Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival
The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecology 2014-07, Vol.102 (4), p.845-856 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 856 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 845 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Comita, Liza S Queenborough, Simon A Murphy, Stephen J Eck, Jenalle L Xu, Kaiyang Krishnadas, Meghna Beckman, Noelle Zhu, Yan Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena |
description | The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in the strength of distance‐ and density‐dependent effects is hypothesized to explain variation in plant species richness along climatic gradients, with effects predicted to be stronger in the tropics than the temperate zone and in wetter habitats compared to drier habitats. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify peer‐reviewed experimental studies published in the 40+ years since the hypothesis was first proposed. Using data from these studies, we conducted a meta‐analysis to assess the current weight of evidence for the distance and density predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis. Overall, we found significant support for both the distance‐ and density‐dependent predictions. For all studies combined, survival rates were significantly reduced near conspecifics compared to far from conspecifics, and in areas with high densities of conspecifics compared to areas with low conspecific densities. There was no indication that these results were due to publication bias. The strength of distance and density effects varied widely among studies. Contrary to expectations, this variation was unrelated to latitude, and there was no significant effect of study region. However, we did find a trend for stronger distance and density dependence in wetter sites compared to sites with lower annual precipitation. In addition, effects were significantly stronger at the seedling stage compared to the seed stage. Synthesis. Our study provides support for the idea that distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality occurs in plant communities world‐wide. Available evidence suggests that natural enemies are frequently the cause of such patterns, consistent with the Janzen–Connell hypothesis, but additional studies are needed to rule out other mechanisms (e.g. intraspecific competition). With the widespread existence of density and distance dependence clearly established, future research should focus on assessing the degree to which these effects permit species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of diversity in plant communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2745.12232 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4140603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24541541</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24541541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f5592-ac42cd25dce219b00a63ddd842317b50264b7c9c8b9f9609f204f36fbcf533bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1DAUjRCIDoU1K8ASGzZTrp9JWCChUXlUlVjQri0ntmc8ytghTgbCqp-AxDfwY_0SnJkyPDb1xr4-5557r32y7DGGE5zWS0wFn5Oc8RNMCCV3stnh5m42AyBkDizPj7IHMa4BQOQc7mdHhBNOSyhm2c8LE3vnl6jtjHZ174KPKFjUrww6U_6b8ddXPxbBe9M0aDW2IQHRxVdIoY3p1fXVd-VVM6arKct8bU3nNsb3qkFm67TxtUE2dEi72KsUpASkvEYJia4fU6hNa3wKexSN0TtwOjRTU3Hotm6rmofZPauaaB7d7MfZ5dvTi8X7-fnHdx8Wb87nlvOSzFXNSK0J17UhuKwAlKBa64IRivOKAxGsyuuyLqrSlgJKS4BZKmxVW05pZelx9nqv2w7VxiQZ33eqkW2aSXWjDMrJfxHvVnIZtpJhBgJoEnhxI9CFz0N6WrlxsU5vp7wJQ5S4IEIAh1LcThWCci6KgtxO5YwBZoxNDTz_j7oOQ5e-aMcikzGKIrGe_j3nYcDfvkgEvid8cY0ZDzgGOdlOTiaTk5bc2U6enS52h5T3ZJ-3jn3o_ugyzlJ5nPBne9yqINWyc1FefiKpdwDMU3GgvwA8VuML</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542274588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Comita, Liza S ; Queenborough, Simon A ; Murphy, Stephen J ; Eck, Jenalle L ; Xu, Kaiyang ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Beckman, Noelle ; Zhu, Yan ; Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</creator><creatorcontrib>Comita, Liza S ; Queenborough, Simon A ; Murphy, Stephen J ; Eck, Jenalle L ; Xu, Kaiyang ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Beckman, Noelle ; Zhu, Yan ; Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</creatorcontrib><description>The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in the strength of distance‐ and density‐dependent effects is hypothesized to explain variation in plant species richness along climatic gradients, with effects predicted to be stronger in the tropics than the temperate zone and in wetter habitats compared to drier habitats. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify peer‐reviewed experimental studies published in the 40+ years since the hypothesis was first proposed. Using data from these studies, we conducted a meta‐analysis to assess the current weight of evidence for the distance and density predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis. Overall, we found significant support for both the distance‐ and density‐dependent predictions. For all studies combined, survival rates were significantly reduced near conspecifics compared to far from conspecifics, and in areas with high densities of conspecifics compared to areas with low conspecific densities. There was no indication that these results were due to publication bias. The strength of distance and density effects varied widely among studies. Contrary to expectations, this variation was unrelated to latitude, and there was no significant effect of study region. However, we did find a trend for stronger distance and density dependence in wetter sites compared to sites with lower annual precipitation. In addition, effects were significantly stronger at the seedling stage compared to the seed stage. Synthesis. Our study provides support for the idea that distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality occurs in plant communities world‐wide. Available evidence suggests that natural enemies are frequently the cause of such patterns, consistent with the Janzen–Connell hypothesis, but additional studies are needed to rule out other mechanisms (e.g. intraspecific competition). With the widespread existence of density and distance dependence clearly established, future research should focus on assessing the degree to which these effects permit species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of diversity in plant communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25253908</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>adults ; atmospheric precipitation ; Biodiversity ; determinants of plant community diversity and structure ; Forest ecology ; Habitats ; herbivores ; herbivory ; Human ecology ; intraspecific competition ; latitude ; maintenance of diversity ; Meta-analysis ; Natural enemies ; pathogens ; plant communities ; Plant ecology ; plant population and community dynamics ; Plant reproduction ; prediction ; review ; seed predation ; Seedlings ; Seeds ; Special Feature – Standard Paper ; species coexistence ; Species diversity ; Survival analysis ; survival rate ; Synecology ; temperate zones ; tropical forest ; Tropical forests ; Tropical regions ; tropics ; weight-of-evidence</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2014-07, Vol.102 (4), p.845-856</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jul 2014</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24541541$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24541541$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comita, Liza S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queenborough, Simon A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eck, Jenalle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnadas, Meghna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckman, Noelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</creatorcontrib><title>Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><addtitle>J Ecol</addtitle><description>The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in the strength of distance‐ and density‐dependent effects is hypothesized to explain variation in plant species richness along climatic gradients, with effects predicted to be stronger in the tropics than the temperate zone and in wetter habitats compared to drier habitats. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify peer‐reviewed experimental studies published in the 40+ years since the hypothesis was first proposed. Using data from these studies, we conducted a meta‐analysis to assess the current weight of evidence for the distance and density predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis. Overall, we found significant support for both the distance‐ and density‐dependent predictions. For all studies combined, survival rates were significantly reduced near conspecifics compared to far from conspecifics, and in areas with high densities of conspecifics compared to areas with low conspecific densities. There was no indication that these results were due to publication bias. The strength of distance and density effects varied widely among studies. Contrary to expectations, this variation was unrelated to latitude, and there was no significant effect of study region. However, we did find a trend for stronger distance and density dependence in wetter sites compared to sites with lower annual precipitation. In addition, effects were significantly stronger at the seedling stage compared to the seed stage. Synthesis. Our study provides support for the idea that distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality occurs in plant communities world‐wide. Available evidence suggests that natural enemies are frequently the cause of such patterns, consistent with the Janzen–Connell hypothesis, but additional studies are needed to rule out other mechanisms (e.g. intraspecific competition). With the widespread existence of density and distance dependence clearly established, future research should focus on assessing the degree to which these effects permit species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of diversity in plant communities.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>atmospheric precipitation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>determinants of plant community diversity and structure</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>herbivores</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>intraspecific competition</subject><subject>latitude</subject><subject>maintenance of diversity</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>pathogens</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>plant population and community dynamics</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>seed predation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Special Feature – Standard Paper</subject><subject>species coexistence</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>tropical forest</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Tropical regions</subject><subject>tropics</subject><subject>weight-of-evidence</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUstu1DAUjRCIDoU1K8ASGzZTrp9JWCChUXlUlVjQri0ntmc8ytghTgbCqp-AxDfwY_0SnJkyPDb1xr4-5557r32y7DGGE5zWS0wFn5Oc8RNMCCV3stnh5m42AyBkDizPj7IHMa4BQOQc7mdHhBNOSyhm2c8LE3vnl6jtjHZ174KPKFjUrww6U_6b8ddXPxbBe9M0aDW2IQHRxVdIoY3p1fXVd-VVM6arKct8bU3nNsb3qkFm67TxtUE2dEi72KsUpASkvEYJia4fU6hNa3wKexSN0TtwOjRTU3Hotm6rmofZPauaaB7d7MfZ5dvTi8X7-fnHdx8Wb87nlvOSzFXNSK0J17UhuKwAlKBa64IRivOKAxGsyuuyLqrSlgJKS4BZKmxVW05pZelx9nqv2w7VxiQZ33eqkW2aSXWjDMrJfxHvVnIZtpJhBgJoEnhxI9CFz0N6WrlxsU5vp7wJQ5S4IEIAh1LcThWCci6KgtxO5YwBZoxNDTz_j7oOQ5e-aMcikzGKIrGe_j3nYcDfvkgEvid8cY0ZDzgGOdlOTiaTk5bc2U6enS52h5T3ZJ-3jn3o_ugyzlJ5nPBne9yqINWyc1FefiKpdwDMU3GgvwA8VuML</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Comita, Liza S</creator><creator>Queenborough, Simon A</creator><creator>Murphy, Stephen J</creator><creator>Eck, Jenalle L</creator><creator>Xu, Kaiyang</creator><creator>Krishnadas, Meghna</creator><creator>Beckman, Noelle</creator><creator>Zhu, Yan</creator><creator>Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival</title><author>Comita, Liza S ; Queenborough, Simon A ; Murphy, Stephen J ; Eck, Jenalle L ; Xu, Kaiyang ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Beckman, Noelle ; Zhu, Yan ; Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f5592-ac42cd25dce219b00a63ddd842317b50264b7c9c8b9f9609f204f36fbcf533bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>atmospheric precipitation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>determinants of plant community diversity and structure</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>herbivores</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>intraspecific competition</topic><topic>latitude</topic><topic>maintenance of diversity</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>pathogens</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>plant population and community dynamics</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>seed predation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Special Feature – Standard Paper</topic><topic>species coexistence</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>tropical forest</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Tropical regions</topic><topic>tropics</topic><topic>weight-of-evidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comita, Liza S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queenborough, Simon A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eck, Jenalle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnadas, Meghna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckman, Noelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comita, Liza S</au><au>Queenborough, Simon A</au><au>Murphy, Stephen J</au><au>Eck, Jenalle L</au><au>Xu, Kaiyang</au><au>Krishnadas, Meghna</au><au>Beckman, Noelle</au><au>Zhu, Yan</au><au>Gómez‐Aparicio, Lorena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Ecol</addtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>856</epage><pages>845-856</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant communities by reducing survival rates of conspecific seeds and seedlings located close to reproductive adults or in areas of high conspecific density. Variation in the strength of distance‐ and density‐dependent effects is hypothesized to explain variation in plant species richness along climatic gradients, with effects predicted to be stronger in the tropics than the temperate zone and in wetter habitats compared to drier habitats. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify peer‐reviewed experimental studies published in the 40+ years since the hypothesis was first proposed. Using data from these studies, we conducted a meta‐analysis to assess the current weight of evidence for the distance and density predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis. Overall, we found significant support for both the distance‐ and density‐dependent predictions. For all studies combined, survival rates were significantly reduced near conspecifics compared to far from conspecifics, and in areas with high densities of conspecifics compared to areas with low conspecific densities. There was no indication that these results were due to publication bias. The strength of distance and density effects varied widely among studies. Contrary to expectations, this variation was unrelated to latitude, and there was no significant effect of study region. However, we did find a trend for stronger distance and density dependence in wetter sites compared to sites with lower annual precipitation. In addition, effects were significantly stronger at the seedling stage compared to the seed stage. Synthesis. Our study provides support for the idea that distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality occurs in plant communities world‐wide. Available evidence suggests that natural enemies are frequently the cause of such patterns, consistent with the Janzen–Connell hypothesis, but additional studies are needed to rule out other mechanisms (e.g. intraspecific competition). With the widespread existence of density and distance dependence clearly established, future research should focus on assessing the degree to which these effects permit species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of diversity in plant communities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25253908</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.12232</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2014-07, Vol.102 (4), p.845-856 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4140603 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | adults atmospheric precipitation Biodiversity determinants of plant community diversity and structure Forest ecology Habitats herbivores herbivory Human ecology intraspecific competition latitude maintenance of diversity Meta-analysis Natural enemies pathogens plant communities Plant ecology plant population and community dynamics Plant reproduction prediction review seed predation Seedlings Seeds Special Feature – Standard Paper species coexistence Species diversity Survival analysis survival rate Synecology temperate zones tropical forest Tropical forests Tropical regions tropics weight-of-evidence |
title | Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta‐analysis of experimental evidence for distance‐ and density‐dependent seed and seedling survival |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20predictions%20of%20the%20Janzen%E2%80%93Connell%20hypothesis:%20a%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20experimental%20evidence%20for%20distance%E2%80%90%20and%20density%E2%80%90dependent%20seed%20and%20seedling%20survival&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Comita,%20Liza%20S&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=856&rft.pages=845-856&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12232&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E24541541%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542274588&rft_id=info:pmid/25253908&rft_jstor_id=24541541&rfr_iscdi=true |