Advice on ganglions is flawed
Patients come to hand specialists seeking removal, and the quoted article by Dias and Buch makes it quite clear that the selection of patients to be managed by masterly neglect was not impartial or objective: "the surgeon's preference dictated" whether surgery or observation was chose...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 2004-05, Vol.328 (7450), p.1262-1262 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7450 |
container_start_page | 1262 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 328 |
creator | Mahaffey, Peter J |
description | Patients come to hand specialists seeking removal, and the quoted article by Dias and Buch makes it quite clear that the selection of patients to be managed by masterly neglect was not impartial or objective: "the surgeon's preference dictated" whether surgery or observation was chosen. 2 The case made for non-operative management is further weakened by the manner of arrival at figures for post-surgical recurrence, said by Dias and Buch to have been 42%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1262-a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_416648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41707799</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41707799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-271191d49920cf8b99522d2e86efc1aebafbdf1e33dbd3747fd37ed99a61d9e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF5SAoWu7GsnWY9FFCH1BoJt2LWRLSm0cK5WclP59bRwC3XUzgrlzZsRB6BZwBkDZfblrMkpExvNi6BBGUn2BZpAzkRaC0ks0w7KQqQAqrtEixgZjTCgXkhUztFyZY13ZxHfJVnfbtvZdTOqYuFZ_W3ODrpxuo12c3jn6eHp8X7-km7fn1_Vqk5YUeJ8SDiDB5FISXDlRSlkQYogVzLoKtC21K40DS6kpDeU5d0O1RkrNwEgr6Bw9THv3h3JnTWW7PuhW7UO90-FHeV2rv0lXf6qtP6ocGMtH_u7EB_91sLFXjT-EbviyAs45Ay7IOEWnqSr4GIN15wOA1ahSDSrVoFKNKtWoUumBWk5UE3sfzkgOHHMu5ZBnUz7C_1n4C-Yvf9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777617828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advice on ganglions is flawed</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mahaffey, Peter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahaffey, Peter J</creatorcontrib><description>Patients come to hand specialists seeking removal, and the quoted article by Dias and Buch makes it quite clear that the selection of patients to be managed by masterly neglect was not impartial or objective: "the surgeon's preference dictated" whether surgery or observation was chosen. 2 The case made for non-operative management is further weakened by the manner of arrival at figures for post-surgical recurrence, said by Dias and Buch to have been 42%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1262-a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Ganglia ; Lesions ; Letters ; Poetry ; Surgery ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2004-05, Vol.328 (7450), p.1262-1262</ispartof><rights>2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2004</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 (c) 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41707799$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41707799$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahaffey, Peter J</creatorcontrib><title>Advice on ganglions is flawed</title><title>BMJ</title><description>Patients come to hand specialists seeking removal, and the quoted article by Dias and Buch makes it quite clear that the selection of patients to be managed by masterly neglect was not impartial or objective: "the surgeon's preference dictated" whether surgery or observation was chosen. 2 The case made for non-operative management is further weakened by the manner of arrival at figures for post-surgical recurrence, said by Dias and Buch to have been 42%.</description><subject>Ganglia</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF5SAoWu7GsnWY9FFCH1BoJt2LWRLSm0cK5WclP59bRwC3XUzgrlzZsRB6BZwBkDZfblrMkpExvNi6BBGUn2BZpAzkRaC0ks0w7KQqQAqrtEixgZjTCgXkhUztFyZY13ZxHfJVnfbtvZdTOqYuFZ_W3ODrpxuo12c3jn6eHp8X7-km7fn1_Vqk5YUeJ8SDiDB5FISXDlRSlkQYogVzLoKtC21K40DS6kpDeU5d0O1RkrNwEgr6Bw9THv3h3JnTWW7PuhW7UO90-FHeV2rv0lXf6qtP6ocGMtH_u7EB_91sLFXjT-EbviyAs45Ay7IOEWnqSr4GIN15wOA1ahSDSrVoFKNKtWoUumBWk5UE3sfzkgOHHMu5ZBnUz7C_1n4C-Yvf9A</recordid><startdate>20040522</startdate><enddate>20040522</enddate><creator>Mahaffey, Peter J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040522</creationdate><title>Advice on ganglions is flawed</title><author>Mahaffey, Peter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-271191d49920cf8b99522d2e86efc1aebafbdf1e33dbd3747fd37ed99a61d9e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Ganglia</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahaffey, Peter J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahaffey, Peter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advice on ganglions is flawed</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><date>2004-05-22</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>328</volume><issue>7450</issue><spage>1262</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1262-1262</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Patients come to hand specialists seeking removal, and the quoted article by Dias and Buch makes it quite clear that the selection of patients to be managed by masterly neglect was not impartial or objective: "the surgeon's preference dictated" whether surgery or observation was chosen. 2 The case made for non-operative management is further weakened by the manner of arrival at figures for post-surgical recurrence, said by Dias and Buch to have been 42%.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1262-a</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2004-05, Vol.328 (7450), p.1262-1262 |
issn | 0959-8138 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_416648 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ganglia Lesions Letters Poetry Surgery Wrist |
title | Advice on ganglions is flawed |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advice%20on%20ganglions%20is%20flawed&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Mahaffey,%20Peter%20J&rft.date=2004-05-22&rft.volume=328&rft.issue=7450&rft.spage=1262&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1262-1262&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1262-a&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41707799%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777617828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41707799&rfr_iscdi=true |