Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions

Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources;...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ambio 2014-10, Vol.43 (6), p.770-778
Hauptverfasser: Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel, Wu, Liangru, Lou, Yiping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 778
container_issue 6
container_start_page 770
container_title Ambio
container_volume 43
creator Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel
Wu, Liangru
Lou, Yiping
description Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources; however, bamboo and other non-timber forest resources have not been a part of the development of these institutions. Bamboo is a unique Non-Timber Forest Product, as it is often classified as forest or timber, and therefore must adhere to the same regulations as timber. Given the recent global expansion of bamboo, it is timely to examine the interplay between bamboo and the traditional institutions of forest governance. This paper aims to contribute to debates regarding cognitive institutional constraints on the development of substitute natural resources using bamboo as a case study, with specific focus on the applicability of Forest Stewardship Council certification, timber legality verification and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to bamboos.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13280-013-0466-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4165839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24709069</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24709069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-8e2c79de916e38ee1acf6e8d95c8f126ebc2b3909851ae7f05df7a05068d62d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9uEzEQxlcIREvhATgAKyGkclgY27v-wwEJogYqVeLQVhwtZ3c2cbSxi-0geuM1eD2eBCcbSuAAnGzN_GY--9NXFA8JvCAA4mUkjEqogLAKas4rcas4JLypK0FB3S4OAep8r2txUNyLcQkAnDF2tzigNVUMiDoswsS471-_pfIcsUwLLI_fmtXM--fl1AeMqex92NYvAmJ8VZ58MSvrrJuXI5dnYzm1qfxo08K68tQlDM4k650ZdjvCdS7HZNN6U473izu9GSI-2J1HxeX05GLyvjr78O508uasmgmAVEmkrVAdKsKRSURi2p6j7FTTyp5QjrOWzpgCJRtiUPTQdL0w0ACXHacdZUfF63Hv1Xq2wq5Fl4IZ9FWwKxOutTdW_95xdqHn_rOus4eSqbzgeLcg-E_r_BG9srHFYTAO_TpqIkAJWQPj_0Y5pRyoqv8DbTgDToGSjD79A136dXZ32FKU8brZUmSk2uBjDNjffJGA3uREjznROSd6kxMt8szjfW9uJn4GIwPPdoCJrRn6YFxr4y9Oypwm0mSOjlzMLTfHsPfEv6g_GoeWMfmwJ54NBb4RfzL2e-O1mYcsfHlOs9xGE5gE9gNnfOlC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562364521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel ; Wu, Liangru ; Lou, Yiping</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel ; Wu, Liangru ; Lou, Yiping</creatorcontrib><description>Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources; however, bamboo and other non-timber forest resources have not been a part of the development of these institutions. Bamboo is a unique Non-Timber Forest Product, as it is often classified as forest or timber, and therefore must adhere to the same regulations as timber. Given the recent global expansion of bamboo, it is timely to examine the interplay between bamboo and the traditional institutions of forest governance. This paper aims to contribute to debates regarding cognitive institutional constraints on the development of substitute natural resources using bamboo as a case study, with specific focus on the applicability of Forest Stewardship Council certification, timber legality verification and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to bamboos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13280-013-0466-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24293019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMBOCX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Bamboo ; Bamboos ; Biological and medical sciences ; case studies ; Certification ; cognition ; Commercial forests ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Deforestation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Emission standards ; emissions ; Emissions control ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Forest degradation ; Forest management ; Forest products ; Forest resources ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Forestry - standards ; Forestry development ; Forestry policy ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; governance ; Governments ; Institutional constraints ; Institutions ; International Agencies ; Natural resources ; PERSPECTIVE ; Physical Geography ; Plantation forestry ; Poaceae ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable forest management ; Timber ; Timber industry ; Timber management ; Timber supply ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 2014-10, Vol.43 (6), p.770-778</ispartof><rights>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-8e2c79de916e38ee1acf6e8d95c8f126ebc2b3909851ae7f05df7a05068d62d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-8e2c79de916e38ee1acf6e8d95c8f126ebc2b3909851ae7f05df7a05068d62d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24709069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24709069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28800015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Liangru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yiping</creatorcontrib><title>Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions</title><title>Ambio</title><addtitle>AMBIO</addtitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><description>Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources; however, bamboo and other non-timber forest resources have not been a part of the development of these institutions. Bamboo is a unique Non-Timber Forest Product, as it is often classified as forest or timber, and therefore must adhere to the same regulations as timber. Given the recent global expansion of bamboo, it is timely to examine the interplay between bamboo and the traditional institutions of forest governance. This paper aims to contribute to debates regarding cognitive institutional constraints on the development of substitute natural resources using bamboo as a case study, with specific focus on the applicability of Forest Stewardship Council certification, timber legality verification and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to bamboos.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Bamboo</subject><subject>Bamboos</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>cognition</subject><subject>Commercial forests</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest degradation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forest resources</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forestry - standards</subject><subject>Forestry development</subject><subject>Forestry policy</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Institutional constraints</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>International Agencies</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>PERSPECTIVE</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Plantation forestry</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable forest management</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Timber industry</subject><subject>Timber management</subject><subject>Timber supply</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9uEzEQxlcIREvhATgAKyGkclgY27v-wwEJogYqVeLQVhwtZ3c2cbSxi-0geuM1eD2eBCcbSuAAnGzN_GY--9NXFA8JvCAA4mUkjEqogLAKas4rcas4JLypK0FB3S4OAep8r2txUNyLcQkAnDF2tzigNVUMiDoswsS471-_pfIcsUwLLI_fmtXM--fl1AeMqex92NYvAmJ8VZ58MSvrrJuXI5dnYzm1qfxo08K68tQlDM4k650ZdjvCdS7HZNN6U473izu9GSI-2J1HxeX05GLyvjr78O508uasmgmAVEmkrVAdKsKRSURi2p6j7FTTyp5QjrOWzpgCJRtiUPTQdL0w0ACXHacdZUfF63Hv1Xq2wq5Fl4IZ9FWwKxOutTdW_95xdqHn_rOus4eSqbzgeLcg-E_r_BG9srHFYTAO_TpqIkAJWQPj_0Y5pRyoqv8DbTgDToGSjD79A136dXZ32FKU8brZUmSk2uBjDNjffJGA3uREjznROSd6kxMt8szjfW9uJn4GIwPPdoCJrRn6YFxr4y9Oypwm0mSOjlzMLTfHsPfEv6g_GoeWMfmwJ54NBb4RfzL2e-O1mYcsfHlOs9xGE5gE9gNnfOlC</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel</creator><creator>Wu, Liangru</creator><creator>Lou, Yiping</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions</title><author>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel ; Wu, Liangru ; Lou, Yiping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-8e2c79de916e38ee1acf6e8d95c8f126ebc2b3909851ae7f05df7a05068d62d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Bamboo</topic><topic>Bamboos</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>cognition</topic><topic>Commercial forests</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest degradation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forest resources</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forestry - standards</topic><topic>Forestry development</topic><topic>Forestry policy</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Institutional constraints</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>International Agencies</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>PERSPECTIVE</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Plantation forestry</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable forest management</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Timber industry</topic><topic>Timber management</topic><topic>Timber supply</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Liangru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yiping</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckingham, Kathleen Carmel</au><au>Wu, Liangru</au><au>Lou, Yiping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><stitle>AMBIO</stitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>770</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>770-778</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><coden>AMBOCX</coden><abstract>Over the centuries, governments and international agencies have developed a wide range of institutions to manage timber resources and conserve values provided by treed lands. Concerns regarding the sustainable supply of timber have provided opportunities for the development of substitute resources; however, bamboo and other non-timber forest resources have not been a part of the development of these institutions. Bamboo is a unique Non-Timber Forest Product, as it is often classified as forest or timber, and therefore must adhere to the same regulations as timber. Given the recent global expansion of bamboo, it is timely to examine the interplay between bamboo and the traditional institutions of forest governance. This paper aims to contribute to debates regarding cognitive institutional constraints on the development of substitute natural resources using bamboo as a case study, with specific focus on the applicability of Forest Stewardship Council certification, timber legality verification and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to bamboos.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24293019</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13280-013-0466-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-7447
ispartof Ambio, 2014-10, Vol.43 (6), p.770-778
issn 0044-7447
1654-7209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4165839
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Agriculture
Atmospheric Sciences
Bamboo
Bamboos
Biological and medical sciences
case studies
Certification
cognition
Commercial forests
Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence
Deforestation
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Emission standards
emissions
Emissions control
Environment
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental Management
Forest degradation
Forest management
Forest products
Forest resources
forest trees
Forestry
Forestry - standards
Forestry development
Forestry policy
Forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General forest ecology
Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology
governance
Governments
Institutional constraints
Institutions
International Agencies
Natural resources
PERSPECTIVE
Physical Geography
Plantation forestry
Poaceae
Sustainable development
Sustainable forest management
Timber
Timber industry
Timber management
Timber supply
Trees
title Can’t See the (Bamboo) Forest for the Trees: Examining Bamboo’s Fit Within International Forestry Institutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%E2%80%99t%20See%20the%20(Bamboo)%20Forest%20for%20the%20Trees:%20Examining%20Bamboo%E2%80%99s%20Fit%20Within%20International%20Forestry%20Institutions&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Buckingham,%20Kathleen%20Carmel&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=770&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=770-778&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft.coden=AMBOCX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13280-013-0466-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E24709069%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562364521&rft_id=info:pmid/24293019&rft_jstor_id=24709069&rfr_iscdi=true