Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound‐derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. Methods Strain was calculated in two regions of in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.152-161
Hauptverfasser: Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Hassan, S. S., Ahn, H., Korzeniewski, S. J., Yeo, L., Chaiworapongsa, T., Romero, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 2
container_start_page 152
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 41
creator Hernandez‐Andrade, E.
Hassan, S. S.
Ahn, H.
Korzeniewski, S. J.
Yeo, L.
Chaiworapongsa, T.
Romero, R.
description ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound‐derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. Methods Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid‐sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross‐sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within‐subject correlation. Inter‐rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. Results A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8–40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross‐sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross‐sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of > 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. Conclusion Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.12344
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4161016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1434025876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5424-1c535095dd72119e05a3d4d18f50b90d31ea9cd839d8d8784be29f266afba5da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rHCEYgKU0NNu0h_6BMtBLepjE168ZL4USkrQQyKU5W1ediWFWNzpu2X8fN5uGthDoScTHh1cfhD4APgGMyWmJ4wkQytgrtAAmZIs7zF-jBZYCt52Q5BC9zfkOYywYFW_QIaHAQTJYoJ_nGz0VPfsYmjg0xqWNN3pq8uyHIbicG1uSD2OzTm4MOphtU_Jun93K3xcdZj_X2xvXlGlOOscSbOMmnec4Jr2-3b5DB4Oesnv_tB6hm4vzH2ff2qvry-9nX69awxlhLRhOOZbc2o4ASIe5ppZZ6AeOlxJbCk5LY3sqbW_7rmdLR-RAhNDDUnOr6RH6sveuy3LlrHGhjjOpdfIrnbYqaq_-Pgn-Vo1xoxgIwCCq4PhJkOJ9cXlWK5-NmyYdXCxZAaMME953_4GSnnZEdKKr6Kd_0LtYUqg_saNIL2sUqNTnPWVSzDm54XluwGqXWNXE6jFxZT_--dBn8nfTCpzugV9-ctuXTerm-nKvfAB9MbK3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282890001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Hernandez‐Andrade, E. ; Hassan, S. S. ; Ahn, H. ; Korzeniewski, S. J. ; Yeo, L. ; Chaiworapongsa, T. ; Romero, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Andrade, E. ; Hassan, S. S. ; Ahn, H. ; Korzeniewski, S. J. ; Yeo, L. ; Chaiworapongsa, T. ; Romero, R.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound‐derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. Methods Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid‐sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross‐sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within‐subject correlation. Inter‐rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. Results A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8–40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross‐sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross‐sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of &gt; 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. Conclusion Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.12344</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23151941</identifier><identifier>CODEN: UOGYFJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; cervical length ; Cervical Length Measurement - methods ; cervix ; Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging ; Cervix Uteri - physiology ; Elasticity - physiology ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy - physiology ; Pregnancy Trimesters ; Premature birth ; strain ; Stress, Physiological - physiology ; transvaginal ultrasound ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.152-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5424-1c535095dd72119e05a3d4d18f50b90d31ea9cd839d8d8784be29f266afba5da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5424-1c535095dd72119e05a3d4d18f50b90d31ea9cd839d8d8784be29f266afba5da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.12344$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.12344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23151941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Andrade, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniewski, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiworapongsa, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound‐derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. Methods Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid‐sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross‐sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within‐subject correlation. Inter‐rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. Results A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8–40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross‐sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross‐sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of &gt; 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. Conclusion Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>cervical length</subject><subject>Cervical Length Measurement - methods</subject><subject>cervix</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - physiology</subject><subject>Elasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy - physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimesters</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>strain</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>transvaginal ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rHCEYgKU0NNu0h_6BMtBLepjE168ZL4USkrQQyKU5W1ediWFWNzpu2X8fN5uGthDoScTHh1cfhD4APgGMyWmJ4wkQytgrtAAmZIs7zF-jBZYCt52Q5BC9zfkOYywYFW_QIaHAQTJYoJ_nGz0VPfsYmjg0xqWNN3pq8uyHIbicG1uSD2OzTm4MOphtU_Jun93K3xcdZj_X2xvXlGlOOscSbOMmnec4Jr2-3b5DB4Oesnv_tB6hm4vzH2ff2qvry-9nX69awxlhLRhOOZbc2o4ASIe5ppZZ6AeOlxJbCk5LY3sqbW_7rmdLR-RAhNDDUnOr6RH6sveuy3LlrHGhjjOpdfIrnbYqaq_-Pgn-Vo1xoxgIwCCq4PhJkOJ9cXlWK5-NmyYdXCxZAaMME953_4GSnnZEdKKr6Kd_0LtYUqg_saNIL2sUqNTnPWVSzDm54XluwGqXWNXE6jFxZT_--dBn8nfTCpzugV9-ctuXTerm-nKvfAB9MbK3</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Hernandez‐Andrade, E.</creator><creator>Hassan, S. S.</creator><creator>Ahn, H.</creator><creator>Korzeniewski, S. J.</creator><creator>Yeo, L.</creator><creator>Chaiworapongsa, T.</creator><creator>Romero, R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography</title><author>Hernandez‐Andrade, E. ; Hassan, S. S. ; Ahn, H. ; Korzeniewski, S. J. ; Yeo, L. ; Chaiworapongsa, T. ; Romero, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5424-1c535095dd72119e05a3d4d18f50b90d31ea9cd839d8d8784be29f266afba5da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>cervical length</topic><topic>Cervical Length Measurement - methods</topic><topic>cervix</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - physiology</topic><topic>Elasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy - physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimesters</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>strain</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>transvaginal ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Andrade, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzeniewski, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiworapongsa, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hernandez‐Andrade, E.</au><au>Hassan, S. S.</au><au>Ahn, H.</au><au>Korzeniewski, S. J.</au><au>Yeo, L.</au><au>Chaiworapongsa, T.</au><au>Romero, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>152</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>152-161</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><coden>UOGYFJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound‐derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. Methods Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid‐sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross‐sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within‐subject correlation. Inter‐rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. Results A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8–40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross‐sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross‐sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of &gt; 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. Conclusion Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>23151941</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.12344</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.152-161
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4161016
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
cervical length
Cervical Length Measurement - methods
cervix
Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging
Cervix Uteri - physiology
Elasticity - physiology
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Female
Humans
Observer Variation
Parity
Pregnancy
Pregnancy - physiology
Pregnancy Trimesters
Premature birth
strain
Stress, Physiological - physiology
transvaginal ultrasound
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
Young Adult
title Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T21%3A04%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20cervical%20stiffness%20during%20pregnancy%20using%20semiquantitative%20ultrasound%20elastography&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Hernandez%E2%80%90Andrade,%20E.&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=152&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=152-161&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft.coden=UOGYFJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.12344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1434025876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282890001&rft_id=info:pmid/23151941&rfr_iscdi=true