Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample

The present study examined the structural validity of the 25-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a large sample of U.S. veterans with military service since September 11, 2001. Participants (N = 1,981) completed the 25-item CD-RISC, a structured clinical interview and a self-report qu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.443-451
Hauptverfasser: Green, Kimberly T., Hayward, Laura C., Williams, Ann M., Dennis, Paul A., Bryan, Brandon C., Taber, Katherine H., Davidson, Jonathan R. T., Beckham, Jean C., Calhoun, Patrick S., Ingle, Sarah J., Miller-Mumford, Marinell, McDonald, Scott D., Pickett, Treven C., Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E., Brancu, Mira, Morey, Rajendra A., Strauss, Jennifer J., Tupler, Larry A., Dennis, Michelle F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 4
container_start_page 443
container_title Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
container_volume 21
creator Green, Kimberly T.
Hayward, Laura C.
Williams, Ann M.
Dennis, Paul A.
Bryan, Brandon C.
Taber, Katherine H.
Davidson, Jonathan R. T.
Beckham, Jean C.
Calhoun, Patrick S.
Ingle, Sarah J.
Miller-Mumford, Marinell
McDonald, Scott D.
Pickett, Treven C.
Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E.
Brancu, Mira
Morey, Rajendra A.
Strauss, Jennifer J.
Tupler, Larry A.
Dennis, Michelle F.
description The present study examined the structural validity of the 25-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a large sample of U.S. veterans with military service since September 11, 2001. Participants (N = 1,981) completed the 25-item CD-RISC, a structured clinical interview and a self-report questionnaire assessing psychiatric symptoms. The study sample was randomly divided into two subsamples: an initial sample (Sample 1: n = 990) and a replication sample (Sample 2: n = 991). Findings derived from exploratory factor analysis (EFA) did not support the five-factor analytic structure as initially suggested in Connor and Davidson’s instrument validation study. Although parallel analyses indicated a two-factor structural model, we tested one to six factor solutions for best model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a two-factor model of resilience, composed of adaptability- (8 items) and self-efficacy-themed (6 items) items; however, only the adaptability-themed factor was found to be consistent with our view of resilience—a factor of protection against the development of psychopathology following trauma exposure. The adaptability-themed factor may be a useful measure of resilience for post-9/11 U.S. military veterans.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1073191114524014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4147024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1073191114524014</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1667957599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-536c6d192d07c47a25add6f86e429b9d398be8afecad65ba8326941b572ddc113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRSMEoqWwZ4W8LIu8ehLbiTdIKG2hUhGooWwtx5m8ukrsV9upYFP1H_hDvoSUVypAYuWR75k7o7lZ9hLoCqCqDoBWJUgAYLxgFNijbBc4L_KS1fLxUi9yfqfvZM9ivKQUuJD102ynYLwWVNLd7Oboq56ss25N0gWSY22SD6RNYTZpDkj88Ou_8c758OP2-6G-tn30jpxhtKNFZ5C0Ro9I9pvD_OykbV4T64gmn3xMuTwAIOerdkU-LHDS4Rv5ggmDdqTV02bE59mTQY8RX9y_e9n58dHn5n1--vHdSfP2NDesZCnnpTCiB1n0tDKs0gXXfS-GWiArZCf7UtYd1npAo3vBO12XhZAMOl4VfW8Ayr3szdZ3M3cT9gZdCnpUm2CnZSnltVV_K85eqLW_VgxYRQu2GOzfGwR_NWNMarLR4Dhqh36OCoSoJK-4lAtKt6gJPsaAw8MYoOouNvVvbEvLqz_Xe2j4ndMC5Fsg6jWqSz8Ht5zr_4Y_Acl-oAE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667957599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Green, Kimberly T. ; Hayward, Laura C. ; Williams, Ann M. ; Dennis, Paul A. ; Bryan, Brandon C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. ; Beckham, Jean C. ; Calhoun, Patrick S. ; Ingle, Sarah J. ; Miller-Mumford, Marinell ; McDonald, Scott D. ; Pickett, Treven C. ; Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E. ; Brancu, Mira ; Morey, Rajendra A. ; Strauss, Jennifer J. ; Tupler, Larry A. ; Dennis, Michelle F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Kimberly T. ; Hayward, Laura C. ; Williams, Ann M. ; Dennis, Paul A. ; Bryan, Brandon C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. ; Beckham, Jean C. ; Calhoun, Patrick S. ; Ingle, Sarah J. ; Miller-Mumford, Marinell ; McDonald, Scott D. ; Pickett, Treven C. ; Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E. ; Brancu, Mira ; Morey, Rajendra A. ; Strauss, Jennifer J. ; Tupler, Larry A. ; Dennis, Michelle F. ; Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup ; Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the structural validity of the 25-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a large sample of U.S. veterans with military service since September 11, 2001. Participants (N = 1,981) completed the 25-item CD-RISC, a structured clinical interview and a self-report questionnaire assessing psychiatric symptoms. The study sample was randomly divided into two subsamples: an initial sample (Sample 1: n = 990) and a replication sample (Sample 2: n = 991). Findings derived from exploratory factor analysis (EFA) did not support the five-factor analytic structure as initially suggested in Connor and Davidson’s instrument validation study. Although parallel analyses indicated a two-factor structural model, we tested one to six factor solutions for best model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a two-factor model of resilience, composed of adaptability- (8 items) and self-efficacy-themed (6 items) items; however, only the adaptability-themed factor was found to be consistent with our view of resilience—a factor of protection against the development of psychopathology following trauma exposure. The adaptability-themed factor may be a useful measure of resilience for post-9/11 U.S. military veterans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1073191114524014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24586090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resilience, Psychological ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terrorism ; United States ; Veterans - psychology</subject><ispartof>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.443-451</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-536c6d192d07c47a25add6f86e429b9d398be8afecad65ba8326941b572ddc113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-536c6d192d07c47a25add6f86e429b9d398be8afecad65ba8326941b572ddc113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1073191114524014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191114524014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Kimberly T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Brandon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taber, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jonathan R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckham, Jean C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingle, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Mumford, Marinell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Treven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancu, Mira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Rajendra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupler, Larry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Michelle F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample</title><title>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><description>The present study examined the structural validity of the 25-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a large sample of U.S. veterans with military service since September 11, 2001. Participants (N = 1,981) completed the 25-item CD-RISC, a structured clinical interview and a self-report questionnaire assessing psychiatric symptoms. The study sample was randomly divided into two subsamples: an initial sample (Sample 1: n = 990) and a replication sample (Sample 2: n = 991). Findings derived from exploratory factor analysis (EFA) did not support the five-factor analytic structure as initially suggested in Connor and Davidson’s instrument validation study. Although parallel analyses indicated a two-factor structural model, we tested one to six factor solutions for best model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a two-factor model of resilience, composed of adaptability- (8 items) and self-efficacy-themed (6 items) items; however, only the adaptability-themed factor was found to be consistent with our view of resilience—a factor of protection against the development of psychopathology following trauma exposure. The adaptability-themed factor may be a useful measure of resilience for post-9/11 U.S. military veterans.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resilience, Psychological</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Veterans - psychology</subject><issn>1073-1911</issn><issn>1552-3489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRSMEoqWwZ4W8LIu8ehLbiTdIKG2hUhGooWwtx5m8ukrsV9upYFP1H_hDvoSUVypAYuWR75k7o7lZ9hLoCqCqDoBWJUgAYLxgFNijbBc4L_KS1fLxUi9yfqfvZM9ivKQUuJD102ynYLwWVNLd7Oboq56ss25N0gWSY22SD6RNYTZpDkj88Ou_8c758OP2-6G-tn30jpxhtKNFZ5C0Ro9I9pvD_OykbV4T64gmn3xMuTwAIOerdkU-LHDS4Rv5ggmDdqTV02bE59mTQY8RX9y_e9n58dHn5n1--vHdSfP2NDesZCnnpTCiB1n0tDKs0gXXfS-GWiArZCf7UtYd1npAo3vBO12XhZAMOl4VfW8Ayr3szdZ3M3cT9gZdCnpUm2CnZSnltVV_K85eqLW_VgxYRQu2GOzfGwR_NWNMarLR4Dhqh36OCoSoJK-4lAtKt6gJPsaAw8MYoOouNvVvbEvLqz_Xe2j4ndMC5Fsg6jWqSz8Ht5zr_4Y_Acl-oAE</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Green, Kimberly T.</creator><creator>Hayward, Laura C.</creator><creator>Williams, Ann M.</creator><creator>Dennis, Paul A.</creator><creator>Bryan, Brandon C.</creator><creator>Taber, Katherine H.</creator><creator>Davidson, Jonathan R. T.</creator><creator>Beckham, Jean C.</creator><creator>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creator><creator>Ingle, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Miller-Mumford, Marinell</creator><creator>McDonald, Scott D.</creator><creator>Pickett, Treven C.</creator><creator>Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E.</creator><creator>Brancu, Mira</creator><creator>Morey, Rajendra A.</creator><creator>Strauss, Jennifer J.</creator><creator>Tupler, Larry A.</creator><creator>Dennis, Michelle F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample</title><author>Green, Kimberly T. ; Hayward, Laura C. ; Williams, Ann M. ; Dennis, Paul A. ; Bryan, Brandon C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Davidson, Jonathan R. T. ; Beckham, Jean C. ; Calhoun, Patrick S. ; Ingle, Sarah J. ; Miller-Mumford, Marinell ; McDonald, Scott D. ; Pickett, Treven C. ; Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E. ; Brancu, Mira ; Morey, Rajendra A. ; Strauss, Jennifer J. ; Tupler, Larry A. ; Dennis, Michelle F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-536c6d192d07c47a25add6f86e429b9d398be8afecad65ba8326941b572ddc113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resilience, Psychological</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Veterans - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Kimberly T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Brandon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taber, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jonathan R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckham, Jean C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingle, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Mumford, Marinell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Treven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancu, Mira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Rajendra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupler, Larry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Michelle F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Kimberly T.</au><au>Hayward, Laura C.</au><au>Williams, Ann M.</au><au>Dennis, Paul A.</au><au>Bryan, Brandon C.</au><au>Taber, Katherine H.</au><au>Davidson, Jonathan R. T.</au><au>Beckham, Jean C.</au><au>Calhoun, Patrick S.</au><au>Ingle, Sarah J.</au><au>Miller-Mumford, Marinell</au><au>McDonald, Scott D.</au><au>Pickett, Treven C.</au><au>Yoash-Gantz, Ruth E.</au><au>Brancu, Mira</au><au>Morey, Rajendra A.</au><au>Strauss, Jennifer J.</au><au>Tupler, Larry A.</au><au>Dennis, Michelle F.</au><aucorp>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</aucorp><aucorp>Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample</atitle><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>443-451</pages><issn>1073-1911</issn><eissn>1552-3489</eissn><abstract>The present study examined the structural validity of the 25-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a large sample of U.S. veterans with military service since September 11, 2001. Participants (N = 1,981) completed the 25-item CD-RISC, a structured clinical interview and a self-report questionnaire assessing psychiatric symptoms. The study sample was randomly divided into two subsamples: an initial sample (Sample 1: n = 990) and a replication sample (Sample 2: n = 991). Findings derived from exploratory factor analysis (EFA) did not support the five-factor analytic structure as initially suggested in Connor and Davidson’s instrument validation study. Although parallel analyses indicated a two-factor structural model, we tested one to six factor solutions for best model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a two-factor model of resilience, composed of adaptability- (8 items) and self-efficacy-themed (6 items) items; however, only the adaptability-themed factor was found to be consistent with our view of resilience—a factor of protection against the development of psychopathology following trauma exposure. The adaptability-themed factor may be a useful measure of resilience for post-9/11 U.S. military veterans.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24586090</pmid><doi>10.1177/1073191114524014</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-1911
ispartof Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.443-451
issn 1073-1911
1552-3489
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4147024
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Male
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Resilience, Psychological
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Terrorism
United States
Veterans - psychology
title Examining the Factor Structure of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Post-9/11 U.S. Military Veteran Sample
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A40%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20Factor%20Structure%20of%20the%20Connor%E2%80%93Davidson%20Resilience%20Scale%20(CD-RISC)%20in%20a%20Post-9/11%20U.S.%20Military%20Veteran%20Sample&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20(Odessa,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Green,%20Kimberly%20T.&rft.aucorp=Mid-Atlantic%20Mental%20Illness%20Research,%20Education%20and%20Clinical%20Center%20Workgroup&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=443-451&rft.issn=1073-1911&rft.eissn=1552-3489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1073191114524014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1667957599%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667957599&rft_id=info:pmid/24586090&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1073191114524014&rfr_iscdi=true