Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons

Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go proce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-05, Vol.14 (5), p.16-16
Hauptverfasser: Qadri, Muhammad A J, Asen, Yael, Cook, Robert G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 5
container_start_page 16
container_title Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 14
creator Qadri, Muhammad A J
Asen, Yael
Cook, Robert G
description Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure to examine the contribution of different visual features in a discrimination of walking and running actions by different digital animal models. Two different tests with point-light displays derived from studies of human biological motion failed to support transfer of the learned action discrimination from fully figured models. Tests with silhouettes, contours, and the selective deletion or occlusion of different parts of the models indicated that information about the global motions of the entire model was critical to the discrimination. This outcome, along with earlier results, suggests that the pigeons’ discrimination of these locomotive actions involved a generalized categorization of the sequence of configural poses. Because the motor systems for locomotion and flying in pigeons share little in common with quadruped motions, the pigeons’ discrimination of these behaviors creates problems for motor theories of action recognition based on mirror neurons or related notions of embodied cognition. It suggests instead that more general motion and shape mechanisms are sufficient for making such discriminations, at least in birds.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/14.5.16
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4144877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1531955652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4a7e50a55937ac39d85f5793159b9d83f293c002c8a1873f48b9f65fd3ed25ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1LAzEUDKLYWsV_IHvTy9Zkk7fZXAQpfkHBi3oN2WxSI9ukbnaF_nujraWe3hveMG9mEDoneEpIya8Jm8KUlAdoTICynNOyONzbR-gkxg-MCwyYHKNRwSouqpKOEby5OKg208H3XWizYDPlM6V7F3zWuKg7t3Re_ULns5VbmODjKTqyqo3mbDsn6PX-7mX2mM-fH55mt_NcMwp9zhQ3gBWAoFxpKpoKLHBBCYg6AWoLQXVypStFKk4tq2phS7ANNU0BtaITdLPRXQ310jTaJJOqlatkSnVrGZST_y_evctF-JKMsBSRJ4GrrUAXPgcTe7lMmUzbKm_CEGVqiAiAEopEvdxQdRdi7IzdvSFY_pQsCZMgSZmYF_uudry_Vuk3uyp2sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1531955652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Qadri, Muhammad A J ; Asen, Yael ; Cook, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Qadri, Muhammad A J ; Asen, Yael ; Cook, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure to examine the contribution of different visual features in a discrimination of walking and running actions by different digital animal models. Two different tests with point-light displays derived from studies of human biological motion failed to support transfer of the learned action discrimination from fully figured models. Tests with silhouettes, contours, and the selective deletion or occlusion of different parts of the models indicated that information about the global motions of the entire model was critical to the discrimination. This outcome, along with earlier results, suggests that the pigeons’ discrimination of these locomotive actions involved a generalized categorization of the sequence of configural poses. Because the motor systems for locomotion and flying in pigeons share little in common with quadruped motions, the pigeons’ discrimination of these behaviors creates problems for motor theories of action recognition based on mirror neurons or related notions of embodied cognition. It suggests instead that more general motion and shape mechanisms are sufficient for making such discriminations, at least in birds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/14.5.16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24879863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Animals ; Columbidae - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Discrimination Learning - physiology ; Form Perception - physiology ; Male ; Motion Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-05, Vol.14 (5), p.16-16</ispartof><rights>2014 ARVO.</rights><rights>2014 ARVO 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4a7e50a55937ac39d85f5793159b9d83f293c002c8a1873f48b9f65fd3ed25ba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144877/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144877/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qadri, Muhammad A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asen, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure to examine the contribution of different visual features in a discrimination of walking and running actions by different digital animal models. Two different tests with point-light displays derived from studies of human biological motion failed to support transfer of the learned action discrimination from fully figured models. Tests with silhouettes, contours, and the selective deletion or occlusion of different parts of the models indicated that information about the global motions of the entire model was critical to the discrimination. This outcome, along with earlier results, suggests that the pigeons’ discrimination of these locomotive actions involved a generalized categorization of the sequence of configural poses. Because the motor systems for locomotion and flying in pigeons share little in common with quadruped motions, the pigeons’ discrimination of these behaviors creates problems for motor theories of action recognition based on mirror neurons or related notions of embodied cognition. It suggests instead that more general motion and shape mechanisms are sufficient for making such discriminations, at least in birds.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Columbidae - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Form Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUE1LAzEUDKLYWsV_IHvTy9Zkk7fZXAQpfkHBi3oN2WxSI9ukbnaF_nujraWe3hveMG9mEDoneEpIya8Jm8KUlAdoTICynNOyONzbR-gkxg-MCwyYHKNRwSouqpKOEby5OKg208H3XWizYDPlM6V7F3zWuKg7t3Re_ULns5VbmODjKTqyqo3mbDsn6PX-7mX2mM-fH55mt_NcMwp9zhQ3gBWAoFxpKpoKLHBBCYg6AWoLQXVypStFKk4tq2phS7ANNU0BtaITdLPRXQ310jTaJJOqlatkSnVrGZST_y_evctF-JKMsBSRJ4GrrUAXPgcTe7lMmUzbKm_CEGVqiAiAEopEvdxQdRdi7IzdvSFY_pQsCZMgSZmYF_uudry_Vuk3uyp2sA</recordid><startdate>20140530</startdate><enddate>20140530</enddate><creator>Qadri, Muhammad A J</creator><creator>Asen, Yael</creator><creator>Cook, Robert G</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140530</creationdate><title>Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons</title><author>Qadri, Muhammad A J ; Asen, Yael ; Cook, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4a7e50a55937ac39d85f5793159b9d83f293c002c8a1873f48b9f65fd3ed25ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Columbidae - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Form Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qadri, Muhammad A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asen, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qadri, Muhammad A J</au><au>Asen, Yael</au><au>Cook, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2014-05-30</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure to examine the contribution of different visual features in a discrimination of walking and running actions by different digital animal models. Two different tests with point-light displays derived from studies of human biological motion failed to support transfer of the learned action discrimination from fully figured models. Tests with silhouettes, contours, and the selective deletion or occlusion of different parts of the models indicated that information about the global motions of the entire model was critical to the discrimination. This outcome, along with earlier results, suggests that the pigeons’ discrimination of these locomotive actions involved a generalized categorization of the sequence of configural poses. Because the motor systems for locomotion and flying in pigeons share little in common with quadruped motions, the pigeons’ discrimination of these behaviors creates problems for motor theories of action recognition based on mirror neurons or related notions of embodied cognition. It suggests instead that more general motion and shape mechanisms are sufficient for making such discriminations, at least in birds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>24879863</pmid><doi>10.1167/14.5.16</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-7362
ispartof Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-05, Vol.14 (5), p.16-16
issn 1534-7362
1534-7362
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4144877
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Columbidae - physiology
Computer Simulation
Discrimination Learning - physiology
Form Perception - physiology
Male
Motion Perception - physiology
title Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20control%20of%20an%20action%20discrimination%20in%20pigeons&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Qadri,%20Muhammad%20A%20J&rft.date=2014-05-30&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/14.5.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1531955652%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1531955652&rft_id=info:pmid/24879863&rfr_iscdi=true