Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces

Digital technologies have opened new opportunities for psychological testing, allowing new computerized testing tools to be developed and/or paper and pencil testing tools to be translated to new computerized devices. The question that rises is whether these implementations may introduce some techno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Battista, Petronilla, Canini, Matteo, Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony, Catricalà, Eleonora, Salvatore, Christian, Gilardi, Maria Carla, Castiglioni, Isabella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 2014
container_start_page 1
container_title Computational and mathematical methods in medicine
container_volume 2014
creator Battista, Petronilla
Canini, Matteo
Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony
Catricalà, Eleonora
Salvatore, Christian
Gilardi, Maria Carla
Castiglioni, Isabella
description Digital technologies have opened new opportunities for psychological testing, allowing new computerized testing tools to be developed and/or paper and pencil testing tools to be translated to new computerized devices. The question that rises is whether these implementations may introduce some technology-specific effects to be considered in neuropsychological evaluations. Two core aspects have been investigated in this work: the efficacy of tests and the clinical ecology of their administration (the ability to measure real-world test performance), specifically (1) the testing efficacy of a computerized test when response to stimuli is measured using a touch-screen compared to a conventional mouse-control response device; (2) the testing efficacy of a computerized test with respect to different input modalities (visual versus verbal); and (3) the ecology of two computerized assessment modalities (touch-screen and mouse-control), including preference measurements of participants. Our results suggest that (1) touch-screen devices are suitable for administering experimental tasks requiring precise timings for detection, (2) intrinsic nature of neuropsychological tests should always be respected in terms of stimuli presentation when translated to new digitalized environment, and (3) touch-screen devices result in ecological instruments being proposed for the computerized administration of neuropsychological tests with a high level of preference from elderly people.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2014/804723
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4131509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1555628692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c5cbccf56065b330db855fb8325ef905890366bff2b82f5568c0890cf972da203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxa2Kqi2lp55BPlagpf7IJA4HpNV2aStVcCkSN8tx7F2jxN7am6Llr69D2hWcOHnk-b03Yz-Ezin5SCnAJSO0uBSkqBg_QCe0KsSsrKh4ta_Jj2P0OqWfhACtgB6hYwa0qKASJygtQr8Ztia636bFX80Qwybt9Dp0YeW06vA8JZNSb_wWO4_nK-dX-BO-N2k7VktrM6V3WPkWLzrn_2iWepTvcLD4yllr4qi-9XmKVdqkN-jQqi6Zs-fzFH3_srxf3Mzuvl3fLuZ3M11wsZ1p0I3WFkpSQsM5aRsBYBvBGRhbExA14WXZWMsawSxAKTTJd9rWFWsVI_wUfZ58N0PTm1bnLaLq5Ca6XsWdDMrJfzvereUqPMqCcgqkzgYXzwYxPAz5ybJ3SZuuU96EIcn8-1AyUdYsox8mVMeQUjR2P4YSOcYkx5jkFFOm3_292Z59ySUD7ydg7Xyrfrn_uL2dYJMRY9UeLuq6oIQ_Ab6kpfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555628692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Battista, Petronilla ; Canini, Matteo ; Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony ; Catricalà, Eleonora ; Salvatore, Christian ; Gilardi, Maria Carla ; Castiglioni, Isabella</creator><contributor>Babiloni, Fabio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Battista, Petronilla ; Canini, Matteo ; Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony ; Catricalà, Eleonora ; Salvatore, Christian ; Gilardi, Maria Carla ; Castiglioni, Isabella ; Babiloni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>Digital technologies have opened new opportunities for psychological testing, allowing new computerized testing tools to be developed and/or paper and pencil testing tools to be translated to new computerized devices. The question that rises is whether these implementations may introduce some technology-specific effects to be considered in neuropsychological evaluations. Two core aspects have been investigated in this work: the efficacy of tests and the clinical ecology of their administration (the ability to measure real-world test performance), specifically (1) the testing efficacy of a computerized test when response to stimuli is measured using a touch-screen compared to a conventional mouse-control response device; (2) the testing efficacy of a computerized test with respect to different input modalities (visual versus verbal); and (3) the ecology of two computerized assessment modalities (touch-screen and mouse-control), including preference measurements of participants. Our results suggest that (1) touch-screen devices are suitable for administering experimental tasks requiring precise timings for detection, (2) intrinsic nature of neuropsychological tests should always be respected in terms of stimuli presentation when translated to new digitalized environment, and (3) touch-screen devices result in ecological instruments being proposed for the computerized administration of neuropsychological tests with a high level of preference from elderly people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-670X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-6718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2014/804723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25147578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Software ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Matteo Canini et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Matteo Canini et al. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c5cbccf56065b330db855fb8325ef905890366bff2b82f5568c0890cf972da203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c5cbccf56065b330db855fb8325ef905890366bff2b82f5568c0890cf972da203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9601-1534 ; 0000-0001-9312-4675 ; 0000-0002-3120-1214 ; 0000-0002-7392-471X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131509/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131509/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25147578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Babiloni, Fabio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Battista, Petronilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catricalà, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvatore, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, Maria Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglioni, Isabella</creatorcontrib><title>Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces</title><title>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Math Methods Med</addtitle><description>Digital technologies have opened new opportunities for psychological testing, allowing new computerized testing tools to be developed and/or paper and pencil testing tools to be translated to new computerized devices. The question that rises is whether these implementations may introduce some technology-specific effects to be considered in neuropsychological evaluations. Two core aspects have been investigated in this work: the efficacy of tests and the clinical ecology of their administration (the ability to measure real-world test performance), specifically (1) the testing efficacy of a computerized test when response to stimuli is measured using a touch-screen compared to a conventional mouse-control response device; (2) the testing efficacy of a computerized test with respect to different input modalities (visual versus verbal); and (3) the ecology of two computerized assessment modalities (touch-screen and mouse-control), including preference measurements of participants. Our results suggest that (1) touch-screen devices are suitable for administering experimental tasks requiring precise timings for detection, (2) intrinsic nature of neuropsychological tests should always be respected in terms of stimuli presentation when translated to new digitalized environment, and (3) touch-screen devices result in ecological instruments being proposed for the computerized administration of neuropsychological tests with a high level of preference from elderly people.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>1748-670X</issn><issn>1748-6718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxa2Kqi2lp55BPlagpf7IJA4HpNV2aStVcCkSN8tx7F2jxN7am6Llr69D2hWcOHnk-b03Yz-Ezin5SCnAJSO0uBSkqBg_QCe0KsSsrKh4ta_Jj2P0OqWfhACtgB6hYwa0qKASJygtQr8Ztia636bFX80Qwybt9Dp0YeW06vA8JZNSb_wWO4_nK-dX-BO-N2k7VktrM6V3WPkWLzrn_2iWepTvcLD4yllr4qi-9XmKVdqkN-jQqi6Zs-fzFH3_srxf3Mzuvl3fLuZ3M11wsZ1p0I3WFkpSQsM5aRsBYBvBGRhbExA14WXZWMsawSxAKTTJd9rWFWsVI_wUfZ58N0PTm1bnLaLq5Ca6XsWdDMrJfzvereUqPMqCcgqkzgYXzwYxPAz5ybJ3SZuuU96EIcn8-1AyUdYsox8mVMeQUjR2P4YSOcYkx5jkFFOm3_292Z59ySUD7ydg7Xyrfrn_uL2dYJMRY9UeLuq6oIQ_Ab6kpfo</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Battista, Petronilla</creator><creator>Canini, Matteo</creator><creator>Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony</creator><creator>Catricalà, Eleonora</creator><creator>Salvatore, Christian</creator><creator>Gilardi, Maria Carla</creator><creator>Castiglioni, Isabella</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-1534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9312-4675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-471X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces</title><author>Battista, Petronilla ; Canini, Matteo ; Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony ; Catricalà, Eleonora ; Salvatore, Christian ; Gilardi, Maria Carla ; Castiglioni, Isabella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c5cbccf56065b330db855fb8325ef905890366bff2b82f5568c0890cf972da203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Battista, Petronilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catricalà, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvatore, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, Maria Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglioni, Isabella</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Battista, Petronilla</au><au>Canini, Matteo</au><au>Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony</au><au>Catricalà, Eleonora</au><au>Salvatore, Christian</au><au>Gilardi, Maria Carla</au><au>Castiglioni, Isabella</au><au>Babiloni, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces</atitle><jtitle>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Math Methods Med</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>2014</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1748-670X</issn><eissn>1748-6718</eissn><abstract>Digital technologies have opened new opportunities for psychological testing, allowing new computerized testing tools to be developed and/or paper and pencil testing tools to be translated to new computerized devices. The question that rises is whether these implementations may introduce some technology-specific effects to be considered in neuropsychological evaluations. Two core aspects have been investigated in this work: the efficacy of tests and the clinical ecology of their administration (the ability to measure real-world test performance), specifically (1) the testing efficacy of a computerized test when response to stimuli is measured using a touch-screen compared to a conventional mouse-control response device; (2) the testing efficacy of a computerized test with respect to different input modalities (visual versus verbal); and (3) the ecology of two computerized assessment modalities (touch-screen and mouse-control), including preference measurements of participants. Our results suggest that (1) touch-screen devices are suitable for administering experimental tasks requiring precise timings for detection, (2) intrinsic nature of neuropsychological tests should always be respected in terms of stimuli presentation when translated to new digitalized environment, and (3) touch-screen devices result in ecological instruments being proposed for the computerized administration of neuropsychological tests with a high level of preference from elderly people.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>25147578</pmid><doi>10.1155/2014/804723</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-1534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9312-4675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-471X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-670X
ispartof Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-13
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4131509
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Psychometrics - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Software
User-Computer Interface
title Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging : Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T05%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerized%20Neuropsychological%20Assessment%20in%20Aging%20:%20Testing%20Efficacy%20and%20Clinical%20Ecology%20of%20Different%20Interfaces&rft.jtitle=Computational%20and%20mathematical%20methods%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Battista,%20Petronilla&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=2014&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1748-670X&rft.eissn=1748-6718&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2014/804723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1555628692%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555628692&rft_id=info:pmid/25147578&rfr_iscdi=true