Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study

Many countries have implemented standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs) to ensure fast diagnosis of patients suspected of having cancer. Yet, studies are sparse on the impact of such CPPs, and few have distinguished between referral routes. For incident cancer patients, we aimed to determine how...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC cancer 2014-08, Vol.14 (1), p.636-636, Article 636
Hauptverfasser: Jensen, Henry, Tørring, Marie Louise, Olesen, Frede, Overgaard, Jens, Vedsted, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 1
container_start_page 636
container_title BMC cancer
container_volume 14
creator Jensen, Henry
Tørring, Marie Louise
Olesen, Frede
Overgaard, Jens
Vedsted, Peter
description Many countries have implemented standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs) to ensure fast diagnosis of patients suspected of having cancer. Yet, studies are sparse on the impact of such CPPs, and few have distinguished between referral routes. For incident cancer patients, we aimed to determine how often GPs suspected cancer at the time of first presentation of symptoms in general practice and to describe the routes of referral for further investigation. In addition, we aimed to analyse if the GP's suspicion of cancer could predict the choice of referral to a CPP. Finally, we aimed to analyse associations between not only cancer suspicion and time to cancer diagnosis, but also between choice of referral route and time to cancer diagnosis. We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of incident cancer patients in Denmark who had attended general practice prior to their diagnosis of cancer. Data were collected from GP questionnaires and national registers. We estimated the patients' chance of being referred to a CPP (prevalence ratio (PR)) using Poisson regression. Associations between the GP's symptom interpretation, use of CPP and time to diagnosis were estimated using quantile regression. 5,581 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 73.8%). A GP was involved in diagnosing the cancer in 4,101 (73.5%) cases (3,823 cases analysed). In 48.2% of these cases, the GP interpreted the patient's symptoms as 'alarm' symptoms suggestive of cancer. The GP used CPPs in 1,426 (37.3%) cases. Patients, who had symptoms interpreted as 'vague' had a lower chance of being referred to a CPP than when interpreted as 'alarm' symptoms (PR = 0.53 (95%CI: 0.48;0.60)). Patients with 'vague' symptoms had a 34 (95% CI: 28;41) days longer median time to diagnosis than patients with 'alarm' symptoms. GPs suspect cancer more often than they initiate a CPP, and patients were less likely to be referred to a CPP when their symptoms were not interpreted as alarm symptoms of cancer. The GP's choice of referral route was a strong predictor of the duration of the diagnostic interval, but the GP's symptom interpretation was approximately twice as strong an indicator of a longer diagnostic interval.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2407-14-636
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4164756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561968176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-f7630ca0966fb4a52b482fc8056062f25cd52ebd474333c3726308da6a5c07013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1r3DAQFaWh2aa55xQEveRQJ5Ktr-0hEJZ2G1hIDs1ZyLK8UbAlR5IXFvrjK2fTJQkNCDTMvHm8eTMAnGB0jrFgF5hwXJQE8QKTglXsA5jtUx9fxIfgc4wPCGEukPgEDkuKOcWUzsCfhXLaBBjHOFhtvYPWwbVxJqgODkHpZLX5BseQcwkG05owVZRrYLK9gcnDxqq189HG71DBwQ9jp1ImKmoVTQOXt5k7bMz2qSeYtY0pbGFMY7P9Ag5a1UVz_PwfgbufP34vfhWrm-X14mpV1ESQVLScVUgrNGesrYmiZU6XrRaIMsTKtqS6oaWpG8JJVVW64mXGi0YxRTXiCFdH4HLHO4x1bxqdR8lDyCHYXoWt9MrK1xVn7-XabyTBjHDKMsFiR1Bb_w7B64r2vZzcl5P7OZJ5OZnl7FlG8I-jiUn2NmrTdcoZP0aJKcNzJjCfoF_fQB_8GFw26QmVn5iLjEI7lA4-xrycvSKM5HQg_9Nw-tKKfcO_i6j-ApTyt8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561561898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jensen, Henry ; Tørring, Marie Louise ; Olesen, Frede ; Overgaard, Jens ; Vedsted, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Henry ; Tørring, Marie Louise ; Olesen, Frede ; Overgaard, Jens ; Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Many countries have implemented standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs) to ensure fast diagnosis of patients suspected of having cancer. Yet, studies are sparse on the impact of such CPPs, and few have distinguished between referral routes. For incident cancer patients, we aimed to determine how often GPs suspected cancer at the time of first presentation of symptoms in general practice and to describe the routes of referral for further investigation. In addition, we aimed to analyse if the GP's suspicion of cancer could predict the choice of referral to a CPP. Finally, we aimed to analyse associations between not only cancer suspicion and time to cancer diagnosis, but also between choice of referral route and time to cancer diagnosis. We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of incident cancer patients in Denmark who had attended general practice prior to their diagnosis of cancer. Data were collected from GP questionnaires and national registers. We estimated the patients' chance of being referred to a CPP (prevalence ratio (PR)) using Poisson regression. Associations between the GP's symptom interpretation, use of CPP and time to diagnosis were estimated using quantile regression. 5,581 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 73.8%). A GP was involved in diagnosing the cancer in 4,101 (73.5%) cases (3,823 cases analysed). In 48.2% of these cases, the GP interpreted the patient's symptoms as 'alarm' symptoms suggestive of cancer. The GP used CPPs in 1,426 (37.3%) cases. Patients, who had symptoms interpreted as 'vague' had a lower chance of being referred to a CPP than when interpreted as 'alarm' symptoms (PR = 0.53 (95%CI: 0.48;0.60)). Patients with 'vague' symptoms had a 34 (95% CI: 28;41) days longer median time to diagnosis than patients with 'alarm' symptoms. GPs suspect cancer more often than they initiate a CPP, and patients were less likely to be referred to a CPP when their symptoms were not interpreted as alarm symptoms of cancer. The GP's choice of referral route was a strong predictor of the duration of the diagnostic interval, but the GP's symptom interpretation was approximately twice as strong an indicator of a longer diagnostic interval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-636</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25175155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Early Detection of Cancer - standards ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; General Practice ; General Practitioners ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Melanoma ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Patient satisfaction ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Public health ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Questionnaires ; Referral and Consultation - standards ; Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Skin cancer ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC cancer, 2014-08, Vol.14 (1), p.636-636, Article 636</ispartof><rights>2014 Jensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Jensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-f7630ca0966fb4a52b482fc8056062f25cd52ebd474333c3726308da6a5c07013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-f7630ca0966fb4a52b482fc8056062f25cd52ebd474333c3726308da6a5c07013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25175155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tørring, Marie Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Frede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study</title><title>BMC cancer</title><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><description>Many countries have implemented standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs) to ensure fast diagnosis of patients suspected of having cancer. Yet, studies are sparse on the impact of such CPPs, and few have distinguished between referral routes. For incident cancer patients, we aimed to determine how often GPs suspected cancer at the time of first presentation of symptoms in general practice and to describe the routes of referral for further investigation. In addition, we aimed to analyse if the GP's suspicion of cancer could predict the choice of referral to a CPP. Finally, we aimed to analyse associations between not only cancer suspicion and time to cancer diagnosis, but also between choice of referral route and time to cancer diagnosis. We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of incident cancer patients in Denmark who had attended general practice prior to their diagnosis of cancer. Data were collected from GP questionnaires and national registers. We estimated the patients' chance of being referred to a CPP (prevalence ratio (PR)) using Poisson regression. Associations between the GP's symptom interpretation, use of CPP and time to diagnosis were estimated using quantile regression. 5,581 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 73.8%). A GP was involved in diagnosing the cancer in 4,101 (73.5%) cases (3,823 cases analysed). In 48.2% of these cases, the GP interpreted the patient's symptoms as 'alarm' symptoms suggestive of cancer. The GP used CPPs in 1,426 (37.3%) cases. Patients, who had symptoms interpreted as 'vague' had a lower chance of being referred to a CPP than when interpreted as 'alarm' symptoms (PR = 0.53 (95%CI: 0.48;0.60)). Patients with 'vague' symptoms had a 34 (95% CI: 28;41) days longer median time to diagnosis than patients with 'alarm' symptoms. GPs suspect cancer more often than they initiate a CPP, and patients were less likely to be referred to a CPP when their symptoms were not interpreted as alarm symptoms of cancer. The GP's choice of referral route was a strong predictor of the duration of the diagnostic interval, but the GP's symptom interpretation was approximately twice as strong an indicator of a longer diagnostic interval.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>General Practitioners</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - standards</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2407</issn><issn>1471-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1r3DAQFaWh2aa55xQEveRQJ5Ktr-0hEJZ2G1hIDs1ZyLK8UbAlR5IXFvrjK2fTJQkNCDTMvHm8eTMAnGB0jrFgF5hwXJQE8QKTglXsA5jtUx9fxIfgc4wPCGEukPgEDkuKOcWUzsCfhXLaBBjHOFhtvYPWwbVxJqgODkHpZLX5BseQcwkG05owVZRrYLK9gcnDxqq189HG71DBwQ9jp1ImKmoVTQOXt5k7bMz2qSeYtY0pbGFMY7P9Ag5a1UVz_PwfgbufP34vfhWrm-X14mpV1ESQVLScVUgrNGesrYmiZU6XrRaIMsTKtqS6oaWpG8JJVVW64mXGi0YxRTXiCFdH4HLHO4x1bxqdR8lDyCHYXoWt9MrK1xVn7-XabyTBjHDKMsFiR1Bb_w7B64r2vZzcl5P7OZJ5OZnl7FlG8I-jiUn2NmrTdcoZP0aJKcNzJjCfoF_fQB_8GFw26QmVn5iLjEI7lA4-xrycvSKM5HQg_9Nw-tKKfcO_i6j-ApTyt8E</recordid><startdate>20140830</startdate><enddate>20140830</enddate><creator>Jensen, Henry</creator><creator>Tørring, Marie Louise</creator><creator>Olesen, Frede</creator><creator>Overgaard, Jens</creator><creator>Vedsted, Peter</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140830</creationdate><title>Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study</title><author>Jensen, Henry ; Tørring, Marie Louise ; Olesen, Frede ; Overgaard, Jens ; Vedsted, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-f7630ca0966fb4a52b482fc8056062f25cd52ebd474333c3726308da6a5c07013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>General Practitioners</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - standards</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tørring, Marie Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Frede</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Henry</au><au>Tørring, Marie Louise</au><au>Olesen, Frede</au><au>Overgaard, Jens</au><au>Vedsted, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study</atitle><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><date>2014-08-30</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>636</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>636-636</pages><artnum>636</artnum><issn>1471-2407</issn><eissn>1471-2407</eissn><abstract>Many countries have implemented standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs) to ensure fast diagnosis of patients suspected of having cancer. Yet, studies are sparse on the impact of such CPPs, and few have distinguished between referral routes. For incident cancer patients, we aimed to determine how often GPs suspected cancer at the time of first presentation of symptoms in general practice and to describe the routes of referral for further investigation. In addition, we aimed to analyse if the GP's suspicion of cancer could predict the choice of referral to a CPP. Finally, we aimed to analyse associations between not only cancer suspicion and time to cancer diagnosis, but also between choice of referral route and time to cancer diagnosis. We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of incident cancer patients in Denmark who had attended general practice prior to their diagnosis of cancer. Data were collected from GP questionnaires and national registers. We estimated the patients' chance of being referred to a CPP (prevalence ratio (PR)) using Poisson regression. Associations between the GP's symptom interpretation, use of CPP and time to diagnosis were estimated using quantile regression. 5,581 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 73.8%). A GP was involved in diagnosing the cancer in 4,101 (73.5%) cases (3,823 cases analysed). In 48.2% of these cases, the GP interpreted the patient's symptoms as 'alarm' symptoms suggestive of cancer. The GP used CPPs in 1,426 (37.3%) cases. Patients, who had symptoms interpreted as 'vague' had a lower chance of being referred to a CPP than when interpreted as 'alarm' symptoms (PR = 0.53 (95%CI: 0.48;0.60)). Patients with 'vague' symptoms had a 34 (95% CI: 28;41) days longer median time to diagnosis than patients with 'alarm' symptoms. GPs suspect cancer more often than they initiate a CPP, and patients were less likely to be referred to a CPP when their symptoms were not interpreted as alarm symptoms of cancer. The GP's choice of referral route was a strong predictor of the duration of the diagnostic interval, but the GP's symptom interpretation was approximately twice as strong an indicator of a longer diagnostic interval.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>25175155</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2407-14-636</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2407
ispartof BMC cancer, 2014-08, Vol.14 (1), p.636-636, Article 636
issn 1471-2407
1471-2407
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4164756
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Denmark - epidemiology
Early Detection of Cancer - standards
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Female
General Practice
General Practitioners
Humans
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical records
Melanoma
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - epidemiology
Patient satisfaction
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Public health
Quality of Health Care - standards
Questionnaires
Referral and Consultation - standards
Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data
Registries - statistics & numerical data
Skin cancer
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A06%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20suspicion%20in%20general%20practice,%20urgent%20referral%20and%20time%20to%20diagnosis:%20a%20population-based%20GP%20survey%20and%20registry%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20cancer&rft.au=Jensen,%20Henry&rft.date=2014-08-30&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=636&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=636-636&rft.artnum=636&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2407-14-636&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1561968176%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561561898&rft_id=info:pmid/25175155&rfr_iscdi=true