Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents
Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of youth and adolescence 2015-05, Vol.44 (5), p.1024-1038 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1038 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1024 |
| container_title | Journal of youth and adolescence |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Knight, Danica K. Dansereau, Donald F. Becan, Jennifer E. Rowan, Grace A. Flynn, Patrick M. |
| description | Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one’s own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4208977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3649110671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7e817c58a9ef5beb9839f55e65a246bd945d6001595f4855866149391f96cb123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS0EKgv0A3BBljin9TjxvwsSBUqpQFzo2XWS8RLI2tTOIvHt62gB0UMP1sgzb94b6UfIIbAvwJj6moEZ2VQM5sdVJbfIAoSqKykZbJMFY42quDawS_ZyfmDlD4Z9Iru8UZJxrRfk94X32E3DMwbMmUZPHb27x5hwGjo3ji_VN5expz_X_XKFYaIu9PQcuyEPMdAb9ziEJb0KE6biMM09HxM97eOIuSudfEB2vBszfn6t--TX94u7sx_V9e3l1dnpddUJVk-VQg2qE9oZ9KLF1ujaeCFQCscb2famEb1kDIQRvtFCaCmhMbUBb2TXAq_3ycnG92ndrrCfs5Mb7VMaVi692OgG--8kDPd2GZ9tw5k2ShWD41eDFP-sMU_2Ia5TKDdbkAo4A8OhqGCj6lLMOaF_TwBmZyh2A8UWKHaGYmXZOfp42vvGG4Ui4BtBLqOwxPQh-r-ufwH_ZJgW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671201921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Knight, Danica K. ; Dansereau, Donald F. ; Becan, Jennifer E. ; Rowan, Grace A. ; Flynn, Patrick M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knight, Danica K. ; Dansereau, Donald F. ; Becan, Jennifer E. ; Rowan, Grace A. ; Flynn, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><description>Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one’s own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24760288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JYADA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Addictive behaviors ; Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior - psychology ; Adolescents ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child ; Child and School Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cognitive Science ; Curricula ; Decision Making ; Decision Making Skills ; Delinquency ; Drug Abuse ; Drug use ; Empirical Research ; Female ; Goal Orientation ; Group Dynamics ; Health Psychology ; History of Psychology ; Humans ; Intervention ; Judgment ; Law and Psychology ; Logical Thinking ; Male ; Metacognition ; Models, Theoretical ; Motivation ; Physical Health ; Principals ; Psychology ; Psychotherapy ; Residential Programs ; Social Environment ; Substance Abuse ; Substance abuse treatment ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers ; Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control ; Teenagers ; Therapeutic Environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of youth and adolescence, 2015-05, Vol.44 (5), p.1024-1038</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7e817c58a9ef5beb9839f55e65a246bd945d6001595f4855866149391f96cb123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7e817c58a9ef5beb9839f55e65a246bd945d6001595f4855866149391f96cb123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knight, Danica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dansereau, Donald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becan, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Grace A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents</title><title>Journal of youth and adolescence</title><addtitle>J Youth Adolescence</addtitle><addtitle>J Youth Adolesc</addtitle><description>Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one’s own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors.</description><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Science</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Making Skills</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Drug Abuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Empirical Research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>History of Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Physical Health</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Residential Programs</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Substance Abuse</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Therapeutic Environment</subject><issn>0047-2891</issn><issn>1573-6601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS0EKgv0A3BBljin9TjxvwsSBUqpQFzo2XWS8RLI2tTOIvHt62gB0UMP1sgzb94b6UfIIbAvwJj6moEZ2VQM5sdVJbfIAoSqKykZbJMFY42quDawS_ZyfmDlD4Z9Iru8UZJxrRfk94X32E3DMwbMmUZPHb27x5hwGjo3ji_VN5expz_X_XKFYaIu9PQcuyEPMdAb9ziEJb0KE6biMM09HxM97eOIuSudfEB2vBszfn6t--TX94u7sx_V9e3l1dnpddUJVk-VQg2qE9oZ9KLF1ujaeCFQCscb2famEb1kDIQRvtFCaCmhMbUBb2TXAq_3ycnG92ndrrCfs5Mb7VMaVi692OgG--8kDPd2GZ9tw5k2ShWD41eDFP-sMU_2Ia5TKDdbkAo4A8OhqGCj6lLMOaF_TwBmZyh2A8UWKHaGYmXZOfp42vvGG4Ui4BtBLqOwxPQh-r-ufwH_ZJgW</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Knight, Danica K.</creator><creator>Dansereau, Donald F.</creator><creator>Becan, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Rowan, Grace A.</creator><creator>Flynn, Patrick M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents</title><author>Knight, Danica K. ; Dansereau, Donald F. ; Becan, Jennifer E. ; Rowan, Grace A. ; Flynn, Patrick M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7e817c58a9ef5beb9839f55e65a246bd945d6001595f4855866149391f96cb123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Science</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Making Skills</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Drug Abuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Empirical Research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>History of Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Physical Health</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Residential Programs</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Substance Abuse</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Therapeutic Environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knight, Danica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dansereau, Donald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becan, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Grace A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of youth and adolescence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knight, Danica K.</au><au>Dansereau, Donald F.</au><au>Becan, Jennifer E.</au><au>Rowan, Grace A.</au><au>Flynn, Patrick M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of youth and adolescence</jtitle><stitle>J Youth Adolescence</stitle><addtitle>J Youth Adolesc</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1024</spage><epage>1038</epage><pages>1024-1038</pages><issn>0047-2891</issn><eissn>1573-6601</eissn><coden>JYADA6</coden><abstract>Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one’s own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24760288</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2891 |
| ispartof | Journal of youth and adolescence, 2015-05, Vol.44 (5), p.1024-1038 |
| issn | 0047-2891 1573-6601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4208977 |
| source | MEDLINE; Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Addictive behaviors Adolescent Adolescent Behavior - psychology Adolescents Behavioral Science and Psychology Child Child and School Psychology Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Cognitive Science Curricula Decision Making Decision Making Skills Delinquency Drug Abuse Drug use Empirical Research Female Goal Orientation Group Dynamics Health Psychology History of Psychology Humans Intervention Judgment Law and Psychology Logical Thinking Male Metacognition Models, Theoretical Motivation Physical Health Principals Psychology Psychotherapy Residential Programs Social Environment Substance Abuse Substance abuse treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Centers Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control Teenagers Therapeutic Environment |
| title | Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A19%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20Theoretically-Based%20Judgment%20and%20Decision%20Making%20Intervention%20for%20Adolescents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20youth%20and%20adolescence&rft.au=Knight,%20Danica%20K.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1024&rft.epage=1038&rft.pages=1024-1038&rft.issn=0047-2891&rft.eissn=1573-6601&rft.coden=JYADA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3649110671%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671201921&rft_id=info:pmid/24760288&rfr_iscdi=true |