCgqzlF78iEEOpEMrqUB9KjjyuyLTh8JQ8FSRrJzfInGaACqYlAKVgK2Uz74p2H2AbcYSA7yB56H3zdEx9JRTfFFNJqf0h617wZIRS8OtXL5uH25tf1sr27__7j-ttd65Rkte2YWyxGIfqBowLXY6dQGxicHqUzSne6Q0lFB-B47-a3jKasl5qOlAqhQVw2X465m22_xsFhrBmC3WS_hry3Cbx9OYl-squ0s5IzReViDvh4CsjpzxZLtWtfHIYAEdO2WKYZNVoIJWepOEpdTqVkHJ_XMGoPyOwJmT0gs0dks-vD_xc-e_4xEn8BGkKWVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1610763354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ancker, Jessica S ; Kern, Lisa M ; Edwards, Alison ; Nosal, Sarah ; Stein, Daniel M ; Hauser, Diane ; Kaushal, Rainu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ancker, Jessica S ; Kern, Lisa M ; Edwards, Alison ; Nosal, Sarah ; Stein, Daniel M ; Hauser, Diane ; Kaushal, Rainu ; HITEC Investigators ; with the HITEC Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features. To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time. Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use. Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency. Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24914013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Decision Making, Computer-Assisted ; Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Electronic Health Records - utilization ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nurse Practitioners - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physicians, Primary Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Research and Applications ; Retrospective Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2014-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1001-1008</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-91c88f33bd2e5acbe95e67adc6f4c756969e4039aac2bc2497601b460f00336a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-91c88f33bd2e5acbe95e67adc6f4c756969e4039aac2bc2497601b460f00336a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215048/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215048/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24914013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ancker, Jessica S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosal, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Rainu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITEC Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>with the HITEC Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features. To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time. Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use. Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency. Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Decision Making, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physicians, Primary Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Research and Applications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9rGzEQxZfSkqRpPkGh6NjLtvov76WlhKQuBAKlgd7ErHbWqyBLriQ7-Nt3jd3QnGZg3nszw69p3jP6iTGhP8Paw2MMLadMtJRyzc2r5oIpbtrOyN-v555q0yrKzXnztpRHSpnmQp0151x2TM62i-ZpmZ6IL6ROSDCgqzlF78iEEOpEMrqUB9KjjyuyLTh8JQ8FSRrJzfInGaACqYlAKVgK2Uz74p2H2AbcYSA7yB56H3zdEx9JRTfFFNJqf0h617wZIRS8OtXL5uH25tf1sr27__7j-ttd65Rkte2YWyxGIfqBowLXY6dQGxicHqUzSne6Q0lFB-B47-a3jKasl5qOlAqhQVw2X465m22_xsFhrBmC3WS_hry3Cbx9OYl-squ0s5IzReViDvh4CsjpzxZLtWtfHIYAEdO2WKYZNVoIJWepOEpdTqVkHJ_XMGoPyOwJmT0gs0dks-vD_xc-e_4xEn8BGkKWVQ</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Ancker, Jessica S</creator><creator>Kern, Lisa M</creator><creator>Edwards, Alison</creator><creator>Nosal, Sarah</creator><creator>Stein, Daniel M</creator><creator>Hauser, Diane</creator><creator>Kaushal, Rainu</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use</title><author>Ancker, Jessica S ; Kern, Lisa M ; Edwards, Alison ; Nosal, Sarah ; Stein, Daniel M ; Hauser, Diane ; Kaushal, Rainu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-91c88f33bd2e5acbe95e67adc6f4c756969e4039aac2bc2497601b460f00336a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Decision Making, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physicians, Primary Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Research and Applications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ancker, Jessica S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosal, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Rainu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITEC Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>with the HITEC Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ancker, Jessica S</au><au>Kern, Lisa M</au><au>Edwards, Alison</au><au>Nosal, Sarah</au><au>Stein, Daniel M</au><au>Hauser, Diane</au><au>Kaushal, Rainu</au><aucorp>HITEC Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>with the HITEC Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>1001-1008</pages><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features. To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time. Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use. Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency. Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>24914013</pmid><doi>10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-5027
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2014-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1001-1008
issn 1067-5027
1527-974X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4215048
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data
Electronic Health Records - utilization
Female
Humans
Male
Nurse Practitioners - statistics & numerical data
Physicians, Primary Care - statistics & numerical data
Research and Applications
Retrospective Studies
United States
title How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20is%20the%20electronic%20health%20record%20being%20used?%20Use%20of%20EHR%20data%20to%20assess%20physician-level%20variability%20in%20technology%20use&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Ancker,%20Jessica%20S&rft.aucorp=HITEC%20Investigators&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=1001-1008&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1610763354%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1610763354&rft_id=info:pmid/24914013&rfr_iscdi=true