MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures

Introduction Increasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or ‘multimorbidity’, is associated wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2014-01, Vol.4 (8), p.e005493-e005493
Hauptverfasser: Daker-White, Gavin, Hays, Rebecca, Esmail, Aneez, Minor, Brian, Barlow, Wendy, Brown, Benjamin, Blakeman, Thomas, Bower, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e005493
container_issue 8
container_start_page e005493
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 4
creator Daker-White, Gavin
Hays, Rebecca
Esmail, Aneez
Minor, Brian
Barlow, Wendy
Brown, Benjamin
Blakeman, Thomas
Bower, Peter
description Introduction Increasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or ‘multimorbidity’, is associated with a range of adverse consequences and poor outcomes and could put patients at increased risk of safety failures. Traditionally, most research into patient safety failures has explored hospital or inpatient settings. Much less is known about patient safety failures in primary care. Our core aims are to understand the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures, to explore the different ways in which patients and services respond (or fail to respond), and to identify opportunities for intervention. Methods and analysis We plan to undertake an applied ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. Patients’ interactions and environments, relevant to their healthcare, will be studied through observations, diary methods and semistructured interviews. A framework, based on previous studies, will be used to organise the collection and analysis of field notes, observations and other qualitative data. This framework includes the domains: access breakdowns, communication breakdowns, continuity of care errors, relationship breakdowns and technical errors. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was received from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee for Wales. An individual case study approach is likely to be most fruitful for exploring the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures. A longitudinal and multiperspective approach will allow for the constant comparison of patient, carer and healthcare worker expectations and experiences related to the provision, integration and management of complex care. This data will be used to explore ways of engaging patients and carers more in their own care using shared decision-making, patient empowerment or other relevant models.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4139641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4039111491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-f3446242609226a806e3fb95298fee5c96d7ea2ea37aa6fed01192354f2d637d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUl1rFDEUHUSxZe0vECTgSwWn5nt2fCiUonWhiz644FvIzNy0KbOTNcls2b_pL_JOdy3VJ-chk8s95-Qk9xTFa0bPGBP6Q7O-CxsYSk6ZLClVshbPimNOpSw1Ver5k_1RcZLSHcVPqlop_rI44oqJ-ZxWx8Wv5cUPv_bJDzdkMWxDv4U1DJn4gSxXffbLEBvf-bwjp4hcLFfLd1NvE_3axh1pbYSPWIUc2tATFyKxAwlNgri12YcByw4JGWsP9yTlsduR4MgGu3hOek-uvqUHUMi3EB8EJ72t7yAmkgPBzZC925F7u0sTNUI3tpPfgwZJ1gEadNb3Y4T0qnjhbJ_g5PCfFavPn75ffimvv14tLi-uy0ZWPJdOSKm55JrWnGs7pxqEa2rF67kDUG2tuwosBysqa7WDjjJWc6Gk450WVSdmxfledzM2a-hatBJtbw5PY4L15u_O4G_NTdgayUStcZkVpweBGH6OkLLBQbTQ93aAMCbDFE5LVjg4hL79B3oXxjjg9Qyr5uhZVUwjSuxRbQwpRXCPZhg1U2zMITZmio3ZxwZZb57e45HzJyQIONsDkP1fir8BlfHTEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785295716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Daker-White, Gavin ; Hays, Rebecca ; Esmail, Aneez ; Minor, Brian ; Barlow, Wendy ; Brown, Benjamin ; Blakeman, Thomas ; Bower, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Daker-White, Gavin ; Hays, Rebecca ; Esmail, Aneez ; Minor, Brian ; Barlow, Wendy ; Brown, Benjamin ; Blakeman, Thomas ; Bower, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Increasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or ‘multimorbidity’, is associated with a range of adverse consequences and poor outcomes and could put patients at increased risk of safety failures. Traditionally, most research into patient safety failures has explored hospital or inpatient settings. Much less is known about patient safety failures in primary care. Our core aims are to understand the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures, to explore the different ways in which patients and services respond (or fail to respond), and to identify opportunities for intervention. Methods and analysis We plan to undertake an applied ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. Patients’ interactions and environments, relevant to their healthcare, will be studied through observations, diary methods and semistructured interviews. A framework, based on previous studies, will be used to organise the collection and analysis of field notes, observations and other qualitative data. This framework includes the domains: access breakdowns, communication breakdowns, continuity of care errors, relationship breakdowns and technical errors. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was received from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee for Wales. An individual case study approach is likely to be most fruitful for exploring the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures. A longitudinal and multiperspective approach will allow for the constant comparison of patient, carer and healthcare worker expectations and experiences related to the provision, integration and management of complex care. This data will be used to explore ways of engaging patients and carers more in their own care using shared decision-making, patient empowerment or other relevant models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25138807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Ambulatory care ; Communication ; Comorbidity ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Drug stores ; Ethnography ; General practice / Family practice ; Health Services Accessibility ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medical Errors ; Patient Safety ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Polypharmacy ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Quality Improvement ; Safety research ; Taxonomy ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2014-01, Vol.4 (8), p.e005493-e005493</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-f3446242609226a806e3fb95298fee5c96d7ea2ea37aa6fed01192354f2d637d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-f3446242609226a806e3fb95298fee5c96d7ea2ea37aa6fed01192354f2d637d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/8/e005493.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/8/e005493.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27530,27531,27905,27906,53772,53774,77350,77381</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daker-White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmail, Aneez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blakeman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>Introduction Increasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or ‘multimorbidity’, is associated with a range of adverse consequences and poor outcomes and could put patients at increased risk of safety failures. Traditionally, most research into patient safety failures has explored hospital or inpatient settings. Much less is known about patient safety failures in primary care. Our core aims are to understand the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures, to explore the different ways in which patients and services respond (or fail to respond), and to identify opportunities for intervention. Methods and analysis We plan to undertake an applied ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. Patients’ interactions and environments, relevant to their healthcare, will be studied through observations, diary methods and semistructured interviews. A framework, based on previous studies, will be used to organise the collection and analysis of field notes, observations and other qualitative data. This framework includes the domains: access breakdowns, communication breakdowns, continuity of care errors, relationship breakdowns and technical errors. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was received from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee for Wales. An individual case study approach is likely to be most fruitful for exploring the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures. A longitudinal and multiperspective approach will allow for the constant comparison of patient, carer and healthcare worker expectations and experiences related to the provision, integration and management of complex care. This data will be used to explore ways of engaging patients and carers more in their own care using shared decision-making, patient empowerment or other relevant models.</description><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>General practice / Family practice</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Errors</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Safety research</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUl1rFDEUHUSxZe0vECTgSwWn5nt2fCiUonWhiz644FvIzNy0KbOTNcls2b_pL_JOdy3VJ-chk8s95-Qk9xTFa0bPGBP6Q7O-CxsYSk6ZLClVshbPimNOpSw1Ver5k_1RcZLSHcVPqlop_rI44oqJ-ZxWx8Wv5cUPv_bJDzdkMWxDv4U1DJn4gSxXffbLEBvf-bwjp4hcLFfLd1NvE_3axh1pbYSPWIUc2tATFyKxAwlNgri12YcByw4JGWsP9yTlsduR4MgGu3hOek-uvqUHUMi3EB8EJ72t7yAmkgPBzZC925F7u0sTNUI3tpPfgwZJ1gEadNb3Y4T0qnjhbJ_g5PCfFavPn75ffimvv14tLi-uy0ZWPJdOSKm55JrWnGs7pxqEa2rF67kDUG2tuwosBysqa7WDjjJWc6Gk450WVSdmxfledzM2a-hatBJtbw5PY4L15u_O4G_NTdgayUStcZkVpweBGH6OkLLBQbTQ93aAMCbDFE5LVjg4hL79B3oXxjjg9Qyr5uhZVUwjSuxRbQwpRXCPZhg1U2zMITZmio3ZxwZZb57e45HzJyQIONsDkP1fir8BlfHTEw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Daker-White, Gavin</creator><creator>Hays, Rebecca</creator><creator>Esmail, Aneez</creator><creator>Minor, Brian</creator><creator>Barlow, Wendy</creator><creator>Brown, Benjamin</creator><creator>Blakeman, Thomas</creator><creator>Bower, Peter</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures</title><author>Daker-White, Gavin ; Hays, Rebecca ; Esmail, Aneez ; Minor, Brian ; Barlow, Wendy ; Brown, Benjamin ; Blakeman, Thomas ; Bower, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-f3446242609226a806e3fb95298fee5c96d7ea2ea37aa6fed01192354f2d637d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>General practice / Family practice</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Errors</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Safety research</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daker-White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmail, Aneez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blakeman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daker-White, Gavin</au><au>Hays, Rebecca</au><au>Esmail, Aneez</au><au>Minor, Brian</au><au>Barlow, Wendy</au><au>Brown, Benjamin</au><au>Blakeman, Thomas</au><au>Bower, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e005493</spage><epage>e005493</epage><pages>e005493-e005493</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>Introduction Increasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or ‘multimorbidity’, is associated with a range of adverse consequences and poor outcomes and could put patients at increased risk of safety failures. Traditionally, most research into patient safety failures has explored hospital or inpatient settings. Much less is known about patient safety failures in primary care. Our core aims are to understand the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures, to explore the different ways in which patients and services respond (or fail to respond), and to identify opportunities for intervention. Methods and analysis We plan to undertake an applied ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. Patients’ interactions and environments, relevant to their healthcare, will be studied through observations, diary methods and semistructured interviews. A framework, based on previous studies, will be used to organise the collection and analysis of field notes, observations and other qualitative data. This framework includes the domains: access breakdowns, communication breakdowns, continuity of care errors, relationship breakdowns and technical errors. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was received from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee for Wales. An individual case study approach is likely to be most fruitful for exploring the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures. A longitudinal and multiperspective approach will allow for the constant comparison of patient, carer and healthcare worker expectations and experiences related to the provision, integration and management of complex care. This data will be used to explore ways of engaging patients and carers more in their own care using shared decision-making, patient empowerment or other relevant models.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>25138807</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005493</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2014-01, Vol.4 (8), p.e005493-e005493
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4139641
source BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ambulatory care
Communication
Comorbidity
Continuity of Patient Care
Drug stores
Ethnography
General practice / Family practice
Health Services Accessibility
Hospitals
Humans
Medical Errors
Patient Safety
Physician-Patient Relations
Polypharmacy
Primary care
Primary Health Care - methods
Quality Improvement
Safety research
Taxonomy
United Kingdom
title MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MAXimising%20Involvement%20in%20MUltiMorbidity%20(MAXIMUM)%20in%20primary%20care:%20protocol%20for%20an%20observation%20and%20interview%20study%20of%20patients,%20GPs%20and%20other%20care%20providers%20to%20identify%20ways%20of%20reducing%20patient%20safety%20failures&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Daker-White,%20Gavin&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e005493&rft.epage=e005493&rft.pages=e005493-e005493&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4039111491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785295716&rft_id=info:pmid/25138807&rfr_iscdi=true