The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review

Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systematic Reviews 2014-09, Vol.3 (1), p.99-99, Article 99
Hauptverfasser: O'Connor, Annette M, Auvermann, Brent W, Higgins, Julian P T, Kirychuk, Shelley P, Sargeant, Jan M, Von Essen, Susanna G, Glanville, Julie M, Wood, Hannah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Systematic Reviews
container_volume 3
creator O'Connor, Annette M
Auvermann, Brent W
Higgins, Julian P T
Kirychuk, Shelley P
Sargeant, Jan M
Von Essen, Susanna G
Glanville, Julie M
Wood, Hannah
description Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions.We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. PROSPERO CRD42014010521.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/2046-4053-3-99
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4160559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541255810</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541255810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-9c040bef29f47e6849ae6ffeea03faeef3240d74b71dffffd5e83b04b9ae30963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1v3CAQRVWrJkpz7bFC6tkpGLBND5VWUb-kSL2kZ4TxsEtkgws4yd7604u76TZR1eEAM_Pm6c0wCL2m5ILSrnlXE95UnAhWsUrKZ-j0GHj-6H2CzlO6IcUaQShpXqKTWtTFI90p-nm9A6xTCsbp7ILHPeQ7AI_nGO7d5PIe54C1d5MeKwswOL_FYYb4G51KZsAmTNPiV-gO9Jh377Fey3MwYcQ2RLzMQ4GXQo3TPmWYimdwhFsHd6_QC6vHBOcP9xn6_unj9eWX6urb56-Xm6uqF5zlShrCSQ-2lpa30HRcamhsEaQJsxrAspqToeV9SwdbbBDQsZ7wvuAYkQ07Qx8OvPPSTzAY8DnqUc2xdBb3Kminnma826ltuFWcNkQIWQg2B4Lehf8QPM2Usaj1E9T6CYopuXK8fRARw48FUlY3YYm-9K1qKRrS0laIgro4oLZ6BOW8DYXPlDPA5EzwYF2JbwSntRAdJX8LTAwpRbBHVZSodVP-1fHm8TCO8D97wX4BqxC90g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956071755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>O'Connor, Annette M ; Auvermann, Brent W ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Kirychuk, Shelley P ; Sargeant, Jan M ; Von Essen, Susanna G ; Glanville, Julie M ; Wood, Hannah</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M ; Auvermann, Brent W ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Kirychuk, Shelley P ; Sargeant, Jan M ; Von Essen, Susanna G ; Glanville, Julie M ; Wood, Hannah</creatorcontrib><description>Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions.We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. PROSPERO CRD42014010521.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-99</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25200608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal Feed ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Antimicrobial agents ; Database searching ; Drug resistance ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Health aspects ; Health Status ; Humans ; Internet/Web search services ; Livestock ; Mental Health ; Online searching ; Planning ; Poultry ; Protocol ; Research Design ; Residence Characteristics ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Systematic Reviews, 2014-09, Vol.3 (1), p.99-99, Article 99</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 O’Connor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 O’Connor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-9c040bef29f47e6849ae6ffeea03faeef3240d74b71dffffd5e83b04b9ae30963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-9c040bef29f47e6849ae6ffeea03faeef3240d74b71dffffd5e83b04b9ae30963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160559/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160559/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200608$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvermann, Brent W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Julian P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirychuk, Shelley P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Essen, Susanna G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanville, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Hannah</creatorcontrib><title>The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review</title><title>Systematic Reviews</title><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions.We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. PROSPERO CRD42014010521.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Database searching</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet/Web search services</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Online searching</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2046-4053</issn><issn>2046-4053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1v3CAQRVWrJkpz7bFC6tkpGLBND5VWUb-kSL2kZ4TxsEtkgws4yd7604u76TZR1eEAM_Pm6c0wCL2m5ILSrnlXE95UnAhWsUrKZ-j0GHj-6H2CzlO6IcUaQShpXqKTWtTFI90p-nm9A6xTCsbp7ILHPeQ7AI_nGO7d5PIe54C1d5MeKwswOL_FYYb4G51KZsAmTNPiV-gO9Jh377Fey3MwYcQ2RLzMQ4GXQo3TPmWYimdwhFsHd6_QC6vHBOcP9xn6_unj9eWX6urb56-Xm6uqF5zlShrCSQ-2lpa30HRcamhsEaQJsxrAspqToeV9SwdbbBDQsZ7wvuAYkQ07Qx8OvPPSTzAY8DnqUc2xdBb3Kminnma826ltuFWcNkQIWQg2B4Lehf8QPM2Usaj1E9T6CYopuXK8fRARw48FUlY3YYm-9K1qKRrS0laIgro4oLZ6BOW8DYXPlDPA5EzwYF2JbwSntRAdJX8LTAwpRbBHVZSodVP-1fHm8TCO8D97wX4BqxC90g</recordid><startdate>20140908</startdate><enddate>20140908</enddate><creator>O'Connor, Annette M</creator><creator>Auvermann, Brent W</creator><creator>Higgins, Julian P T</creator><creator>Kirychuk, Shelley P</creator><creator>Sargeant, Jan M</creator><creator>Von Essen, Susanna G</creator><creator>Glanville, Julie M</creator><creator>Wood, Hannah</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140908</creationdate><title>The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review</title><author>O'Connor, Annette M ; Auvermann, Brent W ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Kirychuk, Shelley P ; Sargeant, Jan M ; Von Essen, Susanna G ; Glanville, Julie M ; Wood, Hannah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b543t-9c040bef29f47e6849ae6ffeea03faeef3240d74b71dffffd5e83b04b9ae30963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Database searching</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet/Web search services</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Online searching</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvermann, Brent W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Julian P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirychuk, Shelley P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Essen, Susanna G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanville, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Hannah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Systematic Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Connor, Annette M</au><au>Auvermann, Brent W</au><au>Higgins, Julian P T</au><au>Kirychuk, Shelley P</au><au>Sargeant, Jan M</au><au>Von Essen, Susanna G</au><au>Glanville, Julie M</au><au>Wood, Hannah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Systematic Reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2014-09-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>99-99</pages><artnum>99</artnum><issn>2046-4053</issn><eissn>2046-4053</eissn><abstract>Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions.We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. PROSPERO CRD42014010521.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25200608</pmid><doi>10.1186/2046-4053-3-99</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-4053
ispartof Systematic Reviews, 2014-09, Vol.3 (1), p.99-99, Article 99
issn 2046-4053
2046-4053
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4160559
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Animal Feed
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
Antimicrobial agents
Database searching
Drug resistance
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Environmental Exposure - adverse effects
Gastrointestinal diseases
Health aspects
Health Status
Humans
Internet/Web search services
Livestock
Mental Health
Online searching
Planning
Poultry
Protocol
Research Design
Residence Characteristics
Systematic review
title The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20between%20proximity%20to%20animal-feeding%20operations%20and%20community%20health:%20a%20protocol%20for%20updating%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20Reviews&rft.au=O'Connor,%20Annette%20M&rft.date=2014-09-08&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=99-99&rft.artnum=99&rft.issn=2046-4053&rft.eissn=2046-4053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2046-4053-3-99&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541255810%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956071755&rft_id=info:pmid/25200608&rft_galeid=A541255810&rfr_iscdi=true