Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units
BACKGROUND:Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists. METHODS:The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2014-03, Vol.120 (3), p.650-664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 650 |
container_title | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Gershengorn, Hayley B Garland, Allan Kramer, Andrew Scales, Damon C Rubenfeld, Gordon Wunsch, Hannah |
description | BACKGROUND:Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists.
METHODS:The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted to ICU during 2001–2008 by using Project IMPACT to determine whether AC and CVC use is consistent across U.S. ICUs. The authors examined trends over time and patients more (mechanically ventilated or on vasopressors) or less (predicted risk of hospital mortality ≤2%) likely to receive either catheter.
RESULTS:Our cohort included 334,123 patients across 122 hospitals and 168 ICUs. Unadjusted AC usage rates remained constant (36.9% [2001] vs. 36.4% [2008]; P = 0.212), whereas CVC use increased (from 33.4% [2001] to 43.8% [2008]; P < 0.001 comparing 2001 and 2008); adjusted AC usage rates were constant from 2004 (35.2%) to 2008 (36.4%; P = 0.43 for trend). Surgical ICUs used both catheters most often (unadjusted rates, ACs56.0% of patients vs. 22.4% in medical and 32.6% in combined units, P < 0.001; CVCs46.9% vs. 32.5% and 36.4%, P < 0.001). There was a wide variability in AC use across ICUs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (median [interquartile range], 49.2% [29.9–72.3%]; adjusted median odds ratio [AMOR], 2.56), vasopressors (51.7% [30.8–76.2%]; AMOR, 2.64), and with predicted mortality of 2% or less (31.7% [19.5–49.3%]; AMOR, 1.94). There was less variability in CVC use (mechanical ventilation63.4% [54.9–72.9%], AMOR, 1.69; vasopressors71.4% (59.5–85.7%), AMOR, 1.93; predicted mortality of 2% or less18.7% (11.9–27.3%), AMOR, 1.90).
CONCLUSIONS:Both ACs and CVCs are common in ICU patients. There is more variation in use of ACs than CVCs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4145875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500691452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4834-dbedaa6de6a230755f1191df0a27647845c85f7f61904f3d9f4b59c1c0ac13873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EomngHyDkCxKXLf7c9V6QoqiUShEcIL1wsCbeMTFsvMV2WvHvMSS0FEuWPZ5nPjwvIS84O-Os794sVh_O2MNlHpEZ18I0nHf6MZnVJ9lIJsQJOc35WzU7Lc1TciKUEop1fEa-XEEKUMIU6eTpIhWs5kghDnSJsaR6v8I47TNdQtliddN1RhoiXcdQcKCfChTM9DIWjDncYOUS_nHmZ-SJhzHj8-M5J-t355-X75vVx4vL5WLVOGWkaoYNDgDtgC0IWTvUnvOeD56B6FrVGaWd0b7zLe-Z8nLovdro3nHHwHFpOjknbw95r_ebHQ7u0Le9TmEH6aedINiHnhi29ut0YxVX2tSRzMnrY4I0_dhjLnYXssNxhIj165Zrxtq-wqKi6oC6NOWc0N-V4cz-1sVWXez_utSwl_-2eBf0V4gKvDoCkB2MPkF0Id9zdVBKt-a-_u00VjHy93F_i8luEcayPdTVSjSCccVkNZq6hZK_ABphpTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500691452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gershengorn, Hayley B ; Garland, Allan ; Kramer, Andrew ; Scales, Damon C ; Rubenfeld, Gordon ; Wunsch, Hannah</creator><creatorcontrib>Gershengorn, Hayley B ; Garland, Allan ; Kramer, Andrew ; Scales, Damon C ; Rubenfeld, Gordon ; Wunsch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists.
METHODS:The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted to ICU during 2001–2008 by using Project IMPACT to determine whether AC and CVC use is consistent across U.S. ICUs. The authors examined trends over time and patients more (mechanically ventilated or on vasopressors) or less (predicted risk of hospital mortality ≤2%) likely to receive either catheter.
RESULTS:Our cohort included 334,123 patients across 122 hospitals and 168 ICUs. Unadjusted AC usage rates remained constant (36.9% [2001] vs. 36.4% [2008]; P = 0.212), whereas CVC use increased (from 33.4% [2001] to 43.8% [2008]; P < 0.001 comparing 2001 and 2008); adjusted AC usage rates were constant from 2004 (35.2%) to 2008 (36.4%; P = 0.43 for trend). Surgical ICUs used both catheters most often (unadjusted rates, ACs56.0% of patients vs. 22.4% in medical and 32.6% in combined units, P < 0.001; CVCs46.9% vs. 32.5% and 36.4%, P < 0.001). There was a wide variability in AC use across ICUs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (median [interquartile range], 49.2% [29.9–72.3%]; adjusted median odds ratio [AMOR], 2.56), vasopressors (51.7% [30.8–76.2%]; AMOR, 2.64), and with predicted mortality of 2% or less (31.7% [19.5–49.3%]; AMOR, 1.94). There was less variability in CVC use (mechanical ventilation63.4% [54.9–72.9%], AMOR, 1.69; vasopressors71.4% (59.5–85.7%), AMOR, 1.93; predicted mortality of 2% or less18.7% (11.9–27.3%), AMOR, 1.90).
CONCLUSIONS:Both ACs and CVCs are common in ICU patients. There is more variation in use of ACs than CVCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24424071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheterization, Central Venous - utilization ; Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Catheterization, Peripheral - utilization ; Catheters - utilization ; Central Venous Catheters - utilization ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data ; United States ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2014-03, Vol.120 (3), p.650-664</ispartof><rights>2014 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4834-dbedaa6de6a230755f1191df0a27647845c85f7f61904f3d9f4b59c1c0ac13873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4834-dbedaa6de6a230755f1191df0a27647845c85f7f61904f3d9f4b59c1c0ac13873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28344568$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24424071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gershengorn, Hayley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garland, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scales, Damon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenfeld, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunsch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><title>Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists.
METHODS:The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted to ICU during 2001–2008 by using Project IMPACT to determine whether AC and CVC use is consistent across U.S. ICUs. The authors examined trends over time and patients more (mechanically ventilated or on vasopressors) or less (predicted risk of hospital mortality ≤2%) likely to receive either catheter.
RESULTS:Our cohort included 334,123 patients across 122 hospitals and 168 ICUs. Unadjusted AC usage rates remained constant (36.9% [2001] vs. 36.4% [2008]; P = 0.212), whereas CVC use increased (from 33.4% [2001] to 43.8% [2008]; P < 0.001 comparing 2001 and 2008); adjusted AC usage rates were constant from 2004 (35.2%) to 2008 (36.4%; P = 0.43 for trend). Surgical ICUs used both catheters most often (unadjusted rates, ACs56.0% of patients vs. 22.4% in medical and 32.6% in combined units, P < 0.001; CVCs46.9% vs. 32.5% and 36.4%, P < 0.001). There was a wide variability in AC use across ICUs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (median [interquartile range], 49.2% [29.9–72.3%]; adjusted median odds ratio [AMOR], 2.56), vasopressors (51.7% [30.8–76.2%]; AMOR, 2.64), and with predicted mortality of 2% or less (31.7% [19.5–49.3%]; AMOR, 1.94). There was less variability in CVC use (mechanical ventilation63.4% [54.9–72.9%], AMOR, 1.69; vasopressors71.4% (59.5–85.7%), AMOR, 1.93; predicted mortality of 2% or less18.7% (11.9–27.3%), AMOR, 1.90).
CONCLUSIONS:Both ACs and CVCs are common in ICU patients. There is more variation in use of ACs than CVCs.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - utilization</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - utilization</subject><subject>Catheters - utilization</subject><subject>Central Venous Catheters - utilization</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EomngHyDkCxKXLf7c9V6QoqiUShEcIL1wsCbeMTFsvMV2WvHvMSS0FEuWPZ5nPjwvIS84O-Os794sVh_O2MNlHpEZ18I0nHf6MZnVJ9lIJsQJOc35WzU7Lc1TciKUEop1fEa-XEEKUMIU6eTpIhWs5kghDnSJsaR6v8I47TNdQtliddN1RhoiXcdQcKCfChTM9DIWjDncYOUS_nHmZ-SJhzHj8-M5J-t355-X75vVx4vL5WLVOGWkaoYNDgDtgC0IWTvUnvOeD56B6FrVGaWd0b7zLe-Z8nLovdro3nHHwHFpOjknbw95r_ebHQ7u0Le9TmEH6aedINiHnhi29ut0YxVX2tSRzMnrY4I0_dhjLnYXssNxhIj165Zrxtq-wqKi6oC6NOWc0N-V4cz-1sVWXez_utSwl_-2eBf0V4gKvDoCkB2MPkF0Id9zdVBKt-a-_u00VjHy93F_i8luEcayPdTVSjSCccVkNZq6hZK_ABphpTc</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Gershengorn, Hayley B</creator><creator>Garland, Allan</creator><creator>Kramer, Andrew</creator><creator>Scales, Damon C</creator><creator>Rubenfeld, Gordon</creator><creator>Wunsch, Hannah</creator><general>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units</title><author>Gershengorn, Hayley B ; Garland, Allan ; Kramer, Andrew ; Scales, Damon C ; Rubenfeld, Gordon ; Wunsch, Hannah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4834-dbedaa6de6a230755f1191df0a27647845c85f7f61904f3d9f4b59c1c0ac13873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - utilization</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - utilization</topic><topic>Catheters - utilization</topic><topic>Central Venous Catheters - utilization</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gershengorn, Hayley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garland, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scales, Damon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenfeld, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunsch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gershengorn, Hayley B</au><au>Garland, Allan</au><au>Kramer, Andrew</au><au>Scales, Damon C</au><au>Rubenfeld, Gordon</au><au>Wunsch, Hannah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>650</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>650-664</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists.
METHODS:The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted to ICU during 2001–2008 by using Project IMPACT to determine whether AC and CVC use is consistent across U.S. ICUs. The authors examined trends over time and patients more (mechanically ventilated or on vasopressors) or less (predicted risk of hospital mortality ≤2%) likely to receive either catheter.
RESULTS:Our cohort included 334,123 patients across 122 hospitals and 168 ICUs. Unadjusted AC usage rates remained constant (36.9% [2001] vs. 36.4% [2008]; P = 0.212), whereas CVC use increased (from 33.4% [2001] to 43.8% [2008]; P < 0.001 comparing 2001 and 2008); adjusted AC usage rates were constant from 2004 (35.2%) to 2008 (36.4%; P = 0.43 for trend). Surgical ICUs used both catheters most often (unadjusted rates, ACs56.0% of patients vs. 22.4% in medical and 32.6% in combined units, P < 0.001; CVCs46.9% vs. 32.5% and 36.4%, P < 0.001). There was a wide variability in AC use across ICUs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (median [interquartile range], 49.2% [29.9–72.3%]; adjusted median odds ratio [AMOR], 2.56), vasopressors (51.7% [30.8–76.2%]; AMOR, 2.64), and with predicted mortality of 2% or less (31.7% [19.5–49.3%]; AMOR, 1.94). There was less variability in CVC use (mechanical ventilation63.4% [54.9–72.9%], AMOR, 1.69; vasopressors71.4% (59.5–85.7%), AMOR, 1.93; predicted mortality of 2% or less18.7% (11.9–27.3%), AMOR, 1.90).
CONCLUSIONS:Both ACs and CVCs are common in ICU patients. There is more variation in use of ACs than CVCs.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</pub><pmid>24424071</pmid><doi>10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3022 |
ispartof | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2014-03, Vol.120 (3), p.650-664 |
issn | 0003-3022 1528-1175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4145875 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Catheterization, Central Venous - methods Catheterization, Central Venous - utilization Catheterization, Peripheral - methods Catheterization, Peripheral - utilization Catheters - utilization Central Venous Catheters - utilization Cohort Studies Female Humans Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Odds Ratio Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data United States Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use |
title | Variation of Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in United States Intensive Care Units |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A19%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20of%20Arterial%20and%20Central%20Venous%20Catheter%20Use%20in%20United%20States%20Intensive%20Care%20Units&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Gershengorn,%20Hayley%20B&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=650&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=650-664&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1500691452%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500691452&rft_id=info:pmid/24424071&rfr_iscdi=true |